Skip to main content
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 77
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Vrousalis, Nicholas 2018. Republic of Equals. The Philosophical Review, Vol. 127, Issue. 1, p. 125.

    Piromalli, Eleonora 2017. Does socialism need fraternity? On Axel Honneth’s The Idea of Socialism. European Journal of Political Theory, p. 147488511771843.

    Nell, Guinevere Liberty 2017. The Driving Force of the Collective. p. 221.

    Hahnel, Robin 2017. Wanted: A Pollution Damage Revealing Mechanism. Review of Radical Political Economics, Vol. 49, Issue. 2, p. 233.

    Gregory, James 2016. How not to be an egalitarian: the politics of homeownership and property-owning democracy. International Journal of Housing Policy, Vol. 16, Issue. 3, p. 337.

    Zweifel, Peter and Frech, H. E. 2016. Why ‘Optimal’ Payment for Healthcare Providers Can Never be Optimal Under Community Rating. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Vol. 14, Issue. 1, p. 9.

    Baiman, Ron P. 2016. The Morality of Radical Economics. p. 253.

    Bou-Habib, Paul 2016. Gaus on Coercion and Welfare-State Capitalism: A Critique. Political Studies, Vol. 64, Issue. 3, p. 651.

    Baiman, Ron P. 2016. The Morality of Radical Economics. p. 75.

    Baiman, Ron P. 2016. The Morality of Radical Economics. p. 173.

    Billingham, Luke 2016. Investigating contingency in school history: an aid to rich, meaningfully critical citizenship?. The Curriculum Journal, Vol. 27, Issue. 4, p. 430.

    Gould, Carol C. 2015. Wiley Encyclopedia of Management. p. 1.

    Marquez, Xavier 2015. Maximizing Accountability to the Least Privileged: The Difference Principle, the Fair Value of the Political Liberties, and the Design of Democratic Institutions. Polity, Vol. 47, Issue. 4, p. 484.

    Nell, Guinevere Liberty 2014. Austrian Theory and Economic Organization. p. 197.

    DeCanio, Samuel 2014. Democracy, the Market, and the Logic of Social Choice. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 58, Issue. 3, p. 637.

    Chase-Dunn, Christopher 2014. Crisis of What: The End of Capitalism or Another Systemic Cycle of Capitalist Accumulation?1. Perspectives on Global Development and Technology, Vol. 13, Issue. 1-2, p. 13.

    Pereira, Gustavo 2013. Elements of a Critical Theory of Justice. p. 103.

    Panayotakis, Costas 2013. Theorizing Scarcity. Review of Radical Political Economics, Vol. 45, Issue. 2, p. 183.

    Nell, Guinevere Liberty 2013. Basic Income and the Free Market. p. 7.

    Veneziani, Roberto 2012. ANALYTICAL MARXISM. Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol. 26, Issue. 4, p. 649.

  • Print publication year: 1994
  • Online publication date: December 2009

15 - A future for socialism



The demise of the Communist system in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe has caused many to believe that socialism cannot exist, either in the present world or as an ideal. I shall argue that, in both cases, it can: but this requires some revision of what constitutes socialism, for if one thought socialism were coextensive with the Soviet model, then clearly the answer to the two questions would be no. In arguing for my revisionist definition of socialism, I begin by discussing what I believe socialists want – the political philosophy, if you will, of socialism. In Section 2, I ask whether public ownership, as it has been conceived of in the socialist movement, is necessary to realize in a politico-economic system what socialists want, and conclude that it is not. In particular, I claim that the direct control of firms by the state is not necessary for socialist goals. Socialists should be eclectic in their attitude toward property relations: there may be many such relations more amenable to reaching socialism's goals than traditional state ownership of the means of production. In Section 3, I propose an explanation for why the centrally planned economies eventually failed, by virtue of their failure to solve what economists call principal–agent problems, and finally critique and amend that theory.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Egalitarian Perspectives
  • Online ISBN: 9780511528293
  • Book DOI:
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *