Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:39:57.835Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conclusion

Democracy and the Civil Sphere in Latin America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2018

Jeffrey C. Alexander
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Carlo Tognato
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2003. “Watergate as Democratic Ritual,” in The Meanings of Social Life: A Cultural Sociology, by Alexander, Jeffrey C.. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 155178.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2006. The Civil Sphere. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2010. The Performance of Politics: Obama’s Victory and the Democratic Struggle for Power. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2011. Performative Revolution in Egypt: An Essay in Cultural Power. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2013. “Struggling over the Mode of Incorporation: Backlash against Multiculturalism in Europe.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 36 (4):531556.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2015. “Nine Thesis on The Civil Sphere,” in Solidarity, Justice, and Incorporation: Thinking through The Civil Sphere, edited by Kivisto, Peter and Sciortino, Giuseppe. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 172190.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2016. “Progress and Disillusion: Civil Repair and Its Discontents.” Thesis Eleven 137 (1):7282.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Bellah, Robert N., Madsen, Richard, Sullivan, William M., Swidler, Ann, and Tipton, Steven. 1991. The Good Society. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Bosniak, Linda. 2006. The Citizen and the Alien: Dilemmas of Contemporary Membership. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brysk, Alison. 2000. “Democratizing Civil Society in Latin America.” Journal of Democracy 11 (3):151165.Google Scholar
Corral, Margarita. 2011. “The State of Democracy in Latin America: A Comparative Analysis of the Attitudes of Elites and Citizens.” Boletin PNUD & Instituto de Iberoamérica. Retrieved July 13, 2017 (www.vanderbilt.edu/lapop/insights/030711.PNUD_PELA_Report.pdf).Google Scholar
Economist Intelligence Unit, The. 2017. Democracy Index 2016: The Revenge of the “Deplorables.” Retrieved April 22, 2017 (www.eiu.com/Handlers/WhitepaperHandler.ashx?fi=Democracy-Index-2016.pdf&mode=wp&campaignid=DemocracyIndex2016).Google Scholar
Glenn, Evelyn Nakano 2002. Unequal Freedom: How Race and Gender Shaped American Citizenship and Labor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gorski, Philip. 2017. American Covenant: A History of Civil Religion from the Puritans to the Present. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Joel. 2012. “Populism and Its Legacy in Argentina,” in Populism in Latin America, 2nd edition, edited by Conniff, Michael L. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press, pp. 2242.Google Scholar
Judis, John. 2016. The Populist Explosion: How the Great Recession Transformed American and European Politics. New York, NY: Columbia Global Reports.Google Scholar
Khosrokhavar, Farhad. 2015. “The Civil Sphere and the Arab Spring: On the Universality of Civil Society,” in Solidarity, Justice, and Incorporation: Thinking through The Civil Sphere, edited by Kivisto, Peter and Sciortino, Giuseppe. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 142171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kivisto, Peter. 2007. “In Search of the Social Space for Solidarity and Justice.” Thesis Eleven 91:110127.Google Scholar
Kivisto, Peter. 2012. “We Really Are All Multiculturalists Now.” The Sociological Quarterly 53 (1):124.Google Scholar
Latham, Michael E. 2000. Modernization as Ideology: American Social Science and “Nation Building” in the Kennedy Era. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werner. 2016. What Is Populism? Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Guillermo, O’Donnell and Schmitter, Philippe C.. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
OECD. 2011. “Trust,” in Society at a Glance 2011: OECD Social Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved July 13, 2017 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/soc_glance-2011–26-en).Google Scholar
Puddington, Arch and Roylance, Tyler. 2017. Populists and Autocrats: The Dual Threat to Global Democracy. Retrieved June 22, 2017 (https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/FH_FIW_2017_Report_Final.pdf).Google Scholar
Sanchez, Magaly R. 2006. “Insecurity and Violence as a New Power Relation in Latin America.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 606:178195.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Arthur M., Jr. 1998 [1949]. The Vital Center: The Politics of Freedom. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. 1996 [1932]. The Concept of the Political, translated and with an Introduction by Schwab, George. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sciortino, Giuseppe. 2007. “Bringing Solidarity Back In.” European Journal of Social Theory 10 (3):503512.Google Scholar
Sciortino, Giuseppe. 2012. “Ethnicity, Race, Nationhood, Foreignness, and Many Other Things: Prolegomena to a Cultural Sociology of Difference-based Interactions,” in The Oxford Handbook of Cultural Sociology, edited by Alexander, Jeffrey C., Jacobs, Ron, and Smith, Philip. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 365389.Google Scholar
Shils, Edward. 1975. Center and Periphery: Essays in Macrosociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shils, Edward. 1991. “The Virtue of Civil Society.” Government and Opposition 26 (1):320.Google Scholar
Transparency International. 2017. Corruption Perceptions Index 2016. Retrieved June 12, 2017 (www.transparency.org/news/feature/corruption_perceptions_index_2016).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×