Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T03:08:36.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Climate Change and the Southern Ocean

The Regime Complex for Regional Governance

from Part IV - Changing Polar Seas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2019

Paul G. Harris
Affiliation:
Education University of Hong Kong
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Climate Change and Ocean Governance
Politics and Policy for Threatened Seas
, pp. 201 - 214
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre. (2008). Position Analysis: CO2 and Climate Change: Ocean Impacts and Adaptation Issues. Hobart: Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre.Google Scholar
Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting. (1995). Decision 1 (1995). Measures, Decisions and Resolutions.Google Scholar
Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting. (2007). Final Report of the Thirtieth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting. New Delhi, India, April 30–May 11, 2007. Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty: Buenos Aires. Available at http://ats.aq/devAS/ats_meetings.aspx?lang=eGoogle Scholar
Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting. (2008). Final Report of the Thirty-First Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting. Kyiv, Ukraine, June 2–13, 2008. Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty: Buenos Aires. Available at http://ats.aq/devAS/ats_meetings.aspx?lang=eGoogle Scholar
Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting. (2009). Final Report of the Thirty-Second Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting. Baltimore, United States, April 6–17, 2009. Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty: Buenos Aires. Available at http://ats.aq/devAS/ats_meetings.aspx?lang=eGoogle Scholar
Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting. (2009). Decision 1 (2009). Meeting of Experts on Climate Change.Google Scholar
Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting. (2010). Final Report of the Thirty-Third Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting. Punte del Este Uruguary. Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty: Buenos Aires. Available at http://ats.aq/devAS/ats_meetings.aspx?lang=eGoogle Scholar
Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting XXXV/Committee for Environmental Protection XV. (2012). ATCM Interests in International Climate Change Discussions – Options for Enhanced Engagement. WP032. Available at http://ats.aq/devAS/ats_meetings_doc_database.aspx?lang=e&menu=2Google Scholar
Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting. (2012). Final Report of the Thirty-Fifth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting. Hobart, June 11–20, 2012. Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty: Buenos Aires. Available at http://ats.aq/devAS/ats_meetings.aspx?lang=eGoogle Scholar
Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting. (2015). Final Report of the Thirty-Eighth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting. Sofia, Bulgaria, June 1–20, 2015. Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty: Buenos Aires. Available at http://ats.aq/devAS/ats_meetings.aspx?lang=eGoogle Scholar
Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting. (2016). Final Report of the Thirty-Ninth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting. Santiago, Chile, May 23–June 1, 2016. Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty: Buenos Aires. Available at http://ats.aq/devAS/ats_meetings.aspx?lang=eGoogle Scholar
Baird, R. (2004). Can Australia assert an Extended Continental Shelf off the Australian Antarctic Territory consistent with the Law of the Sea and within the Constraints of the Antarctic Treaty? Maritime Studies, 13, 119.Google Scholar
Chown, S. L., Lee, J. E., Hughes, K. A., et al. (2012). Challenges to the future conservation of the Antarctic. Science, 337(6091), 158–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comba, D. (2013). An analysis of the impact of climate change for management and governance of the Antarctic region. In Leal Filho, W., ed., Climate Change and Disaster Risk Management. Berlin: Springer, pp. 311–19.Google Scholar
Constable, A. J., Melbourne-Thomas, J., Corney, S. P., et al. (2014). Climate change and Southern Ocean ecosystems I: How changes in physical habitats directly affect marine biota. Global Change Biology, 20(10), 3004–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dudeney, J. R., and Walton, D.W.H. (2012). Leadership in politics and science within the Antarctic Treaty. Polar Research, 31(1), 11075. doi: 10.3402/polar.v31i0.11075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleckler, P. J., Durack, P. J. Stouffer, R. J. Johnson, G. C., and Forest, C.E. (2016). Industrial-era global ocean heat uptake doubles in recent decades. Nature Climate Change, 6(4), 394–8. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, R. (2007). Saving seabirds. In Kriwoken, L., Jabour, J., and Hemmings, A., eds., Looking South: Australia’s Antarctic Agenda. Sydney: The Federation Press, pp. 117–32.Google Scholar
Hall, R., and Haward, M. (2001). Enhancing compliance with international legislation and agreements mitigating seabird mortality on longlines. Marine Ornithology, 28(1), 183–90.Google Scholar
