Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T01:07:35.685Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Hydrologic connectivity: a neglected dimension of conservation biology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2010

Kevin R. Crooks
Affiliation:
Colorado State University
M. Sanjayan
Affiliation:
The Nature Conservancy, Virginia
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Hydrologic connectivity refers to water-mediated transfer of matter, energy, and/or organisms within or between elements of the hydrologic cycle (sensu Pringle 2001). While this property is essential to maintaining the biological integrity of ecosystems, it also serves to perpetuate the flow of exotic species, human-derived nutrients, and toxic wastes in the landscape. All too often, we have acknowledged the importance of hydrologic connectivity in hindsight – as a result of environmental crises. Examples range from: the transport of exotic species that disrupt the food webs of rivers and lakes (e.g., Stokstad 2003); to the occurrence of extremely high levels of persistent organic pollutants (e.g., polychlorinated biphenyls PCBs) that bioaccumulate in global “hotspots” such as the Arctic (e.g., Aguilar et al. 2002); to effects of dams which impede riverine transport of essential elements such as silicon to coastal regions – which has been implicated in coastal eutrophication and the creation of coastal dead zones (e.g., Humborg et al. 2000).

Management and policy decisions regarding land-use activities are often made in the absence of adequate information on hydrologic connectivity in the landscape. An important area of research is to understand how human alterations of this property (e.g., dams, stream flow regulation, water diversion, inter-basin water transfers, water extraction) influence ecological patterns on local, regional, and global scales. Half of the accessible global freshwater runoff has already been appropriated by humans and this could climb to 70% by 2025 (Postel et al. 1996).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aguilar, A., Borrell, A., and Reijnders, P. J. H.. 2002. Geographical and temporal variation in levels of organochlorine contaminants in marine mammals. Marine Environmental Research 53:425–452CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amoros, C., and Bornette, G.. 1999. Antagonistic and cumulative effects of connectivity: a predictive model based on aquatic vegetation in riverine wetlands. Large Rivers 11:311–327Google Scholar
Amoros, C., and Roux, A. L.. 1988. Interaction between water bodies within the floodplain of large rivers: function and development of connectivity. Munstersche Geographische Arbeiten 29:125–130Google Scholar
Anderson, C. 1991. Cholera epidemic traced to risk miscalculation. Nature 354:255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ben-David, M., Hanley, T. A., and Schell, D. M.. 1998. Fertilization of terrestrial vegetation by spawning pacific salmon: the role of flooding and predator activity. Oikos 83:47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benke, A. C. 1990. A perspective on America's vanishing streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 9:77–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benstead, J. P., March, J. G., Pringle, C. M., and Scatena, F. N.. 1999. Effects of a low-head dam and water abstraction on migratory tropical stream biota. Ecological Applications 9:656–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boon, P. J., Callow, P., and Petts, G. E. (eds.) 1992. River Conservation and Management. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Colburn, T., Dumanoski, D., and Peterson-Myers, P.. 1997. Our Stolen Future. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Colwell, R. R., and W. M. Spira. 1992. The ecology of Vibrio cholerae. Pp. 107–127 in Barua, D., and Greenough, III W. B. (eds.) Cholera. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crook, K. E. 2005. Quantifying the effects of water withdrawal on streams draining the Caribbean National Forest, Puerto Rico. M.Sc. thesis, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
Derocher, A. E., H. Wolkers, T. Colburn, et al. 2003. Contaminants in Svalbard polar bear samples archived since 1967 and possible population level effects. Science of the Total Environment 301:163–174CrossRef
Dudgeon, D. 2000. Going with the flow: large-scale hydrological changes and prospects for riverine biodiversity in tropical Asia. BioScience 50:793–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudley, N., and Stolton, S.. 2003. Can protected areas quench our thirst?Conservation in Practice 4:30–31Google Scholar
Fagan, W. F. 2002. Connectivity, fragmentation, and extinction risk in dendritic metapopulations. Ecology 83:3243–3249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frayer, W. E., Peters, D. D., and Pywell, H. R.. 1989. Wetlands of California Central Valley: Status and Trends – 1939 to the mid-1980s. Portland, OR: US Fish and Wildlife Service.Google Scholar
Freeman, M. C., Pringle, C. M., Greathouse, E. A., and Freeman, B. J.. 2003. Ecosystem-level consequences of migratory faunal depletion caused by dams. American Fisheries Society Symposium 35:255–266Google Scholar
Freeman, R., W. Wowerman, T. Grubb, et al. 2002. Opening rivers to Trojan fish: the ecological dilemma of dam removal in the Great Lakes. Conservation in Practice 3:35–40CrossRef
