Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T08:58:37.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Theoretical Underpinnings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2013

Michael P. Scharf
Affiliation:
Case Western Reserve University, Ohio
Get access

Summary

To provide theoretical infrastructure for the exploration of the Grotian Moment concept, this chapter examines the scholarly debate about the nature and formation of customary international law. Then, building on the literature examining rapid formation of customary international law, the chapter explores the role played by context and fundamental technological and tactical change as an accelerating agent.

The Importance of Customary International Law

To paraphrase Mark Twain, reports of the death of customary international law are greatly exaggerated. Despite its widespread codification in treaties during the last century, the unwritten norms, rules, and principles of customary law continue to play a crucial role in international relations. There are three primary reasons for customary international law’s continuing vitality.

First, in some ways, customary international law possesses more jurisprudential power than does treaty law. Unlike treaties, which bind only the parties thereto, once a norm is established as customary international law, it is binding on all states, even those new to a type of activity, so long as they did not persistently object during its formation. Since some international law rules coexist in treaties and custom, customary international law expands the reach of the rules to those states that have not yet ratii ed the treaty. In addition, the customary international law status of the rules can apply to actions of the treaty parties that predated the entry into force of the treaty. Moreover, states that were not even in existence at the time the norm evolved, such as colonies or former parts of a larger state, and therefore never had an opportunity to express their positions as a particular rule emerged, are nonetheless generally deemed to be bound by the entire corpus of customary international law existing upon the date they become sovereign states. Finally, unlike some treaties that by their terms permit withdrawal, customary international law does not recognize a unilateral right to withdraw from it.

