John Rawls’s Marginal Notes on Frank Knight. 1951. Ethics of Competition. 2nd impression. New York: Augustus Kelley.Google Scholar

John Rawls’s Marginal Notes on Lionel Robbins. 1949. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. 2nd edn, revised and extended. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Charles Darwin Correspondence Project.Google Scholar

Transcription of Calendar number: 10988, draft of a letter from Charles Darwin to Charles Bradlaugh, June 6, 1877, supplied to D. M. Levy and S. J. Peart, October 6, 2004.Google Scholar

Arthur Burns Papers. www.eisenhower.archives.gov/Research/Finding_Aids/PDFs/Burns_Arthur_Papers.pdfGoogle Scholar

Clark Warburton Papers, 1920–1979, available from http://sca.gmu.edu/finding_aids/warburton.htmlGoogle Scholar

William J. Baroody Papers, available from http://memory.loc.gov/service/mss/eadxmlmss/eadpdfmss/2008/ms008097.pdfGoogle Scholar

[R. A. “Pat” Adams Collection.] LSE History Project Photographs/16.Google Scholar

Gordon Tullock Papers. Hoover Institution, Stanford University, available from www.oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt787034zq/entire_text/Google Scholar

V. Orval Watts Papers. Hoover Institution, Stanford University, available from http://pdf.oac.cdlib.org/pdf/hoover/83064.pdfGoogle Scholar

John Fraser Collection, available from www.liv.ac.uk/library/sca/colldescs/fraser.htmlGoogle Scholar

Small Special Collections, University of Virginia, President’s Papers.Google Scholar

John Rawls’s Marginal Notes on Frank Knight. 1951. Ethics of Competition. 2nd impression. New York: Augustus Kelley.Google Scholar

John Rawls’s Marginal Notes on Lionel Robbins. 1949. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. 2nd edn, revised and extended. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Charles Darwin Correspondence Project.Google Scholar

Transcription of Calendar number: 10988, draft of a letter from Charles Darwin to Charles Bradlaugh, June 6, 1877, supplied to D. M. Levy and S. J. Peart, October 6, 2004.Google Scholar

Arthur Burns Papers. www.eisenhower.archives.gov/Research/Finding_Aids/PDFs/Burns_Arthur_Papers.pdfGoogle Scholar

Clark Warburton Papers, 1920–1979, available from http://sca.gmu.edu/finding_aids/warburton.htmlGoogle Scholar

William J. Baroody Papers, available from http://memory.loc.gov/service/mss/eadxmlmss/eadpdfmss/2008/ms008097.pdfGoogle Scholar

[R. A. “Pat” Adams Collection.] LSE History Project Photographs/16.Google Scholar

Gordon Tullock Papers. Hoover Institution, Stanford University, available from www.oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt787034zq/entire_text/Google Scholar

V. Orval Watts Papers. Hoover Institution, Stanford University, available from http://pdf.oac.cdlib.org/pdf/hoover/83064.pdfGoogle Scholar

John Fraser Collection, available from www.liv.ac.uk/library/sca/colldescs/fraser.htmlGoogle Scholar

Small Special Collections, University of Virginia, President’s Papers.Google Scholar

Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank, King County, Washington, Together and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, Morgan Stanley & Co. International Limited, The Bank of New York Mellon (F/K/A The Bank of New York), Qsr Management Limited, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Investors Service Ltd., Standard And Poor’s Ratings Services and the McGraw Hill Companies, Inc. 08 Civ. 7508 (SAS). Southern District of New York (September 2, 2009).Google Scholar

Ackley, Gardner. 1961. Macroeconomic Theory. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Ackley, Gardner. 1978. Macroeconomics: Theory and Policy. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Akerlof, George P. 1970. “The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 84: 488–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alchian, Armen A. and Allen, William R.. 1964. University Economics. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar

Allais, Maurice. 1966. “A Restatement of the Quantity Theory of Money.” American Economic Review 56: 1123–1157.Google Scholar

Allen, William R. 1977. “Economics, Economists, and Economic Policy: Modern American Experiences.” History of Political Economy 9: 48–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

American Banker. August 12, 1936. “Rating Services Only Advisory.” American Banker 101: 2.Google Scholar

American Economic Association. 2012. “American Economic Association Adopts Extensions to Principles for Author Disclosure of Conflict of Interest.” Available from www.aeaweb.org/PDF_files/PR/AEA_Adopts_Extensions_to_Principles_for_Author_Disclosure_01-05-12.pdfGoogle Scholar

American Statistical Association. 2000. Ethical Guidelines for Statistical Practice. Alexandria, VA.Google Scholar

Andrews, David F. et al. 1972. Robust Estimates of Location. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Angner, Erik. 2006. “Economists as Experts: Overconfidence in Theory and Practice.” Journal of Economic Methodology 13: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnstein, Walter L. 1965. The Bradlaugh Case: A Study in Late Victorian Opinion and Politics. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth J. 1963. Social Choice and Individual Values. 2nd edn. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth J. 1971. Some Models of Racial Discrimination in the Labor Market. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar

Ashenfelter, Orley and Bloom, David E.. 1984. “Models of Arbitrator Behavior: Theory and Evidence.” American Economic Review 74: 111–124.Google Scholar

Ashenfelter, Orley, et al. 1992. “An Experimental Comparison of Dispute Rates in Alternative Arbitration Systems.” Econometrica 60: 1407–1433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashraf, Nava, Camerer, Colin F., and Loewenstein, George 2005. “Adam Smith, Behavioral Economist.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 19: 131–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The Evolution of Co-operation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Bach, George Leland. 1954–1980. Economics: An Introduction to Analysis and Policy. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Backhouse, Roger E. 1988. Economists and the Economy: The Evolution of Economic Ideas. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Balliet, Daniel. 2010. “Communication and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: a Meta-Analytic Review.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 54: 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Banton, Michael. 1977. The Idea of Race. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar

Barber, William. 1995. “Chile con Chicago: A Review Essay.” Journal of Economic Literature 33: 1941–1949.Google Scholar

Barry, Brian. 1973. The Liberal Theory of Justice: A Critical Examination of the Principle Doctrines in Theory of Justice by John Rawls. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Bernstein, Michael A. 2004. “Statecraft and Its Retainers: American Economics and Public Purpose after Depression and War.” In The Social Sciences Go To Washington: The Politics of Knowledge in the Postmodern Era, edited by Hamilton Cravens. Picsataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 41–60.Google Scholar

Binmore, Kenneth G. 1994. Game Theory and the Social Contact: Playing Fair. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Blanchard, Olivier Jean. 2008. “Neoclassical Synthesis.” In The New Palgrave’s Dictionary of Economics, edited by Blume, Lawrence and Durlauf, Steven. 2nd edn. New York: Palgrave. Available online from www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008_N000041Google Scholar

Blaug, Mark. 1980. The Methodology of Economics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bonner, Hypatia Bradlaugh. 1895. Charles Bradlaugh; A Record of His Life and Work. 2nd edn. T. F. Unwin, London.Google Scholar

Bornstein, Gary and Yaniv, Ilan. 1998. “Individual and Group Behavior in the Ultimatum Game: Are Groups More ‘Rational’ Players?” Experimental Economics 1: 101–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowles, Samuel. 2008. “Policies Designed for Self-Interested Citizens May Undermine the ‘Moral Sentiments’: Evidence from Economic Experiments.” Science 320 (5883): 1605–1609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brady, Gordon. 2008. “The NBER Soviet Study.” Summer Institute for the History of Economics. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University.Google Scholar

Brandis, Royall. 1968. The Principles of Economics. Homewood, IL: Irwin.Google Scholar

