Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T12:39:58.667Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Stromal-Derived Factors That Dictate Organ-Specific Metastasis

from GENES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Bedrich L. Eckhardt
Affiliation:
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
Tracey L. Smith
Affiliation:
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
Robin L. Anderson
Affiliation:
The Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Australia
Wadih Arap
Affiliation:
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
Renata Pasqualini
Affiliation:
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
David Lyden
Affiliation:
Weill Cornell Medical College, New York
Danny R. Welch
Affiliation:
Weill Cornell Medical College, New York
Bethan Psaila
Affiliation:
Imperial College of Medicine, London
Get access

Summary

The acquisition of a metastatic phenotype is the most deadly trait a tumor can develop. Secondary tumors compromise organ function, are refractory to standard chemotherapeutics, and ultimately lead to the demise of the patient. Although tumor progression contains stochastic elements, there is an emerging pattern of organotropism, as various cancers display a predilection to metastasize to distinct secondary sites. A common trait of highly metastatic tumors is the ability to adapt the topology of local and distant microenvironments to better aid their progression. Indeed, many metastasis-regulating genes are components of, or require interactions with, stromal cells or the extracellular matrix (ECM) to exert proper function [1–4]. As such, the propensity to metastasize to specific sites is controlled in part by endemic homing mechanisms that involve coordinated ligand–receptor interactions between the cancer cell and the host microenvironment. Despite large advances in our understanding of metastasis biology, the molecular mechanisms guiding these processes remain largely uncharacterized.

Combinatorial phage-display libraries are a powerful screening tool that can readily identify functional protein interactions in vivo. Their utility has revealed that the stromal microenvironment – specifically the vasculature – of an organ contains a unique “molecular address” that can be modulated during inflammation, tumor growth, and metastasis [3, 5–7]. This chapter explores the role of the stroma during metastatic progression and highlights how phage display technology has been used to discover novel endothelial markers that disrupt tumor progression and metastasis.

Type
Chapter
Information
Cancer Metastasis
Biologic Basis and Therapeutics
, pp. 77 - 84
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Eckhardt, BL et al. (2005) Genomic analysis of a spontaneous model of breast cancer metastasis to bone reveals a role for the extracellular matrix. Mol Cancer Res. 3(1): 1–13.Google ScholarPubMed
Stupack, DG et al. (2006) Potentiation of neuroblastoma metastasis by loss of caspase-8. Nature. 439(7072): 95–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erler, JT et al. (2009) Hypoxia-induced lysyl oxidase is a critical mediator of bone marrow cell recruitment to form the premetastatic niche. Cancer Cell. 15(1): 35–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bandyopadhyay, S et al. (2006) Interaction of KAI1 on tumor cells with DARC on vascular endothelium leads to metastasis suppression. Nat Med. 12(8): 933–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolonin, M, Pasqualini, R, Arap, W (2001) Molecular addresses in blood vessels as targets for therapy. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 5(3): 308–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rajotte, D et al. (1998) Molecular heterogeneity of the vascular endothelium revealed by in vivo phage display. J Clin Invest. 102(2): 430–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hajitou, A, Pasqualini, R, Arap, W (2006) Vascular targeting: recent advances and therapeutic perspectives. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 16(3): 80–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ewing, J (1928) Neoplastic Diseases: A Treatise on Tumors, Edition 3. Philadelphia: WB Saunders.
