Skip to main content
×
Home
The Cambridge World History of Medical Ethics
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Recommend this book

    Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

    The Cambridge World History of Medical Ethics
    • Online ISBN: 9781139195812
    • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521888790
    Please enter your name
    Please enter a valid email address
    Who would you like to send this to? *
    ×
  • Buy the print book

Book description

The Cambridge World History of Medical Ethics is the first comprehensive scholarly account of the global history of medical ethics. Offering original interpretations of the field by leading bioethicists and historians of medicine, it will serve as the essential point of departure for future scholarship in the field. The book reconceptualises the history of medical ethics through the creation of new categories, including the life cycle; discourses of religion, philosophy, and bioethics; and the relationship between medical ethics and the state, which includes a historical reexamination of the ethics of apartheid, colonialism, communism, health policy, imperialism, militarism, Nazi medicine, Nazi 'medical ethics', and research ethics. Also included are the first global chronology of persons and texts; the first concise biographies of major figures in medical ethics; and the first comprehensive bibliography of the history of medical ethics. An extensive index guides readers to topics, texts, and proper names.

Reviews

'I'm pleased to have this volume on my bookshelf; and when a student comes in wondering about what health practitioners in the ninth- to fourteenth-century Middle East thought about psychosomatic aspects of disease, I will know just where to look.'

Kirstin Borgerson Source: Isis

    • Aa
    • Aa
Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send:
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Page 1 of 3


