Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T04:25:50.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2009

Joseph Mendola
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska, Lincoln
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Goodness and Justice
A Consequentialist Moral Theory
, pp. 315 - 322
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, R. M. 1976. Motive Utilitarianism. Journal of Philosophy 73, 467–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Shiekh, A. 1995. ZAKĀT. In Esposito, J. (ed.), The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Modern Islamic World, vol. 4. New York: Oxford University Press, 366–370Google Scholar
Aquinas, T. 1915–38. The Summa Theologica of St. Thomas Aquinas. Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province. London: Burns, Oates & WashbourneGoogle Scholar
Arberry, A. J. 1955. The Koran Interpreted. London: Allen & UnwinGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, . 1980. The Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Audi, R. 1997. Moral Knowledge and Ethical Character. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Ayer, A. J. 1936. Language, Truth, and Logic. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Baier, K. 1978a. Moral Reasons and Reasons to Be Moral. In Kim, J. and Goldman, A. (eds.), Values and Morals. Dordrecht: Reidel, 231–256Google Scholar
Baier, K. 1978b. The Social Source of Reason. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 51, 707–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, B. 1965. Political Argument. London: Routledge & Kegan PaulGoogle Scholar
Barry, B. 1989. Theories of Justice. London: HarvesterGoogle Scholar
Baumgardt, D. 1952. Bentham and the Ethics of Today. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Bentham, J. 1970. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. London: Athlone PressGoogle Scholar
Bergstrom, L. 1976. On the Formulation and Application of Utilitarianism. Nous 10, 121–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, S. 1971. Moral Realism. In Casey, J. (ed.), Morality and Moral Reasoning. London: Methuen, 101–124Google Scholar
Blackburn, S. 1984. Spreading the Word. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, S. 1985. Supervenience Revisited. In Hacking, I. (ed.), Exercises in Analysis: Essays by Students of Casimir Lewy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 47–67Google Scholar
Blackburn, S. 1988. Attitudes and Contents. Ethics 98, 501–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, N., and Stalnaker, R. 1999. Conceptual Analysis, Dualism, and the Explanatory Gap. The Philosophical Review 108, 1–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, R. N. 1988. How to Be a Moral Realist. In Sayre-McCord, G. (ed.), Essays on Moral Realism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 181–228Google Scholar
Brandt, R. B. 1963. Toward a Credible Form of Utilitarianism. In Castañeda, H. N. and Nakhnikian, G. (eds.), Morality and the Language of Conduct. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 107–144Google Scholar
Brandt, R. B. 1979. A Theory of the Good and Right. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Brandt, R. B. 1982. Two Concepts of Utility. In Miller, H. and Williams, W. (eds.), The Limits of Utilitarianism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 169–185Google Scholar
Bratman, M. E. 1987. Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Bratman, M. E. 1992. Shared Cooperative Activity. The Philosophical Review 101, 327–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratman, M. E. 1993. Shared Intention. Ethics 104, 97–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brink, D. O. 1989. Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broad, C. D. 1930. Five Types of Ethical Theory. London: Routledge & Kegan PaulGoogle Scholar
Broome, J. 1991. Weighing Goods. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Buddha. 1955. The Sermon at Benares. In Burtt, E. A. (ed.), The Teachings of the Compassionate Buddha. New York: New American Library, 29–32Google Scholar
Byrne, A. 1999. Cosmic Hermeneutics. Philosophical Perspectives 13, 347–383Google Scholar
Carson, T. L. 1983. Utilitarianism and the Wrongness of Killing. Erkenntnis 20, 49–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, T. L. 2000. Value and the Good Life. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame PressGoogle Scholar
Casell, E. 1982. The Nature of Suffering and the Goals of Medicine. New England Journal of Medicine 306, 11Google Scholar
Castañeda, H-N. 1973. A Problem for Utilitarianism. Analysis 33, 141–142Google Scholar
Chalmers, D. 1996. The Conscious Mind. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Clarke, H. W. 1894. A History of Tithes, 2nd ed. New York: Scribner'sGoogle Scholar
Confucius. 1979. The Analects. Translated and with an introduction by D. C. Lau. Harmondsworth: Penguin
Cummiskey, D. 1996. Kantian Consequentialism. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damasio, A. 1994. Descartes' Error. New York: Grosset/PutnamGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darwall, S. 1983. Impartial Reason. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
Darwall, S., Gibbard, A., and Railton, P. 1992. Toward Fin de Siècle Ethics: Some Trends. The Philosophical Review 101, 1–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Aspremont, C. J., and Gevers, L. 1971. Equity and the Informational Basis of Collective Choice. The Review of Economic Studies 44(2), 199–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. 1980. Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Davies, M., and Humberstone, L. 1980. Two Notions of Necessity. Philosophical Studies 38, 1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawood, N. J. 1974. Translation of The Koran. Harmondsworth: PenguinGoogle Scholar
Diener, E., Wirtz, D., and Oishi, S. 2001. End Effects of Rated Life Quality: The James Dean Effect. Psychological Science 12, 124–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donagan, A. 1977. The Theory of Morality. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Donne, J. 1950. Holy Sonnet VII. In Hayward, J. (ed.), John Donne: A Selection of His Poetry. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 168–169Google Scholar
Dostoevsky, F. 1990. The Brothers Karamazov. Translated by Richard Pevear and Larissa Volokhonsky. New York: Farrar, Straus and GirouxGoogle Scholar
Duncker, K. 1940–41. On Pleasure, Emotion, and Striving. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 1, 391–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgeworth, F. Y. 1881. Mathematical Psychics. London: C. K. PaulGoogle Scholar
Edwards, R. 1979. Pleasures and Pains. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