Hess, KR et al. (2006) Metastatic patterns in adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 106(7): 1624–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paget, S (1889)The distribution of secondary growths in cancer of the breast. Lancet. 1: 571–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, J et al. (2004) Twist, a master regulator of morphogenesis, plays an essential role in tumor metastasis. Cell. 117(7): 927–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gobeil, S et al. (2008) A genome-wide shRNA screen identifies GAS1 as a novel melanoma metastasis suppressor gene. Genes Dev. 22(21): 2932–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, Q et al. (2008) The microRNAs miR-373 and miR-520c promote tumour invasion and metastasis. Nat Cell Biol. 10(2): 202–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, DM, Ruoslahti, E (2004) Metadherin, a cell surface protein in breast tumors that mediates lung metastasis. Cancer Cell. 5(4): 365–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kang, Y et al. (2003) A multigenic program mediating breast cancer metastasis to bone. Cancer Cell. 3(6): 537–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, BS et al. (2008) Primary tumour expression of the cysteine cathepsin inhibitor Stefin A inhibits distant metastasis in breast cancer. J Pathol. 214(3): 337–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allinen, M et al. (2004) Molecular characterization of the tumor microenvironment in breast cancer. Cancer Cell. 6(1): 17–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, L et al. (2004) Expansion of myeloid immune suppressor Gr+CD11b+ cells in tumor-bearing host directly promotes tumor angiogenesis. Cancer Cell. 6(4): 409–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaplan, RN et al. (2005) VEGFR1-positive haematopoietic bone marrow progenitors initiate the pre-metastatic niche. Nature. 438(7069): 820–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, Y et al. (2009) White adipose tissue cells are recruited by experimental tumors and promote cancer progression in mouse models. Cancer Res. 69(12): 5259–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orimo, A et al. (2005) Stromal fibroblasts present in invasive human breast carcinomas promote tumor growth and angiogenesis through elevated SDF-1/CXCL12 secretion. Cell. 121(3): 335–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karnoub, AE et al. (2007) Mesenchymal stem cells within tumour stroma promote breast cancer metastasis. Nature. 449(7162): 557–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chia, J et al. (2007) Evidence for a role of tumor-derived laminin-511 in the metastatic progression of breast cancer. Am J Pathol. 170(6): 2135–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bissell, MJ et al. (2002) The organizing principle: microenvironmental influences in the normal and malignant breast. Differentiation. 70(9–10): 537–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liotta, , Kohn, EC (2001) The microenvironment of the tumour-host interface. Nature. 411(6835): 375–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holopainen, T et al. (2009) Angiopoietin-1 overexpression modulates vascular endothelium to facilitate tumor cell dissemination and metastasis establishment. Cancer Res. 69(11): 4656–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brantley-Sieders, DM et al. (2006) Ephrin-A1 facilitates mammary tumor metastasis through an angiogenesis-dependent mechanism mediated by EphA receptor and vascular endothelial growth factor in mice. Cancer Res. 66(21): 10315–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koong, AC et al. (2000) Candidate genes for the hypoxic tumor phenotype. Cancer Res. 60(4): 883–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Shweiki, D et al. (1992) Vascular endothelial growth factor induced by hypoxia may mediate hypoxia-initiated angiogenesis. Nature. 359(6398): 843–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergers, G et al. (2000) Matrix metalloproteinase-9 triggers the angiogenic switch during carcinogenesis. Nat Cell Biol. 2(10): 737–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langley, RR, Fidler, IJ (2007) Tumor cell-organ microenvironment interactions in the pathogenesis of cancer metastasis. Endocr Rev. 28(3): 297–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergers, G, Benjamin, (2003) Tumorigenesis and the angiogenic switch. Nat Rev Cancer. 3(6): 401–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ahn, GO, Brown, JM (2008) Matrix metalloproteinase-9 is required for tumor vasculogenesis but not for angiogenesis: role of bone marrow-derived myelomonocytic cells. Cancer Cell. 13(3): 193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serafini, P, Borrello, I, Bronte, V (2006) Myeloid suppressor cells in cancer: recruitment, phenotype, properties, and mechanisms of immune suppression. Semin Cancer Biol. 16(1): 53–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kagan, HM, Li, W (2003) Lysyl oxidase: properties, specificity, and biological roles inside and outside of the cell. J Cell Biochem. 