Haward, M. (2008). Governance and Management of the Southern Ocean: Approaching Assessments of Regime Effectiveness. Paper presented at ISA Conference, San Francisco, March 26–30, 2008.Google Scholar
Haward, M. (2009). The Law of the Sea Convention and the Antarctic Treaty System: Constraints or complementarity. In Hong, S.-Y. and van Dyke, J., eds., Maritime Boundary Disputes, Settlement Processes, and the Law of the Sea. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. 231–51.Google Scholar
Haward, M. (2014). The Southern Ocean, climate change and ocean governance. In Schofield, C., Lee, S., and Kwon, M.-S., eds., The Limits of Maritime Jurisdiction. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. 507–23.Google Scholar
Haward, M. (2017a). The originals: The role and influence of the original signatories to the Antarctic Treaty. In Hemmings, A., Dodds, K., and Roberts, P. eds., Handbook on the Politics of Antarctica. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar United Kingdom, pp. 232–40.Google Scholar
Haward, M. (2017b). Contemporary challenges to the Antarctic Treaty and Antarctic Treaty System: Australian interests, interplay and the evolution of a regime complex. Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs, 9(1), 21–4.Google Scholar
Haward, M., and Griffiths., T. (2011). Australia and the Antarctic Treaty System: Fifty Years of Influence. Sydney: UNSW Press.Google Scholar
Haward, M., and Jabour, J. (2014). Environmental change and governance challenges in the Southern Ocean. In Stephens, T. and VanderZwaag, D., eds., Polar Oceans Governance in an Era of Environmental Change. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 2141.Google Scholar
Haward, M., Jabour, J., and Press, A. J. (2012). Antarctic Treaty System ready for a challenge. Science, 338(6107), 603.Google Scholar
Herr, R. A., and Hall, H. R. (1989). Science as currency and the currency of science. In Handmer, J., ed., Antarctica: Policies and Policy Development. Canberra: Centre for Resources and Environmental Studies, ANU, pp. 1323.Google Scholar
Hobday, A. J., and Pecl, G. T. (2014). Identification of global marine hotspots: Sentinels for change and vanguards for adaptation action. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 24(2), 415–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jabour, J. (2009). The Australian Continental Shelf: Has Australia’s high latitude diplomacy paid off? Marine Policy, 33(2), 429–31.Google Scholar
Kock, K.-H., ed. (2000). Understanding CCAMLR’s Approach to Management. Hobart: CCAMLR.Google Scholar
Masson-Delmotte, V. (2006). Climate change – An Antarctic Perspective. SCAR Lecture ATCM XXIX.Google Scholar
Mosely, J. G. (2007). Antarctica: Securing Its Heritage for the Whole World. Canterbury, NSW: Envirobook.Google Scholar
Orheim, O., Press, A., and Gilbert, N. (2011). Managing the Antarctic environment: The evolving role of the committee for environmental protection. In Berkman, P. A., Lang, M. A., Walton, D. W. H., and Young, O. R., eds., Science Diplomacy: Antarctica, Science and the Governance of International Spaces. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press, pp. 209–22.Google Scholar
Press, A. J. (2012). An own goal in political ice hockey? World Heritage listing for Antarctica could reopen minerals debate. The Conversation, June 16. Available at https://theconversation.com/an-own-goal-in-political-ice-hockey-world-heritage-listing-for-antarctica-could-reopen-minerals-debate-7683Google Scholar
Rapley, C. (2007). Climate change and the Antarctic: What’s next? SCAR Lecture ATCM XXX.Google Scholar
Raustiala, K., and Victor, D. (2004). The regime complex for plant genetic resources. International Organization, 58(2), 277310.Google Scholar
Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research. (2017). What does the United Nations Paris Climate Agreement mean for Antarctica? ATCM XL BP20.Google Scholar
Stokke, O. S., and Vidas, D. (1996). Governing the Antarctic: The Effectiveness and Legitimacy of the Antarctic Treaty System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
UNESCO. (2016). World Heritage in the High Seas: An Idea Whose Time Has Come. World Heritage Reports 44, Paris, UNESCO.Google Scholar
Vizzini, S., Martinez-Crego, B., Andolina, C., et al. (2017). Ocean acidification as a driver of community simplification via the collapse of higher order and rise of lower order consumers. Nature Scientific Reports, 7, 4018. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03802-w.Google Scholar
Voosen, P. (2017). Delaware sized iceberg splits from Antarctica. Science, July 12. Available at www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/07/delaware-sized-iceberg-splits-antarcticaGoogle Scholar
World Meteorological Organization. (2015). The Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting (ATCM). World Meteorological Organization Executive Council Panel of Experts on Polar and High Mountain Observations, Research and Services. Sixth Session Reykjavik, September 8–11, 2015.Google Scholar
Young, O. R. (2010). Institutional Dynamics: Emergent Patterns in International Environmental Governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Young, O. R. (2014). Building an international regime complex for the Arctic: Current status and next steps. The Polar Journal, 2(2), 391407.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×