Fehige, C. 1998. A Pareto Principle for Possible People. In Fehige, C. and Wessels, U. (eds.), Preferences. Berlin: de Gruyter, 508–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, F. 1975. World Utilitarianism. In Lehrer, K. (ed.), Analysis and Metaphysics. Dordrecht: Reidel, 255–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, F. 1986. Doing the Best We Can. Dordrecht: ReidelCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, F. 1995. Adjusting Utility for Justice: A Consequentialist Reply to the Objection from Justice. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55, 567–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, F. 2004. Pleasure and the Good Life. Oxford: Clarendon PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, J. M., and Ravizza, M. (eds.). 1992. Ethics: Problems and Principles. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace JovanovichGoogle Scholar
Foot, P. 1967. The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of Double Effect. Oxford Review 5, 5–15Google Scholar
Foot, P. 1978. Virtues and Vices and Other Essays. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Frankena, W. 1973. Ethics, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
Fredrickson, B. L., and Kahneman, D. 1993. Duration Neglect in Retrospective Evaluations of Affective Episodes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65, 45–55CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fried, C. 1978. Right and Wrong. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauthier, D. 1986. Morals by Agreement. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Geach, P. 1958. Imperative and Deontic Logic. Analysis 18, 49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geach, P. 1965. Assertion. The Philosophical Review 74, 449–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gert, B. 1998. Morality. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Gibbard, A. 1965. Rule-Utilitarianism: Merely an Illusory Alternative?Australasian Journal of Philosophy 43, 211–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbard, A. 1990a. Utilitarianism and Coordination. New York: Garland PressGoogle Scholar
Gibbard, A. 1990b. Wise Choices, Apt Feelings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Gibbard, A. 1992. Reply to Blackburn, Carson, Hill and Railton. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72, 969–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, M. 1989. On Social Facts. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, M. 1996. Living Together. Lanham, MD: Rowman & LittlefieldGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, M. 2000. Sociality and Responsibility. Lanham, MD: Rowman & LittlefieldGoogle Scholar
Gilchrist, J. 1969. The Church and Economic Activity in the Middle Ages. London: MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Goldman, H. 1978. Doing the Best One Can. In Kim, J. and Goldman, A. (eds.), Values and Morals. Dordrecht: Reidel, 185–214Google Scholar
Goldsworthy, J. 1992. Well-Being and Value. Utilitas 4, 1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, J. 1986. Well-Being. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Hammond, P. J. 1976. Equity, Arrow's Conditions, and Rawls' Difference Principle. Econometrica 44, 793–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, R. 1992. Morality De Re: Reflections on the Trolley Problem. In Fischer and Ravizza (1992), 320–336
Hare, R. M. 1952. The Language of Morals. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Hare, R. M. 1963. Freedom and Reason. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Hare, R. M. 1981. Moral Thinking. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, G. 1975. Moral Relativism Defended. The Philosophical Review 84, 3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harre, R., and Madden, E. 1975. Causal Powers. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & LittlefieldGoogle Scholar
Harris, J. 1975. The Survival Lottery. Philosophy 50, 81–87CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrod, R. F. 1936. Utilitarianism Revised. Mind 45, 137–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslett, D. W. 1990. What Is Utility?Economics and Philosophy 6, 65–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1996. Being and Time. Translated by Joan Stambaugh. Albany: State University of New York PressGoogle Scholar
Henson, R. 1971. Utilitarianism and the Wrongness of Killing. The Philosophical Review 80, 320–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooker, B. 1995. Rule-Consequentialism, Incoherence, Fairness. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95, 19–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooker, B. 1996. Ross-style Pluralism versus Rule-Consequentialism. Mind 105, 531–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooker, B. 2000. Ideal Rules, Real World. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Horgan, T. 1984. Supervenience and Cosmic Hermeneutics. Southern Journal of Philosophy Supplement 22, 19–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horgan, T., and Timmons, M. 1990–91. New Wave Moral Realism Meets Moral Twin Earth. Journal of Philosophical Research 16, 447–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horgan, T., and Timmons, M. 1992. Troubles on Moral Twin Earth: Moral Queerness Revisited. Synthese 92, 221–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hospers, J. 1961. Human Conduct. New York: Harcourt Brace JovanovichGoogle Scholar
Hurka, T. 1993. Perfectionism. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Hutcheson, F. 1968. A System of Moral Philosophy. New York: Augustus M. KelleyGoogle Scholar
Jackson, F. 1987. Group Morality. In Pettit, P., Sylvan, R., and Norman, J. (eds.), Metaphysics and Morality. Oxford: Blackwell, 91–110Google Scholar
Jackson, F. 1998. From Metaphysics to Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
James, W. 1950. The Principles of Psychology. New York: DoverGoogle Scholar
Kagan, S. 1989. The Limits of Morality. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., Fredrickson, B. L., Schreiber, C. A., and Redelmeier, D. A. 1993. When More Pain Is Preferred to Less: Adding a Better End. Psychological Science 4, 401–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamm, F. M. 1993. Morality, Mortality, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Kamm, F. M. 1996. Morality, Mortality, vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. 1996a. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. In Gregor, Mary J. (trans. and ed.), Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 37–108Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1996b. The Metaphysics of Morals. In Gregor, Mary J. (trans. and ed.), Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 353–603Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1979. Supervenience and Nomological Incommensurables. American Philosophical Quarterly 15, 149–156Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1984. Concepts of Supervenience. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45, 153–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, P. 1979. Phenomenal Qualities. American Philosophical Quarterly 16, 123–129Google Scholar