  • PART I - AN INTRODUCTION TO THE HISTORY OF MEDICAL ETHICS
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter aims to construct a history of medical ethics whose structure would eschew essentialism, presentism, traditionalism, and Eurocentrism and that would, as much as current scholarship will permit, be responsive to the subordinate as well as the dominant voices with cultures. The standard history of medical ethics would thereafter emphasize oaths, codes, rules, principles, and other formalizations of medical self-regulation, underlining that they were founded on ancient traditions that are continuous and influential to the present day. To appreciate the influence of the traditionalist archetype on our understanding of the history of medical ethics, one should compare the construction of histories of science with the construction of histories of medical ethics. Ethics in medicine focuses on primary sources and constructs its history around such enduring issues as abortion, euthanasia, triage, eugenics and the cost-effectiveness of medical procedures.
  • 2 - Bioethics and History
    pp 16-20
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521888790.003
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter sketches one historian's view of the relationship between medical history and bioethics. Some of the most exciting work in medical history today focuses on the changing cultural construction or framing of disease. Feminist historians and historians of mental illness pioneered such studies, but many others now argue that history reveals the value-laden nature of all disease categories. Practitioners' histories of bioethics promote and display the maturation of the field as an autonomous, self-defining, self-reflective discipline, whereas nonpractitioners emphasize that the discipline was shaped by larger social forces and that it often ironically depended on medical power. Modern bioethicists use history to demonstrate the newness of their approach to medical ethics in contrast with the long tradition of doctor-dominated medical ethics before 1960. Even more fundamental than the internal-external distinction is the difference between past and present goals for studying the history of medical ethics.
  • PART II - A CHRONOLOGY OF MEDICAL ETHICS
    pp 21-98
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521888790.004
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter chronicles the history and historiography of medical ethics through the end of the twentieth century, using a few noteworthy events in world and medical history as chronological signposts. Following Roy Porter, the chronology opens circa 4000 BCE: the dates of the earliest known urban centers. The dates, events, persons, and texts cited in the chronology are, for the most part, those mentioned in the book. The earliest medical entry is circa 650 BCE, a description of epilepsy in a Babylonian text; the Hippocratic corpus, several centuries younger, constitute the first texts cited. The chronology ends in 2000, closing with an act prohibiting cloning and a book by Albert Jonsen, on the history of medical ethics. For reasons of economy, and because of the difficulty of putting the present into historical perspective, the chapter restricted entries in the person's column to those who are deceased.
  • PART III - DISCOURSES OF MEDICAL ETHICS THROUGH THE LIFE CYCLE
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Birth and death, in turn, frame the life cycle and pose the fundamental religious questions of human meaning and destiny. As human life has its phases and moments of vulnerability (birth, illness, old age, and dying), religions have also used their authority to protect the vulnerable through an ethics of care, if not inviolable sanctity ascribed to life itself. There are different views on the number of stages in the Hindu life cycle, some late accounts numbering forty. The ethics of transplantation has involved three major issues: defining the moment of death, the nature of the body, and the scope for exploitation. Defining the moment of death has been an issue for transplantation because one has to remove the organs or tissue quickly to maintain the condition of the organ or tissue for transplantation but not so quickly that one might cause death to the donor.
  • 4 - Medical Ethics through the Life Cycle in Buddhist India
    pp 113-125
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521888790.006
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Buddhism by and large left reproductive and family matters to other religions, focusing instead on liberation as the ultimate telos of life. As a result, for Buddhists, each phase of life is characterized by suffering, especially the last phase of old age and dying. The life cycle for Buddhists is being profoundly affected by the development of modern, medical technologies. The impact of Western medicine on Asian countries has escalated in the last half of the twentieth century. There has been transfer not only of the new reproductive technologies and transplantation technologies but also of the ethical and legal issues they have raised. This in turn has sparked discussions of religious, cultural, and regional identities. Much of the Buddhist debate has developed because Buddhism now has a broad movement called socially engaged Buddhism, which is attentive to general ethical issues and has attracted a number of Westerners.
  • 5 - Medical Ethics through the Life Cycle in China
    pp 126-131
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521888790.007
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter provides an account of Chinese perspectives on ethical issues through the life cycle, and focuses on those at the beginning and end of life. Materials presented in the chapter demonstrate that this is certainly not the case with medical ethics in China. The current dominant and official line on such subjects as abortion, fetal life, truth telling about terminal illness, and euthanasia does not necessarily accord with historical values and practices. The chapter reviews Chinese perspectives on ethical issues at the two ends of human life provides further evidence on the diversity, richness, flux, changeability, historical complexity, openness for new possibilities, and contradictory elements of Chinese medical morality. The contemporary dominant Chinese views on abortion, eugenics, and euthanasia seem to support the commonly accepted view that individual human life is less respected in Chinese culture than in the West.
  • 6 - Medical Ethics through the Life Cycle in Japan
    pp 132-136
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521888790.008
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Traditional medical ethics in Japan has faced grave changes challenged by the development of modern biomedical technologies such as organ transplantation. The Japanese life cycle is becoming more similar than different to the situation in the medically advanced countries of the world. The understanding of the life cycle has been vanishing as the Japanese have applied modern biomedical technologies more frequently in well-equipped hospital settings. The unique Japanese sociocultural elements of each life cycle of Sho, Ro, Byo, Shi have been generally converging toward either birth/life or death by disregarding the stages of Ro and Byo, very often particularly by having artificial interventions at both the beginning and end of life. Some traditional elements of the involvement of family members in the process of Sho, Ro, Byo, Shi continue in a variety of ways, as reflected in the newly established framework of the Law for the Care of the Elderly.
  • 7 - Medical Ethics through the Life Cycle in Europe and the Americas
    pp 137-162
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521888790.009
  • View abstract
    Summary
    For four centuries, Europe and the Americas have experimented with the medicalization of the life cycle: conception, childbirth, sexual maturation, aging, and dying. Enlightenment ideals motivated this experiment and, judged in terms of these ideals, many aspects must be considered a success. By the end of the twentieth century mother and child were much more likely to survive childbirth in good health than in any prior period. Much of the pain of delivery had been muted, and the aura and fear of death that once attended childbirth had been dissipated. By focusing reductively on natural causal explanations of health and disease the medical gaze was blind to religious and cultural meanings depriving Europeans and Americans of much that had once made life cycle events significant. The medicalization of birth allowed men to colonize a female and feminine domain.
  • 8 - Medical Ethics through the Life Cycle in the Islamic Middle east
    pp 163-172
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521888790.010
  • View abstract
    Summary
    It is obvious that the Islamic view of humanity and the articles of faith influence the understanding and experience of different phases of life in the biography of a Muslim. The content of such concepts as the beginning of life, childhood, illness, growing old, and death is constructed out of the faith and interpreted accordingly. This chapter discusses the interpretations of these stages of life that can be derived from Islamic sources and some medically relevant moral obligations that arise from them. Even if one can proceed on the basis of a general basic approach to all phases of life, differing opinions about the appropriate and ethically tenable attitudes in these areas of life are to be found in different legal schools. This is an inter-Islamic reality that is to be traced back to the nature and structure of conventional decision making.
  • PART IV - THE DISCOURSES OF RELIGION ON MEDICAL ETHICS
  • View abstract
    Summary
    One of the distinguishing features of Hinduism has been its penchant for both analysis and synthesis. The development of specialized knowledge in the classical period contributed to empirical medicine based on analysis. Despite an emphasis on observation, description, categorization, and experimentation, efforts were made to keep the new approach within a general religious framework and to recognize the fact that body, psychology, and behavior (including ethics) must work together with the environment to maintain harmony, prevent disease, or restore health. This integrative approach also prevented a deep split between philosophy and religion or between religion and ethics. In the medieval period, it led to grand synthetic treatises of the Indian schools of medicine, new syntheses with religion, and attempts to integrate the Islamic systems of medicine. By the modern period, the synthetic spirit was at work once again trying to integrate Western medicine.
  • 10 - The Discourses of Buddhist Medical Ethics
    pp 185-194
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521888790.012
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter examines the place of ethics within the general Buddhist world view (a soteriological orientation). There are differences within Buddhist ethics based on Buddhism's three major traditions, Theravāada, Mahāyāna, and Vajrayāna, and how they view the relation between religion and medicine. In addition, there are differences in modern scholarship based on whether Buddhist ethics is viewed as limited to the means or intrinsic to both the means and the goal. Analogies with medicine were common: illness is the normal condition of the body within samsyāra, the Buddha is the great physician, Buddhist teachings are the medicine, and enlightenment is the absence of illness. The antinomian passages of Mahāyāna and Vajrayāna are interpreted literally by those scholars who view ethics as but instrumental. This has led to some modern scholars interpreting them within the Western framework of utilitarianism or situational ethics.
  • 11 - The Discourses of Confucian Medical Ethics
    pp 195-201
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521888790.013
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Most scholars seem to believe that the Daoist contribution to original Chinese medicine is more prominent than Confucianism; however, it is not controversial that the Confucian teachings of ren have shaped the basic tone of Chinese medical ethics. Ren constitutes the basic virtue of human individuals and sets down the fundamental Confucian principle of human society. Confucianism can be understood as a personal health care system, even if it cannot be reduced to a personal health care system. Confucians have seen medicine as the art of ren; however, they have seen politics as the governing of ren. The Confucian physicians took medicine as an enterprise of ren, namely, the art of ren. Medicine is their way of making the Confucian life, rather than simply treating diseases as technicians. The good life for Confucians is the life of cultivating the virtues for taking care of the family and the whole world.
  • 12 - The Discourses of Early Christian Medical Ethics
    pp 202-210
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521888790.014
