Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-fqc5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T09:39:43.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Institutions: who enforces competition law?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Giorgio Monti
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Get access

Summary

Introduction

So far, we have observed one institution's enforcement of EC competition law: the European Commission. The discussion of controversial mergers in chapters 1 and 8 provided strong indications that the institutional makeup of the Commission plays a determining role in the final outcome. To some, this is evidence of the way EC competition law is corrupted to serve illegitimate aims, while to others, the deliberative process of decision-making is justified by the way competition law is embedded within the EC Treaty and should be used to serve the wider aims of the Community, not merely to preserve consumer welfare. While the political aspect of competition decisions came under severe scrutiny in the 1990s, in particular by German scholars and practitioners, developments since that time within DG Competition (that segment of the Commission that carries out the operational aspect of law enforcement) have brought some changes to the nature of competition law enforcement. These include increased economic sophistication and growing attention to new theories of anticompetitive effects. These trends were caused by DG Competition interacting with US antitrust enforcers, and by the increased number of economists working in DG Competition, culminating in the creation of the post of Chief Competition Economist in 2003.

The growth of economic analysis and expertise is analogous to that which occurred in the United States in the early 1960s, where increasing numbers of economists in the DOJ and FTC affected the direction of antitrust law, facilitating the success of the Chicago School views in the 1970s.

Type
Chapter
Information
EC Competition Law , pp. 392 - 439
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×