Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Akpinar, Aslihan and Ersoy, Nermin 2014. Attitudes of physicians and patients towards disclosure of genetic information to spouse and first-degree relatives: a case study from Turkey. BMC Medical Ethics, Vol. 15, Issue. 1,

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2005
  • Online publication date: September 2009

1 - Philosophical introduction: case analysis in clinical ethics

Summary

Medical ethics has had a rich and complex history over the past 40 years. It has been transformed from a rather clear and straightforward set of rules and attitudes, shaped largely by the medical profession itself, into a major field of academic and social inquiry. Contemporary work in medical ethics can be divided into three parts: ethical analysis and arguments of large-scale issues in science, practice and policy (such as consideration of the ethical issues concerning cloning or resource allocation); theoretical inquiry into the foundations of medical ethics; and practical analysis of particular dilemmas in clinical practice. This last area in medical ethics is normally referred to as clinical ethics, and is in many respects the most important and vibrant part of medical ethics today. It lives through its intimate connection with clinical practice and medical and healthcare education, the ways in which suggestions made by practitioners of clinical ethics are rapidly tested in clinical reality, and the growth of a practical field of work in which ‘ethicists’ support patients, professionals and ethics committees in making good decisions in difficult circumstances.

For all this vibrant growth, there has been some unease with the way clinical ethics has developed. Healthcare professionals are sometimes baffled by the argumentative curlicues of the philosophers; patients and activists are often suspicious that all this ‘ethics’ is just a way of reinforcing existing professional attitudes and authority, and that ethicists are just as blind to patients' concerns as the medical professionals; and philosophers are generally infuriated by the apparent laziness and lack of rigour of their ‘applied’ colleagues.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Case Analysis in Clinical Ethics
  • Online ISBN: 9780511545450
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511545450
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
References
Beauchamp, T. and Childress, J. (2001). Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Beauvoir, S., (1969). A Very Easy Death. London: Penguin.
Brody, H., (2003). Stories of Sickness, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gilligan, C., (1993). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Hunter, K. M., (1991). Doctors' Stories: The Narrative Structure of Medical Knowledge. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Hursthouse, R., (1987). Beginning Lives. Oxford: Blackwell.
Jonsen, A. and Toulmin, S. (1988). The Abuse of Casuistry. London: University of California Press.
Sherwin, S., (1992). No Longer Patient: Feminist Ethics and Health Care. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Zaner, R. M., (1988). Ethics and the Clinical Encounter. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.