Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-h4f6x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-11T02:50:37.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - Values: cultural and individual

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Shalom H. Schwartz
Edited by
Fons J. R. van de Vijver ,
Athanasios Chasiotis  and
Seger M. Breugelmans
Shalom H. Schwartz
Affiliation:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
Fons J. R. van de Vijver
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Tilburg, The Netherlands
Athanasios Chasiotis
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Tilburg, The Netherlands
Seger M. Breugelmans
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Tilburg, The Netherlands
Get access

Summary

During the past two decades, I have developed, validated and applied two separate theories of value related constructs. The first concerns the basic human values on which individual people in all societies differ (e.g., security, achievement, hedonism, concern for others). Basic individual values are an aspect of personality. The second theory deals with normative value orientations on which cultures differ (e.g., hierarchy, egalitarianism, harmony). These orientations underlie and justify the functioning of societal institutions.

Are two value theories really necessary? Could the same value constructs or dimensions serve at both individual and cultural levels of analysis? It would certainly be more parsimonious to do with one theory. Logically, one theory would suffice if we could assume that culture is simply personality writ large or that individual values are culture writ small. Sadly – for accepting either assumption would make life easier – I find them both unacceptable. In addressing the question of the relationship between individual and culture levels, I hold that we need separate theories of values.

This chapter presents and contrasts my individual-level and culture-level theories and suggests how to apply them fruitfully together. It is structured as follows. First, I explicate each theory, specifying its constructs and the relations among them and citing evidence to support them.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Fundamental Questions in Cross-Cultural Psychology , pp. 463 - 493
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Allport, G. W. (1955). Becoming: Basic considerations for a psychology of personality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Berger, P. L., and Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Borg, I., and Groenen, P. J. F. (2005). Modern multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications (2nd edn). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Bryk, A. S., and Raudenbush, S. W. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd edn). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Caprara, G. V., Schwartz, S. H., Capanna, C., Vecchione, M., and Barbaranelli, C. (2006). Personality and politics: Values, traits, and political choice. Political Psychology, 27, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiu, C.-y., Hong, Y. Y., Shavitt, S., and Wyer, R. S. (eds.) (2009). Understanding culture: Theory, research and application. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Comte, A. (1896/2000). The positive philosophy. Martineau, H. (trans.). Kitchener: Batouche Books.Google Scholar
Dansereau, F., Alutto, J. A., and Yammarino, F. J. (1984). Theory-testing in organizational behavior: The ‘variant’ approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., and Schwartz, S. H. (2008). Bringing values back in: The adequacy of the European Social Survey to measure values in 20 countries. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 420–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clercq, S., Fontaine, J. R. J., and Anseel, F. (2008). In search of a comprehensive value model for assessing supplementary person–organization fit. The Journal of Psychology, 142, 277–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diamond, J. (1997). Guns, germs and steel: The fate of human societies. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1893/1964). The division of labor in society. Simpson, G. (trans.). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Feather, N. T. (1975). Values in education and society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, R., Vauclair, C.-M., Fontaine, J. R. J., and Schwartz, S. H. (2010). Are individual- and culture-level value structures different?Testing Hofstede's legacy with the SchwartzValue Survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41, 135–51.Google Scholar
Fontaine, J. R. J., Poortinga, Y. H., Delbeke, L., and Schwartz, S. H. (2008). Structural equivalence of the values domain across cultures: Separating sampling fluctuations from meaningful variation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, 345–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gendel, N., Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., and Wrzesniewski, A. (2005). Personal value priorities of economists. Human Relations, 58, 1227–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttman, L. (1968). A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points. Psychometrika, 33, 469–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd edn). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., and Gupta, V. (eds.) (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 countries. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R., and Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65, 19–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kashima, E. S., and Kashima, Y. (1998). Culture and language: The case of cultural dimensions and personal pronoun use. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 461–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitayama, S., and Cohen, D. (eds.) (2007). Handbook of cultural psychology. New York: Guilford Press.
Kluckhohn, C. (1951). Values and value-orientations in the theory of action: An exploration in definition and classification. In Parsons, T. and Shils, E. (eds.), Toward a general theory of action (pp. 388–433). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kluckhohn, F., and Strodtbeck, F. (1961). Variations in value orientations. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
