References

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511492082.015

Abelson, R. P. and Tukey, J. W. 1959. ‘Efficient conversion of non-metric information into metric information’, Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section of the American Sociological Association, 226–230. Reprinted in Tufte, E. R. 1970. The Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, pp. 407–417Google Scholar

Achen, C. H. 1999. ‘Measurement puzzles in decision-making models’, Paper presented at a meeting on decision-making in the European Union, Enschede, the Netherlands

Achen, C. H. and Snidal, D. 1989. ‘Rational deterrence theory and comparative case studies’, World Politics 41: 143–169CrossRef Google Scholar

Agence Europe 2000. ‘Common definition of honey is subject of policy agreement (with opposition from Spain)’, Europe Daily Bulletins No. 7726, 27 May 2000

Albert, H. 1965 ‘Modell-Platonismus. Der neoklassische Stil des ökonomischen Denkens in kritischer Beleuchtung’, in Topitsch, E. (ed.) Logik der Sozialwissenschaften. Köln/Berlin, Kiepenheuer and Witsch, pp. 406–434Google Scholar

Alesina, A. and Rosenthal, H. 1995. Partisan Politics, Divided Government, and the Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Almond, G. A. 1988. ‘The return to the state’, American Political Science Review 82: 853–874CrossRef Google Scholar

Arregui, J., Stokman, F. N. and Thomson, R. 2004. ‘Bargaining in the European Union and shifts in actors' policy positions’, European Union Politics 5: 47–72CrossRef Google Scholar

Arrow, K. 1951 [1963]. Social Choice and Individual Values [1963 2nd ed.]. New York: John WileyGoogle Scholar

Aspinwall, M. D. and Schneider, G. 2000. ‘Same table, separate menu. The institutionalist turn in political science and the study of European integration’, European Journal of Political Research 38: 1–36CrossRef Google Scholar

Axelrod, R. 1970. Conflict of Interest: A Theory of Divergent Goals with Applications to Politics. Markham: ChicagoGoogle Scholar

Axelrod, R. 1997. The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-based Models of Competition and Collaboration. Princeton University Press: PrincetonGoogle Scholar

Bailer, S. 2004. ‘Bargaining success in the European Union: the impact of exogenous and endogenous power resources’, European Union Politics 5: 99–124CrossRef Google Scholar

Bailer, S. and Schneider, G. 2002. ‘Macht und Einfluss in EU-Verhandlungen: das Integrationsdilemma Deutschlands in vergleichender Perspektive’, in Hegmann, H. and Neumärker, B. (eds.) Die Europäische Union aus Politökonomischer Perspektive. Marburg: Metropolis, pp. 177–203Google Scholar

Bailer-Jones, D. 2003. ‘When scientific models represent’, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17: 59–74CrossRef Google Scholar

Baldwin, R., Berglöf, E., Giavazzi, F. and Widgrén, M. 2000. ‘The EU reforms for tomorrow's Europe’, Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper 2623

Baldwin, R., Berglöf, E., Giavazzi, F. and Widgrén, M. 2001. ‘Nice try – should the Treaty of Nice be ratified, monitoring European integration 11’, London, Centre for Economic Policy Research

Baldwin, R. and Widgrén, M. 2004a. ‘Winners and losers under various dual majority schemes’ in Wiberg, M. (ed.) Reasoned Choices – Essays in Honor of Academy Professor Hannu Nurmi on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday. The Finnish Political Science AsssociationGoogle Scholar

Baldwin, R. and Widgrén, M. 2004b. ‘Council voting in the Constitutional Treaty: devil in the details’, Centre for European Policy Research Policy Brief 53

Banfield, E. C. 1961. Political Influence. Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press.Google Scholar

Banzhaf, J. F. 1965. ‘Weighted voting doesn't work’, Rutgers Law Review 19: 317–43Google Scholar

Baron, D. P. 1991. ‘Majoritarian incentives, pork barrel programs, and procedural control’, American Journal of Political Science 35: 57–90CrossRef Google Scholar

Baron, D. P. and Ferejohn, J. A. 1989. ‘Bargaining in legislatures’, American Political Science Review 83: 1181–1206CrossRef Google Scholar

Barr, J. and Passarelli, F. 2004. ‘Who has the power in the EU?’ Dartmouth College and Bocconi University, working paper

Bartels, L. M. 1997. ‘Specification uncertainty and model averaging’, American Journal of Political Science 41: 641–674CrossRef Google Scholar

Bentley, A. F. 1967 [1908]. The Process of Government. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Bergman, T. 1997. ‘National parliaments and EU affairs committees – notes on empirical variation and competing explanations’, Journal of European Public Policy 4: 272–87CrossRef Google Scholar

Berveling, J. 1994. Het Stempel op de Besluitvorming. Macht, Invloed en Besluitvormig op Twee Amsterdamse Beleidsterreinen. Amsterdam: Thesis PublishersGoogle Scholar

Beyers, J. and Dierickx, G. 1997. ‘Nationality and European negotiations. The working groups of the Council of Ministers’, European Journal of International Relations 4: 435–471CrossRef Google Scholar

Binmore, K. 1987a. ‘Nash bargaining theory’, in Binmore, K. and Dasgupta, P. (eds.) The Economics of Bargaining. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 27–46Google Scholar

Binmore, K. 1987b. ‘Perfect equilibria in bargaining models’, in Binmore, K. and Dasgupta, P. (eds.) The Economics of Bargaining. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 77–105Google Scholar

Binmore, K. 1998. Game Theory and the Social Contract II. Just Playing. Cambridge: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Black, D. 1958. Theories of Committees and Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Bouwen, R. 1993. ‘Organizational innovation as a social construction: managing meaning in multiple realities’, in Lindenberg, S. and Schreuder, H. (eds.) Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Organization Studies. Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 133–149Google Scholar

Brams, S. J. 1975. Game Theory and Politics. New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar

Brams, S. J. and Affuso, P. 1985. ‘New paradoxes of voting power on the EC Council of Ministers’, Electoral Studies 4: 135–139CrossRef Google Scholar

Brams, S. J. and Fishburn, P. C. 1983. Approval Voting. Boston: BirkhauserGoogle Scholar

Bräuninger, T., Cornelius, T., König, T. and Schuster, T. 2001. ‘The dynamics of European integration. A constitutional analysis of the Amsterdam intergovernmental conference’, in Schneider, G. and Aspinwall, M. D. (eds.) The Rules of Integration. Institutionalist Approaches to the Study of Europe. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 46–68Google Scholar

Broscheid, A. and Coen, D. 2003. ‘Insider and outsider lobbying of the European Commission’, European Union Politics 4: 165–190CrossRef Google Scholar

Bryce, J. 1893. The American Commonwealth, 2 vols. New York: MacmillanGoogle Scholar

Bueno de Mesquita, B. 1994. ‘Political forecasting: an expected utility model’, in Mesquita, Bueno B. and Stokman, F. N. (eds.) 1994. European Community Decision Making: Models, Applications and Comparisons. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 71–104Google Scholar

Mesquita, Bueno B. 2000. Principles of International Politics. People's Power, Preferences and Perceptions. Washington: CQ PressGoogle Scholar

Mesquita, Bueno B. 2002. Predicting Politics. Columbus: The Ohio State University PressGoogle Scholar

