Aad, G., et al. [ATLAS and CMS Collaborations]. 2015. Combined measurement of the Higgs Boson mass in pp collisions at and 8 TeV with the ATLAS and CMS experiments. Phys. Rev. Lett., 114, 191803.Google Scholar

Abbott, B. P., et al. [LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations]. 2016. Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116, 061102.Google Scholar

Abbott, B. P., et al. [LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations]. 2016. GW151226: Observation of gravitational waves from a 22-solar-mass binary black hole coalescence. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116, 241103. arXiv:1606.04855 [gr-qc].Google Scholar

Abbott, B. P., et al. [LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations]. 2017. GW170104: Observation of a 50-solar-mass binary black hole coalescence at redshift 0.2. Phys. Rev. Lett., 118, 221101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Abbott, B. P., et al. [LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations]. 2017. GW170814: A three-detector observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole coalescence. Phys. Rev. Lett., 119, 141101.Google ScholarPubMed

Abbott, B. P., et al. [LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations]. 2017. GW170817: Observation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral. Phys. Rev. Lett., 119, 161101.Google ScholarPubMed

Abbott, B. P., et al. [LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations]. 2017. GW170608: Observation of a 19-Solar-Mass binary black hole coalescence. Astrophys. J., 851, L35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abebe, A., Abdelwahab, M., de la Cruz-Dombriz, A., and Dunsby, P. K. S. 2012. Covariant gauge-invariant perturbations in multifluid f(R) gravity. Class. Quant. Grav., 29, 135011.Google Scholar

Abramo, L. R., Batista, R. C., Liberato, L., and Rosenfeld, R. 2007. Structure formation in the presence of dark energy perturbations. J. Cosmo. Astropart. Phys., 0711, 012.Google Scholar

Ade, P. A. R., et al. 2014. Planck 2013 results. XXII. Constraints on inflation. Astron. Astrophys., 571, A22. arXiv:1303.5082 [astro-ph.CO].Google Scholar

Ade, P. A. R., et al. 2015. Planck Collaboration, Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters. Astron. Astrophys., 594, A13.Google Scholar

Aldrovandi, R., and Pereira, J. G. 2013. Teleparallel Gravity: An Introduction, (Springer: Dordrecht).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allemandi, G., Borowiec, A., Francaviglia, M., and Odintsov, S. D. 2005. Dark energy dominance and cosmic acceleration in first order formalism. Phys. Rev. D, 72, 063505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alvarenga, F. G., de la Cruz-Dombriz, A., Houndjo, M. J. S., Rodrigues, M. E., and Sáez-Gómez, D. 2013. Dynamics of scalar perturbations in f(R,T) gravity. Phys. Rev. D, 87, 103526.Google Scholar

Alvarenga, F. G., Houndjo, M. J. S., Monwanou, A. V., and Orou, J. B. C. 2013. Testing some f(R,T) gravity models from energy conditions. J. Mod. Phys., 4, 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amendola, L. 2000. Coupled quintessence. Phys. Rev. D, 62, 043511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amendola, L., Appleby, S., Bacon, D., Baker, T. M., Baldi, M., and Bartolo, N. 2013. Cosmology and fundamental physics with the Euclid satellite. Living Rev. Rel., 16, 6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Amendola, L., Enqvist, K., and Koivisto, T. 2011. Unifying Einstein and Palatini gravities. Phys. Rev. D, 83, 044016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antoniadis, J., et al. 2013. A massive pulsar in a compact relativistic binary. Science, 340, 448–449.Google Scholar

Aoki, K., Maeda, K.-i., and Tanabe, M. 2016. Relativistic stars in bigravity theory. Phys. Rev. D, 93, 064054.Google Scholar

Aramaki, T., et al. 2016. Review of the theoretical and experimental status of dark matter identification with cosmic-ray antideuterons. Phys. Rep., 618, 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arbuzova, E. V., Dolgov, A. D., and Reverberi, L. 2012. Cosmological evolution in R2 gravity. J. Cosmo. Astropart. Phys., 2012, 049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armendáriz-Picón, C. 2002. Predictions and observations in theories with varying couplings. Phys. Rev. D, 66, 064008.Google Scholar

Arnaud, M. 2005. X-ray observations of clusters of galaxies. In Melchiorri, F. and Rephaeli, Y., eds., Background Microwave Radiation and Intracluster Cosmology, Vol. 159, Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi”, (Amsterdam: IOS Press), 77.Google Scholar

Arun, K., Gudennavar, S. B., and Sivaram, C. 2017. Dark matter, dark energy, and alternate models: A review. Adv. Space Res., 60, 166–186.Google Scholar

Aviles, A., and Cervantes-Cota, J. L. 2011. Dark degeneracy and interacting cosmic components. Phys. Rev. D, 83, 023510.Google Scholar

Ayuso, I., Jimenez, J. B., and de la Cruz-Dombriz, A. 2015. Consistency of universally nonminimally coupled f(R, T, RμνT μν) theories. Phys. Rev. D, 91, 104003.Google Scholar

Babichev, E., Koyama, K., Langlois, D., Saito, R., and Sakstein, J. 2016. Relativistic Stars in Beyond Horndeski Theories. Class. Quant. Grav., 33, 235014.Google Scholar

Baer, H., Choi, K.–Y., Kim, J. E., and Roszkowski, L. 2015. Dark matter production in the early Universe: Beyond the thermal WIMP paradigm. Phys. Rep., 555, 1–60.Google Scholar

Baez, J., and Muniain, J. P. 2008. Gauge Fields, Knots and Gravity, (New Jersey, London, Hong Kong, Singapore: World Scientific, 2008).Google Scholar

Balaguera-Antolinez, A., Böhmer, C. G., and Nowakowski, M. 2006. Scales set by the cosmological constant. Class. Quant. Grav., 23, 485–496.Google Scholar

Balaguera-Antolinez, A., Mota, D. F., and Nowakowski, M. 2007. Astrophysical configurations with background cosmology: Probing dark energy at astrophysical scales. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 382, 621–640.Google Scholar

Baldi, M., Pettorino, V., Robbers, G., and Springel, V. 2010. Hydrodynamical N-body simulations of coupled dark energy cosmologies. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 403, 1684–1702.Google Scholar

Bamba, K., Capozziello, S., Nojiri, S., and Odintsov, S. D. 2012. Dark energy cosmology: The equivalent description via different theoretical models and cosmography tests. Astrophys. Space Sci., 342, 155–228.Google Scholar

Bamba, K., Nojiri, S.’i., and Odintsov, S. D. 2008. Inflationary cosmology and the late-time accelerated expansion of the universe in non-minimal Yang-Mills-F(R)gravity and non-minimal vector-F(R) gravity. Phys. Rev. D, 77, 123532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bamba, B., and Odintsov, S. D. 2008. Inflation and late-time cosmic acceleration in non-minimal Maxwell-F (R) gravity and the generation of large-scale magnetic fields. J. Cosmo. Astropart. Phys., 0804, 024.Google Scholar

Bamba, K., and Odintsov, S. D. 2015. Inflationary cosmology in modified gravity theories. Symmetry, 7, 220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bambi, C., and Barausse, E. 2011. Constraining the quadrupole moment of stellar-mass black hole candidates with the continuum fitting method. Astrophys. J., 731, 121.Google Scholar

Barrow, J. D., and Ottewill, A. C. 1983. The stability of general relativistic cosmological theory. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 16, 2757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baykal, A., and Delice, O. 2011. A unified approach to variational derivatives of modified gravitational actions. Class. Quant. Grav., 28, 015014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baykal, A., and Delice, O. 2013. Multi-scalar-tensor equivalents for modified gravitational actions. Phys. Rev. D, 88, 084041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bekenstein, J. D. 2004. Relativistic gravitation theory for the modified Newtonian dynamics paradigm. Phys. Rev. D, 70, 083509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bennett, C. L., et al. 2003. First year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: Preliminary maps and basic results. Astrophys. J. Suppl., 148, 1.Google Scholar

Bertolami, O., Boehmer, C. G., Harko, T., and Lobo, F. S. N. 2007. Extra force in f(R) modified theories of gravity. Phys. Rev. D, 75, 104016.Google Scholar

Bertolami, O., and Ferreira, R. Z. 2012. Traversable Wormholes and Time Machines in non-minimally coupled curvature-matter f(R) theories. Phys. Rev. D, 85, 104050.Google Scholar

Bertolami, O., Frazão, P., and Páramos, J. 2010. Accelerated expansion from a non-minimal gravitational coupling to matter. Phys. Rev. D, 81, 104046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bertolami, O., Frazão, P., and Páramos, J. 2011. Reheating via a generalized non-minimal coupling of curvature to matter. Phys. Rev. D, 83, 044010.Google Scholar

Bertolami, O., Frazão, P., and Páramos, J. 2012. Mimicking dark matter in galaxy clusters through a non-minimal gravitational coupling with matter. Phys. Rev. D, 86, 044034.Google Scholar

Bertolami, O., Frazão, P., and Páramos, J. 2013. Cosmological perturbations in theories with non-minimal coupling between curvature and matter. J. Cosmo. Astropart. Phys., 1305, 029.Google Scholar

Bertolami, O., Pedro, F. G., and Le Delliou, M. 2007. Dark energy-dark matter interaction and putative violation of the Equivalence Principle from the Abell Cluster A586. Phys. Lett. B, 654, 165.Google Scholar

