Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T06:18:47.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Democratization in Postcommunist Europe

Illiberal Regimes and the Leverage of the European Union

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Milada Anna Vachudova
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Valerie Bunce
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Michael McFaul
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Kathryn Stoner-Weiss
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Get access

Summary

The European Union may well be presiding over the most successful democracy-promotion program ever implemented by an international actor. All of the states that have become credible future EU members over the last decade are making progress toward liberal democracy and more transparent market economies. The puzzle is one of causation: Does the EU only accept liberal democracies? Or does the condition of being a credible future EU member create incentives for political actors to make their political agendas compatible with liberal democracy and the state's bid for EU membership?

The convergence that we see toward liberal democracy today is all the more puzzling given the divergence in regimes in the region some fifteen years ago. In some postcommunist states, democratically elected governments began laying the foundations of liberal democracy and implementing comprehensive economic reforms immediately after the collapse of the communist regime. By liberal democracy, I mean a political system where state institutions and democratically elected rulers respect juridical limits on their powers and political liberties. They uphold the rule of law, a separation of powers, and boundaries between the state and the economy. They also uphold basic liberties, such as speech, assembly, religion, and property. Important for our cases, they do not violate the limits on their powers or the political liberties of citizens in order to suppress rival political parties or groups.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Tucker, Joshua A., Pacek, Alexander C., and Berinsky, Adam J., “Transitional Winners and Losers: Attitudes toward EU Membership in Post-Communist Countries.” American Journal of Political Science, 46, No. 3 (2002), pp. 557–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunce, Valerie, “The Political Economy of Postsocialism.” Slavic Review, 58, No. 4 (1999), pp. 756–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekiert, Grzegorz and Hanson, Stephen E., eds., Capitalism and Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe: Assessing the Legacy of Communist Rule (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003)
Rupnik, Jacques, “The Post-communist Divide.” Journal of Democracy, 10, No. 1 (1999), pp. 57–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vachudova, Milada Anna, Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage and Integration after Communism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgiadis, George, Adapting by Expectation: Early EU Polices in the CEE Region and the Consolidation of the Two “Orbits” of Post-communist Economic Transformation. Working Paper No. 05–02 (Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University, 2005)Google Scholar
Oatley, Thomas, International Political Economy: Interests and Institutions in the Global Economy, pp. 379–92 (New York: Pearson Longman, 2004), at p. 386Google Scholar
Åslund, Anders, Building Capitalism: The Transformation of the Former Soviet Bloc, p. 362 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002)Google Scholar
,European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Transition Report (London: EBRD, 2000)Google Scholar
,World Bank, The First Ten Years: Analysis and Lessons for Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2002), pp. 16, 73–4, 107Google Scholar
Bunce, Valerie, “Rethinking Recent Democratization, Lessons from the Post-communist Experience.” World Politics, 55, No. 2 (2003), pp. 167–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roeder, Philip G., “The Revolution of 1989: Postcommunism and the Social Sciences.” Slavic Review, 58, No. 4 (1999), pp. 743–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C., “The Influence of the International Context Upon the Choice of National Institutions and Policies in Neo-Democracies.” In The International Dimensions of Democratization: Europe and the Americas, Expanded Edition, Whitehead, Laurence, ed., pp. 26–54 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pridham, Geoffrey, Herring, Eric, and Sanford, George, eds., Building Democracy? The International Dimension of Democratization in Eastern Europe (London: Leicester University Press, 1997)
Pridham, Geoffrey, ed., Encouraging Democracy: The International Context of Regime Transition in Southern Europe (Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1991)