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter describes the discourses of early Christian medical ethics, and demonstrates that the New Testament presents a primarily naturalistic understanding of sickness that was not inimical to naturalistic healing and medical practice (without which it would be fatuous to speak of early Christian medical ethics). It also describes the most fundamental principles of New Testament ethics. The chapter discusses the patristic era by articulating some basic principles that provided the theological and moral framework of the Church Fathers' medical ethics. It considers the question, regularly raised in secondary literature, of whether the Church Fathers ever rejected the use of medicine and physicians on theological grounds. The chapter deals with these propedeutic but essential matters, and addresses various aspects of patristic medical ethics under the rubrics of compassion, philanthropy, and etiquette and the sanctity of life.
  • 13 - The Discourses of Orthodox Christian Medical Ethics
    pp 211-217
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521888790.015
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Orthodox Christianity understands the moral life to be a whole, a way of life within which one can enter into union with God. Orthodox Christian morality and medical ethics are modes of reorienting persons away from themselves toward God and their fellow man. Neither medical ethics nor bioethics is a univocal term. Orthodox Christianity through its morality, medical ethics, and theology provide a stark example of such differences. As an introduction to the depth of these differences, one considers the Orthodox Christian historiography of Christian morality and medical ethics. Orthodox Christianity contrasts with both Roman Catholicism and most Protestant faiths in rejecting a notion of moral dogmatic progress. Orthodox Christian reflections on medical ethics are one element of the Church's attempt to set aside the alienating character of time, which appears to isolate the past from present, which seems to separate one from the living Fathers of the first centuries.
  • 14 - The Discourses of Roman Catholic Medical Ethics
    pp 218-254
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521888790.016
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter focuses on the major sources of moral definition and authority within Roman Catholicism. It extends from the early Middle Ages to the First Council of the Vatican, which convened in 1869. During most of this lengthy period, canon law and moral theology were the major sources of Roman Catholic medical ethics. Canon law consisted of private compilations of canons of councils, papal rescripts, and episcopal statutes, often inconsistent with each other. The influence of canon law on the development of Roman Catholic medical ethics has been profound, especially in three respects. The chapter describes the role of the magisterium as a source of moral definition. The Church's tradition has constantly upheld, and the magisterium has consistently proposed the moral truth of the absolute inviolability of innocent human life. Within the Church the magisterium is ordinarily exercised in teaching moral principles and precepts through catechesis and preaching.
  • 15 - The Discourses of Protestant Medical Ethics
    pp 255-263
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521888790.017
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Protestantism encouraged the participation of Christians in every aspect of society with the confidence that they could provide a redemptive force in a sinful world. Protestant medical ethics arose more directly from religious considerations of health and disease, as well as from biblical themes such as providence, justification, law and grace, covenant, and the place of suffering in the Christian experience. In medicine Protestant physicians and philosophers as well as theologians, laymen as well as clergy have influenced the formulation of medical ethics. From the sixteenth through the eighteenth centuries, many Protestant clergymen practiced medicine on the side. The distinctively Protestant understanding of the individual and his or her conscience alone before God, together with its insistence that a Christian's calling must be lived out in the world, have served as powerful motivating factors in the medical professions.
  • 16 - The Discourses of Jewish Medical Ethics
    pp 264-269
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521888790.018
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter presents a small sample of the talmudic texts relating to issues in medical ethics. In general, modern Jewish bioethics has tended to proceed in the spirit of Maimonides, endorsing the enhancement of the capacity to heal. The chapter finds resistance to placing Jewish patients in institutions where the ritual dietary laws cannot be observed, numerous concerns over observing the Sabbath by both patients and staff in hospitals, insistence on details of ritual circumcision although accepting (some) medical innovations. Other issues in contemporary Jewish bioethics have a more clearly ethical dimension, often related to the valuation of humans as created in God's image. People committed to the halakhah have continued to turn to rabbinic leaders, and significant portions of the writings in modern Jewish bioethics are produced in the traditional form of responsa. The chapter draws insight for Jewish bioethics from biblical narratives and from rabbinic non-halakhic sources.
  • 17 - The Discourses of Islamic Medical Ethics
    pp 270-278
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521888790.019
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter describes the concepts of health, disease, and illness presented in the Quran and the traditions of the Prophet Muhammad (Sunna) and the moral obligations for practitioners and patients that can be derived from them. The meaning and justification of medical skill and a number of medical-ethical principles are also discussed. The Prophet's recommendations of medical therapies or the mention of specific medicines for particular illnesses emphasize the values of bodily well-being and imply that it is necessary to maintain one's health. The chapter explores what normative content and moral implications the historical texts can have for contemporary Muslims. Despite numerous common positions on topics in medical ethics, such as the problem of abortion, euthanasia, the doctor's duty to maintain confidentiality, it does not seem appropriate to describe the medical ethics of the Islamic Middle Ages as a copy of the Hippocratic ethics.
  • PART V - THE DISCOURSES OF PHILOSOPHY ON MEDICAL ETHICS
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter offers an alternative to Daniel Fox's disconnection hypothesis, providing an account of the influence of philosophy on medical morality that explains the disconnection phenomenon while establishing a deeper sense of connectivity. By applying Hans-Georg Gadamer's concept of the long horizon of philosophical influence, which allows one to analyze the impact of Platonic discourse on a physician, such as Hoche, many centuries later, and by adopting I. Bernard Cohen's four-stage analysis of the dissemination of innovative ideas in science, the chapter shows, in three case studies, how concepts, such as the sympathetic physician, professional ethics, and lebensunwertesLeben, trace their origins to such philosophers as Bacon, Cicero, Hume, Locke, Nietzsche, and Plato. Arguments, concepts, and discourses, although intangible, are just as much inventions as tangible artifacts. The three cases discussed in the chapter are merely illustrative of philosophy's influence on conceptions of medical morality, for better, and for worse.
  • PART VI - THE DISCOURSES OF PRACTITIONERS ON MEDICAL ETHICS
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter distinguishes the roles of traditional medical healers in Africa, who mainly dealt with biological causation, from those of diviners, whose work was largely based on metaphysical aspects. It examines the wider role and social standing of the traditional healer in the community. Health in African communities is generally viewed as a fundamentally ethical question pointing to the relationships in the family and in the community, and between people and nature. Concepts of illness, disease, diagnosis, treatment, and life and death always had a cultural dimension in all societies, including African societies. Most African societies believe in the dualism of body and soul. An experienced traditional healer who then became the mentor of the newly admitted healer led the initiation ceremony. Most traditional healers underwent long periods of training and apprenticeship to acquire knowledge of medicinal herbs and other specialized medical skills.
  • 20 - The Discourses of Practitioners in India
    pp 324-334
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521888790.022
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter attempts to ensure group control of the new physicians beginning with their apprenticeship and the taking of oaths (Hinduism) or indirect regulation by the general observance of monastic rules including the required monthly confessions (Buddhism). The discourses of practitioners describe model nurses and model patients, and who should have access to medicine. After the arrival of Islam in India, this also served to keep Islamic medicine at bay. But with colonialism and the establishment of Western medicine, the discourses of practitioners reflect a deep conflict of values at the heart of medical practice, a conflict that has played out in independent India with the call for a return to a pure Hindu medicine as an expression of Indian nationalism. Traditional medicines and their underlying principles of holism and balance are spreading to the West.
  • 21 - The Discourses of Practitioners in China
    pp 335-344
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521888790.023
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter provides an overview of the moral discourses of medical practitioners in China from the Axial Age to the end of twentieth century, with emphasis given to the great diversity of culture and medical morality in China. With regard to the diversity of morality, healing systems and healers, an overview of the moral discourses of medical practitioners in China should address the characteristics, dissimilarities, similarities and commonalities of the moral discourses of different groups of healers who believed in specific moral systems or religions and practiced specific types of therapy. The chapter focuses on traditional China and Confucian physicians and then twentieth-century China and socialist or communist health care providers. Lack of systematic and detailed exploration in contemporary scholarship precludes a presentation of other Chinese medico-moral discourses, such as the moral discourses of itinerant healers, sorcerer-healers, and practitioners from various ethnic minorities.
  • 22 - The Discourses of Practitioners in Japan
    pp 345-351
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521888790.024
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Japanese medical ethics developed in the framework of a unique discourse integrating concepts of nature, the human body, and medical practice. The understanding and practice of medicine in Japan has been strongly influenced by the acceptance of medical knowledge from countries such as China, Korea, Spain, Portugal, Netherlands, Germany, Britain, France, and United States. In ancient Japan, according to its mythology, disease was understood as a punishment and/or curse of kami. The ancient Japanese believed that there were various kami (god) and evil spirits that possessed living human being and caused different types of disease. People believed that widespread epidemic diseases, famines, and political disorders were caused by traditional gods who were angry because the people had accepted Buddhism. Buddhism, Confucianism, and Taoism had enormous impact on Japanese political, cultural, social, and religious life.
  • 23 - The Discourses of Practitioners in Ancient Europe
    pp 352-358
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521888790.025
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The image of Hippocrates and the precepts of the Hippocratic Oath and related texts had an important influence on medical ethics in Europe and the Middle East from the ancient period onward. The relative insecurity of medicine within the social order partly accounts for the overt preoccupation with reputation, and likewise for the defensive and often polemical tone with which some Hippocratic writer's stake out the claims of their new, nonmagical medicine. Several versions of the Oath were attributed to Hippocrates in antiquity. The inclusion of numerous abortifacients in the doctor's pharmacological arsenal suggest that at least some Hippocratics also dispensed such drugs, as did numerous later Greek physicians. In other Hellenistic medical works, some of the emphases traced in the Hippocratic Corpus also emerge. Galen's valorization of truthfulness with one's patients is to some extent at odds with emphases in the postclassical Hippocratic deontological treatises.

