Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T06:08:09.256Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Innovation across tech-firms' boundaries

A knowledge-based view

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2011

Salma Alguezaui
Affiliation:
e-Business Management School – ISUFI, Università del Salento
Raffaele Filieri
Affiliation:
Faculty of Communication Sciences, Università degli Studi di Roma “La Sapienza”
Farok J. Contractor
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey
Vikas Kumar
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Sumit K. Kundu
Affiliation:
Florida International University
Torben Pedersen
Affiliation:
Copenhagen Business School
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Nowadays, the business environment is becoming more and more dynamic and uncertain requiring firms to continuously innovate within short periods of time. Further, technological products are requiring more and more distinct and numerous bodies of knowledge which increases the complexity of the production process. In order to gain competitive advantage, firms tend to outsource the innovation process strategically, as a whole or in part, to external players. Traditionally, the knowledge creation process was considered a firm's core capability to be kept internally, within its boundaries. However, due to the new rules of competition, firms have started to cooperate with external players in order to create new value and develop novel products. These emergent business tendencies have restructured different technology-oriented industries and reshaped the core capabilities of the firm. Indeed, the knowledge representing a critical input to the value creation process is becoming more dispersed over a network of interconnected organizations. Accordingly, a new governance structure has emerged to overcome the shortcomings raised by the wide-ranging multi-technological base of high-tech products. As a matter of fact, the extended enterprise (EE) is the result of an outsourcing strategy adopted by firms aiming mainly at reducing the complexity, increasing the creativeness, and lowering the cost of the innovation process. Thus, new core capabilities have emerged within the context of the EE, making the traditional core capabilities of a firm obsolete.

Type
Chapter
Information
Global Outsourcing and Offshoring
An Integrated Approach to Theory and Corporate Strategy
, pp. 210 - 238
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Argyres, N. 1996. “Evidence on the role of firm capabilities in vertical decisions,” Strategic Management Journal 17(2): 129–50.3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J.B. 1986. “Strategic factor markets: expectations, luck and business strategy,” Management Science 32(10): 1231–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J.B. 1991. “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage,” Journal of Management 17(1): 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J.B. 1999. “How a firm's capabilities affect boundary decisions,” MIT Sloan Management Review 40(3): 137–45.Google Scholar
Brown, J. and Duguid, P. 1991. “Organizational learning and communities of practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation,” Organization Science 2(1): 40–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brusoni, S. and Prencipe, A. 2001. “Managing knowledge in loosely coupled networks: exploring the links between product and knowledge dynamics,” Journal of Management Studies 38(7): 943–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brusoni, S., Prencipe, A., and Pavitt, K. 2001. “Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: why do firms know more than they make?” Administrative Science Quarterly 46: 1185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmel, E. 1999. Global Software Teams. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Chandler, A.D. 1990. “The enduring logic of industrial success,” Harvard Business Review. March–April, 130–40.Google Scholar
Chesbrough, H.W. 2007. “Why firms should have open business models,” MIT Sloan Management Review 48(2): 22–28.Google Scholar
Christensen, C.M. 1997. The Innovator's Dilemma: when New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Clark, K.B. and Fujimoto, T. 1990. “The power of product integrity,” Harvard Business Review 68(6): 107–18.Google ScholarPubMed
Clark, K.B. and Fujimoto, T. 1991. Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization, and Management in the World Auto Industry. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Coase, R.H. 1937. “The nature of the firm,”Economica 4(16): 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daft, R.L. and Lengel, R.H. 1986. “Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design,” Management Science 32(5): 554–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, T.H. and Prusak, L. 1998. “Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know,” Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Drucker, P. 1993. Post-Capitalist Society. New York City: Harper Business.Google Scholar
Dyer, J. and Nobeoka, I. 2000. “Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge sharing network: the Toyota case,” Strategic Management Journal 21(3): 345:67.3.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyer, J. and Singh, H. 1998. “The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage,” Academy of Management Review 23(4): 680–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fayyoumi, A., Filieri, R., Taifi, N., and Passiante, G. 2007. “Modeling the extended enterprise in the digital economy: some empirical evidence,” Proceedings of the 8th Annual Global Information Technology Management Association (GITMA) Conference, Napoli, 17–19 June.
Fidler, L.A. and Johnson, J.D. 1984. “Communication and innovation implementation,” The Academy of Management Review 9(4): 704–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filieri, R. 2009. “Overcoming knowledge sharing barriers for improving new product development process,” PhD Dissertation, Università degli Studi di Roma ‘Roma 3.’
Filieri, R. and Alguezaui, S. 2008. “Managing open knowledge and firm's boundaries for successful new product development,” Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the International Business Information Management Association (IBIMA), Marrakech, 4–6 January.
