Cholst, I. Oocyte donation and the therapeutic misconception. Fertil Steril 2013; 99: 1561–2.Google Scholar

Applegarth, LD, Kingsberg, SA. The donor as patient: assessment and support. In: Covington, SN, Burns, LH, Eds. Infertility Counseling: A Handbook for Clinicians, 2nd edition. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006; 339–55.Google Scholar

Almeling, R. Sex Cells: The Medical Market for Eggs and Sperm. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

The Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Mature oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline. Fertil Steril 2013; 99: 37–43.Google Scholar

Ory, SJ, Ed. International Federation of Fertility Societies Surveillance (IFFS) 2013. http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.iffs-reproduction.org/resource/resmgr/iffs_surveillance_09-19-13.pdf. (Accessed May 25, 2014.)Google Scholar

Donors: donating for treatment and research [Online]. Available from: URL: http://www.hfea.gov.uk.Google Scholar

Fertility Society of Australia: Reproductive Technology Accreditation Committee. Code of practice for assisted reproductive technology [Online]. 2010 October. Available from: URL: http://www.fertilitysociety.com.au/rtac.Google Scholar

Assisted human reproduction act [Online]. Available from: URL: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/index-eng.php.Google Scholar

A review of the HFEA's sperm and egg donation policies – 2011 [Online]. Available from: URL: http://www.hfea.gov.uk/donationreview.Google Scholar

Del Valle, A, Bradley, L, Said, T. Anonymous semen donor recruitment without reimbursement in Canada. Repro BioMedicine 2008; 17: 15–20.Google Scholar

Ekerhovd, E, Faurskov, A, Werner, C. Swedish sperm donors are driven by altruism, but shortage of sperm donors leads to reproductive traveling. Ups J Med Sci 2008; 113: 305–13.Google Scholar

Ernst, E, Ingerslev, HJ, Schou, O, Stoltenberg, M. Attitudes among sperm donors in 1992 and 2002: a Danish questionnaire survey. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007; 86: 327–33.Google Scholar

Van den Broeck, U, Vandermeeren, M, Vanderschueren, D, Enzlin, P, Demyttenaere, K, D'Hooghe, T. A systematic review of sperm donors: demographic characteristics, attitudes, motives and experiences of the process of sperm donation. Hum Reprod Update 2013; 0: 1–15.Google Scholar

Daniels, K. Anonymity and openness and the recruitment of gamete donors. Part I: semen donors. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2007; 10: 151–8.Google Scholar

Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology: Recommendations for gamete and embryo donation: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2013; 99: 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guidelines for counseling in infertility [Online]. Available from: URL: http://www.eshre.eu.Google Scholar

ESHRE: Task Force on Ethics and Law. Gamete and embryo donation. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 1407–8.Google Scholar

Skillern, A, Cedars, M, Huddleston, H. Egg donor informed consent tool (EDICT): development and validation of a new informed consent tool for oocyte donors. Fert Steril 2013; 99: 1733–8.Google Scholar

Distant, Daniel, Christian Post Reporter: Sperm Bank Mix-Up in Utah: Convicted Felon Fathered 21-Year- Old Girl, Possibly Hundreds of Others. www.christianpost.com/news/sperm-bank-mixup-in-utah-convicted-felon-fathered-21-year-old-girl-possibly-hundreds-of-others-113219. January 23, 2014.Google Scholar

California cryobank [Online]. Available from: URL: http://www.californiacryobank.com.Google Scholar

Purewal, S, van den Akker, OBA. Systematic review of oocyte donation: investigating attitudes, motivations and experiences. Hum Reprod Update 2009; 15: 499–515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jadva, V, Freeman, T, Kramer, W, Golombok, S. Sperm and oocyte donors’ experiences of anonymous donation and subsequent contact with donor offspring. Hum Reprod 2011; 26: 638–46.Google Scholar

Schover, LR, Rothmann, SA, Colllins, RL. The personality and motivation of semen donors: a comparison with oocyte donors. Hum Reprod 1992; 7: 575–9.Google Scholar

Sydjo, G, Svanberg, AS, Lampic, C, Jablonowska, B. Relationships in IVF couples 20 years after treatment. Hum Reprod 2011; 20: 1952–7.Google Scholar

Godmand, KM, Sanders, K, Rosenberg, M, Burton, P. Potential sperm donors’, recipients and their partners’ opinions towards the release of identifying information in Western Australia. Hum Reprod 2006; 22: 3022–6.Google Scholar

Mahlstadt, PP, Probasco, KA. Sperm donors: their attitudes toward providing medical and psychosocial information for recipient couples and donor offspring. Fertil Steril 1991; 56: 747–53.Google Scholar

Riggs, DW, Russell, L. Characteristics of men willing to act as sperm donors in the context of identity release legislation. Hum Reprod 2011; 26: 266–72.Google Scholar

Hammarburg, K, Carmichael, M, Tinney, L, Mulder, A. Gamete donors’ and recipients’ evaluation of donor counseling: a prospective longitudinal cohort study. Aust N Z J Gynaecol 2008; 48: 601–6.Google Scholar

Zweifel, JE, Biaggio, B, Schouweiler, C, Lindheim, SR. Follow-up assessment of excluded oocyte donor candidates. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2009; 35: 320–5.Google Scholar

Jordan, CB, Belar, CD, Williams, RS. Anonymous oocyte donation: a follow-up analysis of donors’ experiences. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2004; 25: 145–51.Google Scholar

Winter, A, Daniluk, J. A gift from the heart: the experiences of women whose egg donations helped their sisters become mothers. J Couns Dev 2004; 82: 483–95.Google Scholar

Yee, S, Hitkari, JA, Greenblatt, EM. A follow-up study of women who donated oocytes to known recipient couples for altruistic reasons. Human Reprod 2007; 22(7): 2040–50.Google Scholar