Bertolami, O., Gomes, C., and Lobo, F. S. N. 2017. Gravitational waves in theories with a non-minimal curvature-matter coupling. arXiv:1706.06826 [gr-qc].CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bertolami, O., Harko, T., Lobo, F. S. N., and Páramos, J. 2008. Non-minimal curvature-matter couplings in modified gravity. arXiv:0811.2876 [gr-qc].Google Scholar

Bertolami, O., Lobo, F. S. N., and Páramos, J. 2008. Nonminimal coupling of perfect fluids to curvature. Phys. Rev. D, 78, 064036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bertolami, O., March, R., and Páramos, J. 2013. Solar system constraints to nonminimally coupled gravity. Phys. Rev. D, 88, 064019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bertolami, O., and Martins, A. 2012. On the dynamics of perfect fluids in nonminimally coupled gravity. Phys. Rev. D, 85, 024012.Google Scholar

Bertolami, O., and Páramos, J. 2008. Do f(R) theories matter? Phys. Rev. D, 77, 084018.Google Scholar

Bertolami, O., and Páramos, J. 2008. On the non-trivial gravitational coupling to matter. Class. Quant. Grav., 25, 245017.Google Scholar

Bertolami, O., and Páramos, J. 2010. Mimicking dark matter through a non-minimal gravitational coupling with matter. J. Cosmo. Astropart. Phys., 1003, 009.Google Scholar

Bertolami, O., and Páramos, J. 2014. Minimal extension of General Relativity: Alternative gravity model with non-minimal coupling between matter and curvature. Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys., 11, 1460003.Google Scholar

Bertolami, O., and Páramos, J. 2014. Modified Friedmann equation from nonminimally coupled theories of gravity. Phys. Rev. D, 89, 044012.Google Scholar

Bertolami, O., and Páramos, J. 2015. Homogeneous spherically symmetric bodies with a nonminimal coupling between curvature and matter: The choice of the Lagrangian density for matter. Gen. Rel. Grav., 47, 1835.Google Scholar

Bertolami, O., Páramos, J., and Turyshev., S. 2008. General theory of relativity: Will it survive the next decade? Astrophys. Space Sci. Libr., 349, 27.Google Scholar

Bertolami, O., and Sequeira, M. C. 2009. Energy conditions and stability in f(R) theories of gravity with non-minimal coupling to matter. Phys. Rev. D, 79, 104010.Google Scholar

Bildhauer, S. 1989. Transport equations for freely propagating photons in curved space-times: A derivation by Wigner transformation. Class. Quant. Grav., 6, 1171–1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binney, J., and Tremaine, S. 2008. Galactic Dynamics. (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Bisabr, Y. 2012. Modified gravity with a non-minimal gravitational coupling to matter. Phys. Rev. D, 86, 044025.Google Scholar

Bisabr, Y. 2013. Non-minimal gravitational coupling of phantom and big rip singularity. Gen. Rel. Grav., 45, 1559–1566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biswas, T., Gerwick, E., Koivisto, T., and Mazumdar, A. 2012. Towards singularity and ghost free theories of gravity. Phys. Rev. Lett., 108, 031101.Google Scholar

Biswas, T., Koivisto, T., and Mazumdar, A. 2013. Nonlocal theories of gravity: The flat space propagator. arXiv:1302.0532 [gr-qc].Google Scholar

Bodmer, A. R. 1971. Collapsed nuclei. Phys. Rev. D, 4, 1601–1606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boehmer, C. G., De Risi, G., Harko, T., and Lobo, F. S. N. 2010. Classical tests of general relativity in brane world models. Class. Quant. Grav., 27, 185013.Google Scholar

Boehmer, C. G., and Harko, T. 2007. Can dark matter be a Bose-Einstein condensate? J. Cosmo. Astropart. Phys., 0706, 025.Google Scholar

Boehmer, C. G., and Harko, T. 2008. Physics of dark energy particles. Found. Phys., 38 (2008), 216–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boehmer, C. G., Harko, T., and Lobo, F. S. N. 2008. Dark matter as a geometric effect in f(R) gravity. Astropart. Phys., 29, 386.Google Scholar

Boehmer, C. G., Harko, T., and Lobo, F. S. N. 2008. Generalized virial theorem in f(R) gravity. J. Cosmo. Astropart. Phys., 0803, 024.Google Scholar

Boehmer, C. G., Harko, T., and Lobo, F. S. N. 2008. Solar system tests of brane world models. Class. Quant. Grav., 25, 045015.Google Scholar

Boehmer, C. G., Harko, T., and Lobo, F. S. N. 2012. Wormhole geometries in modified teleparralel gravity and the energy conditions. Phys. Rev. D, 85, 044033.Google Scholar

Boehmer, C. G., Lobo, F. S. N., and Tamanini, N. 2013. Einstein static Universe in hybrid metric-Palatini gravity. Phys. Rev. D, 88, 104019.Google Scholar

Boisseau, B., Esposito-Farese, G., Polarski, D., and Starobinsky, A. A. 2000. Reconstruction of a scalar tensor theory of gravity in an accelerating universe. Phys. Rev. Lett., 85, 2236.Google Scholar

Bojowald, M. 2011. Quantum Cosmology: A Fundamental Description of the Universe, (New York, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London: Springer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bojowald, M. 2015. Quantum cosmology: A review. Reports on Progress in Physics, 78, 023901.Google Scholar

Bondi, H. 1952. On spherically symmetrical accretion. Mon. Not. R. Acad. Sci., 112, 195–204.Google Scholar

Borka, B., Capozziello, S., Jovanovic, P., and Jovanovic, V. B. 2016. Probing hybrid modified gravity by stellar motion around Galactic Center. Astropart. Phys. 79, 41.Google Scholar

Borowiec, A., Capozziello, S., de Laurentis, M., et al. 2015. Invariant solutions and Noether symmetries in hybrid gravity. Phys. Rev. D, 91, 023517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borriello, A., and Salucci, P. 2001. The dark matter distribution in disc galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 323, 285.Google Scholar

Boylan-Kolchin, M., Bullock, J. S., and Kaplinghat, M. 2011. Too big to fail? The puzzling darkness of massive Milky Way subhaloes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 415, L40–L44.Google Scholar

Boylan-Kolchin, M., Bullock, J. S., and Kaplinghat, M. 2012. The Milky Way’s bright satellites as an apparent failure of ΛCDM. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 422, 1203–1218.Google Scholar

Brans, C., and Dicke, R. H. 1961. Mach’s principle and a relativistic theory of gravitation. Phys. Rev., 124, 925–935.Google Scholar

Brax, P., van de Bruck, C., Mota, D. F., Nunes, N. J., and Winther, H. A. 2010. Chameleons with field dependent couplings. Phys. Rev. D, 82, 083503.Google Scholar

Brax, P. 2012. Screened modified gravity. Acta Phys. Polon. B, 43, 2307.Google Scholar

Brax, P., Davis, A.-C., Li, B., and Winther, H. A. 2012. A unified description of screened modified gravity. Phys. Rev. D, 86, 044015.Google Scholar

Brihaye, Y., Cisterna, A., and Erices, C. 2016. Boson stars in biscalar extensions of Horndeski gravity. Phys. Rev. D, 93, 124057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, J. D. 1993. Action functionals for relativistic perfect fluids. Class. Quant. Grav., 10, 1579–1606.Google Scholar

Buchdahl, H. A. 1959. General relativistic fluid spheres. Phys. Rev., 116, 1027– 1034.Google Scholar

Buchdahl, H. A. 1970. Non-linear Lagrangians and cosmological theory. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 150, 1.Google Scholar

Cai, Y. F., Capozziello, S., De Laurentis, M., and Saridakis, E. N. 2016. f(T) teleparallel gravity and cosmology. Rept. Prog. Phys., 79, 106901.Google Scholar

Calvao, M. O., Lima, J. A. S., and Waga, I. 1992. On the thermodynamics of matter creation in cosmology. Phys. Lett. A, 162, 223.Google Scholar

Carloni, S., Koivisto, T., and Lobo, F. S. N. 2015. A dynamical system analysis of hybrid metric-Palatini cosmologies. Phys. Rev. D, 92, 064035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Capozziello, S. 2002. Curvature quintessence. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 11, 483–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Capozziello, C., Cardone, V. F., and Troisi, A. 2006. Dark energy and dark matter as curvature effects. J. Cosmo. Astropart. Phys., 0608, 001.Google Scholar

Capozziello, C., Cardone, V. F., and Troisi, A. 2007. Low surface brightness galaxies rotation curves in the low energy limit of R_n gravity: no need for dark matter? Month. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 375, 1423–1440.Google Scholar

Capozziello, S., Carloni, S., and Troisi, A. 2003. Quintessence without scalar fields. Recent Res. Dev. Astron. Astrophys., 1, 625.Google Scholar

Capozziello, S., and De Laurentis, M. 2011. Extended theories of gravity. Phys. Rept., 509, 167.Google Scholar

Capozziello, S., Harko, T., Koivisto, T. S., Lobo, F. S. N., and Olmo, G. J. 2013. Cosmology of hybrid metric-Palatini f(X)-gravity. J. Cosmo. Astropart. Phys., 1304, 011.Google Scholar

Capozziello, S., Harko, T., Koivisto, T. S., Lobo, F. S. N., and Olmo, G. J. 2013. Galactic rotation curves in hybrid metric-Palatini gravity. Astropart. Phys., 50 – 52, 65–75.Google Scholar

Capozziello, S., Harko, T., Koivisto, T. S., Lobo, F. S. N., and Olmo, G. J. 2013. The virial theorem and the dark matter problem in hybrid metric-Palatini gravity. J. Cosmo. Astropart. Phys., 07, 024.Google Scholar

