Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Corinne Schweizer Manuel Puppis Matthias Künzler and Samuel Studer 2014. Blast from the Past? A Comparative Analysis of Broadcast Licensing in the Digital Era. Journal of Information Policy, Vol. 4, Issue. , p. 507.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2007
  • Online publication date: December 2009

8 - Policymaking and policy trade-offs: broadcast media regulation in the United States

Summary

Introduction

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has a statutory obligation to pursue the ‘public interest’ through its regulation of broadcast media. The FCC's interpretation of the public interest has led it to pursue three policy objectives: competition, localism and diversity. This policy triad reflects both efficiency and antitrust considerations and concerns about the social, political and cultural effects of media. Therefore, in addition to pursuing competition in broadcast markets through (quasi)-antitrust analysis, the FCC considers the additional elements of diversity and localism – elements that can add considerable nuance and complexity for policymakers.

The FCC employs two broad classes of regulatory tools: structural (ownership) rules and behavioural (content) regulation. The FCC's structural rules often take the form of ownership limits on the number of broadcast stations a single entity may own within and across local markets. The FCC has changed these caps periodically over the last fifty years, but since the 1990s there has been the most substantial change in broadcast ownership policies.

The FCC first permitted the ownership of multiple radio stations within the same market in 1992, allowing entities to own up to two FM and two AM stations within a market with at least fifteen stations, provided that the combined audience share of the stations did not exceed 25 per cent. For stations in markets with fewer than fifteen radio stations, a single licensee was permitted to own up to three stations, of which no more than two could be AM or FM stations, provided that the owned stations represented less than 50 per cent of the total number of radio stations in the market.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

The Economic Regulation of Broadcasting Markets
  • Online ISBN: 9780511611124
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611124
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
References
Anderson, Simon and Coate, Stephen (2003) ‘Market Provision of Public Goods: The Case of Broadcasting’, NBER Working Paper 7513.
Armstrong, Mark (2002) ‘Competition in Two-Sided Markets’, mimeo, Oxford University.
Beebe, Jack (1977) ‘Institutional Structure and Program Choices in Television Markets’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91(1), 15–37.
Berry, Steven and Waldfogel, Joel (2001) ‘Do Mergers Increase Product Variety? Evidence From Radio Broadcasting’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(3), 1009–1025.
Besley, Timothy and Burgess, Robin (2002) ‘The Political Economy of Government Responsiveness: Theory and Evidence from India’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(4), 1415–1451.
Besley, Timothy and Prat, Andrea (2001) ‘Handcuffs for the Grabbing Hand? Media Capture and Government Accountability’, Working Paper, London School of Economics.
Coase, Ronald (1974) ‘The Market for Goods and the Market for Ideas’, American Economic Review, 64(2), Papers and Proceedings, May, 384–391.
Cunningham, Brendan M. and Alexander, Peter J. (2004) ‘A Model of Broadcast Media and Commercial Advertising’, Journal of Public Economic Theory, 6(4), 557–575.
Djankov, Simeon, McLiesh, Caralee, Nenova, Tatiana and Schleifer, Andrei (2003) ‘Who Owns the Media?’, The Journal of Law and Economics, 46, 341–382.
Gabszewicz, J. J., Laussel, D. and Sonnac, N. (2000), ‘TV-Broadcasting Competition and Advertising’, Working Paper, Catholique de Louvain – Center for Operations Research and Economics.
Gal-Or, Esther and Dukes, Anthony (2003) ‘Minimum Differentiation in Commercial Media Markets’, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 12(3), 291–326.
George, Lisa and Waldfogel, Joel (2002) ‘Does the New York Times Spread Ignorance and Apathy?’, Working Paper.
Mullainathan, Sendhil and Schleifer, Andrei (2002) ‘Media Bias’, Working Paper.
Nilssen, Tore and Sørgard, Lars (2000) ‘TV Advertising, Programme Quality, and Product-Market Oligopoly’, Working Paper Series CPC00-012, Competition Policy Center, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
Rochet, Jean-Charles and Tirole, Jean (2004) ‘Platform Competition with Two-Sided Markets’, Working Paper.
Salop, Steven (1979) ‘Monopolistic Competition with Outside Goods’, Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 141–156.
Spence, Michael and Owen, Bruce (1977) ‘Television Programming, Monopolistic Competition, and Welfare’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91(1), 103–126.
Steiner, Peter (1952) ‘Program Patterns and Preferences, and the Workability of Competition in Radio Broadcasting’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 66(2), 194–223.
Stromberg, David (2004a) ‘Radio's Impact on Public Spending’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1), 189–221.
Stromberg, David (2004b) ‘Mass Media Competition, Political Competition, and Public Policy’, Review of Economic Studies, 71(1), 265–284.
Waldfogel, Joel (2002) ‘Consumer Substitution among Media’, Washington, DC: FCC Media Ownership Working Group, October.
Wilbur, Kenneth (2004) ‘Not All Eyeballs Are Created Equal: A Structural Equilibrium Model of Television Advertisers, Networks, and Viewers’, Working Paper.