Breiner, Laurence A. 1979a. “The Career of the Cockatrice.” Isis 70: 30–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breiner, Laurence A. 1979b. “Herbert’s Cockatrice.” Modern Philology 77: 10–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brock, William A., Durlauf, Steven N., and West, Kenneth D.. 2007. “Model Uncertainty and Policy Evaluation: Some Theory and Empirics.” Journal of Econometrics 136: 629–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buchanan, Allen. 2002. “Social Moral Epistemology.” Social Philosophy and Policy 19: 126–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Buchanan, Allen. 2007. “Institutions, Beliefs and Ethics: Eugenics as a Case Study.” Journal of Political Philosophy 15: 22–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buchanan, James M. 1954. “Individual Choice in Voting and the Market.” Journal of Political Economy 62: 334–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buchanan, James M. 1959. “Positive Economics, Welfare Economics, and Political Economy.” Journal of Law and Economics 2: 124–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buchanan, James M. 1967. “Politics and Science: Reflections on Knight’s Critique of Polanyi.” Ethics 77: 303–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buchanan, James M. 2003. “Public Choice: Politics without Romance.” Policy 19: 13–18.Google Scholar

Buchanan, James M. 2004. “The Status of the Status Quo.” Constitutional Political Economy 15: 133–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buchanan, James M. 2010. “Chicago School Thinking: Old and New.” Summer Institute for the History of Economics. University of Richmond.Google Scholar

Buchanan, James M. 2011. “Ideology or Error: Economists and the Great Recession.” Summer Institute for the History of Economics. University of Richmond.Google Scholar

Buchanan, James M. 2012. “Institutional Sources of Fiscal Tragedy.” Summer Institute for the History of Economics. University of Richmond.Google Scholar

Buchanan, James M., and Samuels, Warren J.. 2008. “Politics as Exchange or Politics as Power: Two Views of the Government.” In The Street Porter and the Philosopher, edited by Peart, Sandra J. and Levy, David M.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 15–40.Google Scholar

Buckley, William F., Jr. 1951. God and Man at Yale: The Superstitions of “Academic Freedom.” Chicago: Regnery.Google Scholar

Burns, Jennifer. 2009. Goddess of the Market: Ayn Rand and the American Right. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burtchett, Floyd F. 1939. “Review of Gilbert Harold Bond Ratings as an Investment Guide.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 202: 222–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cain, Daylian M., Loewenstein, George, and Moore, Don A.. 2005. “The Dirt on Coming Clean: Perverse Effects of Disclosing Conflicts of Interest.” Journal of Legal Studies 34: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caldwell, Bruce. 1995. “Introduction” In Contra Keynes and Cambridge: Essays, Correspondence, edited by Hayek, F. A.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1–48.Google Scholar

Caldwell, Bruce. 2008. “Gordon Tullock’s The Organization of Inquiry: A Critical Appraisal.” Public Choice 135: 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camerer, Colin F., and Thaler, Richard H.. 1995. “Anomalies: Ultimatums, Dictators and Manners.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 9: 209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, John Angus. 1989. “The Invisible Rhetorician: Charles Darwin’s ‘Third Party’ Strategy.” Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric 7: 55–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlyle, Thomas. 1841. On Heroes, Hero-Worship, the Heroic in History. J. Fraser: London.Google Scholar

Carlyle, Thomas. 1849. “Occasional Discourse on the Negro Question.” Fraser’s Magazine for Town and Country 40: 670–679.Google Scholar

Carlyle, Thomas. 1867. “Shooting Niagara – and After.” London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar

Chandrasekhar, Sripati. 1981. “A Dirty, Filthy Book.” Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar

Coase, Ronald H. 1960. “The Problem of Social Cost.” Journal of Law and Economics 3: 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coase, Ronald H. 1991. “The Institutional Structure of Production.” Lecture to the memory of Alfred Nobel, December 9, 1991. Available at www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economic-sciences/laureates/1991/coase-lecture.htmlCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coase, Ronald H. 1993. “Law and Economics at Chicago.” Journal of Law and Economics 36: 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colander, David. 2009. “What was ‘It’ that Robbins Was Defining?” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 31: 437–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colander, David C., and Landreth, Harry, eds. 1996. The Coming of Keynesianism to America: Conversations with the Founders of Keynesian Economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Colander, David C., and Landreth, Harry 1998. “God, Man, and Lorie Tarshis at Yale.” In Keynesianism and the Keynesian Revolution in America, edited by Hamuda, Omar. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 59–72.Google Scholar

Cole, Arthur H. 1949. The Great Mirror of Folly (het groote tafereel der dwaasheid): An Economic-Bibliographical Study. Boston: Baker Library of Harvard Business School.Google Scholar

Crawford, Vincent P. 1979. “On Compulsory-Arbitration Schemes.” Journal of Political Economy 87: 131–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Curtis, Lewis P., Jr. 1968. Anglo-Saxons and Celts. Bridgeport, CT: Conference on British Studies at the University of Bridgeport.Google Scholar

Daniell, David. 2003. The Bible in English: Its History and Influence. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Darwin, Charles. 1964. On the Origin of Species by Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, edited by Mayr, Ernst. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Originally published in 1859 in London by John Murray.Google Scholar

Darwin, Charles. 1871. The Descent of Man, or Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.Google Scholar

Darwin, George. 1873. “On Beneficial Restrictions to Liberty of Marriage.” The Contemporary Review 22: 412–426.Google Scholar

Davenport, Guy. 1980. Archilochos, Sappho, Alkman: Three Lyric Poets of the Late Greek Bronze Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

De Bruyn, Frans. 2000a. “Reading Het groote tafereel der dwaasheid: An Emblem Book of the Folly of Speculation in the Bubble Year 1720.” Eighteenth-Century Life 24: 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Bruyn, Frans. 2000b. “Het groote tafereel der dwaasheid and the Speculative Bubble of 1720: A Bibliographical Enigma and an Economic Force.” Eighteenth-Century Life 24: 62–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Bruyn, Frans. 2013. Het Groote Tafereel Der Dwaasheid and Its Readers, Then and Now.” In The Great Mirror of Folly: Finance and Culture, and the Crash of 1720, edited by Goetzmann, William N., Labio, Catherine, Rouwenhorst, K. Geert and Young, Timothy G.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 21–34.Google Scholar

DeMartino, George. 2011. The Economist’s Oath: On the Need for and Content of Professional Economic Ethics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Martino, George. 2015. “Harming Irreparably: On Neoliberalism, Kaldor-Hicks, and the Paretian Guarantee.” Review of Social Economy 73: 315-340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deming, W. Edwards. 1965. “Principles of Professional Statistical Practice.” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 36: 1883–1900.Google Scholar

Desmond, Adrian. 1994. Huxley: The Devil’s Disciple. New York: M. Joseph.Google Scholar

Dewald, William G., Thursby, Jerry, and Anderson, Richard G.. 1986. “Replication in Empirical Economics: The Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking Project.” American Economic Review 76: 587–603.Google Scholar

Diamond, Arthur M. 2008. “The Economics of Science.” In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics Online, edited by Durlauf, Stephen. N. and Blume, Lawrence E.. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Available online at www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008_E000222 doi:10.1057/9780230226203.1491Google Scholar

Dixit, Avinash and Nalebuff, Barry. 2008. “Prisoners’ Dilemma.” In The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics, edited by Henderson, David R.. Liberty Fund, Inc. Library of Economics and Liberty [Online] available at www.econlib.org/library/Enc/PrisonersDilemma.htmlGoogle Scholar

Dobbs, Betty Jo Teeter. 1975. The Foundations of Newton’s Alchemy or “The Hunting of the Greene Lyon.” Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dobbs, Betty Jo Teeter. 1990a. Alchemical Death & Resurrection: The Significance of Alchemy in the Age of Newton. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar

Dobbs, Betty Jo Teeter. 1990b. “From the Secrecy of Alchemy to the Openness of Chemistry.” In Solomon’s House Revisited: The Organization and Institutionalization of Science, edited by Frängsmyr, Tore. Nobel Symposium 75. Canton, MA: Science History Publications, 75–94.Google Scholar