Capozziello, S., Harko, T., Koivisto, T. S., Lobo, F. S. N., and Olmo, G. J. 2013. Wormholes supported by hybrid metric-Palatini gravity. Phys. Rev. D, 86, 127504.Google Scholar

Capozziello, S., Harko, T., Koivisto, T. S., Lobo, F. S. N., and Olmo, G. J. 2015. Hybrid metric-Palatini gravity. Universe, 1, 199.Google Scholar

Capozziello, S., Harko, T., Lobo, F. S. N., and Olmo, G. J. 2013. Hybrid modified gravity unifying local tests, galactic dynamics and late-time cosmic acceleration. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 22, 1342006.Google Scholar

Capozziello, S., Harko, T., Lobo, F. S. N., and Olmo, G. J., and Vignolo, S. 2014. The Cauchy problem in hybrid metric-Palatini f(X)-gravity. Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys., 11, 1450042.Google Scholar

Capozziello, S., and Vignolo, S. 2009. The Cauchy problem for metric-affine f(R)-gravity in presence of perfect-fluid matter. Class. Quant. Grav., 26, 175013.Google Scholar

Capozziello, S., and Vignolo, S. 2009. On the well formulation of the initial value problem of metric–affine f(R)-gravity. Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys., 6, 985– 1001.Google Scholar

Capozziello, S., and Vignolo, S. 2011. The Cauchy problem for metric-affine f(R)-gravity in presence of a Klein-Gordon scalar field. Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys., 8, 167–176.Google Scholar

Capozziello, S., and Vignolo, S. 2012. The Cauchy problem for f(R)-gravity: An overview. Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys., 9, 1250006.Google Scholar

Cardenas, V. H. 2012. Dark energy, matter creation and curvature. The European Physical Journal C, 72, 2149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlberg, R. G., Yee, H. K. C., and Ellingson, E. 1997. The average mass and light profiles of galaxy clusters. Astrophys. J., 478, 462–475.Google Scholar

Carlip, S. 2008. Is quantum gravity necessary? Class. Quant. Grav., 25, 154010.Google Scholar

Carlson, E. D., Machacek, M. E., and Hall, J. L. 1992. Self-interacting dark matter. Astrophys. J., 398, 43–52.Google Scholar

Carroll, S. M. 2014. Spacetime And Geometry: An Introduction To General Relativity, (Harlow, UK: Pearson Education Limited, 2014)Google Scholar

Carroll, S. M., Duvvuri, V., Trodden, M., and Turner, M. S. 2004. Is cosmic speed-up due to new gravitational physics? Phys. Rev. D, 70, 043528.Google Scholar

Cartan, E. 1922. Sur une généralisation de la notion de courbure de Riemann et les espaces à torsion. C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris), 174, 593601.Google Scholar

Cartan, E. 1925. Sur les variétés à connexion affine et la théorie de la relativité généralisée (deuxième partie). Ann. Ec. Norm. Sup., 42, 17–28.Google Scholar

Casas, J. A., García-Bellido, J., and Quiros, M. 1992. Scalar-tensor theories of gravity with Phi-dependent masses. Class. Quant. Grav., 9, 1371.Google Scholar

Castañeda Valle, D., and Mielke, E. W. 2016. Relativistic soliton collisions of axion type dark matter. Phys. Lett. B, 758, 93–97.Google Scholar

Castel-Branco, N., Paramos, J., and March, R. 2014. Perturbation of the metric around a spherical body from a nonminimal coupling between matter and curvature. Phys. Lett. B, 735, 25.Google Scholar

Celani, D. C. F., Pinto-Neto, N., and Vitenti, S. D. P. 2017. Particle creation in bouncing cosmologies. Phys. Rev. D, 95, 023523.Google Scholar

Cembranos, J. A. R. 2009. Dark matter from R₂ gravity. Phys. Rev. Lett., 102, 141301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chakraborty, S. 2013. An alternative f(R, T) gravity theory and the dark energy problem. Gen. Rel. Grav., 45, 2039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chakraborty, S. 2014. Is emergent universe a consequence of particle creation process? Phys. Lett. B, 732, 81–84.Google Scholar

Charmousis, C., Copeland, E. J., Padilla, A., and Saffin, P. M. 2012. Self-tuning and the derivation of a class of scalar-tensor theories. Phys. Rev. D, 85, 104040.Google Scholar

Chavanis, P. H., and Harko, T. 2012. Bose-Einstein condensate general relativistic stars. Phys. Rev. D, 86, 064011.Google Scholar

Cheng, K. S., Dai, Z. G., and Lu, T. 1998. Strange stars and related astrophysical phenomena. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 7, 139–176.Google Scholar

Chen, C.-M., Harko, T., and Mak, M. K. 2000. Bianchi type I cosmologies in arbitrary dimensional dilaton gravities. Phys. Rev. D, 62, 124016.Google Scholar

Choquet-Bruhat, Y. 1962. Cauchy problem, in Witten, L., ed., Gravitation: An Introduction to Current Research, (New York: John Wiley & Sons).Google Scholar

Choquet-Bruhat, Y. 2009. General Relativity and the Einstein Equations, (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Chudaykin, A., Gorbunov, D., and Tkachev, I. 2016. Dark matter component decaying after recombination: Lensing constraints with Planck data. Phys. Rev. D, 94, 023528.Google Scholar

Ciarlet, P., and Lions, J., eds. 1993. Handbook of Numerical Analysis, Vol. 3, (Amsterdam: Elsevier).Google Scholar

Cisterna, A., Delsate, T., Ducobu, L., and Rinaldi, M. 2016. Slowly rotating neutron stars in the nonminimal derivative coupling sector of Horndeski gravity. Phys. Rev. D, 93, 084046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cisterna, A., Delsate, T., and Rinaldi, M. 2015. Neutron stars in general second order scalar-tensor theory: The case of nonminimal derivative coupling. Phys. Rev. D, 92, 044050.Google Scholar

Copeland, E. J., Sami, M., and Tsujikawa, S. 2006. Dynamics of dark energy. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 15, 1753–1936.Google Scholar

Courteau, S., et al. 2014. Galaxy masses. Rev. Mod. Phys., 86, 47–119.Google Scholar

Cui, Y. 2015. A review of WIMP baryogenesis mechanisms. Mod. Phys. Lett. A, A 30, 1530028.Google Scholar

Damour, T. 1996. Testing the equivalence principle: Why and how? Class. Quant. Grav., 13, A33.Google Scholar

Damour, T. 2001. Questioning the equivalence principle. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Ser. IV Phys. Astrophys., 2, 1249.Google Scholar

Damour, T. 2012. Theoretical aspects of the equivalence principle. Class. Quant. Grav., 29, 184001.Google Scholar

Damour, T., and Donoghue, J. F. 2010. Equivalence principle violations and couplings of a light dilaton. Phys. Rev. D, 82, 084033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Damour, T., and Esposito-Farese, G. 1992. Tensor multiscalar theories of gravitation. Class. Quant. Grav., 9, 2093.Google Scholar

Damour, T., and Esposito-Farese, G. 1996. Tensor-scalar gravity and binary-pulsar experiments. Phys. Rev. D, 54, 1474–1491.Google Scholar

Damour, T., Gibbons, G. W., and Gundlach, C. C. 1990. Dark matter, time-varying G, and a dilaton field. Phys. Rev. Lett., 64, 123.Google Scholar

Damour, T., Piazza, F., and Veneziano, G. 2002. Violations of the equivalence principle in a dilaton-runaway scenario. Phys. Rev. D, 66, 046007.Google Scholar

Damour, T., and Polyakov, A. M. 1994. The string dilation and a least coupling principle. Nuc. Phys. B, 423, 532.Google Scholar

Damour, T., and Polyakov, A. M. 1994. String theory and gravity. Gen. Rel. & Grav., 26, 1171.Google Scholar

Damour, T., and A. Vilenkin, A. 1996. String theory and inflation. Phys. Rev. D, 53, 2981.Google Scholar

Danila, B., Harko, T., Lobo, F. S. N., and Mak, M. K. 2017. Hybrid metric-Palatini stars. Phys. Rev. D, 95, 044031.Google Scholar

Das, D., and Banerjee, N. 2008. Brans–Dicke scalar field as a chameleon. Phys. Rev. D, 78, 043512.Google Scholar

Delgaty, M. S. R., and Lake, K. 1998. Physical acceptability of isolated, static, spherically symmetric, perfect fluid solutions of Einstein’s equations. Comput. Phys. Commun., 115, 395–415.Google Scholar

De Felice, A., and Tsujikawa, S. 2010. f(R) theories. Living Rev. Rel., 13, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De la Cruz-Dombriz, A., Dobado, A., and Maroto, A. L. 2008. On the evolution of density perturbations in f(R) theories of gravity. Phys. Rev. D, 2008, 77, 123515.Google Scholar

de Laix, A. A., Scherrer, R. J., and Schaefer, R. K. 1995. Constraints on self-interacting dark matter. Astrophys. J., 452, 495–500.Google Scholar

Demorest, P., Pennucci, T., Ransom, S., Roberts, M., and Hessels, J. 2010. A two-solar-mass neutron star measured using Shapiro delay. Nature, 467, 1081– 1083.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

de Rham, C. 2014. Massive gravity. Living Rev. Rel., 17, 7.Google Scholar

de Rham, C., Hofmann, S., Khoury, J., and Tolley, A. J. 2008. Cascading gravity and degravitation. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 0802, 011.Google Scholar

De Risi, G., Harko, T., and Lobo, F. S. N. 2012. Solar system constraints on local dark matter density. J. Cosmo. Astropart. Phys., 07, 047.Google Scholar

