Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T08:39:37.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Assessing connectivity in salmonid fishes with DNA microsatellite markers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2010

Kevin R. Crooks
Affiliation:
Colorado State University
M. Sanjayan
Affiliation:
The Nature Conservancy, Virginia
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Connectivity is a key consideration for the management and conservation of any species, but empirical characterizations of connectivity can be extremely challenging. Assessments of connectivity require biologically realistic classifications of landscape structure (Kotliar and Wiens 1990), and an understanding of how landscape structure affects migration, dispersal, and population dynamics (Dunning et al. 1992; Rosenberg et al. 1997; Hanski 1999; Taylor et al. Chapter 2). Empirical assessments of connectivity may be accomplished by studying spatial patterns of habitat occupancy through time (Sjögren-Gulve and Ray 1996; Hanski 1999; Moilanen and Hanski Chapter 3), spatially correlated changes in population demography (Bjornstad et al. 1999; Isaak et al. 2003; Carroll Chapter 15), and individual movements (Millspaugh and Marzluff 2001; Tracey Chapter 14). These approaches have provided important insights for many species, but they can be difficult to implement for species with slow population dynamics or turnover (extinction and recolonization), complex life histories, and long-distance migrations. For species with these characteristics, molecular genetic markers represent a valuable tool for understanding processes that influence connectivity (Avise 1994; Frankham et al. 2004; Frankham Chapter 14). In this chapter, we review applications of molecular genetic markers to assess connectivity in salmonid fishes, a group of relatively well-studied species with characteristics that complicate non-genetic approaches to understanding connectivity. Lessons learned from salmonids may apply generally to other species that have received far less attention.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angermeier, P. L., K. L. Krueger, and C. A. Dollof. 2002. Discontinuity in stream-fish distributions: implications for assessing and predicting species occurrences. Pp. 519–528 in Scott, J. M., Heglund, P. J., Samson, F., et al. (eds.) Predicting Species Occurrences: Issues of Accuracy and Scale. Covelo, CA: Island Press.Google Scholar
Angers, B., Magnan, P., Plante, M., and Bernatchez, L.. 1999. Canonical correspondence analysis for estimating spatial and environmental effects on microsatellite gene diversity in brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis). Molecular Ecology 8:1043–1053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, J. D., Shackley, P. E., and Gardiner, R.. 1994. Redistribution of juvenile salmonid fishes after localized catastrophic depletion. Journal of Fish Biology 45:1027–1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avise, J. C. 1994. Molecular Markers, Natural History and Evolution. New York: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balloux, F., and Lugon-Moulin, N.. 2001. The estimation of population differentiation with microsatellite markers. Molecular Ecology 11:155–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, M. A., and Eichert, W.. 2000. WHICHRUN v. 3.2: a computer program for population assignment of individuals based on multilocus genotype data. Journal of Heredity 91:87–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beerli, P. 2004. MIGRATE 1.7.6.1 documentation and program, part of LAMARC. Available online at http://evolution.genetics.washington.edu/lamarc.html
Beerli, P., and Felsenstein, J.. 1999. Maximum-likelihood estimation of migration rates and effective population numbers in two populations using a coalescent approach. Genetics 152:763–773Google ScholarPubMed
Beerli, P., and Felsenstein, J.. 2001. Maximum likelihood estimation of a migration matrix and effective population sizes in n subpopulations by using a coalescent approach. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 98:4563–4568CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bjornn, T. C., and Reiser, D. W.. 1991. Habitat requirements of salmonids in streams. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 19:83–138Google Scholar
Bjornstad, O. N., Ims, R. A., and Lambin, X.. 1999. Spatial population dynamics: analyzing patterns and processes of population synchrony. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14:427–432CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castric, V., and Bernatchez, L.. 2004. Individual assignment test reveals differential restriction to dispersal between two salmonids despite no increase of genetic differences with distance. Molecular Ecology 13:1299–1312CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castric, V., Bonney, F., and Bernatchez, L.. 2001. Landscape structure and hierarchical genetic diversity in the brook charr, Salvelinus fontinalis. Evolution 55:1016–1028CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., and Edwards, A. W. F.. 1967. Phylogenetic analysis: models and estimation procedures. Evolution 32:550–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, A. B., and Mangel, M.. 1999. The dangers of ignoring metapopulation structure for the conservation of salmonids. Fisheries Bulletin 97:213–226Google Scholar
Cornuet, J.-M., Piry, S., Luikart, G., Estoup, A., and Solignac, M.. 1999. New methods employing multilocus genotypes to select or exclude populations as origins of individuals. Genetics 153:1989–2000Google ScholarPubMed