Düppe, Till. 2011. The Making of the Economy: A Phenomenology of Economic Science. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Duvendack, Maren, Palmer-Jones, Richard W., and Reed, W. Robert, 2015. “Replications in Economics: A Progress Report.” Economics Journal Watch 12: 164–191.Google Scholar

Easterly, William. 2013. The Tyranny of Experts: Economists, Dictators and the Forgotten Rights of the Poor. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Elder, Gregory P. 1996. Chronic Vigour: Darwin, Anglicans, Catholics and the Development of a Doctrine of Providential Evolution. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar

Eliade, Mircea. 1972. The Forge and the Crucible. Translated by Corrin, Stephen. 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Elzinga, Kenneth G. 1992. “The Eleven Principles of Economics.” Southern Economic Journal 58: 861–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erasmus, Desiderius. 1904. The Epistles of Erasmus: From His Earliest Letters to His Fifty-First Year Arranged in Order of Time. Translated by Nicholas, Francis Morgan. London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar

Erasmus, Desiderius. 1979. In Praise of Folly. Translated by Miller, Clarence H.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Originally published in 1509 in Latin.Google Scholar

Erasmus, Desiderius. 1999. Colloquies. Translated and annotated by Thompson, Craig R.. Volumes 39 and 40 of Collected Works of Erasmus. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Originally published in Latin in 1518.Google Scholar

Farrant, Andrew, and McPhail, Edward. 2013. “Torturing the Data to Make It Confess? Friedman, and the Chilean ‘Generals’.” Working Paper.Google Scholar

Feigenbaum, Susan, and Levy, David M.. 1993. “The Market for (Ir)reproducible Econometrics.” Social Epistemology 7: 215–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fels, Rendigs. 1961–1966. The Challenge to the American Economy: An Introduction to Economics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar

Fiorito, Luca, and Nerozzi, Sebastiano. 2009. “Jacob Viner’s Reminiscences from the New Deal (February 11, 1953).” Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 27–A: 75–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, Irving. 1930. The Theory of Interest. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Flandreau, Marc, Gaillard, Norbert, and Packer, Frank. 2009. “Rating Performance, Regulation and the Great Depression: Evidence from Government Securities.” Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1433924Google Scholar

Foundation, Ford. 1949. Report of the Study for the Ford Foundation on Policy and Program. Detroit, MI: Ford Foundation.Google Scholar

Forrer, Kuniko. 2013. “Het Groote Tafereel Der Dwaasheid: A Bibliographical Interpretation.” In The Great Mirror of Folly: Finance and Culture, and the Crash of 1720, edited by Goetzmann, William N., Labio, Catherine, Rouwenhorst, K. Geert and Young, Timothy G.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 35–52.Google Scholar

Fraine, Harold G., and Brethouwer, Melvin W.. 1944. The Corporate Bond Project: Organization and Methods. Part I of Organization and Administration of the Corporate Bond Project. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar

Francis, Mark. 2007. Herbert Spencer and the Invention of Modern Life. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freedman, David A. 1984. “On Bootstrapping Two-Stage Least-Squares Estimates in Stationary Linear Models.” Annals of Statistics 12: 827–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frehen, Rik, Goetzmann, William N., and Geert Rouwenhorst, K.. 2013. “Finance in the Great Mirror of Folly.” In The Great Mirror of Folly: Finance and Culture, and the Crash of 1720, edited by Goetzmann, William N., Labio, Catherine, Rouwenhorst, K. Geert and Young, Timothy G.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 63–88.Google Scholar

Fried, Rebecca. 2015. “No Irish Need Deny: Evidence for the Historicity of NINA Restrictions in Advertisements and Signs.” Journal of Social History 49: 1–25.Google Scholar

Friedman, Milton. 1942. “The Inflationary Gap: II. Discussion of the Inflationary Gap.” American Economic Review 32: 314–320.Google Scholar

Friedman, Milton. 1957. A Theory of the Consumption Function.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, Milton. 1962a. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, Milton. 1962b. “Should There Be an Independent Monetary Authority?” In In Search of a Monetary Constitution, edited by Yeager, Leland. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 219–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, Milton. 1991. “Say ‘No’ to Intolerance.” Liberty 4: 17–2018.Google Scholar

Friedman, Milton, and Friedman, Rose Director. 1998. Two Lucky People: Memoirs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, Milton, and Stigler, George J.. 1946. Roofs or Ceilings?: The Current Housing Problem. Irvington-on-Hudson, NY: Foundation for Economic Education.Google Scholar

Friedman, Milton and Stigler, George J.. 1952. “Roofs or Ceilings?” In Readings in Economics, edited by Samuelson, Paul A., Bishop, Robert L., and Coleman, John R.. New York: McGraw-Hill, 161–169.Google Scholar

Froeb, Luke M., and Kobayashi, Bruce H.. 1996. “Naive, Biased, yet Bayesian: Can Juries Interpret Selectively Produced Evidence?” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 12: 257–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

[, F. S.] 1926. “Annals of Eugenics.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 89: 147–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galton, Francis. 1883. Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galton, Francis. 1907a. “One Vote, One Value.” Nature 75: 414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galton, Francis. 1907b. “Vox Populi.” Nature 75: 450–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardiner, John. 1996. “What and Where Are Statistical Ethics.” Presented at the Joint Statistical Meetings. Chicago. Available at www.tcnj.edu/~asaethic/asaweb2.htmlGoogle Scholar

Gleeson, Janet. 1999. Millionaire: The Philanderer, Gambler, and Duelist Who Invented Modern Finance. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Godwin, W. 1801. Thoughts Occasioned by the Perusal of Dr. Parr’s Spital Sermon. London: Taylor and Wilks.Google Scholar

Goetz, Charles. 1991. Uncommon Common-Sense vs. Conventional Wisdom: The Virginia School of Economics. Fairfax, VA: Center for Study of Public Choice.Google Scholar

Goetzmann, William N. et al., eds. 2013. The Great Mirror of Folly: Finance and Culture, and the Crash of 1720. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Good, Irving J. 1983. “Rational Decisions.” In Good Thinking: The Foundations of Probability and Its Applications. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 3–14. Originally published in 1952 in the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society.Google Scholar

Gorlin, Rena A., ed. 1999. Codes of Professional Responsibility. Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs.Google Scholar

Gorman, William G. 1955. “The Intransitivity of Certain Criteria Used in Welfare Economics.” Oxford Economic Papers 7: 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gould, Stephen J. 1981. The Mismeasure of Man. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Gould, Stephen J. 2002. The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Greenspan, Alan. 2005. Testimony of Chairman Alan Greenspan: The Economic Outlook before the Joint Economic Committee, U.S. Congress. Available at www.federalreserve.gov/BOARDDOCS/TESTIMONY/2005/200506092/default.htmGoogle Scholar

Greenwald, Anthony G. and Lisa A., Cooper. 2006. “Implicit bias: Scientific foundations.” California Law Review 94: 945–967.Google Scholar

Greg, William R. 1868. “On the Failure of ‘Natural Selection’ in the Case of Man.” Fraser’s Magazine for Town and Country 78: 353–362.Google Scholar

Greg, William R. 1875. Enigmas of Life. Boston: James R. Osgood.Google Scholar

Grossman, Gene M. and Helpman, Elhanan. 2002. Special Interest Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gruber, Jacob W. 1960. A Conscience in Conflict: The Life of St. George Jackson Mivart. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Halpern, Joseph Y., and Rêgo, Leandro C.. 2009. “Reasoning about Knowledge of Unawareness.” Games and Economic Behavior 67: 503–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hammond, Daniel J., and Hammond, Claire H, eds. 2006. Making Chicago Price Theory: Friedman-Stigler Correspondence 1945–1957. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hands, D. Wade. 1994. “The Sociology of Scientific Knowledge: Some Thoughts on the Possibilities.” In New Perspectives in Economic Methodology, edited by Roger Backhouse. London: Routledge, 75–106.Google Scholar

Harberger, Arnold C. 1954. “Monopoly and Resource Allocation.” American Economic Review 44: 77–87.Google Scholar

Harcourt, Geoffrey C. 1995. “Lorie Tarshis: 1911–1993: In Appreciation.” Economic Journal 105: 1244–1255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harold, Gilbert. 1938 . Bond Ratings as an Investment Guide. New York: Ronald Press.Google Scholar

Harrod, Roy F. 1938. “Scope and Method in Economics.” Economic Journal 48: 383–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayek, F. A. 1994. Hayek on Hayek: An Autobiographical Dialogue, edited by Kresge, Stephen and Wenar, Leif. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heckman, James J. 1997. “The Intellectual Roots of the Law and Economics Movement.” Law and History Review 15: 327–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heckman, James J. 2005. “Interview with James Heckman.” Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Available at //www.minneapolisfed.org/publications/the-region/interview-with-james-heckmanGoogle Scholar

Heilbroner, Robert L. 1968–1970. The Economic Problem. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Herrnstein, Richard J., and Murray, Charles. 1994. The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Het Groote Tafereel Der Dwaasheid &c. 1720 [?] [State 1] Amsterdam. LC HG 6006 G82.Google Scholar

Het Groote Tafereel Der Dwaasheid &c. 1720 [?] [State 2] Amsterdam. LC HG 6006 G822.Google Scholar

Het Groote Tafereel Der Dwaasheid &c. 1720 [?] [State 2] Amsterdam. Available online at the Harvard Business School www.library.hbs.edu/hc/ssb/recreationandarts/tafereel.htmlGoogle Scholar

Het Groote Tafereel Der Dwaasheid &c. 1720 [?] [State 3] Amsterdam. LC HG 6006 G8.Google Scholar

Hickman, W. Braddock. 1952. Trends and Cycles in Corporate Bond Financing. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Hickman, W. Braddock. 1953. The Volume of Corporate Bond Financing since 1900. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Hickman, W. Braddock. 1958. Corporate Bond Quality and Investor Experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Hickman, W. Braddock, and Simpson, Elizabeth T.. 1960. Statistical Measures of Corporate Bond Financing since 1900. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Hicks, John R. 1939. “The Foundations of Welfare Economics.” Economic Journal 49: 696–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hickman, W. Braddock. 1941. “The Rehabilitation of Consumers’ Surplus.” Review of Economic Studies 8: 108–116.Google Scholar

Hitchens, George P. 1944. The Record of Issue and Extinguishment Characteristics of Corporate Bonds, 1900–38. Part III of The Corporate Bond Project: Organization and Methods. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar

Hochstrasser, Julie Berger. 2013. “Print Power: Mad Crowds and the Art of Memory in Het Groote Tafereel Der Dwaasheid.” In The Great Mirror of Folly: Finance and Culture, and the Crash of 1720, edited by Goetzmann, William N., Labio, Catherine, Geert Rouwenhorst, K., and Young, Timothy G.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 191–206.Google Scholar

Hoffman, Elizabeth, McCabe, Kevin A., and Smith., Vernon L. 1996. “Social Distance and Other-Regarding Behavior in Dictator Games.” American Economic Review 86(3): 653–660.Google Scholar

Houser, Daniel, et al. 2014. “Raising the Price of Talk: An Experimental Analysis of Transparent Leadership.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 105: 208–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howson, Susan. 2011. Lionel Robbins. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunt, , James. 1864. The Negro’s Place in Nature: A Paper Read before the London Anthropological Society. New York: Van Eurie, Horton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutt, William H. 1936. Economists and the Public. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar

International Statistical Institute. 1986. “Declaration on Professional Ethics.” International Statistical Review 54: 227–242.Google Scholar

Ioannidis, John P. A. 2005. “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False.” PLOS Medicine. Available at http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jensen, Richard 2002. “‘No Irish Need Apply’: A Myth of Victimization.” Journal of Social History 36: 405–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jonson, Ben. 1974. The Alchemist, edited by Alvin B. Kernan. New Haven: Yale University Press. Originally printed in London in 1611.Google Scholar

Jung, Carl G. 1967. Alchemical Studies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Studies.Google Scholar

Kaldor, Nicholas. 1939. “Welfare Propositions of Economics and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility.” Economic Journal 49: 549–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keith, Arthur. 1917. “Presidential Address. How Can the Institute Best Serve the Needs of Anthropology.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 47: 12–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keynes, John Maynard. 1972. “Newton the Man.” In Essays in Biography. Volume 10 of the Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, edited by Elizabeth Johnson and Donald Moggridge. London: Macmillan, 363-374. Originally prepared for the Newton Tercentenary Celebrations at Trinity College, Cambridge in 1946.Google Scholar

Keynes, J. Neville. 1891. The Scope and Method of Political Economy. London and New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Kindleberger, Charles P. 2000. Manias, Panics and Crashes: A History of Financial Crises. 4th edn. New York: John Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kinzer, Bruce L., Robson, Ann P., and Robson, John M.. 1992. A Moralist In and Out of Parliament: John Stuart Mill at Westminster, 1865–1868. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Kipling, Rudyard. 1895. “Neolithic Age.” Available at www.kipling.org.uk/poems_neolithic.htmGoogle Scholar

Klaus, Václav. 2013. “Hayek and My Life. In F. A. Hayek and the Modern Economy: Economic Organization and Activity, edited by Peart, Sandra J. and Levy, David M.. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Klein, Naomi. 2007. The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. New York: Picador.Google Scholar

Knight, Frank H. 1924. “Some Fallacies in the Interpretation of Social Cost.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 38: 582–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knight, F. H. 1933. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. London: London School of Economics. Originally published in 1921 in Boston by Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar

Knight, F. H. 1939. “Theology and Education.” American Journal of Sociology 44: 649–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knight, F. H. 1947. “Social Science and the Political Trend.” In Freedom and Reform: Essays in Economics and Social Philosophy. New York: Harper, 19–34. Originally published in in 1934 in the University of Toronto Quarterly.Google Scholar

Knight, F. H. 1947. Freedom and Reform, New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar

Knight, F. H. 1951. Ethics of Competition, 2nd impression. New York: Augustus Kelley.Google Scholar

Knight, F. H. 1951. “The Rôle of Principles in Economics and Politics.” American Economic Review 41: 1–29.Google Scholar

Kolchinsky, David. 2010. “Statement and Testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission.” Available at www.fcic.gov/hearings/pdfs/2010-0602-Kolchinsky.pdfGoogle Scholar

Kolm, Serge-Christophe, and Ythier, Jean Mercier, eds. 2006. Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Leonard, Thomas C. 1970. “Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research?” In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, edited by Lakatos, Imre and Musgrave, Alan. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1–23.Google Scholar

Kuznets, Simon. 1942. Uses of National Income in Peace and War. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar

Laidler, David. 1993. “Hawtrey, Harvard, and the Origins of the Chicago Tradition.” Journal of Political Economy 101: 1068–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lane, Rose Wilder. 1947. “Review of Lorie Tarshis’s Elements of Economics.” Economic Council Review of Books 4: 1–8.Google Scholar

Lemmon, Edward J. 1977. An Introduction to Modal Logic: The Lemmon Notes, edited by Segerberg, Krister. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Leonard, Thomas C. 2003. “More Merciful and Not Less Effective Eugenics and American Economics in the Progressive Era.” History of Political Economy 35: 687–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leonard, Thomas C. 2005. “Eugenics and Economics in the Progressive Era.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 19: 207–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leonard, Thomas C. 2016. Illiberal Reforms: Race, Eugenics and American Economics of the Progressive Era. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lerner, Abba P. 1944. The Economics of Control: Principles of Welfare Economics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Levy, David M. 1978. “Some Normative Aspects of the Malthusian Controversy.” History of Political Economy 10: 271–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levy, David M. 1999. “Christianity and Malthusianism: The Invisibility of a Successful Radical.” Historical Reflections/Réflexions Historiques 25: 61–93.Google Scholar

Levy, David M. 2001. How the Dismal Science Got Its Name: Classical Economics and the Ur-Text of Racial Politics. Ann Arbor: Michigan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levy, David M., and Peart, Sandra J.. 2002. “Galton’s Two Papers on Voting as Robust Estimation.” Public Choice 113: 357–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levy, David M., and Peart, Sandra J.. 2005. “The Theory of Economic Policy in British Classical Political Economy: A Sympathetic Reading.” History of Political Economy 37 Supplement: The Role of Government in the History of Economic Thought 120–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levy, David M., and Peart, Sandra J.. 2007. “Counterfeiting Truth: Statistical Reporting on the Basis of Trust.” In Game Theory and Linguistic Meaning, edited by Veikko, Ahti Pietarinen. Oxford, UK: Elsevier, 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levy, David M., and Peart, Sandra J.. 2008a. “An Expert Induced Bubble.” Reason. Available at http://reason.com/archives/2008/09/30/an-expert-induced-bubbleGoogle Scholar

Levy, David M., and Peart, Sandra J.. 2008b. “George J. Stigler: January 17, 1911–December 1, 1991.” The New Palgrave’s Dictionary of Economics, edited by Blume, Lawrence and Durlauf, Steven. 2nd edn. New York: Palgrave. Available at http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008_S000262Google Scholar

Levy, David M., and Peart, Sandra J.. 2008c “Socialist Calculation Debate.” The New Palgrave’s Dictionary of Economics, edited by Blume, Lawrence and Durlauf, Steven. 2nd edn. New York: Palgrave. Available at www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008_S000535Google Scholar

Levy, David M., and Peart, Sandra J.. 2009a. “Adam Smith and the Place of Faction.” In The Elgar Companion to Adam Smith. Edited by Jeffrey Young. Cheltenham, Glos, UK, Edward Elgar, ch 18, 335–345.Google Scholar

Levy, David M. and Peart, Sandra J. 2009b. “Sympathy, Evolution and The Economist.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 71: 29–36.Google Scholar

Levy, David M., and Peart, Sandra J.. 2010. “Richard Whately and the Gospel of Transparency.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 69: 166–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levy, David M., and Peart, Sandra J.. 2011. “Soviet Growth and American Textbooks: An Endogenous Past.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 78: 110–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levy, David M., and Peart, Sandra J.. 2012. “Tullock on Motivated Inquiry: Expert-Induced Uncertainty Disguised as Risk.” Public Choice 153: 163–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levy, David M., and Peart, Sandra J.. 2013a. “Adam Smith on the State: Language and Reform.” In Oxford Handbook on Adam Smith, edited by Berry, Chrisopher, Paganelli, Maria, and Smith, Craig. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 372–392.Google Scholar

Levy, David M., and Peart, Sandra J.. 2013b. “Learning from Scandal about What We Know and What We Think We Know.” Homo Oeconomicus 20: 283–314.Google Scholar

Levy, David M., and Peart, Sandra J.. 2014a. “‘Almost Wholly Negative: The Ford Foundation’s Appraisal of the Virginia School.” Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2485695CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levy, David M., and Peart, Sandra J.. 2014b. “Ronald Coase and the Fabian Society: Competitive Discussion in Liberal Ideology.” http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2472130CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levy, David M., and Peart, Sandra J.. 2014c. “William Beveridge’s ‘Mock Trial of the Economists’: Experts and Liberalism.” http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2377314CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levy, David M., and Peart, Sandra J.. 2015a. “Learning from Failure: A Review of Peter Schuck’s Why Government Fails so Often: And How It Can Do Better.” Journal of Economic Literature 53: 667–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levy, David M., and Peart, Sandra J.. 2015b. “Sympathy Caught between Darwin and Eugenics.” In Sympathy: A History, edited by Schliesser, Eric. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 323–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levy, David M., Peart, Sandra J., and Albert, Margaret. 2012. “Economic Liberals as Quasi-Public Intellectuals: The Democratic Dimension.” Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 30: 1–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levy, David M, et al. 2011. “Leadership, Cheap Talk and Really Cheap Talk.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 77: 40–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lipsey, Richard G. 1963–1966. An Introduction to Positive Economics. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar

Little, Ian M. 2008. “Assessments of the Soviet Union: Who Got It Right and Who Got It Wrong.” Presented at the Summer Institute for the History of Economics. Fairfax VA.Google Scholar

Lipsey, Richard G., and Lancaster, Kelvin. 1956–1957. “The General Theory of Second Best.” Review of Economic Studies 24: 11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lipsey, Richard, Sparks, Gorden R., and Steiner, Peter O.. 1978. Economics. Toronto: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Lipsey, Richard G., and Steiner, Peter O.. 1966–1981. Economics. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Little, Ian M. 1952. “Social Choice and Individual Values.” Journal of Political Economy 60: 422–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Little, Ian M. 1957. A Critique of Welfare Economics. 2nd edn. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Longfield, Mountifort. 1931. Lectures on Political Economy, Delivered in Trinity and Michaelmas Terms in 1833. London: London School of Economics and Political Science. Originally published in 1834 in Dublin by Richard Milliken and Son.Google Scholar

Lorimer, Douglas. 1978. Colour, Class and the Victorians. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar

Machlup, Fritz. 1965. “Why Economists Disagree.” Proceeding of the Philosophical Society 109: 1–7.Google Scholar

Machlup, Fritz. 1978. “If Matter Could Talk.” In Methodology of Economics and Other Social Sciences. New York: Academic Press, 309–32.Google Scholar

Mäki, Uskali. 1999. “Science as a Free Market: A Reflexivity Test in an Economics of Economics.” Prospectives on Science 7:486–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mackay, Charles. 1932. Memoirs of Extraordinary Popular Delusions. New York: L. C. Page. Originally published in 1841 in London. The 1852 edition with the “numerous engravings” was published in London by Office of the National Illustrated Library.Google Scholar

Matthews, R. C. O. 1991. “The Economics of Professional Ethics: Should the Professions Be More Like Business?” Economic Journal 101: 737–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayer, , Thomas. 1972. Permanent Income, Wealth, and Consumption. Berkeley: University of California.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Machlup, Fritz. 1980. “Economics as a Hard Science: Realistic Goal or Wishful Thinking?” Economic Inquiry 18: 165–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Machlup, Fritz. 1993. Truth versus Precision in Economics. Aldershot, Hants, England; Brookfield, Vt., USA: E. Elgar.Google Scholar

Mayr, Ernst. 1991. One Long Argument: Charles Darwin and the Genesis of Modern Evolutionary Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

McCloskey, Deirdre. 2010. Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can’t Explain the Modern World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McConnell, Campbell R. 1960–1990. Elementary Economics: Principles, Problems and Policies. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Mehrling, Perry. 2011. Comments on Levy & Peart, “Prudence with Biased Raters.” History of Economics Society. Notre Dame.Google Scholar

Mill, John S. 1850. “Negro Question.” Fraser’s Magazine for Town and Country 41: 25–31.Google Scholar

Machlup, Fritz. 1973. A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation, Volumes 7-8 Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, edited by Robson, J. M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Originally published in 1843 by J. W. Parker, London.Google Scholar

Machlup, Fritz. 1965. The Principles of Political Economy with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy. Volumes 2–3 of The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, edited by Robson, J. M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Originally published in 1848 by J. W. Parker, London.Google Scholar

Mill, J. S. 1977. On Liberty, Essays on Politics and Society, Volume 18 Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Edited by Robson, J. M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 213–310. Originally published in 1859 by John W. Parker, London.Google Scholar