Mesquita, Bueno B. 2004. ‘Decision making models, rigor and new puzzles’, European Union Politics 5: 125–138CrossRef Google Scholar

Mesquita, Bueno B., Newman, D. and Rabushka, A. 1985. Forecasting Political Events: The Future of Hong Kong. New Haven: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Mesquita, Bueno B. and Stokman, F. N. (eds.) 1994. European Community Decision Making: Models, Applications and Comparisons. New Haven: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Butler, C. K. 2004. ‘Compromise and the two-level game. Modeling compromise at the international table’, Conflict Management and Peace Science 21: 159–77CrossRef Google Scholar

Cameron, D. R. 1992. ‘The 1992 initiative: causes and consequences’, in Sbragia, A. M. (ed.) Euro-Politics: Institutions and Policymaking in the ‘New’ European Community. Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution, pp. 23–74Google Scholar

Caplin, A. and Nalebuff, B. 1988. ‘On 64%–majority rule’, Econometrica 56: 787–814CrossRef Google Scholar

Caplin, A. and Nalebuff, B. 1991. ‘Aggregation and social choice: a mean voter theorem’, Econometrica 59: 1–23CrossRef Google Scholar

Carruba, C. J., Gabel, M., Murrah, L., Clough, R., Montegomery, E. and Schambach, R. 2004. ‘Off the record: unrecorded legislative votes, selection bias, and roll-call vote analysis’, unpublished manuscript

Carrubba, C. J. and Volden, C. 2000. ‘Coalitional politics and logrolling in legislative institutions’, American Journal of Political Science 44: 255–271CrossRef Google Scholar

Chong, D. 1991. Collective Action and the Civil Rights Movement. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Clarke, K. A. 2003. ‘Nonparametric model discrimination in international relations’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 47: 72–93CrossRef Google Scholar

Coleman, J. S. 1966a. ‘The possibility of a social welfare function’, American Economic Review 56: 1105–1122Google Scholar

Coleman, J. S. 1966b. ‘Foundations for a theory of collective decisions’, American Journal of Sociology 71: 615–627CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Coleman, J. S. 1971. ‘Foundations for a theory of social action’, American Journal of Sociology 76: 615–627Google Scholar

Coleman, J. S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University.Google Scholar

Corbett, R. 2000. ‘Academic modelling of the codecision procedure: a practitioner's puzzled reaction’, European Union Politics 1: 373–8Google Scholar

Corbett, R. 2001. ‘A response to a reply to a reaction (I hope someone is still interested!)’, European Union Politics 2: 361–4Google Scholar

Council of the European Communities 1990. The Council of the European Community. Luxembourg: Office of Official Publications of the European Communities

Council of the European Union 2000. ‘A-item note: vertical directives on foodstuffs: proposal for a Council directive relating to honey, political agreement’, COREPER Document 8701/00, 24 May 2000

Crombez, C. 1996. ‘Legislative procedures in the European Community’, British Journal of Political Science 26: 199–288CrossRef Google Scholar

Crombez, C. 1997. ‘The co-decision procedure in the European Union’, Legislative Studies Quarterly 22: 97–119CrossRef Google Scholar

Crombez, C. 2000a. ‘Institutional reform and co-decision in the European Union’, Constitutional Political Economy 11: 41–57CrossRef Google Scholar

Crombez, C. 2000b. ‘Co-decision: ‘towards a bicameral European Union’, European Union Politics 1: 363–8CrossRef Google Scholar

Crombez, C. 2000c. ‘Spatial models of logrolling in the European Union’, European Journal of Political Economy 16: 707–37CrossRef Google Scholar

Crombez, C. 2001. ‘The Treaty of Amsterdam and the co-decision procedure’, in Schneider, G. and Aspinwall, M. D. (eds.) The Rules of Integration. Institutionalist Approaches to the Study of Europe. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 101–122Google Scholar

Crombez, C. 2002. ‘Information, lobbying and the legislative process in the European Union’, European Union Politics 3: 7–32CrossRef Google Scholar

Crombez, C. 2003. ‘The democratic deficit in the European Union’, European Union Politics 4: 101–20CrossRef Google Scholar

Crombez, C., Steunenberg, B. and Corbett, R. 2000. ‘Understanding the EU legislative process: political scientists' and practitioners' perspectives’, European Union Politics 1: 365–85CrossRef Google Scholar

Dai, X. 2002. ‘Political regimes and international trade: the democratic difference revisited’, American Political Science Review 96: 159–65CrossRef Google Scholar

Davis, O., Groot, M. and Hinich, M. 1972. ‘Social preference orderings and majority rule’, Econometrica 40: 147–157CrossRef Google Scholar

Gooijer, J. G. 2002. ‘Introduction to forecasting decisions in conflict situations’, International Journal of Forecasting 1: 319–320CrossRef Google Scholar

Swaan, A. 1973. Coalition Theories and Cabinet Formation. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company: AmsterdamGoogle Scholar

De Vries, M. 1999. Governing with your Closest Neighbour: An Assessment of Spatial Coalition Formation Theories. Ph.D Thesis. University of Nijmegen

Zwaan, J. W. 1995. The Permanent Representatives Committee: its Role in European Union Decision-making. Amsterdam, New York: ElsevierGoogle Scholar

Dimitrova, A. and Steunenberg, B. 2001. ‘The search for convergence of national policies in the European Union: an impossible quest?’ European Union Politics. 1: 201–226CrossRef Google Scholar

Dinan, D. 1999. Ever Closer Union. An Introduction to European Integration. Boulder/London: Lynne RiennerCrossRef Google Scholar

Dobbins, M., Drüner, D. and Schneider, G. 2004. ‘Kopenhagener Konsequenzen: Gesetzgebung in der EU vor und nach der Erweiterung’, Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 35: 51–68Google Scholar

Dowding, K. 2000. ‘Institutionalist research on the European Union’, European Union Politics 1: 125–144CrossRef Google Scholar

Dowding, K. 2002. ‘Rational choice and institutional change: an overview of current theories’, in Steunenberg, B. (ed.) Widening the European Union: The Politics of Institutional Reform and Change. London: Routledge, pp. 21–38CrossRef Google Scholar

Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and RowGoogle Scholar

Edwards, G. 1996. ‘National sovereignty vs. integration? The Council of Ministers’, in Richardson, J. (ed.) European Union: Power and Policy-making. London: Routledge, pp. 127–147CrossRef Google Scholar

Elster, J. and Roemer, J. E. 1991. Interpersonal Comparisons of Well–being. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Enelow, J. M. and Hinich, M. 1984. The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Erev, I., Roth, A. E., Slonim, R. L. and Barron, G. 2002. ‘Predictive value and the usefulness of game theoretic models’, International Journal of Forecasting 18: 359–368CrossRef Google Scholar

European Commission 1996. ‘Proposal for a Council directive relating to honey’, Official Journal C 231, 9 August 1996, 10

European Commission 2001. General Report on the Activities of the European Union, 2000. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities

Evans, P. B. 1993. ‘Building an integrative approach to international and domestic politics: reflections and projections’, in Evans, P. B., Jacobson, H. K. and Putnam, R. D. (eds.) Double-edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 397–430Google Scholar