Ford, D. and Farmer, D. 1986. “Make or buy – a key strategic issue,” Long Range Planning 19(5): 54–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, R.N. and Kaplan, S. 2001. Creative Destruction. Why Companies that are Built to Learn Underperform the Market – and How to Successfully Transform Them. New York: Doubleday/Currency.Google Scholar
Gilley, K.M. and Rasheed, A. 2000. “Making more by doing less: analysis of outsourcing and its effects on firm performance,” Journal of Management 26(4): 763–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomes-Casseres, B. 1996. The Alliance Revolution: The New Shape of Business Rivalry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Granstrand, O. 1998. “Towards a theory of the technology-based firm,” Research Policy 27(5): 465–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granstrand, O., Patel, P., and Pavitt, K. 1997. “Multitechnology corporations: why they have ‘Distributed’ rather than ‘Distinctive Core’ capabilities,” California Management Review 39(4): 8–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granstrand, O. and Sjolander, S. 1990. “Managing innovation in multitechnology corporations,” Research Policy 19(1): 35–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, R.M. 1991. “The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formation,” California Management Review 33(3): 114–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, R.M. 1996. “Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm,” Strategic Management Journal 17(10): 109–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulati, R. and Zajac, E.J. 2000. “Reflections on the study of strategic alliances,” in Faulkner, D. and Rond, M. (eds.), Cooperative Strategy: Economic, Business, and Organizational Issues, pp. 365–74.
Hagedoorn, J. 1995. “Strategic technology partnering during the 1980s: trends, networks and corporate patterns in non-core technologies,” Research Policy 24: 207–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannan, M.T. and Freeman, J.H. 1984. “Structural inertia and organizational change,” American Sociological Review 49(2): 149–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedlund, G. 1994. “A model of knowledge management and the n-form corporation,” Strategic Management Journal 15: 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helper, S. 1991. “Strategy and irreversibility in supplier relations: the case of the US automobile industry,” Business History Review 65(4): 781–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, R. and Cockburn, I. 1994. “Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research,” Strategic Management Journal 15 (Special Issue): 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, G. 1991. “Organizational learning: the contributing process and the literatures,” Organization Science 2(1): 88–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaworski, B., Kohli, A.K., and Sahay, A. 2000. “Market-driven vs. driving markets,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28(1): 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katila, R. 2002. “New product search over time: past ideas in their prime?Academy of Management Journal 45(5): 995–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katila, R. and Ahuja, G. 2002. “Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction,” Academy of Management Journal 45(8): 1183–94.Google Scholar
Koen, P., Ajamian, G., Burkart, R., Clamen, A., Davidson, J., D'Amore, R., Elkins, C., Herald, K., Incorvia, M., Johnson, A., Karol, R., Seibert, R., Slavejkov, A., and Wagner, K. 2001. “Providing clarity and a common language to the ‘fuzzy front end,’Research Technology Management 44(2): 46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogut, B. and Zander, U. 1992. “Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology,” Organization Science 3(3): 383–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koput, K.W. 1997. “A chaotic model of innovative search: some answers, many questions,” Organization Science 8(5): 528–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreiner, K. and Schultz, M. 1993. “Informal collaboration in R and D: the formation of networks across organizations,” Organization Studies 14(2): 189–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristensson, P., Gustafsson, A., and Archer, T. 2004. “Harnessing the creative potential among users,” Journal of Product Innovation Management 21(1): 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Insinga, R.C. and Werle, M.J. 2000. “Linking outsourcing to business strategy,” Academy of Management Executive 14(4): 58–70.Google Scholar
Laursen, K. and Salter, A. 2006. “Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms,” Strategic Management Journal 27(2): 131–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard-Barton, D. 1995. Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Levinthal, D.A. and March, J.G. 1993. “The myopia of learning,” Strategic Management Journal (Winter Special Issue) 14: 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebeskind, J.P., Oliver, A.L., Zucker, L., and Brewer, M. 1996. “Social networks, learning and flexibility: souring scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms,” Organization Science 7(4): 428–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenzoni, G. and Lipparini, A. 1999. “The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study,” Strategic Management Journal 20(4): 317–38.3.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mertins, K., Heisig, P., and Vorbeck, J. 2000. Knowledge Management: Best Practices in Europe. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Möller, K. and Svahn, S. 2003. “Managing strategic nets: a capability perspective,” Marketing Theory 3(2): 209–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, J.F. 1997. The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
Mosakowski, E. 1997. “Strategy making under causal ambiguity: conceptual issues and empirical evidence,” Organization Science 8(4): 414–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, J.Y., Kotabe, M., and Wildt, A.R. 1995. “Strategic and financial implications of global sourcing strategy: a contingency analysis,” Journal of International Business Studies 26(1): 181–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narver, J.C., Slater, S.F., and MacLachlan, D.L. 2000. “Total market orientation, business performance and innovation,” Marketing Science Institute, Working Paper no. 9.116.
