Book contents
- Complications and Outcomes of Assisted Reproduction
- Complications and Outcomes of Assisted Reproduction
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- 1 Ovarian Cancer Following Use of Clomiphene and Gonadotropin in Assisted Reproduction
- 2 Congenital Anomalies Following Assisted Reproductive Technology
- 3 Extra-uterine Pregnancy After Artificial Reproductive Technology
- 4 Minimizing Multiple Pregnancy After Assisted Reproductive Technology
- 5 Prevention of Multiple Pregnancy after IUI and Ovarian Stimulation
- 6 Obstetric Complications of Twin Pregnancy Following Assisted Reproductive Technology
- 7 Selection of a Single Embryo for Transfer
- 8 Complications of Oocyte Retrieval in Assisted Reproduction
- 9 Ultrasound Monitoring in ART Have We Made Any Progress?
- 10 Complications of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome in Assisted Reproduction Technology
- 11 Classification and Pathophysiology of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
- 12 Genetics of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
- 13 Prediction and Prevention of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
- 14 Treatment of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
- 15 Elimination of OHSS by GnRH Agonist and Freezing Embryos
- 16 Ethical and Legal Issues Arising from Complications of ART
- 17 Complications of Gestational Surrogacy
- 18 Complications of Male Fertility Surgery for Sperm Retrieval in the Azoospermic Male
- 19 Impediments, Challenges, and Hurdles for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Persons Seeking Reproductive Medicine
- 20 Political Emotions and Reproductive Medicine From Individual Suffering to European Regulation
- Index
- References
3 - Extra-uterine Pregnancy After Artificial Reproductive Technology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 March 2017
Book contents
- Complications and Outcomes of Assisted Reproduction
- Complications and Outcomes of Assisted Reproduction
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- 1 Ovarian Cancer Following Use of Clomiphene and Gonadotropin in Assisted Reproduction
- 2 Congenital Anomalies Following Assisted Reproductive Technology
- 3 Extra-uterine Pregnancy After Artificial Reproductive Technology
- 4 Minimizing Multiple Pregnancy After Assisted Reproductive Technology
- 5 Prevention of Multiple Pregnancy after IUI and Ovarian Stimulation
- 6 Obstetric Complications of Twin Pregnancy Following Assisted Reproductive Technology
- 7 Selection of a Single Embryo for Transfer
- 8 Complications of Oocyte Retrieval in Assisted Reproduction
- 9 Ultrasound Monitoring in ART Have We Made Any Progress?
- 10 Complications of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome in Assisted Reproduction Technology
- 11 Classification and Pathophysiology of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
- 12 Genetics of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
- 13 Prediction and Prevention of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
- 14 Treatment of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
- 15 Elimination of OHSS by GnRH Agonist and Freezing Embryos
- 16 Ethical and Legal Issues Arising from Complications of ART
- 17 Complications of Gestational Surrogacy
- 18 Complications of Male Fertility Surgery for Sperm Retrieval in the Azoospermic Male
- 19 Impediments, Challenges, and Hurdles for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Persons Seeking Reproductive Medicine
- 20 Political Emotions and Reproductive Medicine From Individual Suffering to European Regulation
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Complications and Outcomes of Assisted Reproduction , pp. 24 - 32Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Steptoe, P C, Edwards, R G. Reimplantation of the human embryo with subsequent tubal pregnancy. Lancet 1976;1(7965):880–882.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tal, J, Haddad, S, Gordin, N, Timor-Tritsch, I. Heterotopic pregnancy after ovulation induction and assisted reproductive technologies: a literature review from 1971 to 1993. Fertil Steril 1996;66:1–12.Google ScholarPubMed
Marion, L, Meeks, G. Ectopic pregnancy: history, incidence, epidemiology and risk factors. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2012;55:376–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bouyer, J, Coste, J, Shojaei, T, et al. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a comprehensive analysis based on a large case-control, population-based study in France. Am J Epidemiol 2003;157:185–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ankum, W M, Mol, B W, Van de Veen, F, Bossuyt, P M. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 1996;65:1093–1099.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pacchiarotti, A, Mohamed, M A, Micara, G, et al. The impact of the depth of embryo replacement on IVF outcome. J Ass Reprod Genet 2007;24:189–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abou-Setta, A M. What is the best site for embryo deposition? A systematic review and meta-analysis using direct and adjusted indirect comparisons. Reprod Biomed Online 2007;14(5):611–619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tiras, B, Polat, M, Korucuoglu, U, Zeyneloglu, H B, Yarali, H. Impact of embryo replacement depth on in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer outcomes. Fertil Steril 2010;94:1341–1345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biervliet, F P, Lesny, P, Maguiness, , Killick, S R. Mechanisms for bilateral ectopics after embryo transfer? Fertil Steril 2001;76:212–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Groeneveld, E, De Leeuw, B, Vergouw, C G, et al. Standardization of catheter load speed during embryo transfer: comparison of manual and pump-regulated embryo transfer. Reprod Biomed Online 2012;24:163–169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lesny, P, Killick, S R. The junctional zone of the uterus and its contractions. Br J Obstet Gynecol 2004;111:1182–1189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tummon, I S, Whitmore, N A, Daniel, S A, Nisker, J A, Yuzpe, A A. Transferring more embryos increases risk of heterotopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril 1994;61:1065–1067.