Korsgaard, C. 1996a. The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, C. 1996b. Personal Identity and the Unity of Agency: A Kantian Response to Parfit. In her Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 362–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, S. 1980. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Lacan, J. 1971. Ecrits. Translated by A. Sheridan. New York: NortonGoogle Scholar
Lao-Tzu, . 1993. Tao Te Ching. Translated by S. Addiss and S. Lombardo. Indianapolis: HackettGoogle Scholar
Lewis, C. I. 1946. An Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation. La Salle, IL: Open CourtGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. 1980. Mad Pain and Martian Pain. In Block, N. (ed.), Readings in Philosophy of Psychology, Vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 216–222Google Scholar
Lewis, D. 1989. Dispositional Theories of Value. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 89, 113–136Google Scholar
Lewis, D. 1994. Reduction of Mind. In Guttenplan, Samuel (ed.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Blackwell, 412–431Google Scholar
Lyons, D. 1965. Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism. Oxford: Clarendon PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, J. L. 1977. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. Harmondsworth: PenguinGoogle Scholar
Mackie, J. L. 1984. Rights, Utility, and Universalization. In Frey, R. G. (ed.), Utility and Rights. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 86–105Google Scholar
Malm, H. 1989. Killing, Letting Die and Simple Conflicts. Philosophy and Public Affairs 18, 238–258Google ScholarPubMed
McDowell, J. 1978. Are Moral Requirements Hypothetical Imperatives?Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, supplementary volume 52, 13–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, J. 1979. Virtue and Reason. Monist 62, 331–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, J. 1981. Noncognitivism and Rule Following. In Holtzman, S. H. and Leich, C. M. (eds.), Wittgenstein: To Follow a Rule. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 141–162Google Scholar
McDowell, J. 1985. Values and Secondary Qualities. In Honderich, T. (ed.), Morality and Objectivity. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 110–129Google Scholar
McMahan, J. 2002. The Ethics of Killing. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendola, J. 1986. Parfit on Directly Collectively Self-Defeating Moral Theories. Philosophical Studies 50, 153–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendola, J. 1987. The Indeterminacy of Options. American Philosophical Quarterly 24, 125–136Google Scholar
Mendola, J. 1988. On Rawls's Basic Structure: Forms of Justification and the Subject Matter of Social Philosophy. The Monist 71, 437–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendola, J. 1990a. Bernard Williams and Ethics at the Limit. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 67, 306–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendola, J. 1990b. Objective Value and Subjective States. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50, 695–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendola, J. 1990c. An Ordinal Modification of Classical Utilitarianism. Erkenntnis 33, 73–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendola, J. 1997. Human Thought. Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendola, J. 1999. Hart, Fuller, Dworkin, and Fragile Norms. SMU Law Review 52, 111–134Google Scholar
Mendola, J. 2004. Justice within a Life. American Philosophical Quarterly 41, 125–140Google Scholar
Mendola, J. 2005a. Consequences, Group Acts, and Trolleys. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86, 64–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendola, J. 2005b. Intuitive Maximin. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35, 429–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendola, J. In print a. Intuitive Hedonism. Philosophical Studies
Mendola, J. In print b. Multiple-Act Consequentialism. Nous
Milgram, S. 1974. Obedience to Authority. New York: Harper and RowGoogle Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1979. Utilitarianism. Indianapolis: HackettGoogle Scholar
Moore, G. E. 1903. Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Moore, G. E. 1912. Ethics. New York: Henry HoltGoogle Scholar
More, H. 1997. An Account of Virtue. Bristol: Thoemmes PressGoogle Scholar
Murphy, L. 2000. Moral Demands in Nonideal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Nagel, T. 1970. The Possibility of Altruism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Nagel, T. 1979. What Is It Like to Be a Bat? In his Mortal Questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 165–180Google Scholar
Nagel, T. 1986. The View from Nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Nagel, T. 1991. Equality and Partiality. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. 2000. Women and Human Development. New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overvold, M. 1980. Self-Interest and the Concept of Self-Sacrifice. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 10, 105–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overvold, M. 1982. Self-Interest and Getting What You Want. In Miller, H. and Williams, W. (eds.), The Limits of Utilitarianism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 186–194Google Scholar
Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Parfit, D. 1995. Equality or Priority?Lawrence: University Press of KansasGoogle Scholar
Perry, D. C. 1967. The Concept of Pleasure. The Hague: Mouton & Co.Google Scholar
Plato, . 1975. Philebus. Translated by J. C. B. Gosling. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Pogge, T. 2002. World Poverty and Human Rights. Cambridge: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
Popper, K. 1966. The Open Society and Its Enemies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Postow, B. C. 1977. Generalized Act Utilitarianism. Analysis 37, 49–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, J. B. 1928. Pilgrimage of Buddhism and A Buddhist Pilgrimage. New York: MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1960. Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Railton, P. 1984. Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs 13, 134–171Google Scholar
