Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T20:38:28.751Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Ghettos and the transmission of ethnic capital

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

David M. Cutler
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Harvard University
Edward L. Glaeser
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Harvard University
Jacob L. Vigdor
Affiliation:
School of Public Policy and Department of Economics, Duke University
Glenn C. Loury
Affiliation:
Boston University
Tariq Modood
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Steven M. Teles
Affiliation:
Brandeis University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

Introduction

African-Americans have experienced high levels of residential segregation from the racial majority for at least a century (Massey and Denton 1993, Cutler, Glaeser, and Vigdor 1999). Over the same time period, black socioeconomic outcomes have persistently lagged behind those of the majority, even as other initially disadvantaged ethnic and racial groups have experienced convergence (see Figures 7.1 and 7.2). Social scientists have developed and tested two causal explanations linking the former trend with the latter. First, the spatial mismatch hypothesis, proposed by John Kain in 1968, posits that residential segregation introduces a physical separation between blacks and centers of employment, which in turn adversely affects black outcomes. Empirical tests of this hypothesis (see Kain 1992, Ihlandfeldt and Sjoquist 1998 for recent reviews) have provided varying degrees of support for the hypothesis. Second, recent literature emphasizing the importance of neighborhood effects, peer groups, and social interactions proposes that segregation negatively affects blacks by separating them from positive role models, high-quality local public goods, or other important inputs into the human capital production function (Wilson 1987, Case and Katz 1993, Cutler and Glaeser 1997).

A natural question to ask upon examining this previous research is whether residential segregation per se has negative effects on socioeconomic outcomes, or whether the relationship between segregation and outcomes depends on specific factors, such as the proximity of ghettos to employment centers or the collective human capital of the segregated group.

Type
Chapter
Information
Ethnicity, Social Mobility, and Public Policy
Comparing the USA and UK
, pp. 204 - 221
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Becker, G. S., 1964, Human Capital; A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education, New York: National Bureau of Economic Research
Borjas, G. J., 1992, “Ethnic Capital and Intergenerational Mobility,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 107: 123–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borjas, G. J. 1995, “Ethnicity, Neighborhoods, and Human Capital Externalities,” American Economic Review 85: 365–90Google Scholar
Case, A. and L. Katz, 1991, “The Company You Keep: The Effect of Family and Neighborhood on Disadvantaged Youth,” NBER Working Paper #3705
Collins, W. and Margo, R. A., 2000, “Residential Segregation and Socioeconomic Outcomes: When Did Ghettos Go Bad?” Economics Letters 69, 2: 239–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, D. M. and Glaeser, E. L., 1997, “Are Ghettos Good or Bad?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112: 827–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, D., Glaeser, E., and Vigdor, J., 1999, “The Rise and Decline of the American Ghetto,” Journal of Political Economy 107: 455–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellen, I. G. and Turner, M. A., 1997, “Does Neighborhood Matter? Assessing Recent Evidence,” Housing Policy Debate 8: 833–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galster, G. C., 1987, “Residential Segregation and Interracial Economic Disparities: A Simultaneous-Equations Approach,” Journal of Urban Economics 21: 22–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ihlandfeldt, K. R. and Sjoquist, D. L., 1998, “The Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis: A Review of Recent Studies and Their Implications for Welfare Reform,” Housing Policy Debate 9: 849–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kain, J. F., 1968, “Housing Segregation, Negro Employment, and Metropolitan Decentralization,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 82: 175–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kain, J. F. 1992, “The Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis: Three Decades Later,” Housing Policy Debate 3: 371–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, L. F., , J. R. Kling, and , J. B. Liebman, 2001, “Moving to Opportunity in Boston: Early Impacts of a Randomized Mobility Program,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 116: 607–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, H. F. and J. Ludwig, 2003, “The Effects of MTO on Educational Opportunities in Baltimore: Early Evidence,” in J. Goering and J. Feins, eds., Choosing a Better Life, Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press
Lieberson, S., 1963, Ethnic Patterns in American Cities, New York: Free Press of Glencoe
Margo, R. A., 1990, Race and Schooling in the South, 1880–1950: An Economic History, University of Chicago Press
Massey, D. and Denton, N., 1988, “The Dimensions of Residential Segregation,” Social Forces 67: 281–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massey, D. and N. Denton 1993, American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Taeuber, K. E. and Taeuber, A. F., 1964, “The Negro as an Immigrant Group: Recent Trends in Racial and Ethnic Segregation in Chicago,” American Journal of Sociology 69: 374–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vigdor, J. L., 2002a, “Locations, Outcomes and Selective Migration,” Review of Economics and Statistics 84: 751–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vigdor, J. L. 2002b, “The Pursuit of Opportunity: Explaining Selective Black Migration,” Journal of Urban Economics 51: 391–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, W. J., 1987, The Truly Disadvantaged, University of Chicago Press

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×