Deser, S., and Gibbons, G. W. 1998. Born-Infeld-Einstein actions? Class. Quan. Grav., 15, L35.Google Scholar

de Sitter, W. 1917. On the relativity of inertia: Remarks concerning Einstein’s latest hypothesis. Koninklijke Nederlandsche Akademie van Wetenschappen Proceedings, 19, 1217–1225.Google Scholar

de Sitter, W. 1917. Einstein’s theory of gravitation and its astronomical consequences. Third paper. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 78, 3–28.Google Scholar

Dewitt, B. S. 1967. Quantum theory of gravity. I. The canonical theory. Phys. Rev., 160, 1113–1148.Google Scholar

Dewitt, B. S. 1967. Quantum theory of gravity. II. The manifestly covariant theory. Phys. Rev., 162, 1195–1239.Google Scholar

Dewitt, B. S. 1967. Quantum Theory of Gravity. III. Applications of the covariant theory. Phys. Rev., 162, 1239–1256.Google Scholar

Dirac, P. A. M. 1996. General Theory of Relativity, (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Dodelson, S. 2003. Modern Cosmology, (Amsterdam: Elsevier)Google Scholar

Dolgov, A. D., and Kawasaki, M. 2003. Can modified gravity explain accelerated cosmic expansion? Phys. Lett. B, 573, 1.Google Scholar

Drummond, I. T., and Hathrell, S. J. 1980. QED Vacuum polarization in a background gravitational field and its effect on the velocity of photons. Phys. Rev. D, 22, 343.Google Scholar

Dubrovin, B. A., Fomenko, A. T., and Novikov, S. P. 1985. Modern Geometry– Methods and Applications: Part II: The Geometry and Topology of Manifolds, 2nd edition, (New York: Springer Verlag).Google Scholar

Dubrovin, B. A., Fomenko, A. T., and Novikov, S. P. 1990. Modern Geometry– Methods and Applications: Part III: Introduction to Homology Theory, 2nd edition, (New York: Springer Verlag).Google Scholar

Dubrovin, B. A., Fomenko, A. T., and Novikov, S. P. 1992. Modern Geometry– Methods and Applications: Part I: The Geometry of Surfaces, Transformation Groups, and Fields, 2nd edition, (New York: Springer Verlag).Google Scholar

Duruisseau, J. P., Kerner, R., and Eysseric, P. 1983. Non-Einsteinian gravitational Lagrangians assuring cosmological solutions without collapse. Gen. Rel. Grav., 15, 797–807.Google Scholar

Dvali, G. R., Gabadadze, G., and Porrati, M. 2000. 4-D gravity on a brane in 5-D Minkowski space. Phys. Lett. B, 485, 208.Google Scholar

Dzhunushaliev, V. 2015. Nonperturbative quantization: Ideas, perspectives, and applications. arXiv:1505.02747.Google Scholar

Dzhunushaliev, V., Folomeev, V., Kleihaus, B., and Kunz, J. 2014. Modified gravity from the quantum part of the metric. Eur. Phys. J. C, 74, 2743.Google Scholar

Dzhunushaliev, V., Folomeev, V., Kleihaus, B., and Kunz, J. 2015. Modified gravity from the nonperturbative quantization of a metric. Eur. Phys. J. C, 75, 157.Google Scholar

Eddington, A. S. 2010. The Mathematical Theory of Relativity, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Einstein, A. 1917. Kosmologische Betrachtungen zur allgemeinen Rela-tivitätstheorie. Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wis-senschaften (Berlin), 1917, 142–152.Google Scholar

Einstein, A. 1928. Sitz. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. p. 217; ibid, 224; Unzicker, A., and Case, T. 2005. Translation of Einstein’s attempt of a unified field theory with teleparallelism (transcription).Google Scholar

Einstein, A. 1988. The Meaning of Relativity: Including the Relativistic Theory of the Non-Symmetric Field, 5th edition, (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Faraoni, V. 2004. Cosmology in Scalar-Tensor Gravity, (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers).Google Scholar

Faraoni, V. 2007. De Sitter space and the equivalence between f(R) and scalar-tensor gravity. Phys. Rev. D, 75, 067302.Google Scholar

Faraoni, V. 2007. A viability criterion for modified gravity with an extra force. Phys. Rev. D, 76, 127501.Google Scholar

Faraoni, V. 2009. The Lagrangian description of perfect fluids and modified gravity with an extra force. Phys. Rev. D, 80, 124040.Google Scholar

Faraoni, V., and Nadeau, S. 2005. The stability of modified gravity models. Phys. Rev. D, 72, 124005.Google Scholar

Ferraro, R., and Fiorini, F. 2007. Modified teleparallel gravity: Inflation without inflaton. Phys. Rev. D, 75, 084031.Google Scholar

Flanagan, E. E. 2003. Higher order gravity theories and scalar tensor theories. Class. Quant. Grav., 21, 417–426.Google Scholar

Fock, V. 1959. The Theory of Space, Time and Gravitation, (Oxford: Pergamon Press).Google Scholar

Fomenko, A. T., and Mishchenko, A. S. 2009. A Short Course in Differential Geometry and Topology, (Cambridge: Cambridge Scientific Publishers)Google Scholar

Fourés-Bruhat, Y. 1958. Bulletin de la Societe Mathematique de France, 86, 155.Google Scholar

Friedman, A. 1922. Über die krümmung des raumes. Zeitschrift für Physik, 10, 377–386.Google Scholar

Frieman, J. A., Hill, C. T., Stebbins, A., and Waga, I. 1995. Cosmology with ultra-light pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone bosons. Phys. Rev. Lett., 75, 20772080.Google Scholar

Fujii, Y., and Maeda, K. I.. 2003. The Scalar-Tensor Theory of Gravitation, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Fulling, S. A. 1989. Aspects of Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space-Time, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Gariel, J., and le Denmat, G. 1995. Matter creation and bulk viscosity in early cosmology. Physics Letters A, 200, 11–16.Google Scholar

Gasperini, M., Piazza, F., Veneziano, G. 2002. Quintessence as a run-away dilaton. Phys. Rev. D, 65, 023508.Google Scholar

Georgiou, A. 2003. A virial theorem for rotating charged perfect fluids in general relativity. Class. Quantum Grav., 20, 359–367.Google Scholar

Glendenning, N. K., Compact Stars, Nuclear Physics, Particle Physics and General Relativity, (New York: Springer, 2000).Google Scholar

Goenner, H. F. M. 1984. Theories of gravitation with nonminimal coupling of matter and the gravitational field. Found. Phys., 14, 865881.Google Scholar

Golovnev, A., Karciauskas, M., and Nyrhinen, H. J. 2015. ADM analysis of gravity models within the framework of bimetric variational formalism. J. Cosmo. Astropart. Phys., 2015, 021.Google Scholar

Gorini, V., Kamenshchik, A. Y., Moschella, U., and Pasquier, V. 2004. Tachyons, scalar fields, and cosmology. Phys. Rev. D, 69, 123512.Google Scholar

Gottlober, S., Schmidt, H. J., and Starobinsky, A. A. 1990. Sixth-order gravity and conformal transformations. Class. Quant. Grav., 7, 893.Google Scholar

Gou, L., et al. 2014. Confirmation via the continuum-fitting method that the spin of the black hole in Cygnus X-1 is extreme. Astrophys. J., 790, 29.Google Scholar

Gourgoulhon, E., and Bonazzola, S. 1994. A virial identity applied to relativistic stellar models. Class. Quantum Grav., 11, 1775–1784.Google Scholar

Grøn, O., and Hervik, S. 2010. Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity: With Modern Applications in Cosmology, (New York: Springer Verlag).Google Scholar

Haghani, Z., Harko, H., Lobo, F. S. N., Sepangi, H. R., and Shahidi, S. 2013. Further matters in space-time geometry: f(R, T, R_μνT _μν) gravity. Phys. Rev. D, 88, 044023.Google Scholar

Haghani, Z., Harko, H., Sepangi, H. R., and Shahidi, S. 2014. Matter may matter. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 23, 1442016.Google Scholar

Haghi, H., Bazkiaei, A. E., Hasani Zonoozi, A., and Kroupa, P. 2016. Declining rotation curves of galaxies as a test of gravitational theory. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 458, 4172–4187.Google Scholar

Harko, T. 2003. Gravitational collapse of a Hagedorn fluid in Vaidya geometry. Phys. Rev. D, 68, 064005.Google Scholar

Harko, T. 2008. Modified gravity with arbitrary coupling between matter and geometry. Phys. Lett. B, 669, 376.Google Scholar

Harko, T. 2009. Matter accretion by brane-world black holes. Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 54, 2583–2594.Google Scholar

Harko, T. 2010. Galactic rotation curves in modified gravity with non-minimal coupling between matter and geometry. Phys. Rev. D, 81, 084050.Google Scholar

Harko, T. 2010. The matter Lagrangian and the energy-momentum tensor in modified gravity with non-minimal coupling between matter and geometry. Phys. Rev. D, 81, 044021.Google Scholar

Harko, T. 2011. Evolution of cosmological perturbations in Bose-Einstein condensate dark matter. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 413, 3095–3104.Google Scholar

Harko, T. 2014. Thermodynamic interpretation of the generalized gravity models with geometry-matter coupling. Phys. Rev. D, 90, 044067.Google Scholar

Harko, T., and Cheng, K. S. 2000. Collapsing strange quark matter in Vaidya geometry. Phys. Lett. A, 266, 249–253.Google Scholar

Harko, T., and Cheng, K. S. 2007. The virial theorem and the dynamics of clusters of galaxies in the brane world models. Phys. Rev. D, 76, 044013.Google Scholar

Harko, T., Koivisto, T. S., and Lobo, F. S. N. 2011. Palatini formulation of modified gravity with a nonminimal curvature-matter coupling. Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 26, 1467–1480.Google Scholar

Harko, T., Koivisto, T. S., Lobo, F. S. N., Olmo, G. J. 2012. Metric-Palatini gravity unifying local constraints and late-time cosmic acceleration. Phys. Rev. D, 85, 084016.Google Scholar

Harko, T., Kovács, Z., and Lobo, F. S. N. 2008. Electromagnetic signatures of thin accretion disks in wormhole geometries. Phys. Rev. D, 78, 084005.Google Scholar

Harko, T., Kovács, Z., and Lobo, F. S. N. 2009. Can accretion disk properties distinguish gravastars from black holes? Class. Quant. Grav., 26, 215006.Google Scholar

Harko, T., Kovács, Z., and Lobo, F. S. N. 2009. Testing Horava-Lifshitz gravity using thin accretion disk properties. Phys. Rev. D, 80, 044021.Google Scholar

Harko, T., Kovács, Z., and Lobo, F. S. N. 2009. Thin accretion disks in stationary axisymmetric wormhole spacetimes. Phys. Rev. D, 79, 064001.Google Scholar

Harko, T., Kovács, Z., and Lobo, F. S. N. 2010. Thin accretion disk signatures in dynamical Chern-Simons modified gravity. Class. Quant. Grav., 27, 105010.Google Scholar

Harko, T., Kovács, Z., and Lobo, F. S. N. 2011. Solar system tests of Horava– Lifshitz gravity. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 467, 1390–1407.Google Scholar

Harko, T., Kovács, Z., and Lobo, F. S. N. 2011. Thin accretion disk signatures of slowly rotating black holes in Horava gravity. Class. Quant. Grav., 28, 165001.Google Scholar

Harko, T. and Lake, M. J. 2014. Null fluid collapse in brane world models. Phys. Rev. D, 89, 064038.Google Scholar

Harko, T., and Lobo, F. S. N. 2010. f(R, L_m) gravity. Eur. Phys. J. C, 70, 373.Google Scholar

Harko, T., and Lobo, F. S. N. 2012. Generalized dark gravity. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 21, 1242019.Google Scholar

Harko, T., and Lobo, F. S. N. 2012. Geodesic deviation, Raychaudhuri equation, and tidal forces in modified gravity with an arbitrary curvature-matter coupling. Phys. Rev. D, 86, 124034.Google Scholar

Harko, T., and Lobo, F. S. N. 2013. Irreversible thermodynamic description of interacting dark energy-dark matter cosmological models. Phys. Rev. D, 87, 044018.Google Scholar

Harko, T., and Lobo, F. S. N. 2014. Generalized curvature-matter couplings in modified gravity. Galaxies, 2, 410.Google Scholar

Harko, T., Lobo, F. S. N., and Mak, M. K. 2014. Arbitrary scalar field and quintessence cosmological models. Eur. Phys. J. C, 74, 2784.Google Scholar

Harko, T., Lobo, F. S. N., Mak, M. K., and Sushkov, S. V. 2013. Modified-gravity wormholes without exotic matter. Phys. Rev. D, 87, 067504.Google Scholar

Harko, T., Lobo, F. S. N., Mak, M. K., and Sushkov, S. V. 2013. Structure of neutron, quark, and exotic stars in Eddington-inspired Born-Infeld gravity. Phys. Rev. D88, 044032.Google Scholar

Harko, T., Lobo, F. S. N., Mimoso, J. P., and Pavón, D. 2015. Gravitational induced particle production through a nonminimal curvature-matter coupling. Eur. Phys. J. C, 75, 386.Google Scholar

Harko, T., Lobo, F. S. N., and Minazzoli, O. 2013. Extended f(R, Lm) gravity with generalized scalar field and kinetic term dependences. Phys. Rev. D, 87, 047501.Google Scholar

Harko, T., and Lobo, F. S. N., Nojiri, S.’i., and Odintsov, S. D. 2011, . f(R, T) gravity. Phys. Rev. D, 84, 024020.Google Scholar

Harko, T., Lobo, F. S. N., Otalora, G., and Saridakis, E. N. 2014. f(T, T) gravity and cosmology. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 1412, 021.Google Scholar

Harko, T., Lobo, F. S. N., Otalora, G., and Saridakis, E. N. 2014. Nonminimal torsion-matter coupling extension of f(T) gravity. Phys. Rev. D, 89, 124036.Google Scholar

Harko, T., and Mak, M. K. 1999. Particle creation in varying speed of light cosmological models. Class. Quantum Grav., 16, 2741–2752.Google Scholar

Harko, T., and Mak, M. K. 2016. Exact power series solutions of the structure equations of the general relativistic isotropic fluid stars with linear barotropic and polytropic equations of state. Astrophysics and Space Science, 361, 1–19.Google Scholar

Harrison, E. R. 1965. Cosmology without general relativity. Ann. Phys., 35, 437–446.Google Scholar

Harvey, D., Massey, R., Kitching, T., Taylor, A., and Tittley, E. 2015. The nongravitational interactions of dark matter in colliding galaxy clusters. Science, 347, 1462–1465.Google Scholar

Hawking, S. W., and Ellis, G. F. R. 1973. The large scale structure of space-time, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Hawking, S. W., and Page, D. N. 1986. Operator ordering and the flatness of the universe. Nucl. Phys. B, 264, 185–196.Google Scholar

Hayashi, K., and Shirafuji, T. 1979. New general relativity. Phys. Rev. D, 19, 3524. (Addendum: ibid. D 24, 3312 [1982]).Google Scholar

Hinshaw, G., et al. (WMAP Collaboration). 2013. First-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: The A angular power spectrum. Astrophys. J. Suppl., 148, 135.Google Scholar

Horndeski, G. W. 1974. Second-order scalar-tensor field equations in a four-dimensional space. Int. J. Theor. Phys., 10, 363.Google Scholar

Horvath, J. E., and Valentim, R. 2017. The masses of neutron stars. In Alsabti, A. W. and Murdin, P., eds., Handbook of Supernovae, (New York: Springer) arXiv:1607.06981.Google Scholar

Houndjo, M. J. S. 2012. Reconstruction of f(R, T) gravity describing matter dominated and accelerated phases. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 21, 1250003.Google Scholar

Houndjo, M. J. S., Batista, C. E. M., Campos, J. P., and Piattella, O. F. 2013. Finite-time singularities in f(R, T) gravity and the effect of conformal anomaly. Can. J. Phys., 91, 548. arXiv:1203.6084 [gr-qc].Google Scholar

Houndjo, M. J. S., and Piattella, O. F. 2012. Reconstructing f(R, T) gravity from holographic dark energy. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 21, 1250024.Google Scholar

Hu, B. L. 1982. Vacuum viscosity description of quantum processes in the early universe. Phys. Lett. A, 90, 375–380.Google Scholar

Hu, W., and Sawicki, I. 2007. Models of f(R) Cosmic acceleration that evade solar-system tests. Phys. Rev. D, 76, 064004.Google Scholar

Huang, R. -N. 2013. The Wheeler–DeWitt equation of f(R, L_m) gravity in minisuperspace. arXiv:1304.5309 [gr-qc].Google Scholar

Hulse, R. A., and Taylor, J. H. 1975. Discovery of a pulsar in a binary system. Astrophys. J. Lett., 195, L51–L53.Google Scholar

Ibragimov, N. H. 2015. Tensors and Riemannian Geometry, (Berlin/Boston: Higher Education Press and Walter de Gruyter).Google Scholar

Iorio, L. 2015. Editorial for the Special Issue: 100 Years of Chronogeometrody-namics: The Status of the Einstein’s Theory of Gravitation in Its Centennial Year. Universe, 1, 38–81.Google Scholar

Iorio, L. 2015. Gravitational anomalies in the solar system? Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 24, 1530015.Google Scholar

Itoh, N. 1970. Hydrostatic Equilibrium of Hypothetical Quark Stars. Progress of Theoretical Physics, 44, 291–292.Google Scholar

Jackson, J. C. 1970. The dynamics of clusters of galaxies in universes with nonzero cosmological constant, and the virial theorem mass discrepancy. Month. Not. R. Astr. Soc., 148, 249–260.Google Scholar

Jamil, M., Momeni, D., Raza, M., and Myrzakulov, R. 2012. Reconstruction of some cosmological models in f(R, T) gravity. Eur. Phys. J. C, 72, 1999.Google Scholar

Jauzac, M., et al. 2016. The extraordinary amount of substructure in the Hubble Frontier Fields cluster Abell 2744. Month. Not. R. Astr. Soc., 463, 3876–3893.Google Scholar

Jesus, J. F., Oliveira, F. A., Basilakos, S., and Lima, J. A. S. 2011. Newtonian perturbations on models with matter creation. Phys. Rev. D, 84, 063511.Google Scholar

Jimenez, J. B., Golovnev, A., Karciauskas, M., and Koivisto, T. S. 2012. The bimetric variational principle for General Relativity. Phys. Rev. D, 86, 084024.Google Scholar

Jimenez, J. B., and Koivisto, T. S. 2014. Extended Gauss-Bonnet gravities in Weyl geometry. Class. Quant. Grav., 31, 135002.Google Scholar

Joshi, P. S. 1993. Global Aspects in Gravitation and Cosmology, (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Jou, D., Casas-Vázquez, J., and Lebon, G. 2010. Extended Irreversible Thermodynamics, (Berlin: Springer Verlag).Google Scholar