Railton, P. 1986. Moral Realism. The Philosophical Review 95, 163–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. 1980. Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory. Journal of Philosophy 77, 515–572Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1985. Justice as Fairness: Political Not Metaphysical. Philosophy and Public Affairs 14, 223–251Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
Regan, D. 1980. Utilitarianism and Co-operation. Oxford: Clarendon PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, W. D. 1930. The Right and the Good. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Ross, W. D. 1939. Foundations of Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Rovane, C. 1998. The Bounds of Agency. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Ryle, G. 1954. Dilemmas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 54–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartre, J. P. 1953. Being and Nothingness. Translated by H. Barnes. New York: Simon and SchusterGoogle Scholar
Sayre-McCord, G. 1988. Moral Theory and Explanatory Impotence. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 12, 435–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. 1973. Rawls' Theory of Justice. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 121, 1020–1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. 1982. Contractualism and Utilitarianism. In Sen, A. and Williams, B. (eds.), Utilitarianism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 103–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Scheffler, S. 1982. The Rejection of Consequentialism. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Scheffler, S. 1988. Consequentialism and Its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. 1986. Social Choice Theory. In Arrow, K. and Intriligator, M. D. (eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Economics, vol. 3. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1073–1181Google Scholar
Sen, A. 1987. On Ethics and Economics. Oxford: Basil BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Shoemaker, S. 1975. Functionalism and Qualia. Philosophical Studies 27, 291–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoemaker, S. 1984. Causality and Properties. In his Identity, Cause, and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 206–233Google Scholar
Sidgwick, H. 1907. The Methods of Ethics, 7th ed. London: MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Singer, P. 1972. Famine, Affluence and Morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1, 229–243Google Scholar
Singer, P. 1993. Practical Ethics, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Slote, M. 1982. Goods and Lives. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 63, 311–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smart, J. J. C. 1973. An Outline of a System of Utilitarian Ethics. In Smart, J. J. C. and Williams, B., Utilitarianism, For and Against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smart, R. N. 1958. Negative Utilitarianism. Mind 67, 542–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, H. 1958. The Religions of Man. New York: Harper and RowGoogle Scholar
Sophocles, . 1984. Oedipus the King. Translated by R. Fagles. In The Three Theban Plays. Harmondsworth: PenguinGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, R. 1978. Assertion. Syntax and Semantics 9, 315–332Google Scholar
Stevenson, C. L. 1937. The Emotive Meaning of Ethical Terms. Mind 46, 14–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, C. L. 1944. Ethics and Language. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Strasnick, S. L. 1975. Preference Priority and the Maximization of Public Welfare. Ph. D. dissertation, Harvard University
Sturgeon, N. 1985. Moral Explanations. In Copp, D. and Zimmerman, D. (eds.), Morality, Reason, and Truth. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld, 49–78Google Scholar
Sumner, L. W. 1996. Welfare, Happiness and Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Tännsjö, T. 1985. Moral Conflict and Moral Realism. Journal of Philosophy 82, 113–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tännsjö, T. 1989. The Morality of Collective Actions. Philosophical Quarterly 39, 221–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tännsjö, T. 1998. Hedonistic Utilitarianism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University PressGoogle Scholar
Temkin, L. S. 1993a. Inequality. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Temkin, L. S. 1993b. Harmful Goods, Harmless Bads. In Frey, R. G. and Morris, C. (eds.), Value, Welfare, and Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 290–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, E. J. 1935. Early Buddhist Scriptures. London: K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.Google Scholar
Thomson, J. J. 1976. Killing, Letting Die, and the Trolley Problem. The Monist 59, 204–217CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomson, J. J. 1985. The Trolley Problem. The Yale Law Journal 94, 1395–1415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuomela, R. 1995. The Importance of Us. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
Unger, P. 1996. Living High and Letting Die. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roojen, M. 1996. Expressivism and Irrationality. The Philosophical Review 105, 311–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velleman, J. D. 1988. Brandt's Definition of ‘Good’. The Philosophical Review 97, 353–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velleman, J. D. 1991. Well-Being and Time. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 72, 48–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vischer, L. 1966. Tithing in the Early Church. Translated by R. C. Schultz. Philadelphia: Fortune PressGoogle Scholar
Neumann, J., and Morgenstern, O. 1944. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Weiss, H. (ed.). 2002. Social Welfare in Muslim Societies in Africa. Stockholm: Nordiska AfrikaininstitutetGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, D. 1987a. Truth, Invention, and the Meaning of Life. In his Needs, Values, Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 87–138Google Scholar
Wiggins, D. 1987b. Truth, and Truth as Predicated of Moral Judgments. In his Needs, Values, Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 139–184Google Scholar
Wiggins, D. 1987c. A Sensible Subjectivism. In his Needs, Values, Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 185–214Google Scholar
Wigoder, G. (ed.). 2002. The New Encyclopedia of Judaism. New York: New York University PressGoogle Scholar
Williams, B. 1973. A Critique of Utilitarianism. In Smart, J. J. C. and Williams, B., Utilitarianism, For and Against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 75–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, B. 1985. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Adams, R. M. 1976. Motive Utilitarianism. Journal of Philosophy 73, 467–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Shiekh, A. 1995. ZAKĀT. In Esposito, J. (ed.), The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Modern Islamic World, vol. 4. New York: Oxford University Press, 366–370Google Scholar