Page 1 of 3


This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.


György Ádám . 1989b. “Gratuity for Doctors and Medical Ethics.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 14: 315–22.

Cristina Álvarez Millán . 1999. “Graeco-Roman Case Histories and their Influence on Medieval Islamic Clinical Accounts.” Social History of Medicine. 12: 19–43.

Cristina Álvarez Millán . 2000. “Practice versus Theory: Tenth-Century Case Histories from the Islamic Middle East.” Social History of Medicine. 13: 293–306.

Harry S. Abram 1972. “Psychological Dilemmas of Medical Progress.” Psychiatry in Medicine. 3: 51–8.

. 1968. “A Definition of Irreversible Coma: A Report of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death. Journal of the American Medical Association. 205: 337–40.

Leo Alexander . 1948a. “Sociopsychologic Structures of the SS.” Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry. 59: 622–34.

Leo Alexander . 1948c. “War Crimes: Their Social-Psychological Aspects.” American Journal of Psychiatry. 105: 170–7.

D. Alter , et al. 2002. “Biology or Bias: Practice Patterns and Long-Term Outcomes for Men and Women with Acute Myocardial Infarction.” Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 39 (12): 1909–16.

. 1995. “The Use of Anencephalic Neonates as Organ Donors.” Journal of the American Medical Association. 273: 1614–8.

Marcia Angell . 2000. “Is Academic Medicine for Sale?New England Journal of Medicine. 342: 1516–18.

Mitchell G. Ash , and Alfons Söllner , eds. 1996. Forced Migration and Scientific Change: Emigré German-Speaking Scientists and Scholars after 1933. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

Saint Augustine . 1957–72. City of God against the Pagans. 7 vols., LOEB CLASSICAL LIBRARY, 411–7. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Robert Baker . 1993c. “Professional Integrity and Global Budgeting: A Study of Physician Gatekeeping in the British National Health Service.” Professional Ethics. 2: 3–34.

Robert Baker . 1998a. “Multiculturalism, Postmodernism And The Bankruptcy Of Fundamentalism.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 8 (3): 210–31.

Robert Baker . 1998b. “A Theory of International Bioethics: The Negotiable and the Non-Negotiable.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 8: 233–73.

Robert Baker . 2001. “Bioethics and Human Rights: A Historical Perspective.” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 10: 241–52.

Robert Baker , and Linda Emanuel . 2000. “The Efficacy of Professional Ethics: The AMA Code of Ethics in Historical and Current Perspective.” Hastings Center Report. 30: S13–17.

Robert Baker , and Martin Strosberg . 1995. Legislating Medical Ethics: A Study of New York State’s Do Not Resuscitate Law. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publications.

World Bank . 1993. World Development Report 1993. New York: Oxford University Press.

M. C. Bassiouni , T. G. Baffers , and J. T. Evard . 1981. “An Appraisal of Human Experimentation in International Law and Practice: The Need for International Regulation of Human Experimentation.” International Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. 72: 1597–666.

Ronald Bayer . 1991. “Public Health Policy and the AIDS Epidemic: An End to HIV Exceptionalism?New England Journal of Medicine. 324: 1500–4.

Ronald Bayer . 2002. “Tobacco, Commercial Speech, and Libertarian Values: The End of the Line for Restrictions on Advertising?American Journal of Public Health. 92: 356–9.

Ronald Bayer , et al. 2003. “Tobacco Advertising in the United States: A Proposal for a Constitutionally Acceptable Form of Regulation.” Journal of the American Medical Association. 287: 2990–5.

Ronald Bayer , and James Colgrove . 2002. “Science, Politics and Ideology in the Campaign Against Environmental Tobacco Smoke.” American Journal of Public Health. 92: 949–54.

Ronald Bayer , Carol Levine , and S. M. Wolf . 1986. “HIV Antibody Screening: An Ethical Framework for Evaluating Proposed Programs.” Journal of the American Medical Association. 256: 1768–74.