Costello, A. B., Down, T. E., Pollard, S. M., Pacas, C. J., and Taylor, E. B.. 2003. The influence of history and contemporary stream hydrology on the evolution of genetic diversity within species: an examination of microsatellite DNA variation in bull trout, Salvelinus confluentus (Pisces: Salmonidae). Evolution 57:328–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, N., Villablanca, F. X., and Roderick, G. K.. 1999. Determining the source of individuals: multilocus genotyping in nonequilibrium population genetics. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14:17–21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunham, J. B., and Rieman, B. E.. 1999. Metapopulation structure of bull trout: influences of physical, biotic, and geometrical landscape characteristics. Ecological Applications 9:642–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunham, J. B., Vinyard, G. L., and Rieman, B. E.. 1997. Habitat fragmentation and extinction risk of Lahontan cutthroat trout. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 17:1126–11332.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunham, J. B., B. E. Rieman, and J. T. Peterson. 2002. Patch-based models of species occurrence: lessons from salmonid fishes in streams. Pp. 327–334 in Scott, J. M., Heglund, P. J., Samson, F., et al. (eds.) Predicting Species Occurrences: Issues of Scale and Accuracy. Covelo, CA: Island Press.Google Scholar
Dunham, J. B., Young, K. A., Gresswell, R. E., and Rieman, B. E.. 2003. Effects of fire on fish populations: landscape perspectives on persistence of native fishes and nonnative fish invasions. Forest Ecology and Management 178:183–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunning, J. B., Danielson, B. J., and Pulliam, H. R.. 1992. Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes. Oikos 65:169–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, J. M. 1981. Some aspects of thermal stress on freshwater teleosts. Pp. 209–245 in Pickering, A. D. (ed.) Stress and Fish. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Epperson, B. K. 2003. Geographical Genetics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fausch, K. D., Torgersen, C. E., Baxter, C. V., and Li, H. W.. 2002. Landscapes to riverscapes: bridging the gap between research and conservation of stream fishes. BioScience 52:483–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankham, R., Ballou, J. D., and Briscoe, D. A.. 2004. A primer of conservation genetics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, D. J., Lippe, C., and Bernatchez, L.. 2004. Consequences of unequal population size, asymmetric gene flow and sex-biased dispersal on population structure in brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis). Molecular Ecology 13:67–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frissell, C. A., Liss, W. J., Warren, C. E., and Hurley, M. D.. 1986. A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: viewing streams in a watershed context. Environmental Management 10:199–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garant, D., Dodson, J. J., and Bernatchez, L.. 2000. Ecological determinants and temporal stability of the within-river population structure in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Molecular Ecology 9:615–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein,, D. B., and Schlotterer, C. (eds.) 1999. Microsatellites: Evolution and Applications. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Griswold, K. E. 2002. Genetic diversity in coastal cutthroat trout and Dolly Varden in Prince William Sound, Alaska. Ph.D. dissertation, Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University.
Groot, C., and Margolis, L. (eds.) 1991. Pacific Salmon Life Histories. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, K. E., Ferguson, A., Taggart, J. B., and Tomasson, T.. 1998. Post-glacial colonization of brown trout, Salmo trutta L.: Ldh-5 as a phylogeographic marker locus. Journal of Fish Biology 35:651–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock J. M. 1999. Microsatellites, and other simple sequences: genomic context and mutational mechanisms. Pp. 1–9 in Goldstein, D. B., and Schlotterer, C. (eds.) Microsatellites: Evolution and Applications. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, M. M., and Mensberg, K.-L.. 1998. Genetic differentiation and relationship between genetic and geographical distance in Danish sea trout (Salmo trutta L.) populations. Heredity 81:493–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, M. M., Ruzzante, D. E., Nielsen, E. E., and Mensberg, K.-L.. 2000. Microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA polymorphism reveals life-history dependent interbreeding between hatchery and wild brown trout (Salmo trutta L.). Molecular Ecology 9:583–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, M. M., Kenchington, E., and Nielsen, E. E.. 2001. Assigning individual fish to populations using microsatellite DNA markers. Fish and Fisheries 2:93–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, M. M., Ruzzante, D. E., Nielsen, E. E., Bekkevold, D., and Mensberg, K.-L.. 2002. Long-term effective population sizes, temporal stability of genetic composition and potential for adaptation in anadromous brown trout (Salmo trutta) populations. Molecular Ecology 11:2523–2535CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanski, I. 1999. Metapopulation Ecology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, S., and A. Taylor. 1997. Empirical evidence for metapopulation dynamics. Pp. 27–42 in Hanski, I. A., and Gilpin, M. E. (eds.) Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Heath, D. D., Pollard, S., and Herbinger, C.. 2001. Genetic structure and relationships among steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) populations in British Columbia. Heredity 86:618–627CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heath, D. D., Busch, C., Kelly, J., and Atagi, D.. 2002. Temporal change in genetic structure and effective population size in steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Molecular Ecology 11:197–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hebert, C., Danzman, R. G., Jones, M. W., and Bernatchez, L.. 2000. Hydrography and population genetic structure in brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis, Mitchill) from easternCanada. Molecular Ecology 9:971–982CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hedrick, P. 1999. Perspective: highly variable loci and their interpretation in evolution and conservation. Evolution 53:313–318CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hedrick, P. W. 2001. Conservation genetics: where are we now?Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16:629–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrick, S. 2002. Seasonal changes in distribution of coastal cutthroat trout in an isolated watershed. M.Sc. thesis. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University.