Knafo, A. (2006). The longitudinal Israeli study of twins (LIST): Children's social development as influenced by genetics, abilities, and socialization. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 9, 791–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knafo, A., and Sagiv, L. (2004). Values and work environment: Mapping 32 occupations. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 19, 255–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knafo, A., Schwartz, S. H., and Levine, R. V. (2009). Helping strangers is lower in embedded cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40, 875–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leung, K., and Bond, M. H. (2004). Social axioms: A model for social beliefs in multi-cultural perspective. In Zanna, M. (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. XXXVI, pp. 122–99). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
Licht, A. N., Goldschmidt, C., and Schwartz, S. H. (2007). Culture rules: The foundations of the rule of law and other norms of governance. Journal of Comparative Economics, 35, 659–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liska, A. E. (1990). The significance of aggregates for testing and conceptually linking macro and micro theories. Social Psychology Quarterly, 53, 292–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markus, H. R., and Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikulincer, M., Gillath, O., Sapir-Lavid, Y., Yaakobi, E., Arias, K., Tal-Aloni, L., and Bor, G. (2003). Attachment theory and concern for others' welfare: Evidence that activation of the sense of secure base promotes endorsement of self-transcendence values. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, C. W. (1956). Varieties of human value. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, D. A. (1988/2000). The design of everyday things. New York: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Perrinjaquet, A., Furrer, O., Usunier, J. C., Cestre, G., and Valette-Florence, P. (2007). A test of the quasi-circumplex structure of human values. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 820–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roccas, S., Horenczyk, G., and Schwartz, S. H. (2000). Acculturation discrepancies and well-being: The moderating role of conformity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 323–34.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S. H., Halevy, N., and Eidelson, R. (2008). Towards a unifying model of identification with groups: Integrating theoretical perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 280–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohan, M. J. (2000). A rose by any name? The values construct. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 255–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In Zanna, M. (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. XXV) (pp. 1–65). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1994a). Are there universal aspects in the content and structure of values?Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1994b). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In Kim, U., Triandis, H. C., Kağitçibaşi, Ç., Choi, S.-C. and Yoon, G. (eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 85–119). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1999). Cultural value differences: Some implications for work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48, 23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (2004). Mapping and interpreting cultural differences around the world. In Vinken, H., Soeters, J. and Ester, P. (eds.), Comparing cultures: Dimensions of culture in a comparative perspective (pp. 43–73). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (2006a). Les valeurs de base de la personne: Théorie, mesures et applications [Basic human values: Theory, measurement, and applications]. Revue française de sociologie, 42, 249–88.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (2006b). Value orientations: Measurement, antecedents and consequences across nations. In Jowell, R., Roberts, C., Fitzgerald, R. and Eva, G. (eds.), Measuring attitudes cross-nationally: Lessons from the European Social Survey (pp. 169–203). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (2007a). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. In Esmer, Y. and Pettersson, T. (eds.), Measuring and mapping cultures: 25 years of comparative value surveys (pp. 33–78). Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (2007b). Cultural and individual value correlates of capitalism: A comparative analysis. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 52–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (2008a). Cultural value orientations: Nature and implications of national differences. Moscow: State University – Higher School of Economics Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (2008b). The structure of human values: Origins and issues. Keynote address at the 14th European Conference on Personality Psychology, Tartu, Estonia.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (2009a). Basic values: How they motivate and inhibit prosocial behavior. In Mikulincer, M. and Shaver, P. (eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (2009b). Causes of culture: National differences in cultural embeddedness. In Gari, A. and Mylonas, K. (eds.), Q.E.D.: From Herodotus' ethnographic journeys to cross-cultural research (pp. 1–12). Athens: Pedio Books Publishing.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H., and Bardi, A. (1997). Influences of adaptation to communist rule on value priorities in Eastern Europe. Political Psychology, 18, 385–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S. H., and Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 550–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S. H., and Boehnke, K. (2004). Evaluating the structure of human values with confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 230–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S. H., and Sagie, G. (2000). Value consensus and importance: A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 465–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, J. I., Licht, A. N., and Schwartz, S. H. (2008). Egalitarianism, cultural distance, and FDI: A new approach. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=957306.Google Scholar
Spranger, E. (1928). Types of men: The psychology and ethics of personality (Pigors, P. J. W., trans.). Halle: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Verplanken, B., and Holland, R. W. (2002). Motivated decision making: Effects of activation and self-centrality of values on choices and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 434–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weber, M. (1922/1968). Economy and society (Fischoff, E.et al., trans.). New York: Bedminster Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1958). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. New York: Scribners.Google Scholar
Williams, R. M. (1968). Values. In Sills, E. (ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences (vol. XVI, pp. 283–7). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×