Evans, P. B., Jacobson, H. K. and Putnam, R. O. (eds.) 1993. Double-edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar

Farrell, H. and Héritier, A. 2003. ‘Formal and informal institutions under codecision: continuous constitution-building in Europe’, Governance 16: 577–600Google Scholar

Farrell, H. and Héritier, A., 2004. ‘Interorganizational negotiation and intraorganizational power in shared decision-making: early agreements under codecision and their impact on the European Parliament and Council’, Comparative Political Studies 37: 1184–1212CrossRef Google Scholar

Fearon, J. D. 1994. ‘Domestic political audiences and the escalation of international disputes’, American Political Science Review 90: 715–735CrossRef Google Scholar

Feder, S. A. 1987. ‘FACTIONS and Policon: new ways to analyze politics’, Studies in Intelligence 31: 41–57. Originally classified ‘Secret.’ Reprinted in Bradford Westerfield, H. 1995. Inside CIA's Private World. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 274–292

Feld, L., Kirchgässner, G. and Weck-Hannemann, H. 2002. ‘Enlargement and the European budget: budgetary decision making and fiscal constraints’, in Steunenberg, B. (ed.) Widening the European Union: The Politics of Institutional Reform and Change. London: Routledge, pp. 144–162CrossRef Google Scholar

Felsenthal, D. and Machover, M. 1998. The Measurement of Voting Power. Theory and Practice, Problems and Paradoxes. Cheltenham: Edward ElgarGoogle Scholar

Felsenthal, D. S. and Machover, M. 2001a. ‘Myths and meanings of voting power’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 13: 81–87CrossRef Google Scholar

Felsenthal, D. S. and Machover, M. 2001b. ‘The Treaty of Nice and qualified majority voting’, Social Choice and Welfare 18: 431–464CrossRef Google Scholar

Franzese, R. J. Jr. 1999. ‘Partially independent central banks, politically responsive governments, and inflation’, American Journal of Political Science 43: 681–706CrossRef Google Scholar

Friedkin, N. E. and Johnsen, E. C. 1990. ‘Social influence and opinion’, Journal of Mathematical Sociology 15: 193–205CrossRef Google Scholar

Friedkin, N. E. and Johnsen, E. C. 1997. ‘Social positions in influence networks’, Social Networks 19: 209–222CrossRef Google Scholar

Friedkin, N. E. and Johnsen, C. 1999. ‘Social influence networks and opinion change’, Advances in Group Processes 16: 1–29Google Scholar

Friedman, J. W. 1990. Game Theory with Applications to Economics. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Fudenberg, D. and Levine, D. K. 1998. The Theory of Learning in Games. Cambridge: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Gabel, M., Hix, S. and Schneider, G. 2002. ‘Who is afraid of cumulative research? Improving data on EU politics’, European Union Politics 3: 481–500CrossRef Google Scholar

Garrett, G. 1995. ‘From the Luxembourg compromise to codecision: decision making in the European Union’, Electoral Studies 50: 289–308CrossRef Google Scholar

Garrett, G. and Tsebelis, G. 1996. ‘An institutional critique of intergovernmentalism’, International Organization 50: 269–299CrossRef Google Scholar

Garrett, G. and Tsebelis, G. 1997. ‘More on the codecision endgame’, Journal of Legislative Studies 3: 139–143CrossRef Google Scholar

Garrett, G. and Tsebelis, G. 1999a. ‘Why resist the temptation to apply power indices to the EU?’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 11: 291–308CrossRef Google Scholar

Garrett, G. and Tsebelis, G. 1999b. ‘More reasons to resist the temptation to apply power indices to the EU’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 11: 331–338CrossRef Google Scholar

Garrett, G. and Tsebelis, G. 2001a. ‘Understanding better the EU legislative process’, European Union Politics 2: 353–361CrossRef Google Scholar

Garrett, G. and Tsebelis, G. 2001b. ‘Even more reasons to resist the temptation to apply power indices to the EU’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 13: 99–105CrossRef Google Scholar

Gaver, K. M. and Geisel, M. S. 1974. ‘Discriminating among alternative models: Bayesian and non–Bayesian approaches’, in Zarembka, P. (ed.) Frontiers in Econometrics. New York: Academic, pp. 49–77Google Scholar

Gilligan, T. and Krehbiel, K. 1995. ‘The gains from exchange hypothesis of legislative organization’, in Shepsle, K. A. and Weingast, B. R. (eds.) Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Grafstein, R. 1992. Institutional Realism. New Haven: Yale University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Granger, C. W. J. and Newbold, P. 1986. Forecasting Economic Time Series, 2nd ed. Orlando, Florida: AcademicGoogle Scholar

Greenberg, J. 1979. ‘Consistent majority rule over compact sets of alternatives’, Econometrica 47: 627–36CrossRef Google Scholar

Gul, F. 1989. ‘Bargaining foundations of Shapley value’, Econometrica 57: 81–95CrossRef Google Scholar

Haas, E. B. 1958. The Uniting of Europe. Stanford: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar

Haas, E. B. 1975. The Obsolescence of Regional Integration Theory. Berkeley: Institute of International StudiesGoogle Scholar

Hall, P. and Taylor, R. 1996. ‘Political science and the three new institutionalisms’, Political Studies 44: 936–957CrossRef Google Scholar

Hammond, T. H. and Miller, G. J. 1987. ‘The core of the constitution’, American Political Science Review 81: 1155–174CrossRef Google Scholar

Hammond, T. H. and Prins, B. C. 1999. ‘The impact of domestic institutions on international negotiations: a taxonomy of results from a complete-information spatial model’, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, Georgia, 2–5 September 1999

Harsanyi, J. C. 1963. ‘A simplified bargaining model for the n-person cooperative game’, International Economic Review 4: 194–220CrossRef Google Scholar

Harsanyi, J. C. 1977. Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Hart, S. and Mas-Colell, A. 1996. ‘Bargaining and value’, Econometrica 64: 357–380CrossRef Google Scholar

Hayes-Renshaw, F. 2001. ‘The Council and enlargement: a challenge or an opportunity?’, Journal of International Relations and Development 4: 9–12Google Scholar

Hayes-Renshaw, F. and Wallace, H. 1995. ‘Executive power in the European Union: the functions and limits of the Council of Ministers’, Journal of European Public Policy 2: 559–582Google Scholar

Hayes-Renshaw, F. and Wallace, H. 1997. The Council of Ministers. Basingstoke: Macmillan PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Herstein, I. N. and Milnor, J. 1953. ‘An axiomatic approach to measurable utility’, Econometrica 21: 291–297CrossRef Google Scholar

Hinich, M. J. and Munger, M. C. 1994. Ideology and the Theory of Political Choice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Hinich, M. and Munger, M. C. 1997. Analytical Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Hix, S. 1998. ‘The study of the European Union II: the ‘New Governance’ agenda and its rival’, Journal of European Public Policy 5: 38–65CrossRef Google Scholar

Hix, S. 1999. The Political System of the European Union. London: MacmillanCrossRef Google Scholar

Hix, S. and Lord, C. 1997. Political Parties in the European Union. New York: St. Martin's PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Hoffmann, S. 1966. ‘Obstinate or obsolete? The face of the nation State and the case of Western Europe’, Daedalus, 95: 892–908Google Scholar