Kurt Bayertz . 1994. The Concept of Moral Consensus: The Case of Technological Interventions into Human Reproduction. Dordrecht/Boston: Kluwer Academic Press.

Dan Beauchamp . 1985. “Community: The Neglected Tradition of Public Health.” Hastings Center Report. 15: 28–36.

Tom L. Beauchamp 2007. “History and Theory in ‘Applied Ethics’.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 17: 55–64.

Henry K. Beecher 1946. “Pain in Men Wounded in Battle.” Annals of Surgery. 123: 96–105.

Henry K. Beecher 1955. “The Powerful Placebo.” Journal of the American Medical Association. 159: 1602–6.

Henry K. Beecher 1966. “Ethics and Clinical Research.” New England Journal of Medicine. 274: 1354–60.

F. K. Beller 1983. “André E. Hellegers as a Philosopher Portrayed by His Thinking. In Memoriam of an Admired Friend.” European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 14 (5): 289–97.

Fritz K. Beller , and Julia Reeve . 1989. “Brain Life and Brain Death – The Anencephalic as an Explanatory Example: A Contribution to Transplantation.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 14: 5–23.

Mainetti, José A., Gustavo Pis Diez, and Juan Carlos Tealdi. 1992. “Bioethics in Latin America.” In Bioethics Yearbook: Regional Development in Bioethics, 1989–1991, vol. 2, edited by B. Andrew Lustig , 83–96. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Weindling, Paul J. 1981. “Theories of the Cell State in Imperial Germany.” In Biology, Medicine and Society, 1840–1940, edited by Charles Webster , 99–155. Cambridge UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.

Russell, Colin A. 1998. “Objections to Anaesthesia: The Case of James Young Simpson.” In Gases in Medicine: Anaesthesia, edited by E. B. Smith and S. Daniels , 173–87. Cambridge UK: Royal Society of Chemistry.

Ulfried Geuter . 1992. The Professionalisation of Psychology in Nazi Germany, translated by Richard J. Holmes. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

Isam Ghanem . 1989. “The Response of Islamic Jurisprudence to Ectopic Pregnancies, Frozen Embryo Implantation, and Euthanasia.” In Arab Law Quarterly. 4: 345–9.

Avner Gil’adi . 1992. Children of Islam: Concepts of Childhood in Medieval Muslim Society. London: Macmillan.

Doris Mueller Goldstein . 1999. “Bibliography of Resources by and about André E. Hellegers.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 9(1): 89–107.

Lawrence O. Gostin 1993. “Controlling the Resurgent Tuberculosis Epidemic: A 50-State Survey of TB Statutes and Proposals for Reform.” Journal of the American Medical Association. 269: 255–61.

Danielle Gourevitch . 1984. Le triangle hippocratique dans le monde greco-romain: Le malade, sa maladie, et son medecin (Bibliotheque des Ecoles francaises d’Athenes et de Rome, 251). Rome: Ecole francaise de Rome.

Diego Gracia . 1987. “Spain: From the Decree to the Proposal.” Hastings Center Report. 17: S29–S31.

Diego Gracia . 1988. “Spain: New Problems, New Books.” Hastings Center Report. 18: S29–S30.

Diego Gracia . 1995. “Hard Times, Hard Choices: Founding Bioethics Today.” Bioethics. 9: 192–206.

Christoph Gradmann . 2001. “Robert Koch and the Pressures of Scientific Research: Tuberculosis and Tuberculin.” Medical History. 45: 1–32.

N. M. Greene 1976. “Henry Knowles Beecher, 1904–1976 (obituary).” Anesthesiology. 45: 377–8.

Jay Katz . 1996. “The Nuremberg Code and the Nuremberg Trial: A Reappraisal.” Journal of the American Medical Association. 276: 1662–6.

Gerald A. Kelly 1956. “The Morality of Mutilation: Towards a Revision of the Treatise.” Theological Studies. 17: 322–44.

M. Margaret Kemeny , et al. 2003. “Barriers to Clinical Trial Participation by Older Women with Breast Cancer.” Journal of Clinical Oncology. 21.12; June 15: 2268–75.

Damien Keown . 1992. The Nature of Buddhist Ethics. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

Damien Keown . 1995. Buddhism and Bioethics. London: St. Martin’s Press.

Rihito Kimura . 1987b. “Bioethics as a Prescription for Civic Action: The Japanese Interpretation.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 12: 267–77.

Lester S. King 1983. “The AMA Sets A New Code of Ethics.” Journal of the American Medical Association. 249: 1338–42.

Steven King , and Alan Weaver . 2000. “Lives in Many Hands: The Medical Landscape in Lancashire, 1700–1820.” Medical History. 44: 173–200.

L. P. Knowles 2001. “The Lingua Franca of Human Rights and the Rise of a Global Bioethic.” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 10: 253–63.

Paul H. Kocher 1950. “The Idea of God in Elizabethan Medicine.” Journal of the History of Ideas. 11: 3–29.

Hans-Peter Kröner . 1989. “Die Emigration deutschsprachiger Mediziner im Nationalsozialismus.” Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte. 12: 1–37.

Eva Labouvie . 1998. Andere Umstände: Eine Kulturgeschichte der Geburt. Köln/Weimar/Wien: Böhlau.

Jens Lachmund , and Gunnar Stollberg . 1995. Patientenwelten: Krankheit und Medizin vom späten 18. bis zum frühen 20. Jahrhundert im Spiegel von Autobiographien. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.

William A. LaFleur 1990. “Contestation and Confrontation: The Morality of Abortion in Japan.” Philosophy East and West. 40: 529–42.

William A. LaFleur 1995. “Silences and Censures: Abortion, History and Buddhism in Japan: A Rejoinder to George Tanabe.” Japanese Journal of Religious Studies. 22: 185–96.

Martin Levey . 1963. “Fourteenth-Century Muslim Medicine and the Ḥisba.” Medical History. 7: 176–82.

Robert J. Levine 1999. “The Need to Revise the Declaration of Helsinki.” New England Journal of Medicine. 341: 531–4.

Norman G. Levinsky 1999. “Quality and Equity in Dialysis and Renal Transplantation.” New England Journal of Medicine. 341:1691–93.

Thornton Todd Lewis . 1994. “A Modern Guide for Mahàyàna Buddhist Life-Cycle Rites: The Nepāl Jana Jīvan Kriyā Paddhati.” Indo-Iranian Journal. 37: 1–46.

