Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-p566r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T12:10:54.055Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Teachers Unions in the United States: The Politics of Blocking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2016

Terry M. Moe
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Terry M. Moe
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Susanne Wiborg
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access

Summary

The teachers unions are a powerful force in American education. They shape the public schools from the bottom up through collective bargaining, and shape them from the top down through their extensive involvement in state and national politics. In combining these bottom-up and top-down sources of power, and in combining them as potently as they do, the teachers unions are unique among all actors in the educational arena.

In this chapter, I will discuss the unions’ historical rise to power, how they have exercised that power in collective bargaining and politics, and the constraining effects they have had on more than a quarter century of attempted reform. Throughout, I will take advantage of the theoretical framing set out in the Introduction, emphasizing the key importance of vested interests and institutional veto points, to offer perspective on why these developments have occurred as they have.

The Formative Era of American Education—and the Late Rise of Union Power

The American public school system began to emerge in roughly its present form a little over 100 years ago, an outgrowth of the Progressive movement during the early 1900s to bureaucratize and professionalize American government at all levels. The national government was not the driving force behind this new education system. Under the Constitution, all responsibilities not specifically assigned to the federal government are reserved to the states—and public education is one of these. From the beginning, the American education system has been radically decentralized, with the states holding primary authority and using it to set up local districts with much discretion to staff, organize, and operate the schools.