Giesy, J. P., D. A. Verbrugge, R. A. Othout, et al. 1995. Contaminants of fishes from Great Lakes-influenced sections and above dams of three Michigan rivers. III. Implications for health of bald eagles. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 29:309–321CrossRef
Gillilan, D. M., and Brown, T. C.. 1997. Instream Flow Protection: Seeking a Balance in Western Water Use. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Gotelli, N. J., and Taylor, C. M.. 1999. Testing metapopulation models with stream-fish assemblages. Evolutionary Ecology Research 1:835–845Google Scholar
Goulding, M., Smith, N. J. H., and Mahar, D. J.. 1996. Floods of Fortune: Ecology and Economy along the Amazon. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Greathouse, E. 2004. Consequences of migratory faunal extirpation upstream from large dams in Puerto Rico. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
Greathouse, E. A., Pringle, C. M., McDowell, W. H., and Holmquist, J. G.. 2006. Indirect upstream effects of dams: consequences of migratory consumer extirpation in Puerto Rico. Ecological Applications 16:339–352CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gresh, T., Lichatowich, J., and Schoonmaker, P.. 2000. An estimation of historic and current levels of salmon production in the northeast Pacific ecosystem. Fisheries 25:15–212.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grigorovich, J. A., R. I. Colautti, E. L. Mills, et al. 2003. Ballast-mediated animal introduction in the Laurentian Great Lakes: retrospective and prospective analyses. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 60:740–756CrossRef
Holmquist, J. G., Schmidt-Gengenbach, J. M., and Yoshioka, B. B.. 1998. High dams and marine-freshwater linkages: effects on native and introduced fauna in the Caribbean. Conservation Biology 12:621–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, R. W., Davis, G. J., and Mosca, V.. 1991. The demographic significance of “sink” populations. Biological Conservation 57:239–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humborg, C. D., J. Conley, L. Rahm, et al. 2000. Silicate retention in river basins: far-reaching effects on biogeochemistry and aquatic food webs. Ambio 29:45–50CrossRef
Iwane, T., Urase, T., and Yamamoto, K.. 2001. Possible impact of treated wastewater discharge on incidence of antibiotic resistant bacteria in river water. Water Science and Technology 43:91–99CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, S. W., and Carothers, S. W.. 1987. External threats: the dilemma of resource management on the Colorado River in Grand Canyon National Park, USA. Environmental Management 11:99–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurance, W. F., and Bierregaard, R. O. Jr. 1997. Tropical Forest Remnants: Ecology, Management, and Conservation of Fragmented Communities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lemly, A. D., Finger, S. E., and Nelson, M. K.. 1993. Ecological implications of subsurface irrigation drainage. Journal of Arid Environments 28:85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemly, A. D., Kingsford, R. T., and Thompson, J. R.. 2000. Irrigated agriculture and wildlife conservation: conflict on a global scale. Environmental Management 25:485–512CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lips, K. R., Reeve, J. D., and Witters, L. R.. 2003. Ecological traits predicting amphibian population declines in Central America. Conservation Biology 17:1078–1088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. G., Pringle, C. M., Townsend, M. J., and Wilson, A. I.. 2002. Effects of freshwater shrimp assemblages on benthic communities along an altitude gradient of a tropical island stream. Freshwater Biology 47:377–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Master, L. 1990. The imperiled status of North American aquatic animals. Biodiversity Network News 3:1–8Google Scholar
Master, L. L., Flack, S. R., and Stein, B. A. (eds.) 1998. Rivers of Life: Critical Watersheds for Protecting Freshwater Biodiversity, Special Publication of the Nature Conservancy. Arlington, VA: NatureServe.Google Scholar
McArthur J. V., and R. C. Tuckfield. 2000. Spatial patterns in antibiotic resistance among stream bacteria: effects of industrial pollution. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 66:3722–3726CrossRef
Meffe, G. K. 1987. Conserving fish genomes: philosophies and practices. Environmental Biology of Fishes 18:3–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Middleton, S., and Liittschwager, D.. 1994. Witness: Endangered Species of North America. San Francisco, CA: Chronicle Books.Google Scholar
Mills, E. L., Leach, J. H., Carlton, J. T., and Secor, C. L.. 1994. Exotic species and the integrity of the Great Lakes: lessons from the past. BioScience 44:666–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nehlsen, W., Williams, J. E, and Jicharowich, J. A.. 1991. Pacific salmon at the crossroads: Stocks at risk from California, Oregon, Idaho, and Washington. Fisheries 16:4–212.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pacific Rivers Council, . 1993. The Decline of Coho Salmon and the Need for Protection under the Endangered Species Act.Eugene, OR: Pacific Rivers Council.