Holler, M. J. 1994. ‘Comment’, in Herder-Dorneich, P., Schenk, K. E. and Schmidtchen, D. (eds.) Neue Politische Ökonomie der Reguliering, Dereguliering and Privatisierung (Jahrbuch für Neue Politische Ökonomie, Volume 13). Tübingen: Mohr, pp. 66–71Google Scholar

Holler, M. J. and Widgrén, M. 1999. ‘Why power indices for assessing EU decision-making’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 11: 321–330CrossRef Google Scholar

Hosli, M. O. 1993. ‘Admission of European Free Trade Association states to the European Community: effects of voting power in the European Community Council of Ministers’, International Organization 47: 629–643CrossRef Google Scholar

Hosli, M. O. 1995. ‘The balance between small and large: effects of a double-majority system on voting power in the European Union’, International Studies Quarterly 39: 351–370CrossRef Google Scholar

Hosli, M. O. 2000. ‘Smaller states and the new voting weights in the Council’, working paper. Clingendael Institute of International Relations: The Hague

Hosli, M. O. and Machover, M. 2004. ‘The Nice Treaty and voting rules in the Council: a reply to Moberg (2002)’, Journal of Common Market Studies 42: 497–521CrossRef Google Scholar

Hosli, M. O. and Van Deemen, A. 2002. ‘Effects of enlargement on efficiency and coalition formation in the Council of the European Union’, in Hosli, M. O., Deemen, A. and Widgrén, M. (eds.) Institutional Challenges in the European Union. London: RoutledgeCrossRef Google Scholar

Hosli, M. O. and Wolffenbuttel, R. F. 2001. ‘Estimating the vote distribution in the Council of the European Union’, Journal of International Relations and Development 4: 38–54Google Scholar

Hotelling, H. 1929. ‘Stability in competition’, Economic Journal 39: 41–57CrossRef Google Scholar

Huber, J. and Inglehart, R. 1995. ‘Expert interpretations of party space and party locations in 42 societies’, Party Politics 1: 73–111CrossRef Google Scholar

Hubschmid, C. and Moser, P. 1997. ‘The cooperation procedure in the EU: why was the European Parliament influential in the decision on car emission standards’, Journal of Comman Market Studies 35: 225–42CrossRef Google Scholar

Hug, S. 2002. Voices of Europe. Citizens, Referendums and European Integration. Lanham: Rowman and LittlefieldGoogle Scholar

Hug, S. and Christin, T. 2002. ‘Referendums and citizen support for European integration’, Comparative Political Studies 5: 586–618Google Scholar

Hug, S. and König, T. 2002. ‘In view of ratification: governmental preferences and domestic constraints at the Amsterdam intergovernmental conference’, International Organization 56: 447–476CrossRef Google Scholar

Iida, K. 1993. ‘When and how do domestic constraints matter? Two-level games with uncertainty’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 37: 403–426CrossRef Google Scholar

Johnson, H. and Broder, D. 1996. The System. Boston: Little BrownGoogle Scholar

Kalai, E. and Smorodinsky, M. 1975. ‘Other solutions to Nash's bargaining problem’, Econometrica 43: 513–518CrossRef Google Scholar

Kasack, C. 2004. ‘The legislative impact of the European Parliament under the revised co-decision procedure. Environmental, public health and consumer protection policies’, European Union Politics 5: 241–260CrossRef Google Scholar

Kauppi, H. and Widgrén, M. 2004. ‘What determines EU decision-making: needs, power or both?’, Economic Policy 39, 221–266Google Scholar

Keeney, R. L. and Raiffa, H. 1993. Decisions with Multiple Objectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Kirman, A. and Widgrén, M. 1995. ‘European economic decision-making policy: Progress or paralysis?’, Economic Policy 21: 421–460CrossRef Google Scholar

Knoke, D., Pappi, F. U. and Broadbent, J. 1996. Comparing Policy Networks: Labor Politics in the US, Germany, and Japan, Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Kollman, K. 2003. ‘The rotating presidency of the European Union as a search for good policies’, European Union Politics 4: 51–74CrossRef Google Scholar

König, T. 1992. Entscheidungen im Politiknetzwerkβ: Der Einflua von Organisationen auf die Arbeits- und Sozialrechtliche Gesetzgebung in den 80er Jahren. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-VerlagCrossRef Google Scholar

König, T. 1997. Europa auf dem Weg zum Mehrebenensystem. Gründe und konsequenzen nationaler und parlamentarischer Integration. Opladen: Westdeutscher VerlagGoogle Scholar

König, T. and Bräuninger, T. 1998. ‘The inclusiveness of European decision rules’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 10: 125–141CrossRef Google Scholar

König, T. and Bräuninger, T. 2000. ‘Governing the enlarged European Union: accession scenarios and institutional reform’, Central European Political Science Review 1: 42–62Google Scholar

König, T. and Hug, S. 2000. ‘Ratifying Maastricht, parliamentary votes on international treaties and theoretical solution concepts’, European Union Politics 1: 89–122CrossRef Google Scholar

König, T. and Pöter, M. 2001. ‘Examining the EU legislative process: the relative importance of agenda and veto power’, European Union Politics 2: 329–351CrossRef Google Scholar

Krehbiel, K. 1988. ‘Spatial models of legislative choice’, Legislative Studies Quarterly 13: 259–319CrossRef Google Scholar

Krehbiel, K. 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Krehbiel, K. 1998. Pivotal Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Kreppel, A. 1999. ‘The European Parliament's influence over EU policy outcomes’, Journal of Common Market Studies 37: 521–538CrossRef Google Scholar

Lane, J. E. and Ersson, S. 2000. The New Institutional Politics. Performance and Outcomes. London and New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

LaPalombara, J. 1960. ‘The utility and limitations of interest group theory in non-American field situations’, Journal of Politics 22: 29–49CrossRef Google Scholar

Laruelle, A. 1998. ‘The EU decision making procedures: some insight from non-cooperative game theory’, IRES Discussion Papers, 97/27

Laruelle, A. 2002. ‘The EU decision making procedures: some insight from non-cooperative game theory’, in Hosli, M., Deemen, A. and Widgrén, M. (eds.) Institutional Challenges in the European Union. London: Routledge, pp. 89–112CrossRef Google Scholar

Laruelle, A. and Widgrén, M. 1998. ‘Is the allocation of power among EU states fair?’, Public Choice 94: 317–339CrossRef Google Scholar

Laruelle, A. and Widgrén, M. 2001. ‘Voting power in a sequence of cooperative games’, in Holler, M. and Owen, G. (eds.) Voting Power And Coalition Formation. Dortrecht and Boston: Kluwer Academic PublishersCrossRef Google Scholar

Laver, M. and Shepsle, K. 1996. Making and Breaking Governments: Cabinets and Legislatures in Parliamentary Democracies. New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Leech, D. 2002. ‘Designing the voting system for the Council of Ministers of the European Union’, Public Choice 113: 437–464CrossRef Google Scholar

Leenders, R. Th. A. J. 1995. Structure and Influence. Statistical Models for the Dynamics of Actor Attributes, Network Structure and their Interdependence. Amsterdam: Thesis PublishersGoogle Scholar

