Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 5
  • Cited by
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Toh, Glenn 2016. English as Medium of Instruction in Japanese Higher Education. p. 65.

    Melissourgou, Maria N. and Frantzi, Katerina T. 2015. Testing Writing in EFL Exams: The Learners’ Viewpoint as Valuable Feedback for Improvement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 199, Issue. , p. 30.

    Ruecker, Todd Shapiro, Shawna Johnson, Erik N. and Tardy, Christine M. 2014. Exploring the Linguistic and Institutional Contexts of Writing Instruction in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 48, Issue. 2, p. 401.

    Yang, Luxin and Gao, Shaofen 2013. Beliefs and practices of Chinese university teachers in EFL writing instruction. Language, Culture and Curriculum, Vol. 26, Issue. 2, p. 128.

    You, Xiaoye 2004. “The choice made from no choice”: English writing instruction in a Chinese University. Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol. 13, Issue. 2, p. 97.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2003
  • Online publication date: October 2012

Chapter 3 - Experienced ESL/EFL writing instructors' conceptualizations of their teaching: Curriculum options and implications

Summary

Education for future language teachers, like the training to become any kind of teacher, involves a process in which novices must acquire both relevant content knowledge and training in pedagogical strategies to be able to create successful classroom experiences for their future students. This is undoubtedly true for English as a second or foreign language (ESL/EFL) writing instructors, who must develop the relevant professional expertise required for this field. Conceptualizing, planning, and delivering courses is the primary focus of the work that such instructors engage in. To help clarify some of the complexities of this practical, professional knowledge, the present chapter1 identifies and analyzes the usual practices that a variety of experienced ESL/EFL writing instructors use to organize their courses. The descriptions of individual and general practices are based on data collected from personal interviews conducted in several different countries; a primary goal of these in-depth interviews was to gather specific information regarding the curriculum practices of highly experienced instructors offering classes in a range of settings.

One might expect that the scope of the variables that ESL/EFL writing instructors typically face when they plan and conduct their courses contributes to a range of curriculum practices. One can also anticipate that experienced instructors would be able to draw from a common pool of practices that reveal some commonality in their courses as well. Thus, identifying areas of commonality and difference in their stated curriculum practices should be of particular value in helping novice instructors to focus their thinking on key aspects of their courses, to reflect on their ongoing teaching experiences from a global perspective, and to anticipate curriculum alternatives that they may wish or be obliged to pursue.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Exploring the Dynamics of Second Language Writing
  • Online ISBN: 9781139524810
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524810
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×