Type
Chapter
Information
Customary International Law in Times of Fundamental Change
Recognizing Grotian Moments
, pp. 29 - 62
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bederman, David, Acquiescence, Objection and the Death of Customary International Law, 21 Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 31, 43 (2010)Google Scholar
Kaplow, David, International Legal Standards and the Weaponization of Outer Space, in Space: The Next Generation – Conference Report, March 31– April 1, 2008, United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (2008), at 161Google Scholar
Bradley, Curtis A. and Gulati, Mitu, Customary International Law and Withdrawal Rights in an Age of Treaties, 21 Duke Journal of International and Comparative Law1 (2010)Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch, The Function of Law in the International Community272–90 (1933)
Treves, Tullio, Customary International Law, in Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2012), at para. 25, available at (last accessed February 9, 2013)
Baxter, Richard, Multilateral Treaties as Evidence of Customary International Law, 41 British Year Book of International Law275, 300 (1965–6)Google Scholar
Kaplow, David, International Legal Standards and the Weaponization of Outer Space, in Space: The Next Generation – Conference Report, 31 March 31–April 1, 2008, United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (2008), at 160Google Scholar
McDougal, M. S. and Schlei, N. A., The Hydrogen Bomb Tests in Perspective: Lawful Measures for Security, 64 Yale Law Journal648 (1955)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Anthea E., Traditional and Modern Approaches to Customary International Law: A Reconciliation, 95 American Journal of International Law757, 758 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendelson, M. H., What Price Expropriation? Compensation for Expropriation: The Case Law, 79 American Journal of International Law414, 1041 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akehurst, M., Custom as a Source of International Law, 47 British Year Book of International Law1, 12 (1974–5)Google Scholar
Roberts, Anthea E., Traditional and Modern Approaches to Customary International Law: A Reconciliation, 95 American Journal of International Law757, 767 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, critiques this as a “democratic deficit.” Anthea E. Roberts, Traditional and Modern Approaches to Customary International Law: A Reconciliation, 95 American Journal of International Law757, 767 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bederman, David J., Acquiescence, Objection and the Death of Customary International Law 21 Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law31, 38 (2010)Google Scholar
Scharf, Michael P. and Day, Margaux, The International Court of Justice’s Treatment of Circumstantial Evidence and Adverse Inferences, 13 Chicago Journal of International Law123, 128 (2012)Google Scholar
Roberts, Anthea E., Traditional and Modern Approaches to Customary International Law: A Reconciliation, 95 American Journal of International Law757, 775 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Bin, United Nations Resolutions on Outer Space: “Instant” International Customary Law? 5 Indian Journal of International Law23 (1963)Google Scholar
Kerwin, Gregory J., The Role of United Nations General Assembly Resolutions in Determining Principles of International Law in United States Courts, 1983 Duke L. J. 876, 879 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Anthea E., Traditional and Modern Approaches to Customary International Law: A Reconciliation, 95 American Journal of International Law 757, 763 (2001)Google Scholar
Schwebel, Stephen, The Effect of Resolutions of the U.N. General Assembly on Customary International Law, 73 Proc. Of the Am. Soc’y of Int’l L. 301, 308 (1979)Google Scholar
Scharf, Michael P., Swapping Amnesty for Peace: Was There a Duty to Prosecute International Crimes in Haiti? 31 Texas Int’l L. J. 1, 41 (1996)Google Scholar
Roberts, Anthea E., Traditional and Modern Approaches to Customary International Law: A Reconciliation, 95 American Journal of International Law757 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Niels, Customary Law without Custom? Rules, Principles, and the Role of State Practice in International Norm Creation, 23 American University International Law Review301 (2008)Google Scholar
Charney, J., Universal International Law, 87 American Journal of International Law529, 547 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplow, David, International Legal Standards and the Weaponization of Outer Space, in Space: The Next Generation – Conference Report, March 31–April 1, 2008, United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (2008), at 162Google Scholar
Yearbook of the Institute of International Law (1982), at Conclusion 14
Lenoir, Noelle, Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights: The First Legal and Ethical Framework at the Global Level, 30 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 537, 551 (1999)Google ScholarPubMed
Ramey, Major Robert A., Armed Conflict on the Final Frontier: The Law of War in Space, 48 A.F.L. Rev. 1, 110n485 (2000)Google Scholar
Rosenstock, Robert, The Declaration of Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations: A Survey, 65 Am. J. Int’l L. 713, 715–16 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwebel, Stephen, The Effect of Resolutions of the U.N. General Assembly on Customary International Law 73 Proc. Of the Am. Soc’y of Int’l L. 301, 302 (1979)Google Scholar
Kirgis, Frederic. L., Jr., Custom on a Sliding Scale, 81 American Journal of International Law146, 149 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tasioulas, John, In Defense of Relative Normativity: Communitarian Values and the Nicaragua Case, 16 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies85, 109 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirgis, Frederic L. Jr., Custom on a Sliding Scale, 81 American Journal of International Law146, 149 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Anthea E., Traditional and Modern Approaches to Customary International Law: A Reconciliation, 95 American Journal of International Law757, 774 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tunkin, G. I., Remarks on the Judicial Nature of Customary Norms in International Law 49 California Law Review419 (1961)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tunkin, G. I., Remarks on the Juridical Nature of Customary Norms of International Law, 49 California Law Review419, 420 (1961)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Anthea E., Traditional and Modern Approaches to Customary International Law: A Reconciliation, 95 American Journal of International Law757, 767 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Stephen C., Nelson, P. A., and Chien, Paul, The Cambrian Explosion: Biology’s Big Bang (2001), at n. 6
Treves, Tullio, Customary International Law, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2012), at para. 24, available at: (last accessed February 9, 2013)
Report of the International Law Association, Committee on Formation of Customary (General) International Law, London Conference (2000), at 20

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Theoretical Underpinnings
  • Michael P. Scharf, Case Western Reserve University, Ohio
  • Book: Customary International Law in Times of Fundamental Change
  • Online publication: 05 June 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139649407.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Theoretical Underpinnings
  • Michael P. Scharf, Case Western Reserve University, Ohio
  • Book: Customary International Law in Times of Fundamental Change
  • Online publication: 05 June 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139649407.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Theoretical Underpinnings
  • Michael P. Scharf, Case Western Reserve University, Ohio
  • Book: Customary International Law in Times of Fundamental Change
  • Online publication: 05 June 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139649407.004
Available formats
×