Nelson, R.R. 1995. “Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change,” Journal of Economic Literature 33(1): 48–90.Google Scholar
Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nonaka, I. 1994. “A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation,” Organization Science 5(1): 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. 1995. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Patel, P. and Pavitt, K. 1997. “The technological competencies of the world's largest firms: complex and path-dependent, but not much variety,” Research Policy 26(2): 141–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penrose, E.T. 1959. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. London: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pentland, B.T. and Reuter, H.H. 1994. “Organizational routines as grammars of action,” Administrative Science Quarterly 39(3): 484–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, M. 1992. “Flexible production, externalisation and the interpretation of business service growth,” The Services Industries Journal 12(1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peteraf, M.A. 1993. “The cornerstone of the competitive advantage: a resource-based theory,” Strategic Management Journal 14(3): 179–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polanyi, Michael. 1967. The Tacit Dimension. Garden City, NY: Anchor.Google Scholar
Porter, M.E. 1980. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Powell, W.W. 1996. “Inter-organizational collaboration in the Biotechnology industry,”Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 120(1): 197–215.Google Scholar
Prahalad, C.K. and Hamel, G. 1990. “The core competence of the corporation,” Harvard Business Review 68(3): 79–91.Google Scholar
Prahalad, C.K. and Ramaswamy, V. 2004. The Future of Competition: Co-Greating Unique Value with Customers. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Prencipe, A. 1997. “Technological competencies and product's evolutionary dynamics: a case study from the aero-engine industry,” Research Policy 25(2): 1261–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quélin, B. and Duhamel, F. 2003. “Bringing together strategic outsourcing and corporate strategy: outsourcing motives and risks,” European Management Journal 21(5): 647–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, J.B. 1992. Intelligent Enterprise: A Knowledge and Service-Based Paradigm for Industry. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Quinn, J.B. 1999. “Strategic outsourcing: leveraging knowledge capabilities,” MIT Sloan Management Review 40(4): 9–21.Google Scholar
Quinn, J.B. 2000. “Outsourcing innovation: the new engine of growth,” MIT Sloan Management Review 41(4): 13–28.Google Scholar
Quinn, J.B. and Hilmer, F.G. 1994. “Strategic outsourcing,” MIT Sloan Management Review 35(4): 43–55.Google Scholar
Rosenkopf, L. and Nerkar, A. 2001. “Beyond local research: boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry,” Strategic Management Journal 22(4): 287–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawhney, M., Verona, G., and Prandelli, E. 2005. “Collaborating to create: the internet as a platform for customer engagement in product innovation,” Journal of Interactive Marketing 19(4): 4–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schilling, M.A. and Hill, C.W.L. 1998. “Managing the new product development process: strategic imperatives,” Academy of Management Executive 12(3): 67–81.Google Scholar
Simonin, B.L. 1999. “Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances,” Strategic Management Journal 20(7): 595–623.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, S.F. and Narver, J. 1998. “Customer led and market oriented: let's not confuse the two,” Strategic Management Journal 19(10): 1001–06.3.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teece, D.J. 2000. Managing Intellectual Capital. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A. 1997. “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management,” Strategic Management Journal 18(7): 509–33.3.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teng, J., Cheon, M., and Grover, V. 1995. “Decisions to outsource information systems functions: testing a strategy–theoretic–discrepancy model,” Decision Sciences 26(1): 75–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomke, S. and Hippel, E. 2002. “Customers as innovators: a new way to create value,” Harvard Business Review 80(4): 74–81.Google Scholar
Toffler, A. 1990. Powershift: Knowledge, Wealth and Violence at the Edge of the 21st Century. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Utterback, J.M. 1994. Mastering the Dynamics of Innovations. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Venkatraman, N. and Henderson, J. 1998. “Real strategies for virtual organizing,” MIT Sloan Management Review 40(1): 33–48.Google Scholar
Hippel, E. 1986. “Lead users: A source of novel product concepts,” Management Science 32(7): 791–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hippel, E. 1987. “Cooperation between rivals: informal know-how trading,” Research Policy 16(6): 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hippel, E. 1988. The Sources of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, G. and Weber, D. 1984. “A transaction cost approach to make-or-buy decisions,” Administrative Science Quarterly 29(3): 372–91.Google Scholar
Walker, G. and Weber, D. 1987. “Supplier competition, uncertainty and make-or-buy decisions,” Academy of Management Journal 30(3): 589–96.Google Scholar
Webster, F.E.. 1992. “The changing role of marketing in the corporation,” Journal of Marketing 56(4): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, E., McDermott, R., and Snyder, W.M. 2002. Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Wenger, E. and Snyder, W.M. 2000. “Communities of practice: an organizational frontier,” Harvard Business Review 78(1): 139–45.Google Scholar
Wernerfelt, B. 1984. “A resource-based view of the firm,” Strategic Management Journal 5(2): 171–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, R.R. and Ruefli, T.W. 2002. “Sustained competitive advantage: temporal dynamics and the incidence and persistence of superior economic performance,” Organization Science 13(1): 82–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zack, M. 1998. “An architecture for managing explicated knowledge,” MIT Sloan Management Review. September.
Zack, M. 1999. “Developing a knowledge strategy,” California Management Review 41(3): 125–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zack, M. 2000. “Competing on knowledge,” Handbook of Business Strategy 1(1): 81–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zander, U. and Kogut, B. 1995. “Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: an empirical test,” Organization Science 6(1): 76–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×