Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 3
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Jenkins, Joy and Wolfgang, J. David 2018. Mediating Misogyny. p. 247.

    Edyvane, Derek 2017. The Passion for Civility. Political Studies Review, Vol. 15, Issue. 3, p. 344.

    Ward, Ian 2017. Democratic Civility and the Dangers of Niceness. Political Theology, Vol. 18, Issue. 2, p. 115.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2014
  • Online publication date: August 2014

4 - Against Civility: A Feminist Perspective

Summary

Judging from the spate of essays, blogs, websites, and conferences devoted to the decline of civility in American society, it would appear that we find ourselves in a dire crisis. Whether this crisis is real or imagined, there is little doubt that it has come to define how we think about the whole problem of public life today. If public opinion surveys are to be believed, the majority of Americans (75 percent) now think that there is indeed a crisis and that it is unprecedented in scope. Joe Wilson’s infamous “You lie!” outburst in the middle of President Obama’s speech was just one more (albeit dramatic) example of our decline into rampant rudeness. For some critics, the crisis points to a kind of domestic version of Samuel Huntington’s “clash of civilizations,” in which all are talking (very loudly) but no one is listening. Indeed, the deafening cacophony of voices, say critics, is the increasingly unbearable price we pay for our otherwise commendable commitment to pluralism. Incivility, in short, is pluralism run amuck.

Rather than affirm that there is a crisis, I want to ask how the very concept of civility is linked to particular normative conceptions of democratic politics. Before turning to the core of my argument, we do well to note that, historically speaking, rude and raucous behavior is hardly new in American political life. As Cornell Clayton has written, venerated political figures such as Thomas Jefferson and John Adams, those “models” of rational political discourse, publicized outright lies and half-truths about their opponents, more or less dragging them through the proverbial journalistic mud. What is more, political arguments in those golden days of reasonable debate often enough ended in deadly duels and fist-fights. “We should resist golden-ageism on the subject of civility and American democracy,” declares Fredrik Logevall. “The halcyon days of political geniality and decorum in the United States never existed, not in the early days of the republic and not in the two-plus centuries that followed.” The point is not that nothing has changed; new forms of media, for example, have altered the ways in which extreme views can be publically voiced and the tone in which they are voiced. The point is not to get entangled in nostalgia for a perfectly civil polity that never existed.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Civility, Legality, and Justice in America
  • Online ISBN: 9781107479852
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107479852
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
Logevall, Fredrik, “The Paradox of Civility,” in Civility and Democracy in America: A Reasonable Understanding, ed. Clayton, Cornell W. and Elgar, Richard (Pullman: Washington State University Press, 2012), 5–12, 5.
Mutz, Diana C., Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006)
Mutz, Diana, “Effects of ‘In-Your-Face’ Television Discourse on Perceptions of a Legitimate Opposition,” American Political Science Review 101, no. 4 (2007): 621–35;
Sobieraj, Sarah and Berry, Jeffrey, “From Incivility to Outrage: Political Discourse in Blogs, Talk Radio, and Cable News,” Political Communication 28, no. 1 (2011): 19–41.
Bickford, Susan, “Emotion Talk and Political Judgment,” Journal of Politics 73, no. 4 (2011): 1025–37,
Young, Iris Marion, Justice and the Politics of Difference (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990)
Tomlinson, Barbara, Feminism and Affect at the Scene of Argument: Beyond the Trope of the Angry Feminist (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 2010)
Arendt, Hannah, The Human Condition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989), 182–3.
Zerilli, Linda M. G., Feminism and the Abyss of Freedom (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005)
Connolly, Joy, The State of Speech: Rhetoric and Political Thought in Ancient Rome (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007)
Christiano, Thomas, “What Is Civility and How Does It Relate to Core Democratic Values?” in Civility and Democracy in America: A Reasonable Understanding, ed. Clayton, Cornell W. and Elgar, Richard (Pullman: Washington State University Press, 2012), 108–118, 116.
Chafe, William H., Civilities and Civil Rights: Greensboro, North Carolina and the Black Struggle for Freedom (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981), 7.
Meyers, Diana Tietjens, “Emotion and Heterodox Moral Perception,” in Feminists Rethink the Self, ed. Meyers, Diana T. (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1997), 197–218, 209.
Myers, Ella, Worldly Ethics: Democratic Politics and Care for the World (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2013), 89.
Habermas, Jürgen, Between Facts and Norms (Malden, MA: MIT Press, 1996), 306.
Cohen, Joshua, “Reflections on Civility,” in Civility and Democracy in America: A Reasonable Understanding, ed. Clayton, Cornell W. and Elgar, Richard (Pullman: Washington State University Press, 2012), 119–123, 119.
Goldfarb, Jeffrey, Civility and Subversion: The Intellectual in Democratic Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 3.
Rawls, John, Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993), xvii.
McCarthy, , “Kantian Constructivism and Reconstructivism: Rawls and Habermas in Dialogue,” Ethics 105 (1994): 44–63,
Rawls, , “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited,” in The Law of Peoples with “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited,” 131–80 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999)
Nussbaum, Martha, “Political Objectivity,” New Literary History 32 (2001): 883–906,
Rawls, John, Collected Papers, ed. Freeman, Samuel (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), 395.
Zerilli, Linda M. G., “Value Pluralism and the Problem of Judgment: Farewell to Public Reason,” Political Theory 40, no. 1 (2012): 6–32.
Strauss, Leo, Spinoza’s Critique of Religion (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997), 29.
Weber, Max, “The Vocation of Science,” in The Essential Weber, ed. Whimster, Sam (New York: Routledge, 2004)