Leenders, R. Th. A. J. 2002. ‘Modeling social influence through network autocorrelation: constructing the weight matrix’, Social Networks 24: 21–48CrossRef Google Scholar

Lewin, L. 1991. Self-interest and Public Interest in Western Politics. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Lewis, J. 2000. ‘The methods of community in EU decision-making and administrative rivalry in the council's infrastructure’, Journal of European Public Policy 7: 261–289CrossRef Google Scholar

Lindberg, L. N. 1963. The Political Dynamics of European Economic Integration. Stanford: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar

Lindblom, C. E. 1965. The Intelligence of Democracy. New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar

Lindenberg, S. 1997. ‘Grounding groups in theory: functional, structural and cognitive interdependencies’, Advances in Group Processes 14: 281–331Google Scholar

Lindenberg, S. 2001. ‘Social rationality versus rational egoism’, in Turner, J. H. (ed.) Handbook of Social Theory. New York: Kluwer Academic and Plenum PublishersGoogle Scholar

Lohmann, S. 1997. ‘Linkage Politics’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 41: 38–67CrossRef Google Scholar

Lowndes, V. 2002. ‘Institutionalism’, in Marsh, D. and Stoker, G. (eds.) Theory and Methods in Political Science. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 90–108CrossRef Google Scholar

Manley, J. F. 1970. The Politics of Finance. Boston: Little, BrownGoogle Scholar

Mansfield, E. D., Milner, H. V. and Rosendorff, P. B. 2000. ‘Free to trade: democracies, autocracies and international trade’, American Political Science Review 94: 305–322CrossRef Google Scholar

Mansfield, E. D., Milner, H. V. and Rosendorff, P. B. 2002. ‘Replication, realism, and robustness: analyzing political regimes and international trade’, American Political Science Review 96: 167–169CrossRef Google Scholar

March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. 1984. ‘The new institutionalism: organizational factors in political life’, American Political Science Review 78: 734–749CrossRef Google Scholar

March, J. and Olsen, J. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: the Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: The Free PressGoogle Scholar

Marks, G., Hooghe, L. and Blank, K. 1996. ‘European integration in the 1980s: state-centric vs. multi-level governance’, Journal of Common Market Studies 34: 341–378CrossRef Google Scholar

Marsden, P. V. and Friedkin, N. E. 1993. ‘Network studies of social influence’, Sociological Methods and Research 22: 127–151CrossRef Google Scholar

Martin, L. 2000. Democratic Commitments-Legislatures and International Cooperation. Princeton: Princeton University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. D. and Green, J. R. 1995. Microeconomic Theory. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Mattila, M. and Lane, J. E. 2001. ‘Why unanimity in the Council? A roll call analysis of Council voting’, European Union Politics 2: 31–52CrossRef Google Scholar

Mavrogordatos, G. 1984. ‘The Greek party system: a case of limited but polarised pluralism’, West European Politics 7: 156–169CrossRef Google Scholar

McKelvey, R. D. 1976. ‘Intransitivities in multidimensional voting models and some implications for agenda control’, Journal of Economic Theory 12: 472–182CrossRef Google Scholar

McKelvey, R. D. 1979. ‘General conditions for global intransitivities in formal voting models’, Econometrica 47: 1085–1112CrossRef Google Scholar

McKelvey, R. D., Ordeshook, P. and Winer, M. 1978. ‘The competitive solution for N-person games without transferable utility: with an application for committee games’, American Political Science Review 72: 599–615CrossRef Google Scholar

Mearsheimer, J. J. 1994–95. ‘The false promise of international institutions’. International Security 19: 5–49Google Scholar

Merlo, A. and Wilson, C. 1995. ‘A stochastic model of sequential bargaining with complete information’, Econometrica 63: 371–399CrossRef Google Scholar

Milner, H. V. 1997. Interests, Institutions, and Information. Princeton: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Milner, H. V. and Rosendorff, P. B. 1996. ‘Trade negotiations, information and domestic politics’, Economics and Politics 8: 145–89Google Scholar

Milner, H. V. and Rosendorff, P. B. 1997. ‘Democratic politics and international trade negotiations. Elections and divided government as constraints on trade liberalization’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 41: 117–146CrossRef Google Scholar

Mo, J. 1995. ‘Domestic institutions and international bargaining: the role of agent veto in two-level games’, American Political Science Review 89: 914–924CrossRef Google Scholar

Moberg, A. 2002. ‘The Nice Treaty and voting rules in the Council’, Journal of Common Market Studies 40: 259–282CrossRef Google Scholar

Mokken, R. J., Payne, D., Stokman, F. N. and Wasseur, F. W. 2000. ‘Decision context and policy effectuation: EU structural reform in Ireland’, Irish Political Studies 15: 39–61CrossRef Google Scholar

Molm, L. 1996. Coercive Power in Social Exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Moravcsik, A. 1993. ‘Introduction: integration international and domestic theories of international bargaining’, in Evans, P. B., Jacobson, H. K. and Putnam, R. D. (eds.) Double-Edged Diplomacy. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar

Moravcsik, A. 1998. The Choice for Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar

Morgan, M. S. and Morrison, M. (eds.) 1999. Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science. Cambridge, Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Morgenthau, H. 1948. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, New York: KnopfGoogle Scholar

Morrison, M. and Morgan, M. S. 1999. ‘Models as mediating instruments’, in Morgan, M. S. and Morrison, M. (eds.) Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 10–37CrossRef Google Scholar

Morton, R. B. 1999. Methods and Models: A Guide to the Empirical Analysis of Formal Models in Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Moser, P. 1996. ‘The European Parliament as a conditional agenda setter: what are the conditions? A critique of Tsebelis (1994)’, American Political Science Review 90: 834–838CrossRef Google Scholar

Moser, P. 1997a. ‘A theory of the conditional influence of the European Parliament in the co-operation procedure’, Public Choice 91: 333–350CrossRef Google Scholar

Moser, P. 1997b. ‘The benefits of the conciliation procedure for the European Parliament: comment to George Tsebelis’, Aussenwirtschaft 52: 57–62Google Scholar

Moser, P D., Schneider, G. and Kirchgässner, G. 2000. Decision Rules in the European Union: a Rational Choice Perspective. New York: St. Martin's PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Moulin, H. 1988. Axioms of Cooperative Decision Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Murphy, A. H. and Winkler, R. L. 1984. ‘Probability forecasting in meteorology’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 79: 489–500Google Scholar

Muthoo, A. 1999. Bargaining Theory With Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Myerson, R. B. 1991. Game Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Napel, S. and Widgrén, M. 2002a. ‘Strategic power in EU decision making procedures’, unpublished manuscript

Napel, S. and Widgrén, M. 2002b. ‘Strategic power revisited’, Munich: CESifo Working Paper No. 736

Napel, S. and Widgrén, M. 2004a. ‘Power measurement as sensitivity analysis – a unified approach’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 16: 517–538CrossRef Google Scholar

Napel, S. and Widgrén, M. 2004b. ‘The inter-institutional distribution of power in EU codecision’, Munich: CESifo Working Paper No. 1347, Social Choice and Welfare, forthcoming

Nash, J. F. 1950. ‘The bargaining problem’, Econometrica 18: 155–162CrossRef Google Scholar