Joyce, A., Jain, B., Khoury, J., and Trodden, M. 2015. Beyond the Cosmological Standard Model. Phys. Rept. 568, 1–98.Google Scholar

Karukes, E. V., and Salucci, P. 2017. The universal rotation curve of dwarf disk galaxies. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 465, 4703–4722.Google Scholar

Katsuragawa, T., Nojiri, S., Odintsov, S. D., and Yamazaki, M. 2016. Relativistic stars in dRGT massive gravity. Phys. Rev. D, 93, 124013.Google Scholar

Kerner, R. 1982. Cosmology without singularity and nonlinear gravitational Lagrangians. Gen. Rel. Grav., 14, 453–469.Google Scholar

Khoury, J., and Weltman, A. 2004. Chameleon fields: Awaiting surprises for tests of gravity in space. Phys. Rev. Lett., 93, 171104.Google Scholar

Khoury, J., and Weltman, A. 2004. Chameleon cosmology. Phys. Rev. D, 69, 044026.Google Scholar

Kiani, F., and Nozari, K. 2014. Energy conditions in F (T, Θ) gravity and compatibility with a stable de Sitter solution. Phys. Lett. B, 728, 554.Google Scholar

Kibble, T. W. B., and Randjbar-Daemi, S. 1980. Non-linear coupling of quantum theory and classical gravity. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 13, 141–148.Google Scholar

Kleihaus, B., Kunz, J., Mojica, S., and Zagermann, M. 2016. Rapidly rotating neutron stars in dilatonic Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet theory. Phys. Rev. D, 93, 064077.Google Scholar

Koivisto, T. 2006. Covariant conservation of energy momentum in modified gravities. Class. Quant. Grav., 23, 4289–4296.Google Scholar

Koivisto, T. 2006. The matter power spectrum in f(R) gravity. Phys. Rev. D, 73, 083517.Google Scholar

Koivisto, T. S. 2009. Cosmology of modified (but second order) gravity. AIP Conf. Proc., 1206, 79–96.Google Scholar

Koivisto, T. S. 2011. On new variational principles as alternatives to the Palatini method. Phys. Rev. D, 83, 101501.Google Scholar

Koivisto, T. S. 2011. The post-Newtonian limit in C-theories of gravitation. Phys. Rev. D, 84, 121502.Google Scholar

Koivisto, T., and Kurki-Suonio, H. 2006. Cosmological perturbations in the Palatini formulation of modified gravity. Class. Quant. Grav., 23, 2355.Google Scholar

Koivisto, T. S., Mota, D. F., and Sandstad, M. 2013. Novel aspects of C-theories in cosmology. Unpublished. arXiv:1305.4754.Google Scholar

Koivisto, T. S., Mota, D. F., and Zumalacarregui, M. 2012. Screening modifications of gravity through disformally coupled fields. Phys. Rev. Lett., 109, 241102.Google Scholar

Koivisto, T. S., Saridakis, E. N., and Tamanini, N. 2015. Scalar fluid theories: Cosmological perturbations and large-scale structure. J. Cosmo. Astropart. Phys., 1509, 047.Google Scholar

Koivisto, T. S., and Tamanini, N. 2013. Ghosts in pure and hybrid formalisms of gravity theories: A unified analysis. Phys. Rev. D, 87, 104030.Google Scholar

Kolb, E. W., and Turner, M. S. 1989. The Early Universe, (Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley Company)Google Scholar

Kong, L., Li, Z., and Bambi, C. 2014. Constraints on the spacetime geometry around 10 stellar-mass black hole candidates from the disk’s thermal spectrum. Astrophys. J., 797, 78.Google Scholar

Kovács, Z., Cheng, K. S., and Harko, T. 2009. Can stellar mass black holes be quark stars? Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 400, 1632–1642.Google Scholar

Kovács, Z., Cheng, K. S., and Harko, T. 2009. Thin accretion disks around neutron and quark stars. Astron. Astrophys., 500, 621–631.Google Scholar

Kovács, Z., and Harko, T. 2010. Can accretion disk properties observationally distinguish black holes from naked singularities? Phys. Rev. D, 82, 124047.Google Scholar

Kramer, D., Stephani, H., MacCallum, M., and Herlt, E. 1980. Exact Solutions of Einstein’s Field Equations, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Kubis, S., and Kutschera, M. 1997. Nuclear matter in relativistic mean field theory with isovector scalar meson. Phys. Lett. B, 399, 191–195.Google Scholar

Lake, K. 2004. Galactic potentials. Phys. Rev. Lett., 92, 051101.Google Scholar

Landau, L. D., and Lifshitz, E. M. 1994. The Classical Theory of Fields, Fourth Revised English Edition, (Amsterdam: Butterworth-Heinemann).Google Scholar

Landau, L. D., and Lifshitz, E. M. 1998. The Classical Theory of Fields, (Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann).Google Scholar

Landau, L. D., and Lifshitz, E. M. 2000. Non-relativistic Quantum Mechanics, (Beijing: World Publishing Company).Google Scholar

Leanizbarrutia, I., Lobo, F. S. N., and Saez-Gomez, D. 2017. Crossing SNe Ia and BAO observational constraints with local ones in hybrid metric-Palatini gravity. Phys. Rev. D, 95, 084046.Google Scholar

Lemaître, G. 1931. Expansion of the universe: A homogeneous universe of constant mass and increasing radius accounting for the radial velocity of extra-galactic nebulae. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 91, 483–490.Google Scholar

Lemos, J. P. S., and Lobo, F. S. N. 2004. Plane symmetric traversable wormholes in an anti-de Sitter background. Phys. Rev. D, 69, 104007.Google Scholar

Lemos, J. P. S., and Lobo, F. S. N. 2008. Plane symmetric thin-shell wormholes: Solutions and stability. Phys. Rev. D, 78, 044030.Google Scholar

Lemos, J. P. S., Lobo, F. S. N., and Quinet de Oliveira, S. 2003. Morris-Thorne wormholes with a cosmological constant. Phys. Rev. D, 68, 064004.Google Scholar

Leray, J. 1953. Hyperbolic Differential Equations, (Princeton: Institute for Advanced Study).Google Scholar

Levkov, D., Rebbi, C., and Rubakov, V. A. 2002. Tunneling in quantum cosmology: Numerical study of particle creation. Phys. Rev. D, 66, 083516.Google Scholar

Li, B., and Barrow, J. D. 2011. N-body simulations for coupled scalar field cosmology. Phys. Rev. D, 83, 024007.Google Scholar

Li, M., Li, X.-D., Wang, S., and Wang, Y. 2013. Dark energy: A brief review. Frontiers of Physics, 8, 828–846.Google Scholar

Lima, J. A. S., and Germano, A. S. M. 1992. On the equivalence of bulk viscosity and matter creation. Physics Letters A, 170, 373–378.Google Scholar

Lima, J. A. S., Zanchin, V., and Brandenberger, R. 1997. On the Newtonian cosmology equations with pressure. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 291, L1–L4.Google Scholar

Lima, N. A. 2014. Dynamics of linear perturbations in the hybrid metric-Palatini gravity. Phys. Rev. D, 89, 083527.Google Scholar

Lima, N. A., and Smer-Barreto, V. 2016. Constraints on hybrid metric-Palatini models from background evolution. Astrophys. J., 818, 186.Google Scholar

Linder, E. V. 2010. Einstein’s other gravity and the acceleration of the universe. Phys. Rev. D, 81, 127301.Google Scholar

Lindquist, R. W. 1966. Relativistic transport theory. Ann. Phys., NY, 37, 487– 518.Google Scholar

Liu, X., Harko, T., and Liang, S.-D. 2016. Cosmological implications of modified gravity induced by quantum metric fluctuations. Eur. Phys. J. C, 76, 420.Google Scholar

Llinares, C., and Mota, D. 2013. Releasing scalar fields: cosmological simulations of scalar-tensor theories for gravity beyond the static approximation. Phys. Rev. Lett., 110, 161101.Google Scholar

Lobo, F. S. N. 2004. Surface stresses on a thin shell surrounding a traversable wormhole. Class. Quant. Grav., 21, 4811.Google Scholar

Lobo, F. S. N. 2005. Energy conditions, traversable wormholes and dust shells. Gen. Rel. Grav., 37, 2023.Google Scholar

Lobo, F. S. N. 2009. The dark side of gravity: Modified theories of gravity. In Dark Energy: Current Advances and Ideas, (Kerala: Research Signpost), 173–204.Google Scholar

Lobo, F. S. N. 2008. Exotic solutions in General Relativity: Traversable wormholes and “warp drive” spacetimes. Class. Quant. Grav., 1–78, arXiv:0710.4474 [gr-qc].Google Scholar

Lobo, F. S. N., and Crawford, P. 2004. Linearized stability analysis of thin shell wormholes with a cosmological constant. Class. Quant. Grav., 21, 391.Google Scholar

Lobo, F. S. N., and Crawford, P. 2005. Stability analysis of dynamic thin shells. Class. Quant. Grav., 22, 4869.Google Scholar

Lobo, F. S. N., and Harko, T. 2012. Extended f(R, L_m) theories of gravity. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Marcel Grossmann Meeting, Stockholm University, Sweden. arXiv:1211.0426 [gr-qc].Google Scholar

Lobo, F. S. N., and Oliveira, M. A. 2009. Wormhole geometries in f(R) modified theories of gravity. Phys. Rev. D, 80, 104012.Google Scholar

