Skip to main content

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
Cancel
×
×
Home
  • Home
Chapter
  • Print publication year: 2013
  • Online publication date: November 2013

Chapter 2 - Methods in complex trait analysis: mapping the genetic basis of sleep using model organisms

from Section 1 - Generalprinciples of genetics and genomics
Export citation
Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

The Genetic Basis of Sleep and Sleep Disorders
  • Online ISBN: 9781139649469
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139649469
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *

CAPTCHA *

Skip to the audio challenge
×

References

1. Flint J. Mapping quantitative traits and strategies to find quantitative trait genes. Methods. 2011;53:163–74.
2. Tafti M, Chollet D, Valatx JL, et al. Quantitative trait loci approach to the genetics of sleep in recombinant inbred mice. J Sleep Res. 1999;8(Suppl 1):37–43.
3. Darvasi A. Experimental strategies for the genetic dissection of complex traits in animal models. Nat Genet. 1998;18:19–24.
4. Churchill GA, Doerge RW. Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics. 1994;138:963–71.
5. Visscher PM, Thompson R, Haley CS. Confidence intervals in QTL mapping by bootstrapping. Genetics. 1996;143:1013–20.
6. Lander ES, Botstein D. Mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics. 1989;121:185–99.
7. R Development Core Team. A language and environment for statistical computing. Computing RFfS, editor. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2004.
8. Broman KW, Wu H, Sen S, et al. R/qtl: QTL mapping in experimental crosses. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:889–90.
9. Mackay TF, Richards S, Stone EA, et al. The Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel. Nature. 2012;482:173–78.
10. Wang J, Williams RW, Manly KF. WebQTL: web-based complex trait analysis. Neuroinformatics. 2003;1:299–308.
11. Peirce JL, Lu L, Gu J, et al. A new set of B×D recombinant inbred lines from advanced intercross populations in mice. BMC Genet. 2004;5:7.
12. Williams RW, Bennett B, Lu L, et al. Genetic structure of the L×S panel of recombinant inbred mouse strains: a powerful resource for complex trait analysis. Mamm Genome. 2004;15:637–47.
13. Voigt B, Kuramoto T, Mashimo T, et al. Evaluation of LEXF/FXLE rat recombinant inbred strains for genetic dissection of complex traits. Physiol Genomics. 2008;32:335–42.
14. Pravenec M, Klir P, Kren V, et al. An analysis of spontaneous hypertension in spontaneously hypertensive rats by means of new recombinant inbred strains. J Hypertens. 1989;7:217–21.
15. Defays R, Bertoli CI. Quantitative trait loci for response to ethanol in an intercontinental set of recombinant inbred lines of Drosophila melanogaster. Alcohol. 2012;46:737–45.
16. Gaertner BE, Phillips PC. Caenorhabditis elegans as a platform for molecular quantitative genetics and the systems biology of natural variation. Genetics Res. 2010;92:331–48.
17. Churchill GA, Airey DC, Allayee H, et al. The Collaborative Cross, a community resource for the genetic analysis of complex traits. Nat Genet. 2004;36:1133–37.
18. Collaborative Cross Consortium. The genome architecture of the Collaborative Cross mouse genetic reference population. Genetics. 2012;190:389–401.
19. Aylor DL, Valdar W, Foulds-Mathes W, et al. Genetic analysis of complex traits in the emerging Collaborative Cross. Genome Res. 2011;21:1213–22.
20. Durrant C, Tayem H, Yalcin B, et al. Collaborative Cross mice and their power to map host susceptibility to Aspergillus fumigatus infection. Genome Res. 2011;21:1239–48.
21. Mott R, Talbot CJ, Turri MG, et al. A method for fine mapping quantitative trait loci in outbred animal stocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:12649–54.
22. Keane TM, Goodstadt L, Danecek P, et al. Mouse genomic variation and its effect on phenotypes and gene regulation. Nature. 2011;477:289–94.
23. Moen CJ, van der Valk MA, Snoek M, et al. The recombinant congenic strains – a novel genetic tool applied to the study of colon tumor development in the mouse. Mamm Genome. 1991;1:217–27.
24. Nadeau JH, Singer JB, Matin A, et al. Analysing complex genetic traits with chromosome substitution strains. Nat Genet. 2000;24:221–25.
25. Glauser DA, Chen WC, Agin R, et al. Heat avoidance is regulated by transient receptor potential (TRP) channels and a neuropeptide signaling pathway in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 2011;188:91–103.
26. Caligari PDS, Mather K. Genotype–environment interaction. 3. Interactions in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc R Soc London B Biol Sci. 1975;191:387–411.
27. Hollocher H, Ting CT, Wu ML, et al. Incipient speciation by sexual isolation in Drosophila melanogaster: extensive genetic divergence without reinforcement. Genetics. 1997;147:1191–201.
28. Mattson DL, Dwinell MR, Greene AS, et al. Chromosome substitution reveals the genetic basis of Dahl salt-sensitive hypertension and renal disease. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2008;295:F837–42.
29. Nadeau JH, Singer JB, Matin A, et al. Analysing complex genetic traits with chromosome substitution strains. Nat Genet. 2000;24:221–25.
30. Singer JB, Hill AE, Burrage L, et al. Genetic dissection of complex traits with chromosome substitution strains of mice. Science. 2004;304:445–48.
31. Takada T, Mita A, Maeno A, et al. Mouse inter-subspecific consomic strains for genetic dissection of quantitative complex traits. Genome Res. 2008;18:500–08.
32. Gregorova S, Divina P, Storchova R, et al. Mouse consomic strains: exploiting genetic divergence between Mus m. musculus and Mus m. domesticus subspecies. Genome Res. 2008;18:509–15.
33. Grupe A, Germer S, Usuka J, et al. In silico mapping of complex disease-related traits in mice. Science. 2001;292:1915–18.
34. Yang H, Wang JR, Didion JP, et al. Subspecific origin and haplotype diversity in the laboratory mouse. Nat Genet. 2011;43:648–55.
35. Yalcin B, Wong K, Agam A, et al. Sequence-based characterization of structural variation in the mouse genome. Nature. 2011;477:326–29.
36. Kang HM, Zaitlen NA, Wade CM, et al. Efficient control of population structure in model organism association mapping. Genetics. 2008;178:1709–23.
37. Bennett BJ, Farber CR, Orozco L, et al. A high-resolution association mapping panel for the dissection of complex traits in mice. Genome Research. 2010;20:281–90.
38. Yang H, Bell TA, Churchill GA, et al. On the subspecific origin of the laboratory mouse. Nat Genet. 2007;39:1100–07.
39. Doroszuk A, Snoek LB, Fradin E, et al. A genome-wide library of CB4856/N2 introgression lines of Caenorhabditis elegans. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:e110
40. Davis RC, Schadt EE, Smith DJ, et al. A genome-wide set of congenic mouse strains derived from DBA/2J on a C57BL/6J background. Genomics. 2005;86:259–70.
41. Davis RC, Jin A, Rosales M, et al. Genome-wide set of congenic mouse strains derived from CAST/Ei on a C57BL/6 background. Genomics. 2007;90:306–13.
42. Burgio G, Szatanik M, Guenet JL, et al. Interspecific recombinant congenic strains between C57BL/6 and mice of the Mus spretus species: a powerful tool to dissect genetic control of complex traits. Genetics. 2007;177:2321–33.
43. Tomida S, Mamiya T, Sakamaki H, et al. Usp46 is a quantitative trait gene regulating mouse immobile behavior in the tail suspension and forced swimming tests. Nat Genet. 2009;41:688–95.
44. Legare ME, Bartlett FS, Frankel WN. A major effect QTL determined by multiple genes in epileptic EL mice. Genome Res. 2000;10:42–48.
45. Stylianou IM, Christians JK, Keightley PD, et al. Genetic complexity of an obesity QTL (Fob3) revealed by detailed genetic mapping. Mamm Genome. 2004;15:472–81.
46. Christians JK, Keightley PD. Fine mapping of a murine growth locus to a 1.4-cM region and resolution of linked QTL. Mamm Genome. 2004;15:482–91.
47. Darvasi A, Soller M. Advanced intercross lines, an experimental population for fine genetic mapping. Genetics. 1995;141:1199–207.
48. Han B, Kang HM, Seo MS, et al. Efficient association study design via power-optimized tag SNP selection. Ann Hum Genet. 2008;72:834–47.
49. Talbot CJ, Nicod A, Cherny SS, et al. High-resolution mapping of quantitative trait loci in outbred mice. Nat Genet. 1999;21:305–08.
50. Johannesson M, Lopez-Aumatell R, Stridh P, et al. A resource for the simultaneous high-resolution mapping of multiple quantitative trait loci in rats: the NIH heterogeneous stock. Genome Res. 2009;19:150–58.
51. Yalcin B, Nicod J, Bhomra A, et al. Commercially available outbred mice for genome-wide association studies. PLoS Genet. 2010;6.
52. Yalcin B, Flint J. Association studies in outbred mice in a new era of full-genome sequencing. Mamm Genome. 2012;23:719–26.
53. Bogue MA, Grubb SC, Maddatu TP, et al. Mouse Phenome Database (MPD). Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:D643–49.
54. Aylor DL, Valdar W, Foulds-Mathes W, et al. Genetic analysis of complex traits in the emerging Collaborative Cross. Genome Res. 2011;21:1213–22.
55. Philip VM, Sokoloff G, Ackert-Bicknell CL, et al. Genetic analysis in the Collaborative Cross breeding population. Genome Res. 2011;21:1223–38.
56. Durrant C, Tayem H, Yalcin B, et al. Collaborative Cross mice and their power to map host susceptibility to Aspergillus fumigatus infection. Genome Res. 2011;21:1239–48.
57. Valdar W, Flint J, Mott R. Simulating the collaborative cross: power of quantitative trait loci detection and mapping resolution in large sets of recombinant inbred strains of mice. Genetics. 2006;172:1783–97.
58. Huang W, Richards S, Carbone MA, et al. Epistasis dominates the genetic architecture of Drosophila quantitative traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:15553–59.
Cancel
Confirm
×