Nash, J. F. 1953. ‘Two-person cooperative games’, Econometrica 21: 128–140CrossRef Google Scholar

Nicholson, M. 1989. Formal Theories in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Noury, A. G. 2002. ‘Ideology, nationality and Euro-Parliamentarians’, European Union Politics 3: 33–58CrossRef Google Scholar

Nugent, N. 1999. The Government and Politics of the European Union. Durham: Duke University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Opp, K. D. 1990. Empirischer Theorienvergleich: Erklärungen sozialen Verhaltens in Problemsituationen. Opladen: Westdeutscher VerlagCrossRef Google Scholar

O'Reilly, C. A. 1983. ‘The use of information in organizational decision making: a model and some propositions’, Research in Organizational Behaviour 5: 103–139Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. 1986. ‘An agenda for the study of institutions’, Public Choice 48: 3–25CrossRef Google Scholar

Owen, G. 1972. ‘Multilinear extensions of games’, Management Science 18: 64–79CrossRef Google Scholar

Owen, G. 1995. Game Theory. 3rd edition. San Diego: Academic PressGoogle Scholar

Pahre, R. 1997. ‘Endogenous domestic institutions in two-level games and parliamentary oversight of the European Union’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 41: 147–174CrossRef Google Scholar

Pahre, R. 2001. ‘Divided government and international cooperation in Austria-Hungary, Sweden-Norway and the European Union’, European Union Politics 2: 131–162CrossRef Google Scholar

Pajala, A. 2002. Expected Power and Success in Coalitions and Space: Empirical Voting Power in 17 European Parliaments and the Council of the EU. Doctoral Dissertation. Turku: University of TurkuGoogle Scholar

Pajala, A. and Widgrén, M. 2004. ‘A priori vs. empirical power in the EU Council of Ministers’, European Union Politics 5: 73–97CrossRef Google Scholar

Pappi, F. U. and Henning, C. 1998. ‘Policy networks, public policy-making and visualization – policy networks: more than a metaphor?’ Journal of Theoretical Politics 10: 553–576CrossRef Google Scholar

Payne, D. 1999. Policy Making in the European Union. An Analysis of the Impact of the Reform of the Structural Funds in Ireland. Amsterdam: Thesis PublishersGoogle Scholar

Peters, G. 1999. Institutional Theory in Political Science: the ‘New Institutionalism’. London: PinterGoogle Scholar

Peterson, J. and Bomberg, E. 1999. Decision Making in the European Union. London: Macmillan PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Plott, C. R. 1967. ‘A notion of equilibrium and its possibility under majority rule’, American Economic Review 57: 787–806Google Scholar

Plott, C. R. 1991. ‘Will economics become an experimental science?’ Southern Economic Journal 57: 901–920CrossRef Google Scholar

Putnam, R. D. 1988. ‘Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games’, International Organization 42: 427–460CrossRef Google Scholar

Putnam, R. D. 1993. ‘Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games’ in Putnam, R. D., Evans, P. and Jacobson, H. (eds.) Double-Edged Diplomacy. International Bargaining and Domestic Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 431–468Google Scholar

Rabinowitz, G. and MacDonald, S. E. 1986. ‘The power of the states in US presidential elections’, American Political Science Review 80: 65–87CrossRef Google Scholar

Raftery, A. E. 1995. ‘Bayesian model selection in social research’, Sociological Methodology 25: 111–163CrossRef Google Scholar

Raiffa, H. 1953. ‘Arbitration schemes for generalized two-person games’, in Kuhn, H. W. and Tucker, A. (eds.) Contribution to the Theory of Games II: Annals of Mathematics Studies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 361–387Google Scholar

Raub, W. and Weesie, J. 1990. ‘Reputation and efficiency in social interactions: an example of network effects’, American Journal of Sociology 96: 626–654CrossRef Google Scholar

Ray, J. L. and Russet, B. 1996. ‘The future as arbiter of theoretical controversies: predictions, explanations and the end of the cold war’, British Journal of Political Sciences 26: 441–470CrossRef Google Scholar

Ray, J. L. and Singer, D. J. 1990. ‘Measuring the concentration of power in the international system’, in Singer, D. J. and Diehl, P. F. (eds.) Measuring the Correlates of War. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar

Richardson, J. (ed.) 1996. European Union: Power and Policy-making. London: RoutledgeCrossRef Google Scholar

Riker, W. H. 1962. The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Riker, W. H. 1980. ‘Implications from the disequilibrium of majority rule for the study of institutions’, American Political Science Review 74: 432–446CrossRef Google Scholar

Riker, W. H. and Brams, S. J. 1973. ‘The paradox of vote trading’, American Political Science Review 67: 1235–1247CrossRef Google Scholar

Riley, J. 1988. Liberal Utilitarianism. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Robert, C. P. 2001. The Bayesian Choice, 2nd ed. New York: SpringerGoogle Scholar

Rojer, M. 1999. ‘Collective decision-making models applied to labour negotiations in the Netherlands: a comparison between a position exchange model and a conflict model’, Rationality and Society 11: 207–235CrossRef Google Scholar

Roth, A. E. 1979. Axiomatic Models of Bargaining. Berlin: Springer-VerlagCrossRef Google Scholar

Rubinstein, A. 1982. ‘Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model’, Econometrica 50: 97–109CrossRef Google Scholar

Rubinstein, A. 2000. Economics and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Schelling, T. C. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Schneider, G. 1994. ‘Getting closer at different speeds: strategic interaction in widening European integration’, in Allan, P. and Schmidt, C. (eds.) Game Theory and International Relations. Cheltenham: Edward ElgarGoogle Scholar

Schneider, G. 1995. ‘Agenda-setting in European integration: the conflict between voters, governments and supranational institutions’, in Laursen, F. (ed.) The Political Economy of European Integration. Maastricht: European Institute of Public Administration, pp. 31–61Google Scholar

Schneider, G. and Aspinwall, M. D. (eds.) 2001. The Rules of Integration. Institutionalist Approaches to the Study of Europe. Manchester: Manchester University PressGoogle Scholar

Schneider, G. and Baltz, K. 2003. ‘The power of specialization: how interest groups influence EU-legislation’, Rivista die Politica Economica XCIII: 253–283Google Scholar

Schneider, G. and Baltz, K. 2005. ‘Domesticated Eurocrats: bureaucratic discretion in the legislative pre-negotiations of the European Union’, Acta Politica, forthcoming

Schneider, G. and Cederman, L. E. 1994. ‘The change of tide in political cooperation: a limited information model of European integration’, International Organization 48: 633–662CrossRef Google Scholar

Schneider, G., Finke, D. and Bailer, S. 2004. ‘Bargaining power: an evaluation of competing models’, University of Konstanz, working paper

Schneider, G. and Weitsman, P. A. 1996. ‘The punishment trap: integration referendums as popularity contests’, Comparative Political Studies 28: 582–607CrossRef Google Scholar

Schofield, N. 1978. ‘Instability of simple dynamic games’, Review of Economic Studies 45: 575–594CrossRef Google Scholar

Scully, R. M. 1997a. ‘The European Parliament and the co-decision procedure: a reassessment’, Journal of Legislative Studies 3: 58–73CrossRef Google Scholar