Aquinas, T. 1915–38. The Summa Theologica of St. Thomas Aquinas. Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province. London: Burns, Oates & WashbourneGoogle Scholar
Arberry, A. J. 1955. The Koran Interpreted. London: Allen & UnwinGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, . 1980. The Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Audi, R. 1997. Moral Knowledge and Ethical Character. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Ayer, A. J. 1936. Language, Truth, and Logic. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Baier, K. 1978a. Moral Reasons and Reasons to Be Moral. In Kim, J. and Goldman, A. (eds.), Values and Morals. Dordrecht: Reidel, 231–256Google Scholar
Baier, K. 1978b. The Social Source of Reason. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 51, 707–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, B. 1965. Political Argument. London: Routledge & Kegan PaulGoogle Scholar
Barry, B. 1989. Theories of Justice. London: HarvesterGoogle Scholar
Baumgardt, D. 1952. Bentham and the Ethics of Today. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Bentham, J. 1970. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. London: Athlone PressGoogle Scholar
Bergstrom, L. 1976. On the Formulation and Application of Utilitarianism. Nous 10, 121–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, S. 1971. Moral Realism. In Casey, J. (ed.), Morality and Moral Reasoning. London: Methuen, 101–124Google Scholar
Blackburn, S. 1984. Spreading the Word. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, S. 1985. Supervenience Revisited. In Hacking, I. (ed.), Exercises in Analysis: Essays by Students of Casimir Lewy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 47–67Google Scholar
Blackburn, S. 1988. Attitudes and Contents. Ethics 98, 501–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, N., and Stalnaker, R. 1999. Conceptual Analysis, Dualism, and the Explanatory Gap. The Philosophical Review 108, 1–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, R. N. 1988. How to Be a Moral Realist. In Sayre-McCord, G. (ed.), Essays on Moral Realism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 181–228Google Scholar
Brandt, R. B. 1963. Toward a Credible Form of Utilitarianism. In Castañeda, H. N. and Nakhnikian, G. (eds.), Morality and the Language of Conduct. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 107–144Google Scholar
Brandt, R. B. 1979. A Theory of the Good and Right. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Brandt, R. B. 1982. Two Concepts of Utility. In Miller, H. and Williams, W. (eds.), The Limits of Utilitarianism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 169–185Google Scholar
Bratman, M. E. 1987. Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Bratman, M. E. 1992. Shared Cooperative Activity. The Philosophical Review 101, 327–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratman, M. E. 1993. Shared Intention. Ethics 104, 97–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brink, D. O. 1989. Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broad, C. D. 1930. Five Types of Ethical Theory. London: Routledge & Kegan PaulGoogle Scholar
Broome, J. 1991. Weighing Goods. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Buddha. 1955. The Sermon at Benares. In Burtt, E. A. (ed.), The Teachings of the Compassionate Buddha. New York: New American Library, 29–32Google Scholar
Byrne, A. 1999. Cosmic Hermeneutics. Philosophical Perspectives 13, 347–383Google Scholar
Carson, T. L. 1983. Utilitarianism and the Wrongness of Killing. Erkenntnis 20, 49–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, T. L. 2000. Value and the Good Life. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame PressGoogle Scholar
Casell, E. 1982. The Nature of Suffering and the Goals of Medicine. New England Journal of Medicine 306, 11Google Scholar
Castañeda, H-N. 1973. A Problem for Utilitarianism. Analysis 33, 141–142Google Scholar
Chalmers, D. 1996. The Conscious Mind. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Clarke, H. W. 1894. A History of Tithes, 2nd ed. New York: Scribner'sGoogle Scholar
Confucius. 1979. The Analects. Translated and with an introduction by D. C. Lau. Harmondsworth: Penguin
Cummiskey, D. 1996. Kantian Consequentialism. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damasio, A. 1994. Descartes' Error. New York: Grosset/PutnamGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darwall, S. 1983. Impartial Reason. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
Darwall, S., Gibbard, A., and Railton, P. 1992. Toward Fin de Siècle Ethics: Some Trends. The Philosophical Review 101, 1–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Aspremont, C. J., and Gevers, L. 1971. Equity and the Informational Basis of Collective Choice. The Review of Economic Studies 44(2), 199–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. 1980. Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Davies, M., and Humberstone, L. 1980. Two Notions of Necessity. Philosophical Studies 38, 1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawood, N. J. 1974. Translation of The Koran. Harmondsworth: PenguinGoogle Scholar
Diener, E., Wirtz, D., and Oishi, S. 2001. End Effects of Rated Life Quality: The James Dean Effect. Psychological Science 12, 124–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donagan, A. 1977. The Theory of Morality. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Donne, J. 1950. Holy Sonnet VII. In Hayward, J. (ed.), John Donne: A Selection of His Poetry. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 168–169Google Scholar
Dostoevsky, F. 1990. The Brothers Karamazov. Translated by Richard Pevear and Larissa Volokhonsky. New York: Farrar, Straus and GirouxGoogle Scholar
Duncker, K. 1940–41. On Pleasure, Emotion, and Striving. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 1, 391–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgeworth, F. Y. 1881. Mathematical Psychics. London: C. K. PaulGoogle Scholar
Edwards, R. 1979. Pleasures and Pains. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
Fehige, C. 1998. A Pareto Principle for Possible People. In Fehige, C. and Wessels, U. (eds.), Preferences. Berlin: de Gruyter, 508–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, F. 1975. World Utilitarianism. In Lehrer, K. (ed.), Analysis and Metaphysics. Dordrecht: Reidel, 255–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, F. 1986. Doing the Best We Can. Dordrecht: ReidelCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, F. 1995. Adjusting Utility for Justice: A Consequentialist Reply to the Objection from Justice. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55, 567–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, F. 2004. Pleasure and the Good Life. Oxford: Clarendon PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, J. M., and Ravizza, M. (eds.). 1992. Ethics: Problems and Principles. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace JovanovichGoogle Scholar