Logunov, A. A. 2001. The Theory of Gravity, (Moscow: Nauka).Google Scholar

Ludwick, K. J. 2017. The viability of phantom dark energy: A review. Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 32, 1730025.Google Scholar

Ma, C.-P., and Bertschinger, E. 1995. Cosmological perturbation theory in the synchronous and conformal Newtonian gauges. Astrophys. J., 455, 7–25.Google Scholar

Maartens, R. 1996. Causal thermodynamics in relativity. Lectures given at the Hanno Rund Workshop on Relativity and Thermodynamics, South Africa. arXiv:astro-ph/9609119.Google Scholar

Maartens, R. 2004. Brane world gravity. Living Rev. Rel., 7, 7.Google Scholar

Maartens, R., and Maharaj, S. D. 1990. Collision-free gases in spatially homogeneous space-times. J. Math. Phys., 22, 595–607Google Scholar

Maartens, R, and Mendez, V. 1997. Nonlinear bulk viscosity and inflation. Phys. Rev. D, 55, 1937–1942.Google Scholar

Mak, M. K., Dobson, P. N. Jr., and Harko, T. 2000. Maximum mass-radius ratio for compact general relativistic objects in Schwarzschild–de Sitter geometry. Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 15, 2153–2158.Google Scholar

Mak, M. K., and Harko, T. 1999. Cosmological particle production in five-dimensional Kaluza-Klein theory. Class. Quantum Grav., 16, 4085–4099.Google Scholar

Mak, M. K., and Harko, T. 2004. Can the galactic rotation curves be explained in brane world models? Phys. Rev. D, 70, 024010.Google Scholar

Maluf, J. W. 2013. The teleparallel equivalent of general relativity. Annalen Phys., 525, 339.Google Scholar

Mamon, G. A., and Lokas, E. L. 2005. Dark matter in elliptical galaxies – II. Estimating the mass within the virial radius. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 363, 705.Google Scholar

Martín-Moruno, P., Nunes, N. J., and Lobo, F. S. N. 2015. Horndeski theories self-tuning to a de Sitter vacuum. Phys. Rev. D, 91, 8, 084029.Google Scholar

Mashhoon, B. 1973. Tidal gravitational radiation. Astrophys. J., 185, 83.Google Scholar

Mashhoon, B. 1975. On tidal phenomena in a strong gravitational field. Astrophys. J., 197, 705.Google Scholar

Mashhoon, B., and Theiss, D. S. 1982. Relativistic tidal forces and the possibility of measuring them. Phys. Rev. Lett., 49, 1542.Google Scholar

Massey, R., et al. 2007. Dark matter maps reveal cosmic scaffolding. Nature, 445, 286–290.Google Scholar

Matsumoto, S., Mukhopadhyay, S., and Sming Tsai, Y.-L. 2016. Effective theory of WIMP dark matter supplemented by simplified models: Singlet-like Majorana fermion case. Phys. Rev. D, 94, 065034.Google Scholar

McCrea, W. H. 1951. Relativity theory and the creation of matter. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 206, 562–575.Google Scholar

McCrea, W. H., and Milne, E. A. 1934. Newtonian universes and the curvature of space. Quart. J. Math. Oxford, 5, 73–80.Google Scholar

Mehdizadeh, M. R., Zangeneh, M. K., and Lobo, F. S. N. 2015. Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet traversable wormholes satisfying the weak energy condition. Phys. Rev. D, 91, 084004.Google Scholar

Michel, F. C. 1972. Accretion of matter by condensed objects. Astrophys. Space Science, 15, 153–160.Google Scholar

Milgrom, M. 1983. A modification of the Newtonian dynamics as a possible alternative to the hidden mass hypothesis. Astrophys. J., 270, 365.Google Scholar

Milne, E. A. 1934. A Newtonian expanding universe. Quart. J. Math. Oxford, 5, 64–72.Google Scholar

Minamitsuji, M., and Silva, H. O. 2016. Relativistic stars in scalar-tensor theories with disformal coupling. Phys. Rev. D, 93, 124041.Google Scholar

Minazzoli, O. 2012. The γ parameter in Brans-Dicke-like (light-)Scalar-Tensor theory with a universal scalar/matter coupling and a new decoupling scenario. eprint, arXiv:1208.2372.Google Scholar

Minazzoli, O. 2013 Conservation laws in theories with universal gravity/matter coupling. Phys. Rev. D, 88, 027506.Google Scholar

Minazzoli, O., and Harko, T. 2012. New derivation of the Lagrangian of a perfect fluid with a barotropic equation of state. Phys. Rev. D, 86, 087502.Google Scholar

Mitra, A. and Glendenning, N. K. 2010. Likely formation of general relativistic radiation pressure supported stars or “eternally collapsing objects”. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. Lett., 404, L50–L54.Google Scholar

Modak, S. K., and Singleton, D. 2012. Inflation with a graceful exit and entrance driven by Hawking radiation. Phys. Rev. D, 86, 123515.Google Scholar

Mohseni, M. 2009. Non-geodesic motion in f(G) gravity with non-minimal coupling. Phys. Lett. B, 682, 89.Google Scholar

Möller, C. 1961. Conservation laws and absolute parallelism in General Relativity. Mat. Fys. Skr. Dan. Vid. Selsk., 1, 10.Google Scholar

Morris, M. S., and Thorne, K. S. 1988. Wormholes in spacetime and their use for interstellar travel: A tool for teaching General Relativity. Am. J. Phys., 56, 395.Google Scholar

Pellegrini, C., and Plebanski, J. 1963. Tetrad fields and gravitational fields. Mat. Fys. Skr. Dan. Vid. Selsk., 2, 4.Google Scholar

Montelongo Garcia, N., and Lobo, F. S. N. 2010. Wormhole geometries supported by a nonminimal curvature-matter coupling. Phys. Rev. D, 82, 104018.Google Scholar

Montelongo Garcia, N., and Lobo, F. S. N. 2011. Nonminimal curvature-matter coupled wormholes with matter satisfying the null energy condition. Class. Quant. Grav., 28, 085018.Google Scholar

Montelongo Garcia, N., Lobo, F. S. N., and Visser, M. 2012. Generic spherically symmetric dynamic thin-shell traversable wormholes in standard general relativity. Phys. Rev. D, 86, 044026.Google Scholar

Moraes, P. H. R. S., Arbañil, J. D. V., and Malheiro, M. 2016. Stellar equilibrium configurations of compact stars in f(R, T) theory of gravity. J. Cosmo. Astropart. Phys., 06, 005.Google Scholar

Mortonson, M. J., Weinberg, D. H., and White, M. 2014. Dark energy: A short review. In K. A. Olive et al. (Particle Data Group), eds., 2014 Review of Particle Physics. arXiv: 1401.0046.Google Scholar

Mukhanov, V. F., and Winitzki, S. 2010. Introduction to Quantum Effects in Gravity, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Muller, V., Schmidt, H. J., and Starobinsky, A. A. 1990. Power-law inflation as an attractor solution for inhomogeneous cosmological models. Class. Quant. Grav., 7, 1163–1168.Google Scholar

Multamaki, T., and Vilja, I. 2006. Spherically symmetric solutions of modified field equations in f(R) theories of gravity. Phys. Rev. D, 74, 064022.Google Scholar

Muñoz, J. B., Kovetz, E. D., Dai, L, and Kamionkowski, M. 2016. Lensing of fast radio bursts as a probe of compact dark matter. Phys. Rev. Lett., 117, 091301.Google Scholar

Murphy, G. L. 1973. Big-bang model without singularities. Phys. Rev. D, 8, 4231–4233.Google Scholar

Naidu, R. L., Reddy, D. R. K., Ramprasad, T., and Ramana, K. V. 2013 . Bianchi type-V bulk viscous string cosmological model in f(R, T) gravity. Astrophys. Space Sci., 348, 247.Google Scholar

Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., and White, S. D. M. 1996. The structure of cold dark matter halos. Astrophys. J., 462, 563–575.Google Scholar

Nesseris, S. 2009. Matter density perturbations in modified gravity models with arbitrary coupling between matter and geometry. Phys. Rev. D, 79, 044015.Google Scholar

Nojiri, S., and Odintsov, S. D. 2003. Modified gravity with negative and positive powers of the curvature: Unification of the inflation and of the cosmic acceleration. Phys. Rev. D, 68, 123512.Google Scholar

Nojiri, S., and Odintsov, S. D. 2003. Where new gravitational physics comes from: M theory? Phys. Lett. B, 576, 5.Google Scholar

Nojiri, S., and Odintsov, S. D. 2004. Dark energy and cosmic speed-up from consistent modified gravity. PoS WC, 2004, 024.Google Scholar

Nojiri, S., and Odintsov, S. D. 2004. Gravity assisted dark energy dominance and cosmic acceleration. Phys. Lett. B, 599, 137.Google Scholar

Nojiri, S., and Odintsov, S. D. 2004. Modified gravity with ln R terms and cosmic acceleration. Gen. Rel. Grav., 36, 1765.Google Scholar

Nojiri, S., and Odintsov, S. D. 2007. Introduction to modified gravity and gravitational alternative for dark energy. Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys., 4, 115–146.Google Scholar

Nojiri, S., and Odintsov, S. D. 2011. Unified cosmic history in modified gravity: from F (R) theory to Lorentz non-invariant models. Phys. Rept., 505, 59.Google Scholar

Nojiri, S., and Odintsov, S. D. 2007. Unifying inflation with LambdaCDM epoch in modified f(R) gravity consistent with solar system tests. Phys. Lett. B, 657, 238. arXiv:0707.1941 [hep-th].Google Scholar

