Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 7
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Tabery, James 2009. Making Sense of the Nature–Nurture Debate. Biology & Philosophy, Vol. 24, Issue. 5, p. 711.

    Mallon, Ron and Weinberg, Jonathan M. 2006. Innateness as Closed Process Invariance*. Philosophy of Science, Vol. 73, Issue. 3, p. 323.

    Dekkers, Wim and Rikkert, Marcel Olde 2006. What is a genetic cause? The example of Alzheimer’s Disease. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, Vol. 9, Issue. 3, p. 273.

    Poland, Jeffrey 2006. Étapes vers un monde sans schizophrénie. Philosophiques, Vol. 33, Issue. 1, p. 99.

    Robert, Jason Scott 2003. Constant Factors and Hedgeless Hedges: On Heuristics and Biases in Biological Research. Philosophy of Science, Vol. 70, Issue. 5, p. 975.

    Giarelli, Ellen 2003. Safeguarding Being: a bioethical principle for genetic nursing care. Nursing Ethics, Vol. 10, Issue. 3, p. 255.

    Sesardic, Neven 2003. Heritability and Indirect Causation. Philosophy of Science, Vol. 70, Issue. 5, p. 1002.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2000
  • Online publication date: June 2012

APPENDIX ONE - THE MEANING OF GENETIC CAUSATION

Summary

Genes do two things. They provide a mechanism of inheritance, and they influence how organisms develop. When genes do the former, they effect a connection between generations – parents pass genes along to their children. When genes do the latter, they participate in processes that occur within a generation; they affect how a fertilized egg – a single cell – divides and differentiates, and eventually becomes an adult, who has numerous traits that were not present at conception.

In saying that genes provide a mechanism of inheritance, the point of the indefinite article is to highlight the fact that there are nongenetic pathways whereby parents influence the traits of their children. A child who hears English spoken while growing up will come to speak English, but this is not because English-speaking parents transmit a gene for speaking English to their offspring. Imitation and learning can lead children to resemble their parents. Cultural context can engender additional similarities that are not genetically mediated; when children inherit money from their parents, this is neither genetic transmission nor learning.

When we turn to the second role that genes play, the indefinite article is again appropriate. Genes are one cause of the traits that organisms develop, but there are others. These nongenetic causes are lumped together under the heading of “environment.” Genes contribute to an individual's being tall, but so does the amount of nutrition consumed when young. In discussing how development proceeds, it is important not to equate “genetic” influences with “biological” influences.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

From Chance to Choice
  • Online ISBN: 9780511806940
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806940
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×