Foot, P. 1967. The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of Double Effect. Oxford Review 5, 5–15Google Scholar
Foot, P. 1978. Virtues and Vices and Other Essays. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Frankena, W. 1973. Ethics, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
Fredrickson, B. L., and Kahneman, D. 1993. Duration Neglect in Retrospective Evaluations of Affective Episodes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65, 45–55CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fried, C. 1978. Right and Wrong. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauthier, D. 1986. Morals by Agreement. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Geach, P. 1958. Imperative and Deontic Logic. Analysis 18, 49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geach, P. 1965. Assertion. The Philosophical Review 74, 449–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gert, B. 1998. Morality. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Gibbard, A. 1965. Rule-Utilitarianism: Merely an Illusory Alternative?Australasian Journal of Philosophy 43, 211–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbard, A. 1990a. Utilitarianism and Coordination. New York: Garland PressGoogle Scholar
Gibbard, A. 1990b. Wise Choices, Apt Feelings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Gibbard, A. 1992. Reply to Blackburn, Carson, Hill and Railton. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72, 969–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, M. 1989. On Social Facts. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, M. 1996. Living Together. Lanham, MD: Rowman & LittlefieldGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, M. 2000. Sociality and Responsibility. Lanham, MD: Rowman & LittlefieldGoogle Scholar
Gilchrist, J. 1969. The Church and Economic Activity in the Middle Ages. London: MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Goldman, H. 1978. Doing the Best One Can. In Kim, J. and Goldman, A. (eds.), Values and Morals. Dordrecht: Reidel, 185–214Google Scholar
Goldsworthy, J. 1992. Well-Being and Value. Utilitas 4, 1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, J. 1986. Well-Being. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Hammond, P. J. 1976. Equity, Arrow's Conditions, and Rawls' Difference Principle. Econometrica 44, 793–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, R. 1992. Morality De Re: Reflections on the Trolley Problem. In Fischer and Ravizza (1992), 320–336
Hare, R. M. 1952. The Language of Morals. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Hare, R. M. 1963. Freedom and Reason. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Hare, R. M. 1981. Moral Thinking. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, G. 1975. Moral Relativism Defended. The Philosophical Review 84, 3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harre, R., and Madden, E. 1975. Causal Powers. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & LittlefieldGoogle Scholar
Harris, J. 1975. The Survival Lottery. Philosophy 50, 81–87CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrod, R. F. 1936. Utilitarianism Revised. Mind 45, 137–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslett, D. W. 1990. What Is Utility?Economics and Philosophy 6, 65–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1996. Being and Time. Translated by Joan Stambaugh. Albany: State University of New York PressGoogle Scholar
Henson, R. 1971. Utilitarianism and the Wrongness of Killing. The Philosophical Review 80, 320–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooker, B. 1995. Rule-Consequentialism, Incoherence, Fairness. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95, 19–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooker, B. 1996. Ross-style Pluralism versus Rule-Consequentialism. Mind 105, 531–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooker, B. 2000. Ideal Rules, Real World. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Horgan, T. 1984. Supervenience and Cosmic Hermeneutics. Southern Journal of Philosophy Supplement 22, 19–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horgan, T., and Timmons, M. 1990–91. New Wave Moral Realism Meets Moral Twin Earth. Journal of Philosophical Research 16, 447–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horgan, T., and Timmons, M. 1992. Troubles on Moral Twin Earth: Moral Queerness Revisited. Synthese 92, 221–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hospers, J. 1961. Human Conduct. New York: Harcourt Brace JovanovichGoogle Scholar
Hurka, T. 1993. Perfectionism. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Hutcheson, F. 1968. A System of Moral Philosophy. New York: Augustus M. KelleyGoogle Scholar
Jackson, F. 1987. Group Morality. In Pettit, P., Sylvan, R., and Norman, J. (eds.), Metaphysics and Morality. Oxford: Blackwell, 91–110Google Scholar
Jackson, F. 1998. From Metaphysics to Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
James, W. 1950. The Principles of Psychology. New York: DoverGoogle Scholar
Kagan, S. 1989. The Limits of Morality. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., Fredrickson, B. L., Schreiber, C. A., and Redelmeier, D. A. 1993. When More Pain Is Preferred to Less: Adding a Better End. Psychological Science 4, 401–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamm, F. M. 1993. Morality, Mortality, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Kamm, F. M. 1996. Morality, Mortality, vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. 1996a. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. In Gregor, Mary J. (trans. and ed.), Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 37–108Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1996b. The Metaphysics of Morals. In Gregor, Mary J. (trans. and ed.), Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 353–603Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1979. Supervenience and Nomological Incommensurables. American Philosophical Quarterly 15, 149–156Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1984. Concepts of Supervenience. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45, 153–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, P. 1979. Phenomenal Qualities. American Philosophical Quarterly 16, 123–129Google Scholar