Violette Lindbeck . 1984. “Thailand: Buddhism Meets the Western Model.” Hastings Center Report. 14: 24–6.

. 2000. “Consensus Statement on the Live Organ Donor.” Journal of the American Medical Association. 284: 2919–26.

Erich H. Loewy 1989. Textbook of Medical Ethics. New York/London: Plenum Medical Book Company.

Erich H. Loewy 1995. Ethische Fragen in der Medizin. Wien/New York: Springer.

Erich H. Loewy 2002. “Bioethics: Past, Present, and an Open Future.” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 11: 388–97.

Irvine Loudon . 1986a. “Deaths in Childbed from the Eighteenth Century to 1935.” Medical History. 30: 1–41.

Bernard H. Luk 1977. “Abortion in Chinese Law.” The American Journal of Comparative Law. 25: 372–90.

Peter Lurie , and M. Wolfe Sidney . 1997. “Unethical Trials of Interventions to Reduce Perinatal Transmission of the Human Immmunodeficiency Virus in Developing Countries.” New England Journal of Medicine. 337: 853–6.

Ruth Macklin . 2003. “Dignity is a Useless Concept.” British Medical Journal. 327: 1419–20.

Ruth Macklin , and Florencia Luna . 1996. “Bioethics in Argentina: A Country Report.” Bioethics. 10: 140–53.

Andreas-Holger Maehle . 1990b. “Literary Responses to Animal Experimentation in Seventeenth- and Eighteenth-Century Britain.” Medical History. 34: 27–51.

Andreas-Holger Maehle . 2003. “Protecting Patient Privacy or Serving Public Interests? Challenges to Medical Confidentiality in Imperial Germany.” Social History of Medicine. 16: 383–401.

José A. Mainetti 1996. “In Search of Bioethics: A Personal Postscript.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 21: 671–9.

Giovanni Maio . 1999. “Is Etiquette Relevant to Medical Ethics? Ethics and Aesthetics in the Works of John Gregory (1724–1773).” Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy. 2: 181–7.

Joseph T. Mangan 1949. “An Historical Analysis of the Principle of Double Effect.” Theological Studies. 10: 41–61.

Jonathan Mann , et al. 1994. “Health and Human Rights.” Health and Human Rights. 1: 6–23.

Aubrey Manning , and James Serpell , eds. 1994. Animals and Human Society: Changing Perspectives. London: Routledge.

V. J. Marmion 2002. “The Death of Claudius.” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 95 (5): 260–1.

C. F. A. Marmoy 1958. “The Auto-Icon of Jeremy Bentham at University College London.” Medical History. 2: 77–86.

Michael R. Marrus 1999. “The Nuremberg Doctors’ Trial in Historical Context.” Bulletin for the History of Medicine. 73: 106–23.

Robert Martensen . 2001. “The History of Bioethics: An Essay Review.” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences. 56: 168–75.

S. Martyn , R. Wright , and L. Clark . 1988. “Required Request for Organ Donation: Moral, Clinical, and Legal Problems.” Hastings Center Report. 18: 27–34.

Charles R. McCarthy 1994. “Historical Background of Clinical Trials Involving Women and Minorities.” Academic Medicine. 69: 695–8.

Richard A. McCormick 1983. “The Ethical Matrix of Medicine.” European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 14 (5): 283–7.

Richard A. McCormick 1994. “Some Early Reactions to Veritatis Splendor.” Theological Studies. 55: 481–506.

Laurence B. McCullough 1999. “Hume’s Influence on John Gregory and the History of Medical Ethics.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 24: 376–95.

Laurence B. McCullough 2000. “Holding the Present and Future Accountable to the Past: History and the Maturation of Clinical Ethics as a Field of the Humanities.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 25: 5–11.

Labisch, Alfons. 1997. “From Traditional Individualism to Collective Professionalism: State, Patient, Compulsory Health Insurance, and the Panel Doctor Question in Germany, 1883–1931.” In Medicine and Modernity: Public Health and Medical Care in Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century Germany, edited by Manfred Berg and Geoffrey Cocks , 35–54. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.

Park, Catherine. 1992. “Medicine and Society in Medieval Europe.” In Medicine in Society, edited by Andrew Wear , 59–90. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.

Robert K. Merton 1957. “Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science.” American Sociological Review. 22: 635–59.

James C. Mohr 2000. “American Medical Malpractice Litigation in Historical Perspective.” Journal of the American Medical Association. 283: 1731–7.

Francis D. Moore 1968. “Medical Responsibility for the Prolongation of Life.” Journal of the American Medical Association. 206: 384–6.

Jonathan D. Moreno , and Ronald Bayer . 1985. “The Limits of the Ledger in Public Health Promotion.” Hastings Center Report. 15: 37–41.

Robert Morison . 1971. “Death: Process or Event?Science. 173: 694–702.

David F. Musto 1986. “Quarantine and the Problem of AIDS.” Milbank Quarterly. 64. Supplement. 1: 97–117.

S. H. Myers 1990. The Bluestocking Circle: Women, Friendship, and the Life of the Mind in Eighteenth-Century England. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Azim A. Nanji 1988. “Medical Ethics and the Islamic Tradition.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 13: 257–75.

Vicente Navarro . 1975. “The Political Economy of Health Care.” The International Journal of Health Services. 5: 65–94.

Jing-Bao Nie . 1996. “The Physician as General.” Journal of American Medical Association. 276: 1099.

Jing-Bao Nie . 1999c. “The Problem of Coerced Abortion in China and Related Ethical Issues.” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 8: 463–79.

Jing-Bao Nie . 2000. “The Plurality of Chinese and American Medical Moralities: Toward an Interpretative Cross-Cultural Bioethics.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 10: 239–60.

Jing-Bao Nie . 2002c. “Japanese Doctors’ Experimentation in Wartime China.” The Lancet. 360: s5–s6.

O. F. Norheim 1995. “The Norwegian Welfare State in Transition: Rationing and Plurality of Values as Ethical Challenges for the Health Care System.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 20: 639–55.

Jiro Nudeshima . 1991. “Obstacles to Brain Death and Organ Transplantation in Japan.” The Lancet. 338: 1063–4.

