Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 6
  • Cited by
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Parfenchyk, Volha 2016. Redrawing the boundary of medical expertise: medically assisted reproduction and the debate on Italian bioconstitutionalism. New Genetics and Society, Vol. 35, Issue. 4, p. 329.

    Turner, Bryan S. 2008. The interdisciplinary curriculum: from social medicine to postmodernism. Sociology of Health & Illness, Vol. 12, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Herk, R.van Klazinga, N.S Schepers, R.M.J and Casparie, A.F 2001. Medical audit: threat or opportunity for the medical profession. A comparative study of medical audit among medical specialists in general hospitals in the Netherlands and England, 1970–1999. Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 53, Issue. 12, p. 1721.

    Moran, Michael 1995. Explaining Change in the National Health Service: Corporatism, Closure and Democratic Capitalism. Public Policy and Administration, Vol. 10, Issue. 2, p. 21.

    Yishai, Yael 1992. Physicians and the state in the U.S.A. and Israel. Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 34, Issue. 2, p. 129.

    Misztal, Barbara A. 1991. HIV/AIDS POLICIES IN AUSTRALIA: BUREAUCRACY AND COLLECTIVE ACTION. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 11, Issue. 4, p. 62.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 1987
  • Online publication date: June 2012

7 - Health care and the boundaries of politics

Summary

Politics has no clearly definable boundaries. Virtually any aspect of society is potentially an object of political interest, if only because of its possible symbolic uses. Terrorism, to take an extreme case, observes no boundaries to the political: Any person or object can become a target of exemplary violence through the complex transformations of the terrorist code. To the revolutionary terrorist, everything is political, and politics is everything. At some historical moments, even many petty details of ordinary life – items of clothing, phrases of speech – take on instantly understood political meaning. The sphere of the political expands particularly in periods of upheaval and change. Realities previously accepted as natural and objective facts become objects of political change. Matters formerly considered private and personal become political and public, and decisions once assumed to be technical matters for experts to resolve erupt into political controversy.

Yet this phenomenon – the “politicization” of elements of social life commonly believed to lie beyond politics – testifies that politics generally has an assumed sphere. The boundaries may be inexact and indistinct, but their location and the level of concern about respecting them are nonetheless a significant aspect of a political culture. Although the division of what is political from what is nonpolitical may be entirely conventional, it is a convention that helps to give order to a society by distinguishing how different domains of social life ought to be run.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Changing Boundaries of the Political
  • Online ISBN: 9781139173605
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173605
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×