Korsgaard, C. 1996a. The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, C. 1996b. Personal Identity and the Unity of Agency: A Kantian Response to Parfit. In her Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 362–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, S. 1980. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Lacan, J. 1971. Ecrits. Translated by A. Sheridan. New York: NortonGoogle Scholar
Lao-Tzu, . 1993. Tao Te Ching. Translated by S. Addiss and S. Lombardo. Indianapolis: HackettGoogle Scholar
Lewis, C. I. 1946. An Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation. La Salle, IL: Open CourtGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. 1980. Mad Pain and Martian Pain. In Block, N. (ed.), Readings in Philosophy of Psychology, Vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 216–222Google Scholar
Lewis, D. 1989. Dispositional Theories of Value. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 89, 113–136Google Scholar
Lewis, D. 1994. Reduction of Mind. In Guttenplan, Samuel (ed.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Blackwell, 412–431Google Scholar
Lyons, D. 1965. Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism. Oxford: Clarendon PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, J. L. 1977. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. Harmondsworth: PenguinGoogle Scholar
Mackie, J. L. 1984. Rights, Utility, and Universalization. In Frey, R. G. (ed.), Utility and Rights. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 86–105Google Scholar
Malm, H. 1989. Killing, Letting Die and Simple Conflicts. Philosophy and Public Affairs 18, 238–258Google ScholarPubMed
McDowell, J. 1978. Are Moral Requirements Hypothetical Imperatives?Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, supplementary volume 52, 13–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, J. 1979. Virtue and Reason. Monist 62, 331–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, J. 1981. Noncognitivism and Rule Following. In Holtzman, S. H. and Leich, C. M. (eds.), Wittgenstein: To Follow a Rule. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 141–162Google Scholar
McDowell, J. 1985. Values and Secondary Qualities. In Honderich, T. (ed.), Morality and Objectivity. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 110–129Google Scholar
McMahan, J. 2002. The Ethics of Killing. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendola, J. 1986. Parfit on Directly Collectively Self-Defeating Moral Theories. Philosophical Studies 50, 153–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendola, J. 1987. The Indeterminacy of Options. American Philosophical Quarterly 24, 125–136Google Scholar
Mendola, J. 1988. On Rawls's Basic Structure: Forms of Justification and the Subject Matter of Social Philosophy. The Monist 71, 437–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendola, J. 1990a. Bernard Williams and Ethics at the Limit. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 67, 306–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendola, J. 1990b. Objective Value and Subjective States. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50, 695–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendola, J. 1990c. An Ordinal Modification of Classical Utilitarianism. Erkenntnis 33, 73–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendola, J. 1997. Human Thought. Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendola, J. 1999. Hart, Fuller, Dworkin, and Fragile Norms. SMU Law Review 52, 111–134Google Scholar
Mendola, J. 2004. Justice within a Life. American Philosophical Quarterly 41, 125–140Google Scholar
Mendola, J. 2005a. Consequences, Group Acts, and Trolleys. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86, 64–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendola, J. 2005b. Intuitive Maximin. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35, 429–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendola, J. In print a. Intuitive Hedonism. Philosophical Studies
Mendola, J. In print b. Multiple-Act Consequentialism. Nous
Milgram, S. 1974. Obedience to Authority. New York: Harper and RowGoogle Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1979. Utilitarianism. Indianapolis: HackettGoogle Scholar
Moore, G. E. 1903. Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Moore, G. E. 1912. Ethics. New York: Henry HoltGoogle Scholar
More, H. 1997. An Account of Virtue. Bristol: Thoemmes PressGoogle Scholar
Murphy, L. 2000. Moral Demands in Nonideal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Nagel, T. 1970. The Possibility of Altruism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Nagel, T. 1979. What Is It Like to Be a Bat? In his Mortal Questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 165–180Google Scholar
Nagel, T. 1986. The View from Nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Nagel, T. 1991. Equality and Partiality. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. 2000. Women and Human Development. New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overvold, M. 1980. Self-Interest and the Concept of Self-Sacrifice. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 10, 105–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overvold, M. 1982. Self-Interest and Getting What You Want. In Miller, H. and Williams, W. (eds.), The Limits of Utilitarianism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 186–194Google Scholar
Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Parfit, D. 1995. Equality or Priority?Lawrence: University Press of KansasGoogle Scholar
Perry, D. C. 1967. The Concept of Pleasure. The Hague: Mouton & Co.Google Scholar
Plato, . 1975. Philebus. Translated by J. C. B. Gosling. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Pogge, T. 2002. World Poverty and Human Rights. Cambridge: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
Popper, K. 1966. The Open Society and Its Enemies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Postow, B. C. 1977. Generalized Act Utilitarianism. Analysis 37, 49–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, J. B. 1928. Pilgrimage of Buddhism and A Buddhist Pilgrimage. New York: MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1960. Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Railton, P. 1984. Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs 13, 134–171Google Scholar
Railton, P. 1986. Moral Realism. The Philosophical Review 95, 163–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. 1980. Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory. Journal of Philosophy 77, 515–572Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1985. Justice as Fairness: Political Not Metaphysical. Philosophy and Public Affairs 14, 223–251Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
