Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T00:20:30.573Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

27 - Pay to Play

Connecting University Research Funding to Licensing Outcomes

from Part XI - Public–Private Partnerships

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2019

Farok J. Contractor
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey
Jeffrey J. Reuer
Affiliation:
University of Colorado Boulder
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Frontiers of Strategic Alliance Research
Negotiating, Structuring and Governing Partnerships
, pp. 457 - 471
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almeida Costa, Luis and Dierickx, Ingemar. 2002. “Licensing and bundling,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 20(2): 251267.Google Scholar
Anderson, Timothy R., Daim, Tugrul U., and Lavoie, Francois F. 2007. “Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer,” Technovation, 27(5): 306318.Google Scholar
Argyres, Nicholas and Mayer, Kyle. 2007. “Contract design as a firm capability: An integration of learning and transaction cost perspectives,” Organization Science, 32(4): 10601077.Google Scholar
Arora, Ashish, Fosfuri, Andrea, and Alfonso, Gambardella 2001. Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Audretsch, David and Feldman, Maryann. 1996. “R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production,” The American Economic Review, 86(3): 630640.Google Scholar
Bercovitz, Janet and Feldman, Maryann. 2007. “Fishing upstream: Firm innovation strategy and university research alliances,” Research Policy, 36(7): 930948.Google Scholar
Bercovitz, Janet and Feldman, Maryann. 2008. “Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level,” Organization Science, 19(1): 6989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenthal, David, Campbell, Eric, Causino, Nancyanne, and Louis, Karen. 1996. “Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry,” New England Journal of Medicine, 335: 17341739.Google Scholar
Cohen, Wes, Nelson, Richard, and Walsh, John. 2002. “Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D,” Management Science, 48(1): 123.Google Scholar
Gandal, Neil and Rockett, Katherine. 1995. “Licensing a sequence of innovations,” Economics Letters, 47(1): 101107.Google Scholar
Gulati, Ranjay. 1995. “Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances,” The Academy of Management Journal, 38(1): 85112.Google Scholar
Huang, K. and Murray, Fiona. 2009. “Does patent strategy shape the long-run supply of public knowledge? Evidence from human genetics,” Academy of Management Journal, 52: 11931221.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Adam. 1989. “Real effects of academic research,” The American Economic Review, 79(5): 957970.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Adam, Trajtenberg, Manuel, and Henderson, Rebecca. 1993. “Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3): 577598.Google Scholar
Kessler, Eric H. and Chakrabarti, Alok K. 1996. “Innovation speed: A conceptual model of context, antecedents, and outcomes,” The Academy of Management Review, 21(4): 11431191.Google Scholar
Kim, Jisun and Daim, Tugrul U. 2014. “A new approach to measuring time-lags in technology licensing: Study of U.S. academic research institutions,” Journal of Technology Transfer, 39: 748773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, Mathew Y. 2015. Fundamentals of Patenting and Licensing for Scientists and Engineers: Second Edition. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edwin. 1995. “Academic research underlying industrial innovations: Sources, characteristics, and financing,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 77(1): 5562.Google Scholar
Markman, Gideon D., Gianiodis, Peter T., Phan, Phillip, and Balkin, David B. 2005. “Innovation speed: Transferring university technology to market,” Research Policy, 34: 10581075.Google Scholar
Markman, Gideon, Siegel, Donald S., and Wright, Mike. 2008. “Research and technology commercialization,” Journal of Management Studies, 45: 14011423.Google Scholar
Modic, Dolores, Feldman, Maryann P., and Changoluisa, Javier. 2015. The time lag in university technology transfers – a micro-level licensing data analysis. Presentation at the OECD conference: IP Statistics for Decision-makers, Vienna, November 2015.Google Scholar
Mowery, David C., Nelson, Richard R., Sampat, Bhaven N., and Ziedonis, Arvids A. 2001. “The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: An assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole Act of 1980,” Research Policy, 30: 99119.Google Scholar
Mowery, David and Ziedonis, Arvids. 2015. “Market versus spillovers in outflows of university research,” Research Policy, 44(1): 5066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen-Smith, Jason and Powell, Walter. 2004. “Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community,” Organization Science, 15(1): 521.Google Scholar
Pacheco-de-Almeida, Goncalo, Hawk, Ashton, and Yeung, Bernard. 2015. “The right speed and its value,” Strategic Management Journal, 36(2): 159176.Google Scholar
Perkmann, Markus, Tartari, Valentina, McKelvey, Maureen, Autio, Erkko, Brostrom, Anders, D’Este, Pablo, Fini, Riccardo, Geuna, Aldo, Grimaldi, Rosa, Hughes, Alan, Krabel, Stefan, Kitson, Michael, Llerena, Patrick, Lissoni, Francesco, Salter, Ammon, and Sobrero, Maurizio. 2013. “Academic engagement and commercialization: A review of the literature on university-industry relations,” Research Policy, 42(2): 423442.Google Scholar
Perkmann, Markus and Walsh, Kathryn. 2007. “University-industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda,” International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4): 259280.Google Scholar
Powell, Walter, Koput, Kenneth, and Smith-Doerr, Laurel. 1996. “Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1): 116145.Google Scholar
Powers, Joshua B. 2003. “Commercializing academic research: Resource effects on performance of university technology transfer,” Journal of Higher Education, 74(1): 2650.Google Scholar
Rothaermel, Frank, Agung, Shanti, and Jiang, Lin. 2007. “University entrepreneurship: A taxonomy of the literature,” Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4): 691791.Google Scholar
Schilling, Melissa and Phelps, Corey. 2007. “Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation,” Management Science, 53(7): 11131126.Google Scholar
Sorenson, Olav, Rivkin, Jan, and Fleming, Lee. 2006. “Complexity, networks and knowledge flow,” Research Policy, 35: 9941017.Google Scholar
Stalk, George and Haut, Thomas M. 1990. How Time-based Competition Is Reshaping Global Markets. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Uzzi, Brian. 1997. “Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 3567.Google Scholar
Welsh, R., Glenna, L., Lacy, W., and Biscotti, D. 2008. “Close enough but not too far: Assessing the effects of university-industry research relationships and the rise of academic capitalism,” Research Policy, 37: 18541864.Google Scholar
Wright, Brian, Drivas, Kyriakos, Lei, Zhen, and Merril, Stephen. 2014. “Industry-funded academic inventions boost innovation,” Nature, 507: 297299.Google Scholar
Zollo, Maurizio, Reuer, Jeffrey, and Singh, Harbir. 2002. “Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances,” Organization Science, 13(6): 701713.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×