Mill, John Stuart. 1981. Autobiography. Autobiography and Literary Essays, Volume 1 of the Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, edited by Robson, John M. and Stillinger, Jack. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Originally published in 1873 in London by Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer.Google Scholar

Mill, John Stuart. 1984. “Inaugural Address Delivered to the University of St Andrews,” Essays on Equality, Law, and Education. Volume 21 Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Edited by Robson, J. M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 215–58. Originally published in 1867 by Longman, Green. Reader, and Dyer, London.Google Scholar

Mill, John Stuart. 1986. “Romilly’s Public Responsibility and the Ballot.” Newspaper Writings, Volume 25 of The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, edited by Robson, Anne. Toronto: University of Toronto, 474–475. Originally published in 1865 in Reader.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montes, Leonidas. 2015. “Friedman’s Two Visits to Chile in Context.” Summer Institute for the Study of the History of Economics. University of Richmond.Google Scholar

Morgan, Mary S., and Morrison, Margaret, eds. 1999. Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgenson, Gretchen, and Rosner, Joshua. 2011. Reckless Endangerment: How Outsized Ambition, Greed and Corruption Led to Economic Armageddon. New York: Times Book.Google Scholar

Munk, Nina. 2013. The Idealist: Jeffrey Sachs and the Quest to End Poverty. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Murphy, Antoin. 1997. John Law: Economic Theorist and Policy Maker. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murphy, Antoin. 2012. “The First Stock Market Collapse: Perspectives from John Law and Richard Cantillion.” History of Economics Society. St. Catharines, Ontario: Brock University.Google Scholar

National Bureau of Economic Research. 1941. The Corporate Bond Project, a History and Description, a Work Projects Administration Study Sponsored by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Supervised by the National Bureau of Economic Research. New York: NBER.Google Scholar

Newman, William R. 2004. Promethean Ambitions: Alchemy and the Quest to Perfect Nature. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newman, William R., and Principe, Lawrence M.. 1999. “Alchemy vs. Chemistry: The Etymological Origins of a Historiographic Mistake.” Early Science and Medicine 3: 32–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nummedal, Tara. 2007. “On the Utility of Alchemical Fraud.” In Chymists and Chymistry: Studies in the History of Alchemy and Early Modern Chemistry, edited by Principe, Lawrence M.. Canton, MA: Science History Publications, 173–180.Google Scholar

Nummedal, Tara. 2009. Alchemy and Authority in the Holy Roman Empire. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha 1997. Cultivating Humanity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Nummedal, Tara. 2010. Not for Profit: Why Democracy Needs the Humanities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Nutter, G. Warren. 1957. “Some Observations on Soviet Industrial Growth.” American Economic Review 47: 618–630.Google Scholar

Nutter, G. Warren. 1962. The Growth of Industrial Production in the Soviet Union. Princeton, NJ: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar

Nutter, G. Warren. 1969. The Strange World of Ivan Ivanov. New York and Cleveland: World Publishing.Google Scholar

Nutter, G. Warren. 1983a. “Economic Warfare.” In Political Economy and Freedom: A Collection of Essays, edited by Couch Nutter, Jane. Indianapolis: Liberty Press 222–236. Originally given to the National War College (Washington DC) in 1958.Google Scholar

Nutter, G. Warren. 1983b. “The Soviet Stir: Economic Crisis and Response.” In Political Economy and Freedom, edited by Couch Nutter, Jane. Indianapolis: Liberty Press, 181–188. Originally presented in 1964 to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.Google Scholar

O’Connor, J. F. T. 1936. “Law Department.” Federal Reserve Bulletin 22: 191–198.Google Scholar

Ospovat, Don. 1981. The Development of Darwin’s Theory: Natural History, Natural Theology, and Natural Selection, 1838–1859. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E., Walker, J., and Gardner, R. 1992. “Covenants With and Without a Sword: Self-governance is Possible.” American Political Science Review 86: 404–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palyi, Melchior. 1938. “Bank Portfolios and the Control of the Capital Market.” Journal of Business 11: 70–111.Google Scholar

Partnoy, Frank. 2002. “The Paradox of the Credit Ratings.” In Ratings, Rating Agencies and the Global Financial System, edited by Levich, Richard M., Majnoni, Giovanni, and Reinhart, Carmen M.. Boston: Kluwer, 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pearson, Karl. 1936. “Method of Moments and Method of Maximum Likelihood.” Biometrika 28: 34–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pearson, Karl, and Moul, Margaret. 1925. “The Problem of Alien Immigration into Great Britain, Illustrated by an Examination of Russian and Polish Jewish Children.” Annals of Eugenics 1: 5–55, 56–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peart, Sandra J. 1995. The Economics of W. S. Jevons. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Peart, Sandra J. 2000. “Irrationality and Intertemporal Choice in Early Neo-Classical Thought.” Canadian Journal of Economics 3: 175–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peart, Sandra J. 2009. “We’re All ‘Persons’ Now: Classical Economists and their Opponents on Marriage, the Franchise and Socialism.” Journal of History of Economic Thought 31: 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peart, Sandra J. 2015. Hayek on Mill: The Mill-Taylor Friendship and Related Writings. Volume 16 of The Collected Works of F. A. Hayek. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peart, Sandra J., and Levy, David M.. 2005. The ‘Vanity of the Philosopher’: From Equality to Hierarchy in Post-Classical Economics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peart, Sandra J. 2008a. “Darwin’s Unpublished Letter at the Bradlaugh–Besant Trial: A Question of Divided Expert Judgment.” European Journal of Political Economy 24: 243–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peart, Sandra J. and Levy, David M.. 2008b. “Discussion, Construction and Evolution: Mill, Buchanan and Hayek on the Constitutional Order.” Constitutional Political Economy 19: 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peart, Sandra J. 2013. “Hayek and the Individualists.” In F. A. Hayek and the Modern Economy: Economic Organization and Activity, edited by Peart, Sandra J. and Levy, David M.. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Phillips, J. Ronnie. 1995. The Chicago Plan and New Deal Banking Reform. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.Google Scholar

Phillips, Peter C. B. 1983. “Exact Small Sample Theory in the Simultaneous Equations Models.” In Handbook of Econometrics, edited by Griliches, Zvi and Intriligator, Michael D.. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 449–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pigou, Arthur C. 1907. “Social Improvement and Modern Biology.” Economic Journal 17: 358–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peart, Sandra J. 1918. The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Peart, Sandra J. 1935. Economics in Practice. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Place, Francis. 1930. Illustrations and Proofs of the Principle of Population, edited by Himes, Norman E.. London: Allen & Unwin. Originally published in 1822 in London by Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown.Google Scholar

Plato, . 1930. Republic. Translated by Shorey, Paul. Cambridge, MA: Loeb Classical Library.Google Scholar

Polanyi, Michael. 1962. “The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory.” Minerva 38: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Popper, Karl R. 1970. “Normal Science and Its Dangers.” In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, edited by Lakatos, Imre and Musgrave, Alan. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press, 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Popper, Karl R. 1974. Logic of Scientific Discovery. Translated by Freed, Julius and Freed, Lan. 7th revised impression. London: Hutchinson. English translation of the 1935 German language original was published in London in 1959 by Hutchinson.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl R. 1983. Realism and the Aim of Science, edited by Bartley, W. W. III. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Posner, Richard A. 1999a. “An Economic Approach to Legal Evidence.” Stanford Law Review 51: 1477–1546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Posner, Richard A. 1999b. “The Law and Economics of the Economic Expert Witness.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 13: 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Principe, Lawrence M., and Newman, William R.. 2001. “Some Problems with the Historiography of Alchemy.” In Secrets of Nature: Astrology and Alchemy in Early Modern Europe, edited by Newman, William R. and Grafton, Anthony. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 385–431.Google Scholar

Principe, Lawrence M., and De Witt, Lloyd. 2002. Transmutations – Alchemy in Art: Selected Works from the Eddleman and Fisher collections at the Chemical Heritage Foundation. Philadelphia: Chemical Heritage Foundation.Google Scholar