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aston, K I, Peterson, C M, Carrell, D T. Monozygotic twinning associated with artificial reproductive technologies: a review. Reproduction 2008;36:377–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, R T, Upham, K M, Forman, E J, Zhao, T, Treff, N R. Cleavage-stage biopsy significantly impairs human embryonic implantation potential while blastocyst biopsy does not: a randomized and paired clinical trial. Fertil Steril 2013;100:624–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paltieli, Y, Eibschitz, I, Ziskind, G, et al. High progesterone levels and ciliary dysfunction – possible cause of ectopic pregnancy. J Assist Reprod Genet 2000;17:103–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ng, E H, Yeung, W S, So, W W, Ho, P C. An analysis of ectopic pregnancies following in vitro fertilization treatment in a 10-year period. J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;18:359–364.Google ScholarPubMed
Ishihara, O, Kuwahara, A, Saitoh, H. Frozen–thawed blastocyst transfer reduces ectopic pregnancy risk: an analysis of single embryo transfer cycles in Japan. Fertil Steril 2011;95:1066–1069.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shapiro, B S, Daneshmand, S T, De Leon, L, et al. Frozen–thawed embryo transfer is associated with a significantly reduced incidence of ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril 2012;98:1490–1494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clayton, H B, Schieve, L A, Pterson, H B, et al. Ectopic pregnancy risk with assisted reproductive technology procedures. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:595–604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jun, S H, Mili, A A. Ectopic pregnancy rates with frozen compared with fresh blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril 2007;88:629–631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Decleer, W, Osmanagaoglu, K, Meganck, G, Devroey, P. Slightly lower incidence of ectopic pregnancies in frozen embryo transfer cycles versus fresh in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer cycles: a retrospective cohort study. Fertil Steril 2014;101:162–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klipstein, S, Oskowitz, W S P. Bilateral ectopic pregnancy after transfer of two embryos. Fertil Steril 2000;74:887–888.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Condous, G, Okaro, E, Khalid, A, et al. The use of a new logistic regression model for predicting the outcome of pregnancies of unknown location. Hum Reprod 2004;19:1900–1910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zee, J, Sammel, M D, Chung, K, et al. Ectopic pregnancy prediction in women with a pregnancy of unknown location: data beyond 48h are necessary. Hum Reprod 2014;29:441–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemmann, E, Ghazi, D M, Corsan, G H. Adnexal torsion in menotropin-induced pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 1990;76:403–406.Google ScholarPubMed
Roest, J, Mous, H, Zeilmaker, G, et al. The incidence of major clinical complications in a Dutch transport IVF programme. Hum Reprod Update 1996;2:345–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mol, F, van den Boogaard, E, van Mello, N M, et al. Guideline adherence in ectopic pregnancy management. Hum Reprod 2011;26:307–315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Mello, N M, Mol, F, Verhoeve, H R, et al. Methotrexate or expectant management in women with an ectopic pregnancy or pregnancy of unknown location and low serum HCG concentrations. A randomized comparison. Hum Reprod 2013;28:60–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernandez, H, Capmas, P, Lucot, J P, et al. Fertility after ectopic pregnancy: the DEMETER randomized trial. Hum Reprod 2013;28:1247–1253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kårhus, L L, Egerup, P, Skowlund, C W, Lidegaard, O. Long-term reproductive outcomes in women whose first pregnancy is ectopic: a national controlled follow-up study. Hum Reprod 2013;28:241–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, E, Condous, G, Van Calster, B, et al. A validation of the most commonly used protocol to predict the success of single-dose methotrexate in the treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Hum Reprod 2007;22:858–863.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ng, S, Hamontri, S, Chua, I, et al. Laparoscopic management of 53 cases of cornual ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril 2009;92:448–452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soriano, D, Vicus, D, Mashiach, R, et al. Laparoscopic treatment of cornual pregnancy: a series of 20 consecutive cases. Fertil Steril 2008;90:839–843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed