Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 9
  • Cited by
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Mayr, Gerald 2017. Evolution of avian breeding strategies and its relation to the habitat preferences of Mesozoic birds. Evolutionary Ecology, Vol. 31, Issue. 1, p. 131.

    Boulton, Rebecca L. and Cassey, Phillip 2012. How avian incubation behaviour influences egg surface temperatures: relationships with egg position, development and clutch size. Journal of Avian Biology, Vol. 43, Issue. 4, p. 289.

    Maurer, Golo Portugal, Steven J. and Cassey, Phillip 2011. Review: an embryo's eye view of avian eggshell pigmentation. Journal of Avian Biology, Vol. 42, Issue. 6, p. 494.

    Liu, Guangbin Yang, Hongsheng and Liu, Shilin 2010. Effects of rearing temperature and density on growth, survival and development of sea cucumber larvae, Apostichopus japonicus (Selenka). Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, Vol. 28, Issue. 4, p. 842.

    Underwood, Todd J. and Sealy, Spencer G. 2006. Influence of Shape on Egg Discrimination in American Robins and Gray Catbirds. Ethology, Vol. 112, Issue. 2, p. 164.

    Horner, John R. 2000. Dinosaur Reproduction and Parenting. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Vol. 28, Issue. 1, p. 19.

    Schalkwyk, S.J. Van Cloete, S.W.P. Brown, C.R. and Brand, Z. 2000. Hatching success of ostrich eggs in relation to setting, turning and angle of rotation. British Poultry Science, Vol. 41, Issue. 1, p. 46.

    Varricchio, David J. Jackson, Frankie and Trueman, Clive N. 1999. A nesting trace with eggs for the Cretaceous theropod dinosaurTroodon formosus. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, Vol. 19, Issue. 1, p. 91.

    Babiker, E. M. and Baggott, G. K. 1992. Effect of turning upon the sub‐embryonic fluid and albumen of the egg of the Japanese quail. British Poultry Science, Vol. 33, Issue. 5, p. 973.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 1991
  • Online publication date: November 2009

19 - Reasons for the dichotomy in egg turning in birds and reptiles

Summary

Introduction

The need for egg turning during incubation is one of the most dramatic differences between the incubation requirements of birds and reptiles. Almost all avian eggs need to be turned throughout much of incubation (Poulsen, 1953; Drent, 1975) and although there are many studies of the egg turning behaviour in incubating birds (Drent, 1975), these are not discussed here. By stark contrast, reptilian embryos are usually killed by turning during incubation (Ferguson, 1985). Egg turning in birds is thought to prevent deleterious adhesions between the embryo and the shell membranes (New, 1957) but in reptiles such adhession is normal (Ewert, 1985; Ferguson, 1985). This simplistic view of the phenomenon of egg turning is widely accepted yet if the requirement and effects of turning are examined further the situation is not so clear cut. In this chapter, the effects of egg turning on avian and reptilian development are described and some suggestions are made for the physiological basis of turning in birds. The possible evolutionary relationships between tgg turning behaviour in birds and its absence in reptiles, are discussed.

The effects of egg turning on hatchability in birds and reptiles

Avian eggs

The majority of studies of egg turning on avian embryos are concerned with effects on hatchability in poultry (Landauer, 1967; Lundy, 1969). Eycleshymer (1907) first showed that turning rate affected hatchability, although by modern standards the results were poor; 58% of fertile eggs of the fowl (Gallus gallus) hatched after being turned five times a day compared with 45% of eggs turned twice a day and only 15% hatchability of unturned eggs.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Egg Incubation
  • Online ISBN: 9780511585739
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511585739
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×