Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 17
  • Cited by
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Macqueen, Susy Knoch, Ute Wigglesworth, Gillian Nordlinger, Rachel Singer, Ruth McNamara, Tim and Brickle, Rhianna 2018. The impact of national standardized literacy and numeracy testing on children and teaching staff in remote Australian Indigenous communities. Language Testing, p. 026553221877575.

    Barni, Monica and Salvati, Luisa 2017. Language Testing and Assessment. p. 417.

    Weideman, Albert 2017. Responsible Design in Applied Linguistics: Theory and Practice. Vol. 28, Issue. , p. 149.

    ElHadad, Ghada Naimie, Zahra AbuZaid, Rana Ahmed and Thing, Davina Foo Yan 2017. Social Interactions and Networking in Cyber Society. p. 71.

    Macqueen, Susy Pill, John and Knoch, Ute 2016. Language test as boundary object: Perspectives from test users in the healthcare domain. Language Testing, Vol. 33, Issue. 2, p. 271.

    Wang, Ge 2016. Pains and Gains of Ethnic Multilingual Learners in China. Vol. 17, Issue. , p. 27.

    Barni, Monica and Salvati, Luisa 2016. Language Testing and Assessment. p. 1.

    HAIM, ORLY 2015. Investigating Transfer of Academic Proficiency Among Trilingual Immigrant Students: A Holistic Tri-Directional Approach. The Modern Language Journal, Vol. 99, Issue. 4, p. 696.

    d’Agnese, Vasco 2015. PISA’s colonialism: Success, money, and the eclipse of education. Power and Education, Vol. 7, Issue. 1, p. 56.

    Park, Gloria and Henderson Lee, Sarah 2014. Critical Perspectives on World Englishes: An Inquiry into Our Disciplinary Spaces as Teacher-Scholars. TESOL Journal, Vol. 5, Issue. 3, p. 395.

    Ydesen, Christian 2014. High-stakes educational testing and democracy – antagonistic or symbiotic relationship?. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, Vol. 9, Issue. 2, p. 97.

    Puspawati, Indah 2014. Fairness Issues in a Standardized English Test for Nonnative Speakers of English. TESOL Journal, Vol. 5, Issue. 3, p. 555.

    Sidiropoulou, Maria and Tsapaki, Efpraxia 2014. Conceptualisations across English–Greek parallel press data: a foreign language teaching perspective. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, Vol. 8, Issue. 1, p. 32.

    Gao, F. 2012. Teacher identity, teaching vision, and Chinese language education for South Asian students in Hong Kong. Teachers and Teaching, Vol. 18, Issue. 1, p. 89.

    Lazaraton, Anne 2010. From Cloze to Consequences and Beyond: An Interview With Elana Shohamy. Language Assessment Quarterly, Vol. 7, Issue. 3, p. 255.

    Crookes, Graham 2010. Language Teachers’ Philosophies of Teaching: Bases for Development and Possible Lines of Investigation. Language and Linguistics Compass, Vol. 4, Issue. 12, p. 1126.

    Damber, Ulla 2009. Using inclusion, high demands and high expectations to resist the deficit syndrome: a study of eight Grade three classes overachieving in reading. Literacy, Vol. 43, Issue. 1, p. 43.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2004
  • Online publication date: October 2012

Chapter 5 - Assessment in multicultural societies: Applying democratic principles and practices to language testing

Summary

Introduction: The power of tests

This chapter will discuss dimensions of the power of language tests and their special roles in multicultural societies in which different groups are rejecting assimilative notions for the sake of recognition and interactive models. By discussing a number of language testing scenarios, the chapter will show how tests serve as tools to perpetuate de facto assimilative models. It will then propose a number of principles and assessment practices that better match democratic societies by giving voice to different groups, applying interactive assessment models, monitoring the uses of tests, protecting the rights of test takers, and recommending that language testers assume greater responsibilities for the tools they develop.

This chapter is contextualized within the framework of critical language testing (CLT) (Shohamy, 1998, 2001a, 2001b), an area that applies theories of critical pedagogy and critical applied linguistics (Kramsch, 1993; Pennycook, 2001) to the domain of language testing. CLT emerges from the need to examine, question, and monitor the uses of assessment tools in education and society, especially as they are used by institutions of power and authority. The need to examine, question, and monitor the uses of language tests is a result of growing evidence that tests are used in powerful ways in a variety of contexts. In this regard, Tollefson (1995) claims that tests represent three sources of power: state, discourse, and ideology. State power is understood in terms of bureaucracies, discourse power in terms of the imposition of tests by unequal individuals (the tester and the test taker), and ideological power in terms of the belief of what is right and what is wrong, what is good knowledge and what is not, what is worthwhile economically and what is not.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Critical Pedagogies and Language Learning
  • Online ISBN: 9781139524834
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524834
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×