When I began my current project on working-class consumption in the interwar period, I believed that the glass was half full - that I would find working-class cultures permeated by mass consumption and working-class material life transformed by automobiles, household appliances, and ever more fashionable ready-made clothes. The vaunted post-World War II prosperity that stands between us and the interwar period colored my view of the earlier period, as did the focus on middle-class abundance of most of what has been written about the history of consumption. I should have known better. I had evidence from my work on department stores, which showed their preoccupation with the middle-class minority that commanded significant discretionary income as well as my memories of a 1950s working-class community in which scarcity edged out abundance despite Congress of Industrial Organizations (CIO) union wages.
After digesting a great deal of evidence about working-class families’ lives between 1919 and 1940, I have concluded that in fact the glass was half empty. I emphasize the constraints placed on working-class demand and the ways in which working-class people negotiated them, rather than the possibilities offered by the marketplace. The material aspects of working-class peoples lives did, of course, improve in certain ways, but the improvements seem to me to be less striking than the continuing budget strictures under which families operated.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.