Teachers in this new system clearly had vested interests in their jobs, with strong incentives to get organized in protecting those interests. Yet throughout the school system's era of institutional formation and expansion—lasting roughly half a century—hardly any teachers got organized into unions, and there was no collective bargaining. In this respect, the United States was unique among Western nations, where teachers universally got organized into unions as their education systems developed. The prime reason for American exceptionalism is that in the US, collective bargaining for public sector workers—of all types, not just teachers—was typically prohibited by law and practice, and the political environment for the unionization of public workers was quite hostile.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Comparative Politics of Education
Teachers Unions and Education Systems around the World
, pp. 24 - 55
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Jenny. 2013. Curious grade for teachers: Nearly all pass. New York Times (March 30).Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., Jeffrey M. Berry, Marie Hojnacki, David C. Kimball, and Beth L. Leech. 2009. Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. University of Chicago Press.
Brill, Steven. 2010. Teachers unions’ last stand. New York Times Sunday Magazine (May 17).Google Scholar
Brill, Steven. 2011. Class Conflict: Inside the Fight to Fix America's Schools. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Chubb, John E., and Moe, Terry M.. 1990. Politics, Markets, and America's Schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Di Salvo, Daniel. 2015. Government Against Itself: Public Sector Unions and American Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Finn, Chester E., Manno, Bruno V, and Vanourek, Gregg. 2001. Charter Schools in Action. Princeton University Press.
Freeman, Richard B. 1986. Unionism comes to the public sector. Journal of Economic Literature 24.1 (March): 41–86.Google Scholar
Friedman Foundation. 2015. The ABC's of School Choice, 2014 Edition, available at: www.friedmanfoundation.org
Hanushek, Eric A. 2003. The failure of input-based schooling policies. The Economic Journal 113 (February): 64–98.Google Scholar
Hanushek, Eric A., and Rivkin, Steven. 2006. Teacher Quality. In Hanushek, Eric A. and Welch, Finis, eds, Handbook of the Economics of Education. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1051–78.
Henig, Jeffrey R., Hula, Richard C., Orr, Marion, and Pedescleaux, Desiree S.. 1999. The Color of School Reform. Princeton University Press.
Hess, Frederick M. 2003. Refining or Retreating? High-Stakes Accountability in the States. In Peterson, Paul E and West, Martin, eds, Leave No Child Behind? The Politics and Practices of School Accountability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Hess, Frederick M. 2010. The Same Thing Over and Over Again. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hess, Frederick M., and Finn, Chester E., Jr. 2007. Conclusion: Can This Law Be Fixed: A Hard Look at the NCLB Remedies. In Hess, Frederick M. and Finn, Chester E., Jr., eds, No Remedy Left Behind: Lessons From a Half-Decade of NCLB. Washington, DC: AEI Press.
Hess, Frederick M., and Henig, Jeffrey R.. 2015. The New Education Philanthropy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
Hess, Frederick M., and West, Martin R.. 2006. A Better Bargain: Overhauling Teacher Collective Bargaining for the 21st Century. Program on Education Policy and Governance, Harvard University.
Hill, Paul T., ed. 2006. Charter Schools Against the Odds. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press; Center for Education Reform.
Hill, Paul THill, Paul T., and Jochim, Aschley E.. 2009. Political Perspectives on School Choice. In Berends, Mark, Springer, Matthew G., Ballou, Dale, and Walberg, Herbert J., eds, Handbook of Research on School Choice. New York: Routledge, 3–18.
Howell, William G., Peterson, Paul E., and West, Martin R.. 2009. The persuadable public. Education Next 9 (Fall): 20–9.Google Scholar
Hoxby, Caroline M. 1996. How teachers unions affect education production. Quarterly Journal of Economics 111.3: 671–718.Google Scholar
Hoxby, Caroline M. 2005. Inadequate yearly progress: Unlocking the secrets of NCLB. Education Next 5.3 (Summer).Google Scholar
Huetteman, Emmarie. 2015. Senate approves overhaul of No Child Left Behind. New York Times (December 9).Google Scholar
Kirst, Michael, and Wirt, Frederick M.. 2009. The Political Dynamics of American Education, 4th ed. Richmond, CA: McCutchan.
Lovenheim, Michael. 2009. The effect of teachers’ unions on education production: Evidence from union election certifications in three midwestern states. Journal of Labor Economics, 27.4, 525–87.Google Scholar
Lovenheim, Michael, and Willen, Alexander. 2015. The long-run effect of teachers unions on educational attainment and earnings. Working Paper.
McGuinn, Patrick. 2006. No Child Left Behind and the Transformation of Federal Education Policy. University of Kansas Press.
McGuinn, Patrick, and Manna, Paul, eds. 2013. Educational Governance for the Twenty-First Century: Overcoming the Structural Barriers to School Reform. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Moe, Terry M. 2001. Schools, Vouchers, and the American Public. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Moe, Terry M. 2003. Politics, Control, and the Future of School Accountability. In Peterson, Paul E. and West, Martin, eds, Leave No Child Behind? The Politics and Practices of School Accountability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Moe, Terry M. 2005. Teachers Unions and School Board Elections. In Howell, William G., ed., Beseiged: School Boards and the Future of Education Politics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Moe, Terry M. 2006. Political control and the power of the agent. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 22, 1–29.Google Scholar
Moe, Terry M. 2008. Beyond the free market: The structure of school choice. Brigham Young University Law Review. 2008.1: 557–92.Google Scholar
Moe, Terry M. 2009. Collective bargaining and the performance of the public schools. American Journal of Political Science 53.1: 156–74.Google Scholar
Moe, Terry M. 2011. Special Interest: Teachers Unions and America's Public Schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Moe, Terry M. 2015. Vested interests and political institutions. Political Science Quarterly 130.2 (Summer): 277–318.Google Scholar
Moe, Terry M., and Chubb, John E.. 2009. Liberating Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Morken, Hubert, and Formicola, Jo Renee. 1999. The Politics of School Choice. London: Rowman and Littlefield.
Murphy, Marjorie. 1990. Blackboard Unions: The AFT and the NEA, 1900–1980. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
National Alliance for Public Charter Schools. 2015. A growing movement: America's largest charter school communities. www.publiccharters.org/publications/enrollment-share-10/
National Commission on Excellence in Education. 1983. A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. The Elementary School Journal 84.2: 113–130.
National Council on Teacher Quality. 2015. State of the States: Evaluating Teaching, Leading and Learning. Washington, DC: National Council on Teacher Quality.
O'Day, Jennifer A., and Smith, Marshall S. (1993). Systemic School Reform and Educational Opportunity. In Fuhrman, Susan, ed., Designing Coherent Education Policy: Improving the System. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 250–312.
Patashnik, Eric. 2008. Reforms at Risk: What Happens After Major Policy Changes Are Enacted. Princeton University Press.
Reckhow, Sarah. 2012. Follow the Money: How Foundation Dollars Change Public School Politics. Oxford University Press, USA.
Resnick, Brian. 2011. The mess of No Child Left Behind. The Atlantic (December 16) www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2011/12/the-mess-of-no-child-left-behind/250076/
Rhodes, Jesse H. 2012. An Education in Politics: The Origin and Evolution of No Child Left Behind. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Rich, Motoko. 2013. US reading and math scores show slight gains. New York Times (November 7).Google Scholar
Rich, Motoko. 2015. Nationwide test shows dip in students’ math abilities. New York Times (October 28).Google Scholar
Sawchuk, Stephen. 2013. Teacher ratings still high despite new measures. Education Week (February 5).Google Scholar
Schlozman, Kay. 2010. Who Sings in the Heavenly Chorus: The Shape of the Organized Interest System. In Maisel, L. Sandy, Berry, Jeffrey M., and Edwards, George C. III, eds, The Oxford Handbook of American Political Parties and Interest Groups. New York: Oxford University Press.
Semuels, Alana. 2016. Why are unions so worried about an upcoming Supreme Court case? The Atlantic (January 8).Google Scholar
Stone, Clarence N., Henig, Jeffrey R., and Pierannunzi, Carol. 2001. Building Civic Capacity. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
Strauss, Valerie. 2014. GOP's Klein smacks Obama over NCLB waivers, says administration ‘has not gotten the message’ from elections. Washington Post (November 14).Google Scholar
Strunk, Katharine O. 2011. Are teachers’ unions really to blame? Collective bargaining agreements and their relationships with district resource allocation and student performance in California. Education Finance and Policy 6.3: 354–98.Google Scholar
Strunk, Katharine O., and Grissom, Jason A.. 2010. Do strong unions shape district policies? Collective bargaining, teacher contract restrictiveness, and the political power of teachers unions. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 32.3: 389–406.Google Scholar
Taylor, Kate. 2015. Chancellor Carmen Fariña changes New York City schools’ course. New York Times (February 6).Google Scholar
Toch, Thomas. 1991. In the Name of Excellence. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton University Press.
Tyack, David, and Cuban, Larry. 1995. Tinkering Toward Utopia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vergari, Sandra. 2007. The politics of charter schools. Educational Policy 21.1: 15–39.Google Scholar
Viteritti, Joseph, ed. 2009. When Mayors Take Charge: School Governance in the City. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Weisberg, D., Sexton, S., Mulhern, J., and Keeling, D. 2009. The Widget Effect: Our National Failure to Acknowledge and Act on Differences in Teacher Effectiveness. Brooklyn, NY: The New Teacher Project. www.widgeteffect.org/down-loads/TheWidgetEffect.pdf
Williams, Joe. 2006. Echo Chamber: The National Education Association's Campaign against NCLB, Education Sector, Connecting the Dots (July 2006) on Education Sector's website at: www.educationsector.org/publications/echo-chambernational-education-associations-campaign-against-nclb
Williams, Joe. 2007. District Accountability: More Bark Than Bite? In Hess, Frederick M. and Finn, Chester E., Jr., eds, No Remedy Left Behind: Lessons From a Half-Decade of NCLB. Washington, DC: AEI Press.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×