Scully, R. M. 1997b. ‘The European Parliament and co-decision: a rejoinder to Tsebelis and Garrett’, Journal of Legislative Studies 3: 93–103CrossRef Google Scholar

Selck, T. J. 2004. ‘On the dimensionality of European Union legislative decision making’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 16: 203–222CrossRef Google Scholar

Selck, T. J. and Steunenberg, B. 2004. ‘Between power and luck: the European Parliament in the EU legislative process’, European Union Politics 5: 25–46CrossRef Google Scholar

Shapley, L. S. 1953. ‘A value for n-person cooperative games’, in Kuhn, H. and Tucker, A. (eds.) Contributions to the Theory of Games,vol II. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 343–459Google Scholar

Shapley, L. S. 1977. ‘A comparison of power indices and a non-symmetric generalization’, RAND Corporation, Paper P-5872

Shapley, L. S. and Shubik, M. 1954. ‘A method for evaluating the distribution of power in a committee system’, American Political Science Review 48: 787–792CrossRef Google Scholar

Shepsle, K. A. 1979. ‘Institutional arrangements and equilibrium in multidimensional voting models’, American Journal of Political Science 32: 27–60CrossRef Google Scholar

Shepsle, K. A. 1989. ‘Studying institutions: some lessons from the rational choice approach’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 1: 131–147CrossRef Google Scholar

Shepsle, K. A. and Weingast, B. R. 1981. ‘Structure-induced equilibrium and legislative choice’, Public Choice 37: 503–519CrossRef Google Scholar

Shepsle, K. A. and Weingast, B. R. 1984. ‘Uncovered sets and sophisticated voting outcomes with implications for agenda institutions’, American Journal of Political Science 28: 49–74CrossRef Google Scholar

Shepsle, K. A. and Weingast, B. R. 1987. ‘Why are congressional committees powerful?’ American Political Science Review 81: 935–45Google Scholar

Shepsle, K. A. and Weingast, B. R. 1995. ‘Positive theories of congressional institutions’, in Shepsle, K. A. and Weingast, B. R. (eds.) Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 5–35CrossRef Google Scholar

Sherrington, P. 1999. The Council of Ministers: Political Authority in the European Union. London and New York: PinterGoogle Scholar

Shubik, M. 1982. Game Theory in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Signorino, C. S. 1999. ‘Estimation and strategic interaction in discrete choice models of international conflict’, American Political Science Review 92: 279–297CrossRef Google Scholar

Singer, D. J. 1969. ‘The incomplete theorist: insight without evidence’, in Rosenau, J. N. and Knorr, K. (eds.) Contending Approaches to International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 63–86Google Scholar

Snidal, D. 1994. ‘The politics of scope: endogenous actors, heterogeneity and institutions’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 6: 449–472CrossRef Google Scholar

Soetendorp, B. and Hosli, M. O. 2001. ‘The hidden dynamics of EU Council decision making’, Acta Politica 4, 252–287Google Scholar

Steunenberg, B. 1994a. ‘Decision-making under different institutional arrangements: legislation by the European Community’, Journal of Theoretical and Institutional Economics 150: 642–669Google Scholar

Steunenberg, B. 1994b. ‘Regulatory policymaking in a parliamentary setting’ in Herder-Dorneich, P.Schenk, K. E. and Schmidtchen, D. (eds.) Neue Politische Ökonomie der Reguliering, Dereguliering and Privatisierung (Jahrbuch für Neue Politische Ökonomie, Volume 13). Tübingen: Mohr, pp. 36–57Google Scholar

Steunenberg, B. 1997. ‘Codecision and its reform: a comparative analysis of decision making rules in the European Union’, in Steunenberg, B. and Vught, F. A. (eds.) Political Institutions and Public Policy: Perspectives on European Decision Making. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 205–229CrossRef Google Scholar

Steunenberg, B. 2000a. ‘Constitutional change in the European Union: parliament's impact on the reform of the codecision procedure’, in Wagenaar, H. (ed.) Government Institutions: Effects, Changes and Normative Foundations. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 89–108CrossRef Google Scholar

Steunenberg, B. 2000b. ‘Seeing what you want to see: the limits of current modelling on the European Union’, European Union Politics 1: 368–373Google Scholar

Steunenberg, B. 2001. ‘Enlargement and institutional reform in the European Union: separate or connected issues?’ Constitutional Political Economy 12: 349–368CrossRef Google Scholar

Steunenberg, B. 2002a. ‘Playing different games: the European Parliament and the reform of codecision’, in Steunenberg, B. and Thomassen, J. (eds.) The European Parliament: Moving Toward Democracy in the EU. Boulder: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 163–83Google Scholar

Steunenberg, B. 2002b. ‘An even wider Union: the effects of enlargement on EU decision-making’, in Steunenberg, B. (ed.) Widening the European Union: The Politics of Institutional Change and Reform. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 97–118CrossRef Google Scholar

Steunenberg, B. and Dimitrova, A. 1999. Interests, Legitimacy, and Constitutional Choice: the Extension of the Codecision Procedure in Amsterdam. Enschede: University of Twente. MimeoGoogle Scholar

Steunenberg, B., Koboldt, C. and Schmidtchen, D. 1996. ‘Policymaking, comitology, and the balance of power in the European Union’, International Review of Law and Economics 16: 329–344CrossRef Google Scholar

Steunenberg, B.Koboldt, C. and Schmidtchen, D. 1997. ‘Beyond comitology: a comparative analysis of implementation procedures with parliamentary involvement’, Aussenwirtschaft 52: 87–112Google Scholar

Steunenberg, B., Schmidtchen, D. and Koboldt, C. 1999. ‘Strategic power in the European Union: evaluating the distribution of power in policy games’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 11: 339–366CrossRef Google Scholar

Stigum, B. 1990. Towards a Formal Science of Economics. Cambridge: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Stokman, F. N. 2004. ‘What binds us when with whom? Content and structure in social network analysis’, extended version of keynote at the SUNBELT XXIV International Social Network Conference, Portorož (Slovenia), May 13 2004 (www.oprit.rug.nl/stokman/articles.htm)

Stokman, F. N. 2005. ‘Was verbindet uns wann mit wem? Inhalt und Struktur in der Analyse Sozialer Netzwerke’, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie (forthcoming)

Stokman, F. N. and Thomson, R. (eds.) 2004. ‘Special issue: winners and losers in the European Union’, European Union Politics 5: 1–138CrossRef Google Scholar

Stokman, F. N., Assen, M., Knoop, Jan J. and Oosten, R. 2000. ‘Strategic decision making’, Advances in Group Processes 17: 131–153Google Scholar

Stokman, F. N. and Van den Bos, J. M. M. 1992. ‘A two–stage model of policymaking with an empirical test in the US energy-policy domain’, in Moore, G. and Whitt, Allen J. (eds.) The Political Consequences of Social Networks. Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press, pp. 219–253Google Scholar

Stokman, F. N. and Van Oosten, R. 1994. ‘The exchange of voting positions: an object-oriented model of policy networks’, in Mesquita, Bueno B. and Stokman, F. N. (eds.) European Community Decision Making: Models, Applications and Comparisons. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 105–127Google Scholar

