Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 3
  • Cited by
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Funar, Louis and Kapoudjian, Christophe 2008. The braided Ptolemy–Thompson group is finitely presented. Geometry & Topology, Vol. 12, Issue. 1, p. 475.

    Neretin, Yu.A. 2003. Groups of hierarchomorphisms of trees and related Hilbert spaces. Journal of Functional Analysis, Vol. 200, Issue. 2, p. 505.

    Kholodenko, A. 2002. Kontsevich–Witten model from 2+1 gravity: new exact combinatorial solution. Journal of Geometry and Physics, Vol. 43, Issue. 1, p. 45.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 1997
  • Online publication date: May 2010

The universal Ptolemy group and its completions

Summary

Introduction

A new model of a universal Teichmüller space was introduced in [P2], and a universal analogue of the mapping class groups, called the “universal Ptolemy group”, was denned and studied. In our concentration on the geometry in [P2], we perhaps obfuscated the essentially easy algebraic and combinatorial arguments underlying this definition, and one goal here is to give a gentle survey of these aspects and a complete definition of the universal Ptolemy group. To be sure, the geometric side of the story provides the main calculational tools of the theory (and explains the terminology “Ptolemy group”), but we do not discuss these aspects here.

To hopefully gain some perspective on the results in this paper, we next review the “universal (decorated) Teichmüller theory” from [P2]. In this context, the appellate “universal” means that we seek certain infinite dimensional spaces (actually, we shall find infinite–dimensional symplectic Fréchet manifolds supporting a group action) together with maps of each of the “classical (decorated) Teichmüller spaces” into our universal object in such a way that classical combinatorial, topological, and geometric structures arise as the pull–back or restriction of corresponding (group invariant) structures on the universal objects.

The classical “(decorated) Teichmüller theory” may be described as follows.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Geometric Galois Actions
  • Online ISBN: 9780511666124
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511666124
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×