Nojiri, S., Odintsov, S. D., and Oikonomou, V. K. 2017. Modified gravity theories on a nutshell: Inflation, bounce and late-time evolution. Phys. Rept., 692, 1–104.Google Scholar

Nojiri, S., Odintsov, S. D., and Sasaki, M. 2005. Gauss-Bonnet dark energy. Phys. Rev. D, 71, 123509.Google Scholar

Nucamendi, U., Salgado, M., and Sudarsky, D. 2001. Alternative approach to the galactic dark matter problem. Phys. Rev. D, 63, 125016.Google Scholar

Nunes, R. C., and Pan, S. 2016. Cosmological consequences of an adiabatic matter creation process. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 459, 673–682.Google Scholar

Obukhov, Y. N., and Puetzfeld, D. 2013. Conservation laws in gravitational theories with general nonminimal coupling. Phys. Rev. D, 87, 081502.Google Scholar

Odintsov, S. D., and Sáez-Gómez, D. 2013. f(R, T, R_μνT ^μν) gravity phenomenology and ΛCDM universe. Phys. Lett. B, 725, 437.Google Scholar

Ohanian, H. C. 1976. Gravitation and Spacetime, (New York: Norton).Google Scholar

Olmo, G. J. 2005. The gravity Lagrangian according to solar system experiments. Phys. Rev. Lett., 95, 261102.Google Scholar

Olmo, G. J. 2005. Post-Newtonian constraints on f(R) cosmologies in metric and Palatini formalism. Phys. Rev. D, 72, 083505.Google Scholar

Olmo, G. J. 2007. Violation of the Equivalence Principle in modified theories of gravity. Phys. Rev. Lett., 98, 061101.Google Scholar

Olmo, G. J. 2008. Hydrogen atom in Palatini theories of gravity. Phys. Rev. D, 77, 084021.Google Scholar

Olmo, G. J. 2011. Palatini approach to modified gravity: f(R) theories and beyond. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 20, 413–462.Google Scholar

Olmo, G. J., and Sanchis-Alepuz, H. 2011. Hamiltonian formulation of Palatini f(R) theories a la Brans-Dicke. Phys. Rev. D, 83, 104036.Google Scholar

Olmo, G. J., and Rubiera-Garcia, D. 2015. Brane-world and loop cosmology from a gravity-matter coupling perspective. Phys. Lett. B, 740, 73.Google Scholar

Overduin, J. M., and Wesson, P. S. 1997. Kaluza-Klein gravity. Phys. Repts., 283, 303.Google Scholar

Overduin, J. M., and Wesson, P. S. 2004. Dark matter and background light. Phys. Repts., 402, 267–406.Google Scholar

Ozel, F., and Freire, P. 2016. Masses, radii, and equation of state of neutron stars. Astron. Astrophys., 54, 401–440.Google Scholar

Pace, F., Waizmann, J.-C., and Bartelmann, M. 2010. Spherical collapse model in dark energy cosmologies. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 406, 1865–1874.Google Scholar

Padmanabhan, T. 2003. Cosmological constant – the weight of the vacuum. Phys. Rept., 380, 235–320.Google Scholar

Page, D. N., and Thorne, K. S. 1974. Disk-accretion onto a black hole: Time-averaged structure of accretion disk. Astrophys. J., 191, 499–506.Google Scholar

Parker, L. 1968. Particle creation in expanding universes. Phys. Rev. Lett., 21, 562–564.Google Scholar

Parker, L. 2009. Quantized fields and particle creation in expanding universes. II. Phys. Rev. D, 3, 346–356.Google Scholar

Parker, L. E., and Toms, D. J. 2009. Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime-Quantized Fields and Gravity, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Pauli, W. 1958. Theory of Relativity, (London: Pergamon Press).Google Scholar

Peebles, P. J. E. 1993. Principles of Physical Cosmology, (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Peebles, P. J. E., and Ratra, B. 2003. The cosmological constant and dark energy. Rev. Mod. Phys., 75, 559–606.Google Scholar

Penzias, A. A., and Wilson, R. W. 1965. A measurement of excess antenna temperature at 4080 Mc/s. Astrophys. J., 142, 419.Google Scholar

Perlmutter, S., Turner, M. S., White, M. J. 1999. Constraining dark energy with SNe Ia and large scale structure. Phys. Rev. Lett., 83, 670–673.Google Scholar

Perlmutter, S., et al. 1999. Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 high redshift supernovae. Astrophys. J., 517, 565–586.Google Scholar

Persic, M., Salucci, P., and Stel, F. 1996. The universal rotation curve of spiral galaxies – I. The dark matter connection. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 281, 27–47.Google Scholar

Pigozzo, C., Carneiro, S., Alcaniz, J. S., Borges, H. A., Fabris, J. C. 2016. Evidence for cosmological particle creation? J. Cosmo. Astropart. Phys., 1605, 022.Google Scholar

Pogosian, L., and Silvestri, A. 2008. Pattern of growth in viable f(R) cosmologies. Phys. Rev. D, 77, 023503.Google Scholar

Poisson, E., and Visser, M. 1995. Thin-shell wormholes: Linearization stability. Phys. Rev. D, 52, 7318.Google Scholar

Poplawski, N. J. 2006. A Lagrangian description of interacting dark energy. arXiv:gr-qc/0608031.Google Scholar

Prigogine, I., and Géhéniau, J. 1986. Entropy, matter, and cosmology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 83, 6245–6249.Google Scholar

Prigogine, I., and Géhéniau, J., Gunzig, E., and Nardone, P. 1988. Thermodynamics of cosmological matter creation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 85, 7428– 7432.Google Scholar

Pritchard, J. R., and Loeb, A. 2012. 21-cm cosmology. Rept. Prog. Phys., 75, 086901.Google Scholar

Puetzfeld, D., and Obukhov, Y. N. 2008. On the motion of test bodies in theories with non-minimal coupling. Phys. Rev. D, 78, 121501.Google Scholar

Puetzfeld, D., and Obukhov, Y. N. 2013. Covariant equations of motion for test bodies in gravitational theories with general nonminimal coupling. Phys. Rev. D, 87, 044045.Google Scholar

Puetzfeld, D., and Obukhov, Y. N. 2013. Equations of motion in gravity theories with nonminimal coupling: a loophole to detect torsion macroscopically? Phys. Rev. D, 88, 064025.Google Scholar

Pun, C. S. J., Kovács, Z., and Harko, T. 2008. Thin accretion disks in f(R) modified gravity models. Phys. Rev. D, 78, 024043.Google Scholar

Pun, C. S. J., Kovács, Z., and Harko, T. 2008. Thin accretion disks onto brane world black holes. Phys. Rev. D, 78, 084015.Google Scholar

Raigorodski, L. D., Stavrions, P. C., and Balan, V. 1999. Introduction to the Physical Principles of Differential Geometry, (Athens: University of Athens).Google Scholar

Ram, S., and Priyanka, . 2013. Some Kaluza-Klein cosmological models in f(R, T) gravity theory. Astrophys. Space Sci., 347, 389.Google Scholar

Ramos, R. O., dos Santos, M. V., and Waga, I. 2014. Matter creation and cosmic acceleration. Phys. Rev. D, 89, 083524.Google Scholar

Ratra, B., and Peebles, P. J. E. 1988. Cosmological consequences of a rolling homogeneous scalar field. Phys. Rev. D, 37, 3406–3427.Google Scholar

Read, J. I., Iorio, G., Agertz, O., and Fraternali, F. 2016. Understanding the shape and diversity of dwarf galaxy rotation curves in ΛCDM. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 462, 3628–3645.Google Scholar

Reiprich, T. H., and Boehringer, H. 2002. The Mass function of an X-ray flux-limited sample of galaxy clusters. Astrophys. J., 567, 716.Google Scholar

Reis, R. R. 2003. Domain of validity of the evolution of perturbations in Newtonian cosmology with pressure. Phys. Rev. D, 67, 087301.Google Scholar

Resco, M.A., de la Cruz-Dombriz, A., Llanes-Estrada, F. J., and Zapatero Castrillo, V. 2016. On neutron stars in f(R) theories: Small radii, large masses and large energy emitted in a merger. Phys. Dark Univ., 13, 147–161.Google Scholar

Rhoades, C. E., and Ruffini, R. 1974. Maximum mass of a neutron star. Phys. Rev. Lett., 32, 324–327.Google Scholar

Riess, A. G., et al. 1998. Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant. Astron. J., 116, 1009–1038.Google Scholar

Riess, A. G., et al. 2001. The farthest known supernova: Support for an accelerating universe and a glimpse of the epoch of deceleration. Astrophys. J., 560, 49–71.Google Scholar

Riess, A. G., et al. (Supernova Search Team Collaboration). 2004. Type Ia supernova discoveries at z > 1 from the Hubble Space Telescope: Evidence for past deceleration and constraints on dark energy evolution. Astrophys. J., 607, 665–687.Google Scholar

Robertson, H. P. 1935. Kinematics and world-structure. Astrophys. J., 82, 284.Google Scholar

Rosa, J. L., Carloni, S., Lemos, J. P. S., and Lobo, F. S. N. 2017. Cosmological solutions in generalized hybrid metric-Palatini gravity. Phys. Rev. D, 95, 124035.Google Scholar

Rubin, V. C., Thonnard, N., and Ford, W. K. Jr. 1980. Rotational properties of 21 SC galaxies with a large range of luminosities and radii, from NGC 4605 /R = 4kpc/ to UGC 2885 /R = 122 kpc/. Astrophys. J., 238, 471–487.Google Scholar