Hendry, A. P., and Stearns, S. C. (eds.) 2004. Evolution Illuminated: Salmon and Their Relatives. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hendry, A. P., V. Castric, M. T. Kinnison, and T. P. Quinn. 2004. The evolution of philopatry and dispersal: homing versus straying in salmonids. Pp. 52–91 in Hendry, A. P., and Stearns, S. C. (eds.) Evolution Illuminated: Salmon and Their Relatives. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hutchison, D. W., and Templeton, A. R.. 1999. Correlation of pairwise genetic and geographic measures: inferring the relative influence of gene flow and drift on the distribution of genetic variability. Evolution 53:1898–1914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaak, D. J., Thurow, R. F., Rieman, B. E., and Dunham, J. B.. 2003. Temporal variation in synchrony among chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) redd counts from a wilderness area in central Idaho. CanadianJournal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 60:840–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jehle, R., and Arntzen, J. W.. 2002. Microsatellite markers in amphibian conservation genetics. Herpetological Journal 12:1–9Google Scholar
Jonsson, B., and Jonsson, N.. 1993. Partial migration: niche shift versus sexual maturation in fishes. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 3:348–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knudsen, K. L., Muhlfeld, C. C., Sage, G. K., and Leary, R. F.. 2002. Genetic structure of Columbia River redband trout populations in the Kootenai River drainage, Montana, revealed by microsatellite and allozyme loci. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 131:1093–11052.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knutsen, H., Knutsen, J. A., and Jorde, P. E.. 2001. Genetic evidence for mixed origin of recolonized sea trout populations. Heredity 87:207–214CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koizumi, I., and Maekawa, K.. 2004. Metapopulation structure of stream-dwelling Dolly Varden charr inferred from patterns of occurrence in the Sorachi River basin, Hokkaido, Japan. Freshwater Biology 49:973–981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotliar, N. B., and Wiens, J. A.. 1990. Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity. Oikos 59:253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latterell, J. J., Fausch, K. D., Gowan, C., and Riley, S. C.. 1998. Relationship of trout recruitment to snowmelt runoff flows and adult trout abundance in six Colorado mountain streams. Rivers 6:240–250Google Scholar
Manel, S., Schwartz, M. K., Luikart, G., and Taberlet, P.. 2003. Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:189–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McElhany, P., Ruckelshaus, M. H., Ford, M. J., Wainwright, T. C., and Bjorkstedt, E. P.. 2000. Viable Salmonid Populations and the Recovery of Evolutionarily Significant Units. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-42. Seattle, WA: US. Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
Miller, D., Luce, C., and Benda, L.. 2003. Time, space, and episodicity of physical disturbance in streams. Forest Ecology and Management 178:121–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millspaugh, J. J., and Marzluff, J. M.. 2001. Radio Tracking and Animal Populations. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morita, K., and Yamamoto, S.. 2002. Effects of habitat fragmentation by damming on the persistence of stream-dwelling charr populations. Conservation Biology 16:1318–1323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narum, S. R., Contor, C., Talbot, A., and Powell, M. S.. 2004. Genetic divergence of sympatric resident and anadromous forms of Oncorhynchus mykiss in the Walla Walla River, USA. Journal of Fish Biology 65:471–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Näslund, I. 1993. Migratory behavior of brown trout, Salmo trutta L.: implications of genetic and environmental influences. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 2:51–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nei, M. 1973. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 70:3321–3323CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nei, M., Maruyama, T., and Chakraborty, R.. 1975. The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 29:1–10CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nei, M., Tajima, F., and Tateno, Y.. 1983. Accuracy of genetic distances and phylogenetic trees from molecular data. Journal of Molecular Evolution 19:153–170CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neigel, J. E. 1997. A comparison of alternative strategies for estimating gene flow from genetic markers. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28:105–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neville, H. M., Dunham, J. B., and Peacock, M. M.. In press. Landscape attributes and life history variability shape genetic structure of trout populations in a stream network. Landscape Ecology.Google Scholar
Nielsen, E. E., Hansen, M. M., and Loeschcke, V.. 1999. Genetic variation in time and space: microsatellite analysis of extinct and extant populations of Atlantic salmon. Evolution 53:261–268CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nielsen, J. L., and D. A. Powers (eds.) 1995. Evolution and the Aquatic Ecosystem: Defining Unique Units in Population Conservation. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society.