Putnam, Hilary. 2004. The Collapse of the Fact / Value Dichotomy and Other Essays. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

The Queen v. Charles Bradlaugh and Annie Besant. June 18, 1877. 1878. London: Freethought Publishing, [2 Q.B.D, 569; reversed 3 Q.B.D., 607].Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. 1969. Set Theory and Its Logic, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rainger, Ronald. 1978. “Race, Politics, and Science: The Anthropological Society of London in the 1860s.” Victorian Studies 22: 51–70.Google Scholar

Rand, Ayn. 1995. Letters of Ayn Rand, edited by Berliner, Michael S.. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Rapoport, Anatol. 1987. “Prisoner’s Dilemma.” In The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, edited by John Eatwell, Murray Milgate, and Peter Newman. Available at www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde1987_X001756#citationsGoogle Scholar

Rawls, John. 1955. “Two Concepts of Rules.” Philosophical Review 64: 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rawls, John. 1958. “Justice as Fairness.” Philosophical Review 67: 164–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rawls, John. 1999. “Justice as Reciprocity.” In Collected Papers, edited by Freeman, Samuel. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 190–224. Originally published in 1971 in John Stuart Mill: Utilitarianism, with Critical Essays, edited by Samuel Gorowitz.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. 2000. Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy, edited by Freeman, Samuel. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. 2007. Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy, edited by Freeman, Samuel. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reder, Melvin W. 1982. “Chicago Economics: Permanence and Change.” Journal of Economic Literature 20: 1–38.Google Scholar

Reinhart, Carmen M., and Rogoff, Kenneth. 2009. This Time It’s Different. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Richards, Robert J. 1992. The Meaning of Evolution: The Morphological Construction and Ideological Reconstruction of Darwin’s Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robbins, Lionel. 1938. “Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility: A Comment.” Economic Journal 48: 635–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robbins, Lionel. 1949. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. 2nd edn., revised and extended. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Robbins, Lionel. 1952. The Theory of Economic Policy in English Classical Political Economy. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Robbins, Lionel. 1971. The Autobiography of an Economist. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robbins, Lionel. 1981. “Economics and Political Economy.” American Economic Review 71: 1–10.Google Scholar

Romer, Paul M. 2015. “Mathiness in the Theory of Economic Growth.” American Economic Review 105: 89–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenberg, Nathan and Birdzell, L. E. Jr. 1986. How the West Grew Rich: The Economic Transformation of the Industrial World. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Rostow, W. W. 1960. The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rubinstein, Ariel. 2000. The Economics of Language: Five Essays. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruse, Michael. 1999. “Afterwards: Two Decades Later.” In The Darwin Revolution: Science Red in Tooth and Claw. 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Sachs, Jeffrey D. 1991. “Crossing the Valley of Tears in East European Reform.” Challenge 34: 26–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sachs, Jeffrey D. 2005. The End of Poverty: Economic Possibilities for Our Time. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Sally, David. 1995. “Conversations and Cooperation in Social Dilemma: A Meta-Analysis of Experiments from 1958 to 1992.” Rationality and Society 7: 58–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sally, David. 2001. “On Sympathy and Games.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 44: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Samuels, Warren J. 2005. “Melchior Palyi: An Introduction and Bibliography.” Research in the History and Methodology of Economics 23: 305–306.Google Scholar

Samuelson, Paul A. 1943. “Further Commentary on Welfare Economics.” American Economic Review 33 : 604–607.Google Scholar

Samuelson, Paul A. 1948–80. Economics: An Introductory Analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Samuelson, Paul A. 1965. The Foundations of Economic Analysis. Student edition. New York: Antheneum.Google Scholar

Samuelson, Paul A. 1997. “Credo of a Lucky Textbook Author.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 11: 153–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Samuelson, Paul. A., and Scott, Anthony. 1966–1971. Economics: An Introductory Analysis. Toronto: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Savage, Leonard J. 1972. The Foundations of Statistics. 2nd edn. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Schama, Simon. 1987. The Embarrassment of Riches: An Interpretation of Dutch Culture in the Golden Age. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar

Schama, Simon. 2000. “Money Unconfined: ‘I Invest, He Speculates, They Gamble’.” In Great Bubbles, edited by Ross B. Emmett. London: Pickering and Chatto, vol. 1, 130–61. Originally published in The Embarrassment of Riches in 1988 in Berkeley by the University of California Press.Google Scholar

Schuck, Peter. 2014. Why Government Fails So Often: And How It Can Do Better. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1954. A History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar

Sellink, Manfred. 2007. Bruegel: The Complete Paintings, Drawings and Prints. Belgium: Ludion.Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya K. 1977. “Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 6: 317–344.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1979. “The Welfare Basis of Real Income Comparisons.” Journal of Economic Literature 17: 1–45.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1995. “Rationality and Social Choice.” American Economic Review, 85: 1–24.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 2012. “What happened to Europe?” New Republic, August 2. Available at www.newrepublic.com/article/magazine/105657/sen-europe-democracy-keynes-social-justiceGoogle Scholar

Sen, A. K. 2013. “On James Buchanan,” http://lijian267.blog.sohu.com/252974528.htmlGoogle Scholar

Silk, Leonard S. 1972. “Truth vs. Partisan Political Purpose.” American Economic Review 62: 376–378.Google Scholar

Simons, Henry C. 1934. A Positive Program for Laissez Faire. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Skousen, Mark. 1997. “The Perseverance of Paul Samuelson’s Economics.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 11: 137–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Adam 1790. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. 6th edition. Available at www.econlib.org/library/Smith/smMS.html. Originally published in 1759 by A. Millar, London.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1904. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, edited by Edwin Cannan. Available at www.econlib.org/library/Smith/smWN.html. Originally published in 1776 by W. Strahan and T. Cadell, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1982a. Essays in Philosophical Subjects. Edited by W. P. D. Wightman and J. C. Bryce. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. Originally published in 1795 in London by T. Cadell Jun and W. Davies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1982b. Lectures on Jurisprudence, edited by Meek, Ronald L., Raphael, David D. and Stein, Peter. G.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. Originally published in 1978 by Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Smith, Vernon L. 1998. “The Two Faces of Adam Smith.” Southern Economic Journal 65: 1–19.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 2008. Rationality in Economics: Constructivist and Ecological Forms. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Spieth, Darius. 2013. “The French Context of Het Groote Tafereel Der Dwaasheid: John Law, Rococo Culture, and the Riches of the New World.” In The Great Mirror of Folly: Finance and Culture, and the Crash of 1720, edited by Goetzmann, William N., Labio, Catherine, Geert Rouwenhorst, K. and Young, Timothy G.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 219–234.Google Scholar

Stepan, Nancy. 1982. The Idea of Race in Science. Hamden, CT: Archon Books.Google Scholar

Stepan, Nancy. 1991. The Hour of Eugenics: Race, Gender and Nation in Latin America. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

[Stephens, Frederic George]. 1873. Catalogue of Prints and Drawings in the British Museum, Division I, Political and Personal Satires. London: British Museum.Google Scholar

Stigler, George J. 1943. “New Welfare Economics.” American Economic Review 33: 355–359.Google Scholar

Stigler, George J. 1945. “The Cost of Subsistence.” Journal of Farm Economics 25: 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stigler, George J. 1946. Theory of Price. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1948. Review of Foundations of Economic Analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association 43: 603–605.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1961. “The Economics of Information.” Journal of Political Economy 69: 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1966. Theory of Price. 3rd edn. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1975. “Editorial Comment.” Journal of Political Economy 83: 1295-1296.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. 1988. Memoirs of an Unregulated Economist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Stigler, George J., and Becker, Gary S.. 1977. “De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum.” American Economic Review 67: 76–90.Google Scholar

Stigler, Stephen M. 1986. The History of Statistics: The Measurement of Uncertainty before 1900. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Stigler, Stephen M. 1999. Statistics on the Table: The History of Statistical Concepts and Methods. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Stigler, Stephen M. 2010. “The Changing History of Robustness.” American Statistician 64: 277–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Su, Huei-Chun, and Colander., David 2013. “A Failure to Communicate: The Fact-Value Divide and the Putnam-Dasgupta Debate.” Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 6: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suzumura, Kotaro, and Samuelson, Paul. 2005. “An Interview with Paul Samuelson: Welfare Economics, ‘Old’ and ‘New’, and Social Choice Theory.” Social Choice and Welfare 25: 327–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sylla, Richard. 2002. “An Historical Primer on the Business of Credit Rating.” Ratings, Rating Agencies and the Global Financial System, edited by Levich, Richard M., Majnoni, Giovanni and Reinhart, Carmen M.. Boston: Kluwer, 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tarshis, Lorie. 1947. The Elements of Economics: An Introduction to the Theory of Price and Employment. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Tarshis, Lorie. 1967. Modern Economics. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Terborgh, George W. 1945. The Bogey of Economic Maturity. Chicago: Machinery and Allied Products Institute.Google Scholar

Tetlock, Philip E. 2005. Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Thacker, Paul D., and Seife., Charles 2015. “The Fight over Transparency: Round Two.” Available at https://archive.is/4kflmGoogle Scholar

Thompson, Dennis E. 1987. Political Ethics and Public Office. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Thorndike, Lynn. 1958. A History of Magic and Experimental Science: The Seventeenth Century. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Thornton, Henry. 1939. An Enquiry into the Nature and Effects of the Paper Credit of Great Britain (1802): Together with His Evidence Given Before the Committees of Secrecy of the Two Houses of Parliament in the Bank of England, March and April, 1797, Some Manuscript Notes, and His Speeches on the Bullion Report, May 1811, edited by Hayek, F. A.. London: George Allen and Unwin. Originally printed in 1802 in London by J. Hatchard.Google Scholar

Trani, Eugne P. and Holsworth, Robert D.. 2010. The Indispensable University: Higher Education, Economic Development and the Knowledge Economy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Tukey, John W. 1986. “The Future of Data Analysis.” Philosophy and Principles of Data Analysis: 1949–1964. Volume 3 of The Collected Works of John W. Tukey, edited by Jones, Lyle V.. Monterey: Wadsworth & Brooks, 391–484. Originally published in 1962 in the Annals of Mathematical Statistics.Google Scholar

Tullock, Gordon. 1980. Trials on Trial: The Pure Theory of Legal Procedure. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Wallace, Alfred Russel. 2005. The Organization of Inquiry. Volume 3 of Selected Works of Gordon Tullock, edited by Rowley, Charles K.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. Originally published in 1966 in Durham, N.C. by Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Tyndale, William, Trans. 1992. Tyndale’s Old Testament, edited by Daniell, David. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. The translation from the Hebrew was originally published between 1530 and 1537 in Antwerp by Merten de Keyser.Google Scholar

Valdes, Juan Gabriel. 2008. Pinochet’s Economists: The Chicago School of Economics in Chile, paperback edition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Vardeman, Stephen B. and Morris, Max D.. 2003. “Statistics and Ethics: Some Advice for Young Statisticians.” American Statistician 57: 21–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Viner, Jacob. 1927. “Adam Smith and Laissez-Faire.” Journal of Political Economy, 35: 198–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wallace, Alfred Russel. 1937. Studies in the Theory of International Trade. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar

Wallace, Alfred Russel. 1962. “The Necessary and the Desirable Range of Discretion to Be Allowed to a Monetary Authority.” In In Search of a Monetary Constitution, edited by Yeager, Leland. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 244–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Viscusi, W. Kip and Gayer, Ted. 2015. “Behavioral Public Choice: The Behavioral Paradox of Government Policy.” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 38: 973–1007.Google Scholar

Vorzimmer, Peter J. 1970. Charles Darwin: The Years of Controversy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Voth, Hans-Joachim. 2013. “Blowing Bubbles: Rational Exuberance in the South Sea and Mississippi Bubbles.” In The Great Mirror of Folly: Finance and Culture, and the Crash of 1720, edited by Goetzmann, William N., Labio, Catherine, Rouwenhorst, K. Geert and Young, Timothy G.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 89–97.Google Scholar

Wald, Abraham. 1950. Statistical Decision Functions. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Wallace, Alfred Russel. 1864. “The Origin of Human Races and the Antiquity of Man Deduced from the Theory of ‘Natural Selection’.” Journal of the Anthropological Society of London 2: clviii–clxxxvii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wallace, Alfred Russel. 1871. “The Development of Human Races under the Law of Natural Selection.” Contributions to the Theory of Natural Selection. 2nd edn. London: Macmillan and Co., 303–331.Google Scholar

Wallace, Alfred Russel. 1900. “Human Selection.” Studies Scientific & Social. London: Macmillan, 509–526. Originally published in 1890 in Fortnightly Review.Google Scholar

Wallace, Alfred Russel. 1913. Social Environment and Moral Progress. London: Cassell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wallas, Graham. 1898. The Life of Francis Place, 1771–1854. London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar

Warlick, M. E. 2006. “Fluctuating Identities: Gender Reversals in Alchemical Imagery.” In Art & Alchemy, edited by Warnberg, Jacob. Copenhagen: Museeum Tusculanum Press, University of Copenhagen, 103–123.Google Scholar

Webb, Sidney. 1910. “Eugenics and the Poor Law: The Minority Report.” The Eugenics Review 2: 233–241.Google Scholar

Weisbrot, Mark, and Baker, Dean. 2004. “Applying Economics to Economists: Good Governance at the International Financial Institutions.” CEPR Briefing Paper. Available at https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cepr.net%2Fdocuments%2Fpublications%2Fifi_2004_07.pdfGoogle Scholar

Whately, R. 1832. Introductory Lectures on Political Economy. 2nd edn. London: B. Fellowes.Google Scholar

White, Eugene. 2013. “The Long Shadow of John Law on French Public Finance: The Mississippi Bubble.” In The Great Mirror of Folly: Finance and Culture, and the Crash of 1720, edited by Goetzmann, William N., Labio, Catherine, Rouwenhorst, K. Geert and Young, Timothy G.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 99–105.Google Scholar

White, Lawrence J. 2002. “The Credit Rating Industry: An Industrial Organization Analysis.” Ratings, Rating Agencies and the Global Financial System, edited by Levich, Richard M., Majnoni, Giovanni, and Reinhart, Carmen M.. Boston: Kluwer, 19–40.Google Scholar

Wallace, Alfred Russel. 2010. “The Credit Rating Agencies.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 24: 211–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whistler, Diane, White, K. J., Bates, David and Golding, Madeline. 2015. Shazam 11. Cambridge UK: Shazam Analytics.Google Scholar

Wible, James. 1998. The Economics of Science: Methodology and Epistemology as if Economics Really Mattered. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, John. 1881. Studies of Modern Mind and Character at Several European Epochs. London: Longman, Green and Co.Google Scholar

Wolf, Charles. 1979. “A Theory of Nonmarket Failure: Framework for Implementation Analysis.” Journal of Law and Economics 22: 107–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Woodward, Richard T., and Bishop, Richard C.. 1997. “How to Decide When Experts Disagree: Uncertainty-Based Choice Rules in Environmental Policy.” Land Economics 73: 492–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yeager, Leland B. 1976. “Economics and Principles.” Southern Economic Journal 42: 559–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Young, Robert J. C. 1995. Colonial Desire: Hybridity in Theory, Culture, and Race. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ziliak, Stephen T., and McCloskey, Deirdre N.. 2008. The Cult of Statistical Significance: How the Standard Error Costs Us Jobs, Justice, and Lives. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar