Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 1991
  • Online publication date: September 2009

8 - Autocracy, corporate law, and the dilemma of cultural delay

Summary

Someday the future historian of our era will note its curious feature: In small clashes over trifling issues he will discover the slow but relentless action of the powerful currents of history.

– Petr B. Struve (1897)

The main theme of the history of Russian corporate law – the survival of the restrictive features of the legislation of 1836 into the era of railroads, steel mills, and electricity – provides an instructive reminder of the essential continuity of tsarist policy toward capitalist institutions. Created to protect investors from unscrupulous manipulators of corporate stock prices, the law of 1836 established a procedure for incorporation that placed the fate of each new company in the hands of the bureaucracy. Neither Reutern, Witte, nor Timashev abandoned this cumbersome device in favor of the registration system (iavochnaia sistema), which predominated in Europe, the United States, and even Japan by the end of the nineteenth century.

An equally important theme is that piecemeal changes in the law of 1836, such as the recognition of unnamed corporate shares by the 1860s and the legalization of futures deals in 1893, did not signify increased liberalization. The ministers of Alexander III and Nicholas II in fact imposed on corporate officials and employees ever greater restrictions – on residence, landownership, and economic activity – that had no foundations except premodern ethnic, religious, and national prejudices.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

The Corporation under Russian Law, 1800–1917
  • Online ISBN: 9780511528934
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511528934
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×