Northcote, T. G. 1992. Migration and residency in stream salmonids: some ecological considerations and evolutionary consequences. Nordic Journal of Freshwater Research 67:5–17Google Scholar
Northcote, T. G., and Hartman, G. F.. 1988. The biology and significance of stream trout populations (Salmo spp.) living above and below waterfalls. Polskie Archiuvum Hydrobiologii 35:409–422Google Scholar
O'Connell, M., and Wright, J. M.. 1997. Microsatellite DNA in fishes. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 7:331–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostergaard, S., Hansen, M. M., Loeschcke, V., and Nielsen, E. E.. 2003. Long-term temporal changes of genetic composition in brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) populations inhabiting an unstable environment. Molecular Ecology 12:3123–3135CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paetkau, D., Calvert, W., Stirling, I., and Strobeck, C.. 1995. Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears. Molecular Ecology 4:347–354CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peacock, M. M. 1997. Determining natal dispersal patterns in a population of North American pikas (Onchotona princeps) using direct mark–resight and indirect genetic methods. Behavioral Ecology 8:340–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacock, M. M., and C. Ray. 2001. Dispersal in pikas (Ochotona princeps): combining genetic and demographic approaches to reveal spatial and temporal patterns. Pp. 43–56 in Clobert, J., Dhondt, A., Danchin, E., and Nichols, J. (eds.) The Evolution of Dispersal. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Peakall, R., Ruibal, M., and Lindenmayer, D. B.. 2003. Spatial autocorrelation analysis offers new insights into gene flow in the Australian bush rat, Rattus fuscipes. Evolution 57:1182–1195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M., and Donnelly, P.. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959Google ScholarPubMed
Quinn, T. P. 1993. A review of homing and straying of wild and hatchery-produced salmon. Fisheries Research 18:29–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rannala, B., and Mountain, J. L.. 1997. Detecting immigration by using multilocus genotypes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 94:9197–9201CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rieman, B. E., and Dunham, J. B.. 2000. Metapopulations of salmonids: a synthesis of life history patterns and empirical observations. Ecology of Freshwater Fishes 9:51–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rieman, B. E., and McIntyre, J. D.. 1995. Occurrence of bull trout in naturally fragmented habitat patches of varied sizes. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 124:285–2962.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rieman, B. E., Lee, D. C., and Thurow, R. F.. 1997. Distribution, status, and likely future trends of bull trout within the Columbia River and Klamath Basins. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 17:1111–11252.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, D. K., Noon, B. R., and Meslow, E. C.. 1997. Biological corridors: form, function, and efficacy.BioScience 47:677–687
Rousset, F. 2001. Genetic approaches to the estimation of dispersal rates. Pp. 18–28 in Clobert, J., Dhondt, A., Danchin, E., and Nichols, J. (eds.) The Evolution of Dispersal. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ryman, N., and Utter, F. (eds.) 1987. Population Genetics, and Fishery Management, Washington Sea Grant Program. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Shrimpton, J. M., and Heath, D. D.. 2003. Census vs. effective population size in chinook salmon: large- and small-scale environmental perturbation effects. Molecular Ecology 12:2571–2583CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sjögren-Gulve, P., and C. Ray. 1996. Large-scale forestry extirpates the pool frog: using logistic regression to model metapopulation dynamics. Pp. 111–137 in McCullough, D. R. (ed.) Metapopulations and Wildlife Conservation and Management. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Slatkin, M. 1985a. Gene flow in natural populations. Annual Reviews of Ecology and Systematics 16:393–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slatkin, M. 1985b. Rare alleles as indicators of gene flow. Evolution 39:53–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slatkin, M. 1987. Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations. Science 236:787–792CrossRef
Slatkin, M. 1993. Isolation by distance in equilibrium and non-equlibrium populations. Evolution 47:264–279CrossRef
Slatkin, M. 1995. A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics 139:457–462