88(4): 660–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erler, JT, Weaver, VM (2009) Three-dimensional context regulation of metastasis. Clin Exp Metastasis. 26(1): 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedl, P, Gilmour, D (2009) Collective cell migration in morphogenesis, regeneration and cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 10(7): 445–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Avraamides, CJ, Garmy-Susini, B, Varner, JA (2008) Integrins in angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer. 8(8): 604–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jin, H, Varner, J (2004) Integrins: roles in cancer development and as treatment targets. Br J Cancer. 90(3): 561–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Felding-Habermann, B et al. (2002) Involvement of tumor cell integrin alpha v beta 3 in hematogenous metastasis of human melanoma cells. Clin Exp Metastasis. 19(5): 427–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sloan, EK et al. (2006) Tumor-specific expression of alphavbeta3 integrin promotes spontaneous metastasis of breast cancer to bone. Breast Cancer Res. 8(2): R20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brandenberger, R et al. (2001) Identification and characterization of a novel extracellular matrix protein nephronectin that is associated with integrin alpha8beta1 in the embryonic kidney. J Cell Biol. 154(2): 447–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stupack, DG et al. (2001) Apoptosis of adherent cells by recruitment of caspase-8 to unligated integrins. J Cell Biol. 155(3): 459–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, S et al. (2000) Regulation of angiogenesis in vivo by ligation of integrin alpha5beta1 with the central cell-binding domain of fibronectin. Am J Pathol. 156(4): 1345–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chambers, AF, Groom, AC, MacDonald, IC (2002) Dissemination and growth of cancer cells in metastatic sites. Nat Rev Cancer. 2(8): 563–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCarty, OJ et al. (2000) Immobilized platelets support human colon carcinoma cell tethering, rolling, and firm adhesion under dynamic flow conditions. Blood. 96(5): 1789–97.Google ScholarPubMed
Muller, A et al. (2001) Involvement of chemokine receptors in breast cancer metastasis. Nature. 410(6824): 50–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, YX et al. (2005) Skeletal localization and neutralization of the SDF-1(CXCL12)/CXCR4 axis blocks prostate cancer metastasis and growth in osseous sites in vivo. J Bone Miner Res. 20(2): 318–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petty, JM et al. (2009) Crosstalk between CXCR4/stromal derived factor-1 and VLA-4/VCAM-1 pathways regulates neutrophil retention in the bone marrow. J Immunol. 182(1): 604–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, YX et al. (2007) Expression and activation of alpha v beta 3 integrins by SDF-1/CXC12 increases the aggressiveness of prostate cancer cells. Prostate. 67(1): 61–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vidal, CI et al. (2004) An HSP90-mimic peptide revealed by fingerprinting the pool of antibodies from ovarian cancer patients. Oncogene. 23(55): 8859–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giordano, RJ et al. (2001) Biopanning and rapid analysis of selective interactive ligands. Nat Med. 7(11): 1249–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolonin, MG et al. (2006) Ligand-directed surface profiling of human cancer cells with combinatorial peptide libraries. Cancer Res. 66(1): 34–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pasqualini, R, Ruoslahti, E (1996) Organ targeting in vivo using phage display peptide libraries. Nature. 380(6572): 364–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arap, W et al. (2002) Steps toward mapping the human vasculature by phage display. Nat Med. 8(2): 121–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, JK, Smith, G (1990) Searching for peptide ligands with an epitope library. Science. 249(4967): 386–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zurita, AJ, Arap, W, Pasqualini, R (2003) Mapping tumor vascular diversity by screening phage display libraries. J Control Release. 91(1–2): 183–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joyce, JA et al. (2003) Stage-specific vascular markers revealed by phage display in a mouse model of pancreatic islet tumorigenesis. Cancer Cell. 4(5): 393–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oh, Y et al. (2005) Phenotypic diversity of the lung vasculature in experimental models of metastases. Chest. 128(6 Suppl): 596S–600S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burg, MA et al. (1999) NG2 proteoglycan-binding peptides target tumor neovasculature. Cancer Res. 59(12): 2869–74.Google ScholarPubMed