Catherine Park . 1985. Doctors and Medicine in Early Renaissance Florence. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.

John Passmore . 1975. “The Treatment of Animals.” Journal of the History of Ideas. 36: 195–218.

Thomas Rütten . 1996b. “Receptions of the Hippocratic Oath in the Renaissance: The Prohibition of Abortion as a Case Study in Reception.” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences. 51: 456–83.

Matthew Ramsey . 1999. “Alternative Medicine in Modern France.” Medical History. 43: 286–322.

Naomi Raskin . 1961. “Doctors Afield: Vikenti Vikentievich Veresaev (Smidovich) 1867–1945.” New England Journal of Medicine. 265: 1154–5.

Pinit Ratanakul . 1988. “Bioethics in Thailand: The Struggle for Buddhist Solutions.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 13: 301–12.

Sita Reddy . 2002. “Asian Medicine in America: The Ayurvedic Case.” Amercian Academy of Political and Social Sciences. 583: 97–121.

Warren T. Reich 1994. “The Word “Bioethics”: Its Birth and the Legacies of Those Who Shaped It.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 4: 319–35.

Warren T. Reich 1995c. “The Word “Bioethics”: The Struggle Over Its Earliest Meanings.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 5: 19–34.

Warren T. Reich 1996. “Revisiting the Launching of the Kennedy Institute: Re-Visioning the Origins of Bioethics.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 6: 323–7.

Warren T. Reich 2001. “The Care-Based Ethic of Nazi Medicine and the Moral Importance of What We Care About.” American Journal of Bioethics. 1: 64–74.

Benedikt Reinert . 1968. Die Lehre vom tawakkul in der klassischen Sufik. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.

Nicholas Rescher . 1969. “The Allocation of Exotic Medical Lifesaving Therapy.” Ethics. 79: 173–86.

Susan M. Rigdon 1996. “Abortion Law and Practice in China: An Overview with Comparisons to the United States.” Social Sciences & Medicine. 42: 543–60.

Vardit Rispler-Chaim . 1998. “Genetic Engineering in Contemporary Islamic Thought.” Science in Context. 11: 567–73.

Vardit Rispler-Chaim . 1999. “The Right Not to Be Born.” The Muslim World. 89 (April): 130–43.

John M. Rist 1982. Human Value: A Study in Ancient Philosophical Ethics. Leiden: E. J. Brill.

John Robertson . 1999. “The Dead Donor Rule.” Hastings Center Report. 29: 6–14.

Bernard E. Rollin 1995. The Frankenstein Syndrome: Ethical and Social Issues in the Engineering of Animals. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.

Nikolas Rose . 1998. “Governing Risky Individuals.” Psychiatry, Psychology and the Law. 5: 177–95.

Steven Rose . 1995. “The Rise of Neurogenetic Determinism.” Nature. 373: 380–2.

Mark A. Rothstein 1983. “Employee Selection Based on Susceptibility on Occupational Illness.” Michigan Law Review. 81: 1379–1496.

Andrea Rusnock . 2002. Vital Accounts: Quantifying Health and Population in Eighteenth-Century England and France. Cambridge MA: Cambridge University Press.

Alfred Sadler Jr., Blair Sadler , and E. Blythe Stason . 1968. “The Uniform Anatomical Gift Act: A Model for Reform.” JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association. 206: 2505–6.

Hans-Martin Sass . 1983. “Reichsrundschrieben 1931: Pre-Nuremberg German Regulations Concerning New Therapy and Human Experimentation.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 8: 99–111.

Todd L. Savitt 1982. “The Use of Blacks for Medical Experimentation and Demonstration in the Old South.” Journal of Southern History. 48: 331–48.

Hartmut Scharfe . 1999. “The Doctrine of the Three Humors in Traditional Indian Medicine and the Alleged Antiquity of Tamil Siddha Medicine.” Journal of the American Oriental Society. 119: 609–29.

Joseph G. Schenker 1992. “Religious Views Regarding Treatment of Infertility by Assisted Reproductive Technologies.” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 9: 3–8.

Londa Schiebinger . 2003. “Human Experimentation in the Eighteenth Century: Natural Boundaries and Valid Testing.” In The Moral Authority of Nature, edited by Lorraine Daston and Fernando Vidal , 384–408. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Ulf Schmidt . 2004. Justice at Nuremberg: Leo Alexander and the Nazi Doctors’ Trial. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hans-Walter Schmuhl . 1992. Rassenhygiene, Nationalsozialismus, Euthanasie. Von derVerhütung zur Vernichtung “lebensunwerten Lebens.” 2nd ed. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

Evelyne Schuster . 1997. “Fifty Years Later: The Significance of the Nuremberg Code.” New England Journal of Medicine. 337: 1436–40.

Eduard Seidler . 1991. Die medizinische Fakultät der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg im Breisgau. Grundlagen und Entwicklungen. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Virginia A. Sharpe , and I. Faden Alan . 1998. Medical Harm: Historical, Conceptual, and Ethical Dimensions of Iatrogenic Illness. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.

T. Sheldon 1994. “Europe Backs New Declaration on Patients’ Rights.” British Medical Journal. 308: 997.

Michael I. Shevell 1996. “Neurology’s Witness to History: The Combined Intelligence Operative Sub-Committee Reports of Leo Alexander.” Neurology. 47 (4): 1096–1103.

Michael I. Shevell 1998. “Neurology’s Witness to History: Part Ⅱ. Leo Alexander’s Contributions to the Nuremberg Code (1946 to 1947).” Neurology. 50 (1): 274–78.

Evelyne Shuster . 1998. “The Nuremberg Code: Hippocratic Ethics and Human Rights.” Lancet. 351: 974–77.

Nancy G. Siraisi 1990. Medieval and Early Renaissance Medicine: An Introduction to Knowledge and Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Margaret Sleeboom-Faulkner . 2006. “The Chinese Concept of Euthanasia and Health Care.” Bioethics. 20 (4): 203–12.

Dale C. Smith 1996. “The Hippocratic Oath and Modern Medicine.” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences. 51 (4): 484–500.

