Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T02:26:58.446Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - “Tanya, the one with Jonathan's kidney”: a living unrelated donor case of church associates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2010

Paul J. Ford
Affiliation:
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Denise M. Dudzinski
Affiliation:
University of Washington School of Medicine
Get access

Summary

Case narrative

An ethics consult was requested of me in my role as a fellow in transplantation ethics. It came from the kidney-transplant coordinator in regard to a potential living unrelated donor (LURD). Apparently the donor had minimal knowledge of and relationship to her intended recipient.

The case first came up for consideration in the transplant team's weekly meeting early in January. Transplant coordinator Callie Jenkins, RN, presented Tanya Keller's case following Ms. Keller's donor evaluation a few days earlier. The case required ethics input because of the potential donor's relational status to Jonathan Noble, the intended recipient with end-stage renal disease. Ms. Keller was said to be a “church associate” of Mr. Noble.

“What are our criteria for living donor acceptance?” asked a senior nephrologist, with a nod to the ethicist in attendance. “Uncoerced, not paid, understands the procedure, good health.” The physician had answered his own question. Shortly afterward, the transplant coordinator sent me a letter formally requesting an ethics consult:

Ms. Tanya Keller is a 31-year-old woman who has expressed a wish to donate a kidney to one of our patients, Jonathan Noble. She has been tissue typed and found to be a compatible match to Jonathan. Tanya describes herself as a church acquaintance/friend of Jonathan's. They have known each other awhile, though she does not describe their relationship as close.

Ms. Keller has not had the complete medical donor evaluation yet, but in our preliminary medical inquiry she sounds like a healthy candidate. Her reasons for wanting to donate seem sound. We have asked Tanya to see you to help her explore the full implication of kidney donation. […]

Type
Chapter
Information
Complex Ethics Consultations
Cases that Haunt Us
, pp. 141 - 147
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×