Laakkonen, P et al. (2002) A tumor-homing peptide with a targeting specificity related to lymphatic vessels. Nat Med. 8(7): 751–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, G et al. (2009) MTDH activation by 8q22 genomic gain promotes chemoresistance and metastasis of poor-prognosis breast cancer. Cancer Cell. 15(1): 9–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koivunen, E, Wang, B, Ruoslahti, E (1995) Phage libraries displaying cyclic peptides with different ring sizes: ligand specificities of the RGD-directed integrins. Biotechnology (NY). 13(3): 265–70.Google ScholarPubMed
Pasqualini, R, Koivunen, E, Ruoslahti, E (1997) Alpha v integrins as receptors for tumor targeting by circulating ligands. Nat Biotechnol. 15(6): 542–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brooks, PC, Clark, RA, Cheresh, DA (1994) Requirement of vascular integrin alpha v beta 3 for angiogenesis. Science. 264(5158): 569–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arap, W, Pasqualini, R, Ruoslahti, E (1998) Cancer treatment by targeted drug delivery to tumor vasculature in a mouse model. Science. 279(5349): 377–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitjans, F et al. (2000) In vivo therapy of malignant melanoma by means of antagonists of alphav integrins. Int J Cancer. 87(5): 716–23.3.0.CO;2-R>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mintz, PJ et al. (2003) Fingerprinting the circulating repertoire of antibodies from cancer patients. Nat Biotechnol. 21(1): 57–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, AS (2001) The glucose-regulated proteins: stress induction and clinical applications. Trends Biochem Sci. 26(8): 504–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, AS (2007) GRP78 induction in cancer: therapeutic and prognostic implications. Cancer Res. 67(8): 3496–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, E et al. (2006) GRP78 as a novel predictor of responsiveness to chemotherapy in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 66(16): 7849–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daneshmand, S et al. (2007) Glucose-regulated protein GRP78 is up-regulated in prostate cancer and correlates awith recurrence and survival. Hum Pathol. 38(10): 1547–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arap, MA et al. (2004) Cell surface expression of the stress response chaperone GRP78 enables tumor targeting by circulating ligands. Cancer Cell. 6(3): 275–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zurita, AJ et al. (2004) Combinatorial screenings in patients: the interleukin-11 receptor alpha as a candidate target in the progression of human prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 64(2): 435–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, VO et al. (2009) The interleukin-11 receptor alpha as a candidate ligand-directed target in osteosarcoma: consistent data from cell lines, orthotopic models, and human tumor samples. Cancer Res. 69(5): 1995–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanavadi, S et al. (2006) Expression of interleukin 11 and its receptor and their prognostic value in human breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 13(6): 802–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Javelaud, D et al. (2007) Stable overexpression of Smad7 in human melanoma cells impairs bone metastasis. Cancer Res. 67(5): 2317–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pasqualini, R et al. (2000) Aminopeptidase N is a receptor for tumor-homing peptides and a target for inhibiting angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 60(3): 722–7.Google Scholar
Giordano, RJ et al. (2005) Structural basis for the interaction of a vascular endothelial growth factor mimic peptide motif and its corresponding receptors. Chem Biol. 12(10): 1075–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hetian, L et al. (2002) A novel peptide isolated from a phage display library inhibits tumor growth and metastasis by blocking the binding of vascular endothelial growth factor to its kinase domain receptor. J Biol Chem. 277(45): 43137–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
An, P et al. (2004) Suppression of tumor growth and metastasis by a VEGFR-1 antagonizing peptide identified from a phage display library. Int J Cancer. 111(2): 165–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Binetruy-Tournaire, R et al. (2000) Identification of a peptide blocking vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-mediated angiogenesis. EMBO J. 19(7): 1525–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zou, J et al. Peptides specific to the galectin-3 carbohydrate recognition domain inhibit metastasis-associated cancer cell adhesion. Carcinogenesis. (2005) 26(2): 309–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fukuda, MN et al. (2000) A peptide mimic of E-selectin ligand inhibits sialyl Lewis X-dependent lung colonization of tumor cells. Cancer Res. 60(2): 450–6.Google ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×