Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 1993
  • Online publication date: March 2008

II.1 - Concepts of Disease in the West

from Part II - Changing Concepts of Health and Disease
Summary

The semantic and logical quagmires that await anyone audacious enough to safari through the changing concepts of disease, illness, and health are portended by a cursory analysis of the definition formulated by the World Health Organization. “Health,” we are informed, “is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity” (Caplan, Engelhardt, and McCartney 1981). Aside from the fact that this seems more realistic for a bovine than a human state of existence, problems abound in what appears to be a fairly straightforward statement. The word “complete” immediately removes the definition from the realm of human reality. What is complete mental well-being, or physical for that matter? Worse still, the phrase “complete social wellbeing” is so freighted with individual interpretations that it alone renders the definition useless, if not pernicious.

This essay concentrates on ideas of physical health and disease, which is not to minimize the importance of psychiatric disease, but rather to admit that concepts of mental health and illness, although sharing most of the definitional difficulties of physical health and disease, are even more difficult to handle. In large part this is because with mental illness we lack the kinds of objective tools to measure brain function that have helped, though not resolved, questions of what constitutes health and disease in the physical realm. This is not, however, to deny the interconnectedness of the psychic and the physical, which is assumed in all of what follows.

Perhaps no one sentence captures the history of changing notions about disease better than a paraphrase of Humpty Dumpty’s haughty admonition: “When I use the word disease, it means just what I choose it to mean – neither more nor less.” mean - neither more nor less. A number of important considerations lead to this generalization. Among these are the following: (1) The definition of disease has varied with time and place in history; (2) the names assigned to diseases are ultimately abstractions, although it is useful at times to act as though they are real; (3) what we mean by diagnostic terms, as with words in general, can be discerned more accurately by what we do with them than what we say about them.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

The Cambridge World History of Human Disease
  • Online ISBN: 9781139053518
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521332866
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
Adams Francis. 1886. The genuine works of Hippocrates, vol. 1. New York.
Arnold Thomas. 1952. The legacy of Islam. London.
Bernard Claude. 1865. Introduction & I’étude de la médecine expérimentale. Paris.
Boorse Christopher. 1975. On the distinction between disease and illness. Philosophy and Public Affairs. 5.
Burns Chester R. 1975. Diseases versus healths: Some legacies in the philosophies of modern medical science. In Evaluation and explanation in the biomedical sciences, ed. Engelhardt H. T. Jr., and Spicker S. F.. Boston.
Caplan Arthur L., Engelhardt H. Tristram Jr., and McCartney James J.. 1981. Concepts of health and disease: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Reading, Mass.
Clendening Logan. 1931. Modern methods of treatment. St. Louis, Mo..
Engel George L. 1977. The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science. 196.
Faber Knud. 1923. Nosography in modern internal medicine. New York.
Garrison Fielding H. 1929. An introduction to the history of medicine. Philadelphia.
Garrison Fielding H. 1966. Contributions to the history of medicine. New York.
Hudson Robert P. 1966. The concept of disease. Annals of Internal Medicine. 65.
Jones W. H. S. 1952. Hippocrates, vol. 2. London.
Jowett Benjamin, trans. 1892. The dialogues of Plato, vol. 1. New York.
King Lester S. 1982. Medical thinking: A historical preface. Princeton, N.J..
Kudlien Fridolf. 1973. The old Greek concept of “relative” health. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences. 9.
Lewis Aubrey, 1972. “Psychogenic”: A word and its mutations. Psychological Medicine. 2.
Lush Brandon, ed. 1961. Concepts of medicine: A collection on aspects of medicine. New York.
Meador Clifton K. 1965. The art and science of nondisease. New England Journal of Medicine. 272.
Niebyl Peter H. 1971. Sennert, van Helmont, and medical ontology. Bulletin of the History of Medicine. 45.
Pagel Walter. 1972. Van Helmont’s concept of disease – to be or not to be? The influence of Paracelsus. Bulletin of the History of Medicine. 46.
Rapaport Elliot. 1982. Prevention of recurrent sudden death. New England Journal of Medicine. 306.
Riese Walther. 1953. The conception of disease, its history, its versions, and its nature. New York.
Risse Guenter B. 1979. Epidemics and medicine: The influence of disease on medical thought and practice. Bulletin of the History of Medicine. 53.
Sauvages Francois Boissier. 1768. Nosologia methodica sistens morborum classes. Amsterdam.
Sigerist Henry E. 1971. The great doctors: A biographical history of medicine. New York.
Sundström Per. 1987. Icons of disease. Kristianstads Boktryckeri.
Sydenham Thomas. 1848. The works of Thomas Sydenham, M.D., Vol. 1, ed. Latham R. G.. London.
Taylor F. Kraupl. 1979. The concepts of illness, disease and morbus. London.
Temkin Owsei. 1977. The double face of Janus and other essays in the history of medicine. Baltimore.
Trimble Michael R. 1982. Functional diseases. British Medical Journal. 285.