Regan, D. 1980. Utilitarianism and Co-operation. Oxford: Clarendon PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, W. D. 1930. The Right and the Good. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Ross, W. D. 1939. Foundations of Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Rovane, C. 1998. The Bounds of Agency. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Ryle, G. 1954. Dilemmas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 54–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartre, J. P. 1953. Being and Nothingness. Translated by H. Barnes. New York: Simon and SchusterGoogle Scholar
Sayre-McCord, G. 1988. Moral Theory and Explanatory Impotence. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 12, 435–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. 1973. Rawls' Theory of Justice. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 121, 1020–1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. 1982. Contractualism and Utilitarianism. In Sen, A. and Williams, B. (eds.), Utilitarianism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 103–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Scheffler, S. 1982. The Rejection of Consequentialism. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Scheffler, S. 1988. Consequentialism and Its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. 1986. Social Choice Theory. In Arrow, K. and Intriligator, M. D. (eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Economics, vol. 3. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1073–1181Google Scholar
Sen, A. 1987. On Ethics and Economics. Oxford: Basil BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Shoemaker, S. 1975. Functionalism and Qualia. Philosophical Studies 27, 291–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoemaker, S. 1984. Causality and Properties. In his Identity, Cause, and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 206–233Google Scholar
Sidgwick, H. 1907. The Methods of Ethics, 7th ed. London: MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Singer, P. 1972. Famine, Affluence and Morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1, 229–243Google Scholar
Singer, P. 1993. Practical Ethics, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Slote, M. 1982. Goods and Lives. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 63, 311–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smart, J. J. C. 1973. An Outline of a System of Utilitarian Ethics. In Smart, J. J. C. and Williams, B., Utilitarianism, For and Against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smart, R. N. 1958. Negative Utilitarianism. Mind 67, 542–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, H. 1958. The Religions of Man. New York: Harper and RowGoogle Scholar
Sophocles, . 1984. Oedipus the King. Translated by R. Fagles. In The Three Theban Plays. Harmondsworth: PenguinGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, R. 1978. Assertion. Syntax and Semantics 9, 315–332Google Scholar
Stevenson, C. L. 1937. The Emotive Meaning of Ethical Terms. Mind 46, 14–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, C. L. 1944. Ethics and Language. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Strasnick, S. L. 1975. Preference Priority and the Maximization of Public Welfare. Ph. D. dissertation, Harvard University
Sturgeon, N. 1985. Moral Explanations. In Copp, D. and Zimmerman, D. (eds.), Morality, Reason, and Truth. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld, 49–78Google Scholar
Sumner, L. W. 1996. Welfare, Happiness and Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Tännsjö, T. 1985. Moral Conflict and Moral Realism. Journal of Philosophy 82, 113–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tännsjö, T. 1989. The Morality of Collective Actions. Philosophical Quarterly 39, 221–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tännsjö, T. 1998. Hedonistic Utilitarianism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University PressGoogle Scholar
Temkin, L. S. 1993a. Inequality. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Temkin, L. S. 1993b. Harmful Goods, Harmless Bads. In Frey, R. G. and Morris, C. (eds.), Value, Welfare, and Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 290–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, E. J. 1935. Early Buddhist Scriptures. London: K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.Google Scholar
Thomson, J. J. 1976. Killing, Letting Die, and the Trolley Problem. The Monist 59, 204–217CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomson, J. J. 1985. The Trolley Problem. The Yale Law Journal 94, 1395–1415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuomela, R. 1995. The Importance of Us. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
Unger, P. 1996. Living High and Letting Die. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roojen, M. 1996. Expressivism and Irrationality. The Philosophical Review 105, 311–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velleman, J. D. 1988. Brandt's Definition of ‘Good’. The Philosophical Review 97, 353–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velleman, J. D. 1991. Well-Being and Time. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 72, 48–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vischer, L. 1966. Tithing in the Early Church. Translated by R. C. Schultz. Philadelphia: Fortune PressGoogle Scholar
Neumann, J., and Morgenstern, O. 1944. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Weiss, H. (ed.). 2002. Social Welfare in Muslim Societies in Africa. Stockholm: Nordiska AfrikaininstitutetGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, D. 1987a. Truth, Invention, and the Meaning of Life. In his Needs, Values, Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 87–138Google Scholar
Wiggins, D. 1987b. Truth, and Truth as Predicated of Moral Judgments. In his Needs, Values, Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 139–184Google Scholar
Wiggins, D. 1987c. A Sensible Subjectivism. In his Needs, Values, Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 185–214Google Scholar
Wigoder, G. (ed.). 2002. The New Encyclopedia of Judaism. New York: New York University PressGoogle Scholar
Williams, B. 1973. A Critique of Utilitarianism. In Smart, J. J. C. and Williams, B., Utilitarianism, For and Against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 75–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, B. 1985. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Joseph Mendola, University of Nebraska, Lincoln
  • Book: Goodness and Justice
  • Online publication: 22 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498954.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Joseph Mendola, University of Nebraska, Lincoln
  • Book: Goodness and Justice
  • Online publication: 22 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498954.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Joseph Mendola, University of Nebraska, Lincoln
  • Book: Goodness and Justice
  • Online publication: 22 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498954.009
Available formats
×