Stokman, F. N. and Zeggelink, E. P. H. 1996. ‘Is politics power or policy oriented? A comparative analysis of dynamic access models in policy networks’, Journal of Mathematical Sociology 21: 77–111CrossRef Google Scholar

Sweet, Stone A. and Sandholtz, W. (eds.) 1998. Supranational Governance: The Institutionalization of the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Straffin, P. D. 1977. ‘Homogeneity, independence and power indices’, Public Choice 30: 107–118CrossRef Google Scholar

Straffin, P. D 1988. ‘The Shapley-Shubik and Banzhaf power indices as probabilities’, in Roth, A. (ed.) The Shapley Value. Essays in Honor of Lloyd Shapley. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Stratmann, T. 1997. ‘Logrolling’, in Mueller, D. C. (ed.) Perspectives on Public Choice: A Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Tallberg, J. 2003. ‘The agenda-shaping powers of the EU Council presidency’, Journal of European Public Policy 10: 1–19Google Scholar

Tarar, A. 2001. ‘International bargaining with two-sided domestic constraints’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 45: 320–340CrossRef Google Scholar

Thomson, R., Boerefijn, J. and Stokman, F. N. 2004. ‘Actor alignments in European Union decision-making’. European Journal of Political Research 43: 237–261Google Scholar

Thomson, R., Torenvlied, R. and Stokman, F. N. (eds.) 2003. ‘Special issue: models of collective decision-making’, Rationality and Society 15CrossRef Google Scholar

Tollison, R. and Willet, T.. 1979. ‘An economic theory of mutually advantageous issue linkage in international organizations’, International Organization 4: 425–449CrossRef Google Scholar

Tsebelis, G. 1994. ‘The power of the European Parliament as a conditional agenda setter’, American Political Science Review 88: 128–42CrossRef Google Scholar

Tsebelis, G. 1995. ‘Will Maastricht reduce the ‘democratic deficit’?’ APSA Comparative Politics 6: 4–6Google Scholar

Tsebelis, G. 1996. ‘More on the European Parliament as a conditional agenda setter: response to Moser’, American Political Science Review 90: 839–844CrossRef Google Scholar

Tsebelis, G. 1997. ‘Maastricht and the democratic deficit’, Aussenwirtschaft 52: 29–56Google Scholar

Tsebelis, G. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton: Princeton University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Tsebelis, G. and Garrett, G. 1996. ‘Agenda setting power, power indices, and decision making in the European Union’, International Review of Law and Economics 16: 345–361CrossRef Google Scholar

Tsebelis, G. and Garrett, G. 1997a. ‘Agenda setting, vetoes and the European Union's co-decision procedure’, Journal of Legislative Studies 3: 74–92CrossRef Google Scholar

Tsebelis, G. and Garrett, G. 1997b. ‘Why power indices cannot explain decisionmaking in the European Union’, in Schmidtchen, D. and Cooter, R. (eds.) Constitutional Law and Economics of the European Union. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 11–31Google Scholar

Tsebelis, G. and Garrett, G. 2000. ‘Legislative politics in the European Union’, European Union Politics 1: 5–32CrossRef Google Scholar

Tsebelis, G. and Garrett, G. 2001. ‘The institutional foundations of intergovernmentalism and supranationalism in the European Union’, International Organization 55: 357–390CrossRef Google Scholar

Tsebelis, G., Jensen, C., Kalandrakis, A. and Kreppel, A. 2001 ‘Legislative procedures in the European Union: an empirical analysis’, British Journal of Political Science 31: 373–399CrossRef Google Scholar

Tsebelis, G. and Kalandrakis, A. 1999. ‘The european parliament and environmental legislation: the case of chemicals’, European Journal of Political Research 36: 119–154CrossRef Google Scholar

Tsebelis, G. and Money, J. 1997. Bicameralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Tullock, G. 1959. ‘Some problems of majority voting’, Journal of Political Economy 67: 571–579CrossRef Google Scholar

Assen, M. 2001. Essays on Actor Models in Exchange Networks and Social Dilemmas. Amsterdam: Thela ThesisGoogle Scholar

Assen, M., Stokman, F. N. and Oosten, R. C. H. 2003. ‘Conflict measures in cooperative position exchange models of collective decision-making’, Rationality and Society 15: 64–84Google Scholar

Deemen, A. 1997. Coalition Formation and Social Choice, Amsterdam: KluwerCrossRef Google Scholar

Van Deemen, A. and Hosli, M. O. 1999. ‘Conflict and cooperation in collective decision-making systems’, working paper

Van den Bogaard, A. 1999. ‘Past measurement and future prediction’, in Morgan, M. S. and Morrison, M. (eds.) Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 282–325CrossRef Google Scholar

Bos, J. M. M. 1991. Dutch EC Policy Making. A Model-Guided Approach to Coordination and Negotiation. Amsterdam: Thela ThesisGoogle Scholar

Doel, J. and Velthoven, B. 1993. Democracy and Welfare Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Hees, M. and Steunenberg, B. 2000. ‘The choices judges make: court rulings, personal values, and legal constraints’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 12: 299–317Google Scholar

Schendelen, R. 2002. Machiavelli in Brussels: The Art of Lobbying the EU. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Wagner, R. H. 2004. ‘Bargaining and conflict resolution’, in Maoz, Z., Mintz, A., Clifton Margan, T., Palmer, G. and Stoll, R. J. (eds.) Multiple Paths to Knowledge in International Relations. Lexington: Lexington Books, pp. 39–72Google Scholar

Wallace, W. 2000. ‘Collective governance’, in Wallace, H. and Wallace, W. (eds.) Policy-Making in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 523–542Google Scholar

Wallace, H. and Wallace, W. (eds.) 1996. Policy-Making in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Wallace, H. and Wallace, W. (eds.)2000. Policy-Making in the European Union 4th edition. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Ward, H. 2002. ‘Rational choice’, in Marsh, D. and Stoker, G. (eds.) Theory and Methods in Political Science. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 65–89CrossRef Google Scholar

Weibull, J. W. 1995. Evolutionary Game Theory. Cambridge: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Weick, K. E. 1979. The Social Psychology of Organizing. Reading: Addison-WesleyGoogle Scholar

Weiler, J. H. H. 1999. The Constitution of Europe. ‘Do the New Clothes Have an Emperor?’ and other essays on European Integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Weingast, B. R. and Marshall, W. J. 1988. ‘The industrial organization of congress; or, why legislatures, like firms, are not organized as markets’, Journal of Political Economy 96: 132–163CrossRef Google Scholar

Westlake, M. 1994. A Modern Guide to the European Parliament. London: PinterGoogle Scholar

Westlake, M. 1995. The Council of the European Union. London: CatermillGoogle Scholar

Widgrén, M. 1994. ‘Voting power in the EC and the consequences of two different enlargements’, European Economic Review 38: 1153–1170CrossRef Google Scholar

Widgrén, M. 1995. ‘Probabilistic voting power in the EU Council: the cases of trade policy and social regulation’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 97: 345–356CrossRef Google Scholar

Wilson, W. 1885. Congressional Government. Boston: Houghton MifflinGoogle Scholar

Zimmer, C., Schneider, G. and Dobbins, M. 2005. ‘The contested Council: conflict dimensions of an intergovernmental EU institution’, Political Studies 53: 403–422CrossRef Google Scholar