Why you need another lens
You will have gathered that I think piggybacking is one of the best astronomical uses for a DSLR. But the “kit” lens that probably came with your DSLR is not very suitable for piggyback astrophotography. It has at least three disadvantages:
It is slow (about f/4 or f/5.6).
It is a zoom lens, and optical quality has been sacrificed in order to make zooming possible.
It is plastic-bodied and not very sturdy; the zoom mechanism and the autofocus mechanism are both likely to move during a long exposure.
Fortunately, you have many alternatives, some of which are quite inexpensive. One is to buy your camera maker's 50-mm f/1.8 “normal” lens; despite its low price, this is likely to be the sharpest lens they make, especially when stopped down to f/4. Another alternative is to use an inexpensive manual-focus telephoto lens from the old days. There are several ways of doing this; Nikon DSLRs take Nikon manual-focus lenses (though the autofocus and light meter don't work), and Canons accept several types of older lenses via adapters.
Big lens or small telescope?
But wait a minute–instead of a lens, should you be looking for a small telescope, perhaps an f/6 “short-tube” refractor? Some of these have ED glass or even three-element lenses and perform very well for astrophotography.
In my opinion and experience, good telephoto lenses perform even better. After all, they have more elements and more sophisticated optical designs.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.