Smedbol, R. K., McPherson, A., Hansen, M. M., and Kenchington, E.. 2002. Myths and moderation in marine “metapopulations”?Fish and Fisheries 3:20–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spruell, P., Riemen, B. E., Knudsen, K. L., Utter, F. M., and Allendorf, F. W.. 1999. Genetic population structure within streams: microsatellite analysis of bull trout populations. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 8:114–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spruell, P., Hemmingsen, A. R., Howell, P. J., Kanda, N., and Allendorf, F. W.. 2003. Conservation genetics of bull trout: geographic distribution of variation at microsatellite loci. Conservation Genetics 4:17–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunnucks, P. 2000. Efficient genetic markers for population biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15:199–203CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, E. B., Stamford, M. D., and Baxter, J. S.. 2003. Population subdivision in westslope cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki lewisi) at the northern periphery of its range: evolutionary inferences and conservation implications. Molecular Ecology 12:2609–2622CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tessier, N., and Bernatchez, L.. 1999. Stability of population structure and genetic diversity across generations assessed by microsatellites among sympatric populations of landlocked Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Molecular Ecology 8:169–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waples, R. S. 1998. Separating the wheat from the chaff: patterns of genetic differentiation in high gene flow species. Journal of Heredity 89:438–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waples, R. S. 2002. Definition and estimation of effective population sizes in the conservation of endangered species. Pp. 147–168 in McCullough, D. R., and Beissinger, S. R. (eds.) Population Viability Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Waples, R. S. 2004. Salmonid insights into effective population size. Pp. 295–314 in Hendry, A. P., and Stearns, S. C. (eds.) Evolution Illuminated: Salmon and Their Relatives. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Waples, R. S., Gustafson, R. G., Weitkamp, L. A.. et al. 2001. Characterizing diversity in salmon from the Pacific Northwest. Journal of Fish Biology 59:1–41Google Scholar
Waser, P. M., and Strobeck, C.. 1998. Genetic signatures of interpopulational dispersal. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13:43–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weir, B. S., and Cockerham, C. C.. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370Google ScholarPubMed
Wenburg, J. K., and Bentzen, P.. 2001. Genetic and behavioral evidence for restricted gene flow among coastal cutthroat trout populations. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 130:1049–10692.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitlock, M. C., and McCauley, D. E.. 1999. Indirect measures of gene flow and migration: Fst/=1/(4Nm+1). Heredity 83:117–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiens, J. A. 2002. Riverine landscapes: taking landscape ecology into the water. FreshwaterBiology 47:501–515Google Scholar
Wilson, A. J., Hutchings, J. A., and Ferguson, M. M.. 2004. Dispersal in a stream dwelling salmonid: inferences from tagging and microsatellite studies. Conservation Genetics 5:25–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wofford, J. E. B., Gresswell, R. E., and Banks, M. A.. 2004. Influence of barriers to movement on within-watershed genetic variation of coastal cutthroat trout. Ecological Applications 15:628–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16:97–159Google ScholarPubMed
Wright, S. 1940. Breeding structure of populations in relation to speciation. American Naturalist 74:232–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. 1951. The genetical structure of populations. Annals of Eugenics 15:323–354CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamamoto, S., Morita, K., Kitano, S.. et al. 2004. Phylogeography of white-spotted charr (Salvelinus leucomaenis) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Zoological Science 21:229–240CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, K. A. 1999. Managing the decline of Pacific salmon: metapopulation theory and artificial recolonization as ecological mitigation. CanadianJournal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 56:1700–1706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, S. F., McLellan, J. G., and Shaklee, J. B.. 2004. Genetic integrity and microgeographic population structure of westslope cutthroat trout, Oncorhynchus clarki lewisi, in the Pend Oreille Basin in Washington. Environmental Biology of Fishes 69:127–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×