Weisz, George. 1990. “The Origins of Medical Ethics in France: The International Congress of Morale Médicale of 1955.” In Social Science Perspectives on Medical Ethics, edited by George Weisz , 145–61. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Moritz Steinschneider . 1866. “Wissenschaft und Charlatanerie unter den Arabern im neunten Jahrhundert: Nach der hebräischen Übersetzung eines Schriftchens von Rhases.” Virchows Archiv. 36: 570–86.

Gotthard Strohmaier . 1974. “Ḥunayn ibn Isḥāq et le Serment hippocratique.” Arabica. 21: 318–23.

Noorda, Sijbolt. 1979. “Illness and Sin, Forgiving and Healing: The Connection of Medical Treatment and Religious Beliefs in Ben Sira. 38: 1–15.” In Studies in Hellenistic Religions, edited by M. J. Vermaseren , 215–24. Leiden: E. J. Brill.

George Sussman . 1977. “The Glut of Doctors in Mid-Nineteenth Century France.” Comparative Studies in Society and History. 19: 287–304.

Thomas S. Szasz 1996. “Routine Neonatal Circumcision: Symbol of the Birth of the Therapeutic State.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 21: 137–48.

Zbigniew Szawarski . 1987. “Poland: Biomedical Ethics in a Socialist State.” Hastings Center Report. 17: S27–S29.

Stephan Tanneberger . 1989. “Ethical Responsibility in the German Democratic Republic.” Hastings Center Report. 19: S9–S10.

Cara Tannenbaum , Nancy Mayo , and Francine Ducharme . 2005. “Older Women’s Health Priorities and Perceptions of Care Delivery: Results of the WOW Health Survey.” Canadian Medical Association Journal. 173: 153–59.

Henk A. M. J. ten Have 1998. “Philosophy of Medicine and Health Care – European Perspectives.” Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy. 1: 1–3.

David C. Thomasma , et al., eds. 1998. Asking to Die: Inside the Dutch Debate about Euthanasia. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Klaus V. Toyka 1998. “Neurology’s Witness to History: Leo Alexander [letter].” Neurology. 51 (6): 1772.

Laurence H. Tribe 1971. “Trial by Mathematics: Precision and Ritural in the Legal Process.” Harvard Law Review. 84: 1329–93.

R. D. Truog , and C. Fletcher John . 1989. “Anencephalic Newborns: Can Organs Be Transplanted Before Brain Death?New England Journal of Medicine. 321: 388–91.

Cornelie Usborne . 1992. The Politics of the Body in Weimar Germany: Women’s Reproductive Rights and Duties. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.

Jochen Vollmann , and Rolf Winau . 1996. “Informed Consent in Human Experimentation before the Nuremberg Code.” British Medical Journal. 313: 1445–7.

Ivan Waddington . 1975. “The Development of Medical Ethics – A Sociological Analysis.” Medical History. 19: 36–51.

J. M. Wallace-Hadrill 1951. “The Work of Gregory of Tours in the Light of Modern Research.” In Transactions of the Royal Historical Society. 5th series. 1: 25–45.

Michael T. Walton 1983. “The Advisory Jury and Malpractice in 15th Century London: The Case of William Forest.” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences. 40: 478–80.

John Harley Warner . 1991. “Ideals of Science and Their Discontents in Late Nineteenth-Century American Medicine.” Isis. 82: 454–78.

Andrew Wear . 2000. Knowledge and Practice in English Medicine, 1550–1680. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.

David Weatherall . 2000. “Academia and Industry: Increasingly Uneasy Bedfellows.” The Lancet. 355: 1574.

Matthias M. Weber 1993. Ernst Rüdin: Eine kritische Biographie. Munich: Springer.

Richard Weikart . 2004. From Darwin to Hitler: Evolutionary Ethics, Eugenics, and Racism in Germany. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Paul J. Weindling 1985. “Weimar Eugenics: The Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity and Eugenics in Social Context.” Annals of Science. 42: 303–18.

Paul J. Weindling 1996b. “Human Guinea Pigs and the Ethics of Experimentation: The BMJ’s Correspondent at the Nuremberg Medical Trial.” British Medical Journal. 313: 1467–70.

Paul J. Weindling 2000. Epidemics and Genocide in Eastern Europe, 1890–1945. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

Paul J. Weindling 2001. “The Origins of Informed Consent: The International Scientific Commission on Medical War Crimes and the Nuremberg Code.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine. 75: 37–71.

Paul J. Weindling 2004. Nazi Medicine and the Nuremberg Trials: From Medical War Crimes to Informed Consent. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

George Weisz . 1979. “The Politics of Medical Professionalization in France, 1845–1848.” Journal of Social History. 12: 3–30.

George Weisz . 2003. “The Emergence of Medical Specialization in the Nineteenth Century.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine. 77: 536–75.

Dorothy C. Wertz 1998. “Eugenics is Alive and Well: A Survey of Genetic Professionals around the World.” Science in Context. 11: 493–510.

Daniel Wikler . 1991. “What Has Bioethics to Offer Health Policy?Milbank Quarterly. 69: 233–51.

Tom Wilkie , and Elizabeth Graham . 1998. “Power without Responsibility: Media Portrayals of Dolly and Science.” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 7: 150–9.

Dick L. Willems , et al. 2000. “Attitudes and Practices Concerning the End of Life: A Comparison Between Physicians From the United States and From the Netherlands.” Archives of Internal Medicine. 160: 63–8.

G. E. W. Wolstenholme , and M. O’ Connor , eds. 1966. Ethics in Medical Progress With Special Reference to Transplantation. Boston: Little Brown.

William M. Wood 1849. “Thoughts on Suits for Malpractice, suggested by Certain Judicial Proceedings in Erie County, Pennsylvania.” American Journal of Medical Sciences. n. s.: 395.

Robert M. Young 1971. “Evolutionary Biology and Ideology: Then and Now.” Science Studies. 1: 177–206.

Stuart J. Youngner , M. Arnold Robert , and Michael DeVita . 1999. “When is ‘Dead’?Hastings Center Report. 29: 14–21.

Boris Yudin . 1992. “Bioethics for the New Russia.” Hastings Center Report. 22: 5–6.

Daqing Zhang , and Zhifan Cheng . 2000. “Medicine is a Humane Art: The Basic Principles of Professional Ethics in Chinese Medicine.” Hastings Center Report. 30: S8–S12.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 2541 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 2452 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.