Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2015
  • Online publication date: May 2015

2 - Two Thousand Years of Computation

from PART ONE - Ancient Origins
Summary

ONCE THE AXIOMATIC METHOD had been adopted, reasoning was often spoken of as the one and only tool available for solving mathematical problems. In the discourse they developed about their science, mathematicians hardly ever mentioned computation. This doesn't mean that computing vanished from the practice of mathematics, however. Mathematicians would regularly put forward new algorithms to systematically solve certain types of problems. It seems that the history of mathematics has a bright side – that of conjectures, theorems, and proofs – and a hidden one – that of algorithms.

This chapter will focus on three important points in this history, each set in a different time period, and each raising important issues.

First we will tackle the apparent contradiction between mathematical discourse, which tends to overlook computation, and mathematical practice, which places great weight on it. We will also retrace the transition between the prehistory of mathematics and Ancient Greek mathematics.

Next we will examine the relative parts played in medieval mathematics by the Mesopotamian legacy and by the Greek legacy.

Finally we will explore why so many new geometric figures (the catenary curve, the roulette curve, etc.) appeared in the seventeenth century, whereas ancient geometry focused on only a small number of figures (the triangle, the circle, the parabola, etc.).

EUCLID's ALGORITHM: REASONING-BASED COMPUTATION

Euclid linked his name not only to geometry and the axiomatic method but also, ironically, to an algorithm that allows the calculation of the greatest common divisor of two integers. It is known as Euclid's algorithm.

The first method for calculating the greatest common divisor of two numbers consists of listing the divisors of each number – successively dividing the number by all smaller numbers and writing down all those for which there is no remainder – and identifying the largest number that appears on both lists. For instance, in order to calculate the greatest common divisor of 90 and 21, we start by listing the divisors of 90 (1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 9, 10, 15, 18, 30, 45, and 90) and those of 21 (1, 3, 7, and 21).

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Computation, Proof, Machine
  • Online ISBN: 9781139026581
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139026581
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
Jean-Luc, Chabert, Évelyne, Barbin, Michet, Guillemot, Anne, Michel-Pajus, Jacques, Borowczyk, Ahmed, Djebbar, Jean-Clause, Martzloff, Histoires d'algorithmes, du caillou à lapuce, Belin, 1994.
Ahmed, Djebbar, L'Âge d'or des sciences arabes, le Pommier/Cité des Sciences et de l'Industrie, 2005.
Georg Wilhem, Leibniz, La Naissance du calcul différentiel, introduction, translation, and annotations by Marc, Parmentier, preface by Michel, Serres, Vrin, 1989.