Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 40
  • Cited by
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Finke, Daniel 2017. Underneath the culture of consensus: Transparency, credible commitments and voting in the Council of Ministers. European Union Politics, Vol. 18, Issue. 3, p. 339.

    Finke, Daniel and Herbel, Annika 2016. Coalition Politics and Parliamentary Oversight in the European Union. Government and Opposition, p. 1.

    Grabau, Martina and Hegelich, Simon 2016. The Gas Game: Simulating Decision-Making in the European Union's External Natural Gas Policy. Swiss Political Science Review, Vol. 22, Issue. 2, p. 232.

    Arregui, Javier 2016. Determinants of Bargaining Satisfaction Across Policy Domains in the European Union Council of Ministers. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 54, Issue. 5, p. 1105.

    Finke, Daniel and Dannwolf, Tanja 2015. Who let the dogs out? The effect of parliamentary scrutiny on compliance with EU law. Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 22, Issue. 8, p. 1127.

    Westerwinter, Oliver 2015. Joost Pauwelyn, Ramses A. Wessel and Jan Wouters (Eds.). 2012. Informal international lawmaking. (Oxford: Oxford University Press). The Review of International Organizations, Vol. 10, Issue. 1, p. 97.

    Finke, Daniel 2015. Why do European political groups call the roll?. Party Politics, Vol. 21, Issue. 5, p. 750.

    Leinaweaver, Justin and Thomson, Robert 2014. Testing models of legislative decision-making with measurement error: The robust predictive power of bargaining models over procedural models. European Union Politics, Vol. 15, Issue. 1, p. 43.

    Tsebelis, George and Hahm, Hyeonho 2014. Suspending vetoes: how the euro countries achieved unanimity in the fiscal compact. Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 21, Issue. 10, p. 1388.

    Høyland, Bjørn and Hansen, Vibeke Wøien 2014. Issue-specific policy-positions and voting in the Council. European Union Politics, Vol. 15, Issue. 1, p. 59.

    Slapin, Jonathan B 2014. Measurement, model testing, and legislative influence in the European Union. European Union Politics, Vol. 15, Issue. 1, p. 24.

    Lucas, Pablo and Payne, Diane 2014. Interdisciplinary Applications of Agent-Based Social Simulation and Modeling. p. 72.

    Webber, Douglas 2014. How likely is it that the European Union will disintegrate? A critical analysis of competing theoretical perspectives. European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 20, Issue. 2, p. 341.

    Kleine, Mareike 2014. Informal Governance in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 21, Issue. 2, p. 303.

    Rasmussen, Anne and Reh, Christine 2013. The consequences of concluding codecision early: trilogues and intra-institutional bargaining success. Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 20, Issue. 7, p. 1006.

    Thomson, Robert 2013. Double versus Triple Majorities: Will the New Voting Rules in the Council of the European Union Make a Difference?. West European Politics, Vol. 36, Issue. 6, p. 1221.

    Finke, Daniel and Fleig, Andreas 2013. The merits of adding complexity: non-separable preferences in spatial models of European Union politics. Journal of Theoretical Politics, Vol. 25, Issue. 4, p. 546.

    Leuffen, Dirk Shikano, Susumu and Walter, Stefanie 2013. Measurement and Data Aggregation in Small-n Social Scientific Research. European Political Science, Vol. 12, Issue. 1, p. 40.

    Costello, Rory and Thomson, Robert 2013. The distribution of power among EU institutions: who wins under codecision and why?. Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 20, Issue. 7, p. 1025.

    CARRUBA, CLIFFORD J. GABEL, MATTHEW and HANKLA, CHARLES 2012. Understanding the Role of the European Court of Justice in European Integration. American Political Science Review, Vol. 106, Issue. 01, p. 214.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2006
  • Online publication date: September 2009

10 - Evaluating political decision-making models

Summary

HOW WELL DO THE MODELS FORECAST?

Stocks have reached what looks like a permanently high plateau.

Irving Fisher, prominent professor of mathematical economics at Yale University, 17 October 1929

The previous chapters in this book have elaborated many different models of political decision-making in the European Union. To make their forecasts, some of these models focus on the incentives created by EU legal regulations or decision-making rules. Other models emphasise the power of bargaining in political decision-making. Still others start from logrolling, coalitions, or the spatial theory of voting.

The aim of this book is to set out all these models of EU decision-making, and then to evaluate how well the models predict actual decisions. Most of the discussion is quantitative. Yet in important respects, we mean to integrate prior case studies, formal theory, and statistical methods. For example, each of the modelling approaches represented in this book builds on one or more central aspects of political life known from dozens of skilful case studies of political decisions. All competent model-building depends on careful qualitative research in which explanatory factors are identified and tentative empirical generalisations are formulated. No model is worthwhile if, like some formal theorising, it applies to nothing in particular. Case studies have generated most of the interesting hypotheses in political science. They are the essential foundation for most model building.

Moreover, case studies play a crucial role in evaluating theory.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

The European Union Decides
  • Online ISBN: 9780511492082
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492082
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×