The board of nonprofit organizations: puzzling through the gaps between law and practice – a view from the United States

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511712128.015

- Aa
- Aa

Print publication year: 2010
Online publication date: August 2011

8.1 - The board of nonprofit organizations: puzzling through the gaps between law and practice – a view from the United States

from 8 - The board of nonprofit organizations: law and practice

By Evelyn Brody, Chicago-Kent College of Law

Edited by Klaus J. Hopt, Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, Germany, Thomas Von Hippel, Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, Germany
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511712128.015
pp 481-530

Export citation

Summary

Introduction

Scholars of American corporate governance – both for-profit and nonprofit – have long remarked on the contrast between the sketchiness of the legal regime and the robust and diverse set of practices inside boardrooms and executive suites. To many, this state of affairs is the desired result of a laissez-faire legal structure that sets forth minimum rules of the road but that otherwise provides only default rules for conduct. Indeed, the Delaware supreme court – speaking for the state in which most large US corporations are incorporated – recently observed: “All good corporate governance practices include compliance with statutory law and case law establishing fiduciary duties. But the law of corporate fiduciary duties and remedies for violation of those duties are distinct from the aspirational goals of ideal corporate governance practices…”

This laissez-faire legal construct makes sense for corporations that have private owners. Minimal laws put a lower bound on behavior to prevent opportunistic behavior, but otherwise get out of the way. Where corporate statutes set forth rules of practice, they can, in most cases, be overridden by the corporate charter or bylaws. After all, the theory goes, owners do not need to be protected from themselves and the contracts they might enter into. To contractarian purists, fiduciary duties in the business context impose only a duty of loyalty and good faith, and do not expose fiduciaries to monetary liability for breaches of the duty of care waived by the shareholders unless there is lack of good faith.

Hopt, Klaus J., Walz, W. Rainer, Hippel, Thomas, and Then, Volker (eds.), The European Foundation: A New Legal Approach (Gütersloh, Germany: Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung 2006)

Hansmann, Henry, Ownership of Enterprise (Belknap Press of Harvard University Press 1996)

Simon, John, Dale, Harvey, and Chisolm, Laura, “The Federal Tax Treatment of Charitable Organizations”, in The Non-Profit Sector: A Research Handbook267 (2nd edn., edited by Powell, W.W. and Steinberg, Richard) (Yale University Press 2006)

,American Law Institute, Restatement (Third) of Trusts § 78 (2007)

Brody, Evelyn, “Accountability and Public Trust”, in The State of America's Nonprofit Sector471 (Lester M. Salamon, editor) (Brookings Institution Press and The Aspen Institute 2002)

Brody, Evelyn, “Governing the US Nonprofit Organization: Accommodating Autonomy in Organizational Law” 46 Canadian Business Law Journal343, 371–72 (2008)

Brody, Evelyn, “Whose Public? Parochialism and Paternalism in State Charity Law Enforcement”, 79 Indiana Law Journal937 (2004)

Hansmann, Henry, “The Role of Nonprofit Enterprise”, 89 Yale L.J.835 (1980)

Fishman, James J., “The Development of Nonprofit Corporation Law and an Agenda for Reform”, 34 Emory Law Journal617 (1985)

Fremont-Smith, Marion R. and Kosaras, Andras, “Wrongdoing by Officers and Directors of Charities: A Survey of Press Reports 1995–2002”, 42Exempt Org. Tax Rev.25 (2003)

Siegel, Jack B., A Desktop Guide for Nonprofit Directors, Officers, and Advisors: Avoiding Trouble While Doing Good (John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2006)

Fishman, James J., “Standards of Conduct for Directors of Nonprofit Corporations”, 7 Pace Law Review389 (1987)

Chait, Richard P., Ryan, William P., and Taylor, Barbara E., Governance as Leadership: Reframing the Work of Nonprofit Boards (John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2004)

Hall, Peter Dobkin, A History of Nonprofit Boards in the United States 4 (2003)

Hansmann, Henry and Kraakman, Reinier, “The End of History for Corporate Law”, 89 Georgetown Law Journal439 (2001)

Hopt, Klaus J., “The German Two-Tier Board: Experience, Theories, Reforms”, in Comparative Corporate Governance: The State of the Art and Emerging Research227 (edited by Hopt, Klaus J., Kanda, Kideki, Roe, Mark J., Wymeersch, Eddy, and Prigge, Stefan) (Oxford University Press 1998)

Bowen, William G., Inside the Boardroom: Governance by Directors and Trustees (John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1994)

Cox, James D., “The ALI, Institutionalization, and Disclosure: The Quest for the Outside Director's Spine”, 61 George Washington Law Review1233, 1236 (1993)

Coffee, Jr John C.., “Beyond the Shut-Eyed Sentry: Toward a Theoretical View of Corporate Misconduct and an Effective Legal Response”, 63 Virginia Law Review1099 (1977)

Fisch, Jill E., “Taking Boards Seriously”, 19 Cardozo Law Review265 (1997)

Langevoort, Donald C., “The Human Nature of Corporate Boards: Law, Norms, and the Unintended Consequences of Independence and Accountability”, 89 Georgetown Law Journal797 (2001)

Dallas, Lynne L., “The Multiple Roles of Boards of Directors”, 40 San Diego Law Review781 (2003)

Maitlis, Sally, “Taking it From the Top: How CEOs Influence (and Fail to Influence) their Boards”, 25 Organization Studies1275 (Sage Publications 2004)

Useem, Michael and Zelieke, Andy, “Oversight and Delegation in Corporate Goveranance: Deciding What the Board Should Decide”, 14 Corp. Governance: An Int'l Rev.2 (2006)

Ostrower, Francie and Bobowick, Marla J., Nonprofits and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2 and 7, Appendix Table (2006)

Hall, Peter Dobkin, Inventing the Nonprofit Sector (Johns Hopkins University Press 1992)

Dawson, Ian and Dunn, Alison, “Governance Codes of Practice in the Not-for-Profit Sector”, 14 Corp. Governance: An Int'l Rev.33 (2006)

Gilson, Ronald J. and Kraakman, Reinier, “Reinventing the Outside Director: An Agenda for Institutional Investors”, 43 Stanford Law Review863, 883–92 (1991)

ABA Coordinating Committee on Nonprofit Governance, Guide to Nonprofit Corporate Governance in the Wake of Sarbanes-Oxley 45 (2005) [hereinafter ABA, Sarbanes-Oxley Guide]

DeJong, Ralph E. and Peregrine, Michael W., “Director Compensation Plans for Nonprofits: Addressing the Key Legal Issues”, 30 Exempt Org. Tax Rev.29 (2002)

Boris, Elizabeth T., Renz, Loren, Barve, Asmita, Hager, Mark A., and Hobor, George, Foundation Expenses Compensation: How Operating Characteristics Influence Spending (Urban Institute, Foundation Center, and Philanthropic Research Inc. 2006)

Saidel, Judith R., “Expanding the Governance Construct: Functions and Contributions of Nonprofit Advisory Groups”, 27 Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly421 (1998)

Callen, Jeffrey L., Klein, April, and Tinkelman, Daniel, “Board Composition, Committees, and Organizational Efficiency: The Case of Nonprofits”, 32 Nonprofit & Voluntary Q.493, 503 (2004)

Guidebook for Directors of Nonprofit Corporations 49 (Overton, George W. and Drey, Jeannie Carmedelle, eds., 2nd edn. 2002)

Small, Jonathan A., “Should the Executive Director Serve on its Board?,” presented at the Nonprofit Forum (New York City, October 19, 2006)

Reiser, Dana Brakman, “Dismembering Civil Society: The Social Cost of Internally Undemocratic Nonprofits”, 82 Oregon Law Review829 (2003)

Hansmann, Henry, “The Role of Nonprofit Enterprise”, 89 Yale L. J.835, 838–9 (1980)

Reiser, Dana Brakman, “Decision-Makers Without Duties: Defining the Duties of Parent Corporations Acting as Sole Corporate Members in Nonprofit Health Care Systems”, 53 Rutgers Law Review979 (2001)

Williamson, Oliver E., “Corporate Governance”, 93 Yale L.J.1197, 1210 (1984)

Orts, Eric W., “Beyond Shareholders: Interpreting Corporate Constituency Statutes”, 61 George Washington Law Review14, 16, and 73 (1992)

Ben-Ner, Avner, “Book Review: Who Benefits from the Nonprofit Sector? Reforming Law and Public Policy Towards Nonprofit Organizations”, 104 Yale L.J.731 (1994)

Brody, Evelyn, “Entrance, Voice and Exit: The Constitutional Bounds of the Right of Association”, 35 U.C. Davis Law Review821 (2002)

Atkinson, Rob, “Unsettled Standing: Who (Else) Should Enforce the Duties of Charitable Fiduciaries?”, 23 Journal of Corporation Law655 (1998)

Brody, Evelyn, “From the Dead Hand to the Living Dead: The Conundrum of Charitable-Donor Standing”, 41 Georgia Law Review1183 (2007)

Manning, Bayless, “The Business Judgment Rule and the Director's Duty of Attention: A Time for Reality”, 39 Business Lawyer1477, 1494 (1984)

In re Caremark International, 698 A.2d 959 (Del. Ch. 1996)

Stone v. Ritter, 911 A.2d 362, 370 (Del. 2006)

Hone, Michael C., “Aristotle and Lyndon Baines Johnson: Thirteen Ways of Looking at Blackbirds and Nonprofit Corporations: The American Bar Association's Revised Model Nonprofit Corporation Act”, 39 Case Western Reserve Law Review751, 771–2 (1988–89)

Goldschmid, Harvey J., “The Fiduciary Duties of Nonprofit Directors and Officers: Paradoxes, Problems, and Proposed Reforms”, 23 Journal of Corporation Law631 (1998)

Fleishman, Joel L., “Philanthropy and Outcomes: Dilemmas in the Quest for Accountability”, in Philanthropy and the Nonprofit Sector in a Changing America172 (Clotfelter, Charles T. and Ehrlich, Thomas, eds.) (Indiana University Press 1999)

Comparative Corporate Governance of Non-Profit Organizations

8.1 - The board of nonprofit organizations: puzzling through the gaps between law and practice – a view from the United States

CAPTCHA *