Poff, M. L., Allan, J. D., Bain, M. B., et al. 1997. The natural flow paradigm. BioScience 47: 769–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Policansky, D., and Magnuson, J. J.. 1998. Genetics, metapopulations, and ecosystem management of fisheries. Ecological Applications 8:119–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postel, S. L., Daily, G. C., and Ehrlich, P. R.. 1996. Human appropriation of renewable freshwater. Science 271:785–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pringle, C. M. 1996. Atyid shrimp (Decapoda: Atyidae) influence spatial heterogeneity of algal communities over different scales in tropical montane streams, Puerto Rico. Freshwater Biology 35:125–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pringle, C. M. 1997. Exploring how disturbance is transmitted upstream: going against the flow. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16:425–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pringle, C. M. 2000. Threats to U.S. public lands from cumulative hydrologic alterations outside of their boundaries. Ecological Applications 10:971–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pringle, C. M. 2001. Hydrologic connectivity and the management of biological reserves: a global perspective. Ecological Applications 11:981–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pringle, C. M. 2003a. The need for a more predictive understanding of hydrologic connectivity. Aquatic Conservation 13:467–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pringle, C. M. 2003b. What is hydrologic connectivity and why is it ecologically important?Hydrological Processes 17:2685–2689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pringle, C. M. 2003c. Interacting effects of altered hydrology and contaminant transport: Emerging ecological patterns of global concern. Pp. 85–107 in Holland, M., Blood, E., and Shaffer, L. (eds.) Achieving Sustainable Freshwater Systems: A Web of Connections. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Pringle, C. M., and F. J. Triska. 2000. Emergent biological patterns and surface-subsurface interactions at landscape scales. Pp. 167–193 in Jones, J. B., and Mulholland, P. J. (eds.) Stream and Groundwaters. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pringle, C. M., Hemphill, N. H., McDowell, W., Bednarek, A., and March, J.. 1999. Linking species and ecosystems: different biotic assemblages cause interstream differences in organic matter. Ecology 80:1860–1872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pringle, C. M., Freeman, M. C., and Freeman, B. J.. 2000. Regional effects of hydrologic alterations on riverine macrobiota in the New World: Tropical-temperate comparisons. BioScience 50:807–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricciardi, A. 2001. Facilitative interactions among invaders: is an “invasional meltdown” occurring in the Great Lakes?Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58:2513–2525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, D. M., McCully, P., and Pringle, C. M.. 2000. Global-scale environmental effects of hydrological alterations: introduction. BioScience 50:746–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelhas, J., and Greenberg, R.. 1996. Forest Patches in Tropical Landscapes. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Shafer, C. L. 1990. Nature Reserves. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Skaare, J. U., H. J. Larsen, E. Lie, et al. 2002. Ecological risk assessment of persistent organic pollutants in the arctic. Toxicology 181:193–197
Smith, S. D., Wellington, A. B., Nachlinger, J. L., and Fox, C. A.. 1991. Functional responses of riparian vegetation to stream flow diversion in the eastern Sierra Nevada. Ecological Applications 1:89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soulé, M. E., and Terborgh, J. (eds.) 1999. Continental Conservation: Scientific Foundations for Regional Reserve Networks. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Stanford, J. A., and J. V. Ward. 1992. Management of aquatic resources in large catchments: recognizing interactions between ecosystem connectivity and environmental disturbance. Pp. 91–124 in Naiman, R. J. (ed.) Watershed Management. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanford, J. A., and Ward, J. V.. 1993. An ecosystem perspective of alluvial rivers: connectivity and the hyporheic corridor. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 12:48–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoeckel, J. A., Schneider, D. W., Soeken, L. A., Blodgett, K. D., and Sparks, R. E.. 1997. Larval dynamics of a riverine metapopulation: implications for zebra mussel recruitment, dispersal, and control in a large-river system. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16:586–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokstad, E. 2003. Can well-timed jolts keep out unwanted exotic fish?Science 301:157–158CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strayer, D. L., Caraco, N. F., Cole, J. J., Findlay, S., and Pace, M. L.. 1999. Transformation of freshwater ecosystems by bivalves. BioScience 49:19–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stromberg, J. C., and Patten, D. T.. 1992. Mortality and age of black cottonwood stands along diverted and undiverted streams in the eastern Sierra Nevada, California. Madrono 39:205–223Google Scholar
Taylor, D. J., and Hebert, P. D. N.. 1993. Cryptic intercontinental hybridization in Daphnia (Crustacea): the ghost of introductions past. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 254:163–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tockner, K., and Stanford, J. A.. 2002. Riverine flood plains; present state and future trends. Environmental Conservation 29:308–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avyle, M. J., and Evans, J. W.. 1990. Temperature selection by striped bass in a Gulf of Mexico coastal river system. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 10:58–662.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, J. V. 1997. An expansive perspective of riverine landscapes: pattern and process across scales. River Ecosystems 6:52–60Google Scholar
Ward, J. V., and Stanford, J. A.. 1989a. The four-dimensional nature of lotic ecosystems. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 8:2–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, J. V., and J. A. Stanford. 1989b. Riverine ecosystems: the influence of man on catchment dynamics and fish ecology. Pp. 56–64 in D P. Dodge (ed.) Proceedings of the International Large River Symposium, Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences No. 160. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Department of Fisheries and Oceans.
Wiens, J. A. 2002. Riverine landscapes: taking landscape ecology into the water. Freshwater Biology 47:501–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, T. C., Harvey, J. W., Franke, O. Lehn, and Alley, W. M.. 1998. Ground Water and Surface Water: A Single Resource, US Geological Survey Circular (USA) No. 1139. Denver, CO: US Geological Survey.Google Scholar
Young, B. E., K. R. Lips, J. K. Reaser, et al. 2001. Population declines and priorities for amphibian conservation in Latin America. Conservation Biology 15:1213–1223CrossRef

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×