Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 2
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Bentivegna, Sara and Marchetti, Rita 2018. Journalists at a crossroads: Are traditional norms and practices challenged by Twitter?. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, Vol. 19, Issue. 2, p. 270.

    Nechushtai, Efrat 2018. From Liberal to Polarized Liberal? Contemporary U.S. News in Hallin and Mancini’s Typology of News Systems. The International Journal of Press/Politics, Vol. 23, Issue. 2, p. 183.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2016
  • Online publication date: June 2016

4 - The many crises of Western journalism: A comparative analysis of economic crises, professional crises, and crises of confidence

from PART I - THE CRISIS NARRATIVE
Summary

INTRODUCTION

Journalism in the “Western world” of high-income democracies is seen by many as being in a crisis. This, in itself, is nothing new. Because it is important and imperfect, journalism is almost always seen by someone somewhere as facing some sort of crisis. But the scale, scope, and societal consequences of crises changes over time. In the early twenty-first century, Western journalism faces a series of specific and quite different potential and real crises, only some of which are directly inherited from the twentieth century. Current crises are in part a result of the ongoing fundamental structural transformation of our media systems, where economic and technological forces in combination generate ever more intense competition for attention, for advertisements, and for audiences’ media spending. These developments put existing forms of journalism as well as the institutions that sustain and constrain journalism under considerable pressure across the Western world. But the crises are also tied to inherited differences in how journalism and the news media organizations that have historically hosted the journalistic occupation developed in the post-war period, the ways in which journalism as a profession was defined, and its status in a wider – changing – society. This means that different countries face different crises of journalism.

The main real and potential crises of today can, I will suggest, be seen as three distinct kinds: first, an economic crisis concerning the very existence of the news media industry that underwrites journalism as an occupation, a form of salaried employment, second, a professional crisis concerning the demarcation of journalism itself, its separation from other kinds of work, and, third, a crisis of confidence concerning the relations between journalism and the people who make up the public that journalism claims and aims to serve (cf. Gitlin 2011). One could imagine other crises too, and journalism has historically been seen as facing a range and succession of different crises at various points (Breese 2012). But there does not, for example, seem to be a crisis of demand, as most people continue to use news and name it their most important source of information about public affairs. Similarly, phone hacking revelations in the UK, examples of plagiarism in many countries, and similar instances might suggest journalism is facing an ethical crisis.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

The Crisis of Journalism Reconsidered
  • Online ISBN: 9781316050774
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316050774
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
Abbott, Andrew. 1988. The System of Professions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2006. The Civil Sphere. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Althaus, Scott L. 2002. “American News Consumption during Times of National Crisis.” PS: Political Science & Politics 35 (03): 517–521. doi:10.1017/S104909650200077X.
Anderson, C.W. 2011. “Between Creative and Quantified Audiences.” Journalism 12 (5): 550–566. doi:10.1177/1464884911402451.
Anderson, C. W. and Schudson, Michael. 2009. “Objectivity, Professionalism, and Truth Seeking in Journalism.” In The Handbook of Journalism Studies, edited by Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin and Hanitzsch, Thomas, pp. 88–101. London: Routledge.
Blumler, Jay G, and Gurevitch, Michael. 1995. The Crisis of Public Communication. London: Routledge.
Breese, Elizabeth Butler. 2012. “Interpreting the News.” PhD, Connecticut: Yale University. http://search.proquest.com/docview/1269522648/abstract?accountid=14732.
Bruno, Nicola and Nielsen, Rasmus Kleis. 2012. “Survival Is Success.” Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
Chalaby, Jean K. 1996. “Journalism as an Anglo-American Invention.” European Journal of Communication 11 (3): 303–326.
Costera Meijer, Irene. 2010. “Democratizing Journalism?.” Journalism Studies 11 (3): 327–342. doi:10.1080/14616700903500256.
Esser, Frank and Brüggemann, Michael. 2010. “The Strategic Crisis of German Newspapers.” In The Changing Business of Journalism and Its Implications for Democracy, edited by Levy, David A. L and Nielsen, Rasmus Kleis, pp. 39–54. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
Gitlin, Todd. 2011. “A Surfeit of Crises.” In Will the Last Reporter Please Turn out the Lights, edited by McChesney, Robert Waterman and Pickard, Victor W., pp. 92–102. New York: New Press.
Hallin, Daniel C and Mancini, Paolo. 2004. Comparing Media Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Humphreys, Peter. 1996. Mass Media and Media Policy in Western Europe. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Kuhn, Raymond. 2011. The Media in Contemporary France. Berkshire: Open University Press.
Ladd, Jonathan M. 2012. Why Americans Hate the Media and How It Matters. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lewis, Seth C. 2012. “The Tension Between Professional Control and Open Participation.” Information, Communication & Society 15 (6): 836–866.
Nielsen, Rasmus Kleis. 2012. Ten Years That Shook the Media World. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
Norris, Pippa. 2011. Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Örnebring, Henrik. 2009. The Two Professionalisms of Journalism. Reuters Institute Working Paper. Oxford.
Rottwilm, Philip. 2014. The Future of Journalistic Work. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
Schudson, Michael. 1978. Discovering the News. New York: Basic Books.
Williams, Andy, Wardle, Claire, and Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin. 2010. “Have They Got News for Us?.” Journalism Practice 5 (1): 85–99. doi:10.1080/17512781003670031.
Zelizer, Barbie. 2004. Taking Journalism Seriously. Thousand Oaks, CA; London: Sage.