Bunce, Valerie, “Should Transitologists Be Grounded?Slavic Review, 54, No. 1 (1995), pp. 111–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C. and Karl, Terry Lynn, “The Conceptual Travels of Transitologists and Consolidologists: How Far to the East Should They Attempt to Go.” Slavic Review, 53, No. 1 (1995), pp. 173–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karl, Terry Lynn, “The Hybrid Regimes of Central America.” Journal of Democracy, 6, No. 3 (1995), pp. 72–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zakaria, Fareed, “The Rise of Illiberal Democracy.” Foreign Affairs, 76, No. 6 (1997), pp. 22–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Larry, “Thinking about Hybrid Regimes.” Journal of Democracy, 13, No. 2 (2002), pp. 21–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven and Way, Lucan, “The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism.” Journal of Democracy, 13, No. 2 (2002), pp. 51–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven and Way, Lucan, “Linkage versus Leverage: Rethinking the International Dimension of Regime Change.” Comparative Politics, 38, No. 4 (2006), pp. 379–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabbe, Heather, “How Does Europeanisation Affect CEE Governance? Conditionality, Diffusion and Diversity.” Journal of European Public Policy, 8, No. 4 (2001), pp. 1013–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank and Sedelmeier, Ulrich, eds., The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2005)
Kelley, Judith, Ethnic Politics in Europe: The Power of Norms and Incentives (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Epstein, Rachel, “Cultivating Consensus and Creating Conflict: International Institutions and the (De)politicization of Economic Policy in Post-communist Europe.” Comparative Political Studies, 39, No. 8 (2006), pp. 1019–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, Wade, The Enlargement of the European Union and NATO: Ordering from the Menu in Central Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andonova, Liliana B., Transnational Politics of the Environment. The EU and Environmental Policy in Central and Eastern Europe (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Mattli, Walter, The Logic of Regional Integration, Europe and Beyond (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. and Nye, Joseph S., Power and Interdependence (Boston: Little Brown, 1977)Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew, “Negotiating the Single European Act: National Interests and Conventional Statecraft in the European Community.” International Organization, 45, No. 1 (1991), pp. 19–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew, The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998), Chap. 1Google Scholar
McFaul, Michael, “The Fourth Wave of Democracy and Dictatorship: Noncooperative Transitions in the Post-communist World.” World Politics, 54, No. 2 (2002), pp. 212–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, M. Steven, “The Determinants of Economic Reform in the Post-communist World.” East European Politics and Societies, 12, No. 1 (1998), pp. 31–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Dwyer, Conor, “Runaway State Building: How Political Parties Shape States in Post-communist Europe.” World Politics, 56, No. 4 (2004), pp. 520–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orenstein, Mitchell, Out of the Red (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grzymała-Busse, Anna, “Political Competition and the Politicization of the State in East Central Europe.” Comparative Political Studies, 36, No. 10 (2003), pp. 1123–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunce, Valerie, Subversive Institutions, The Design and the Destruction of Socialism and the State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demeš, Pavol and Forbrig, Joerg eds., Reclaiming Democracy: Civil Society and Electoral Change in Central and Eastern Europe. Washington, DC: German Marshall Fund, 2007
Benjamin, Robert, National Democratic Institute, interview in Washington, DC, 2003. For the debate, Mendelson, Sarah E. and Glenn, John K., eds., The Power and Limits of NGOs: A Critical Look at Building Democracy in Eastern Europe and Eurasia (New York: Columbia University Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Ottaway, Marina and Carothers, Thomas, eds., Funding Virtue: Civil Society Aid and Democracy Promotion (New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2000)
Snyder, Jack, From Voting to Violence: Democratization and Nationalist Conflict, p. 355 (New York: Norton, 2000)Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephen and Webb, Steven B., “Introduction.” In Voting for Reform: Democracy, Political Liberalization, and Economic Adjustment, pp. 1–36, 21 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994)Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A. and Taylor, Rosemary C. R., “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms.” Political Studies, 44 (1996). pp. 936–57, 955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pevehouse, Jon C., “Democracy from the Outside-In? International Organizations and Democratization.” International Organization, 56, No. 3 (2002), pp. 515–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaubatz, Kurt Taylor, “Democratic States and Commitment in International Relations.” International Organization, 50, No. 1 (1996), pp. 109–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Lisa, Democratic Commitments, Legislatures and International Cooperation (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattli, Walter and Plümper, Thomas, “The Internal Value of External Options.” European Union Politics, 5, No. 3 (2004), pp. 307–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faul, Michael Mc, “Transitions from Postcommunism.” Journal of Democracy, 16, No. 3 (2005), pp. 5–19Google Scholar
Way, Lucan, “Ukraine's Orange Revolution: Kuchma's Failed Authoritarianism.” Journal of Democracy, 16, No. 2 (2005), pp. 131–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×