Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T18:06:50.698Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - The governance of science for sustainability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Jill Jäger
Affiliation:
Sustainable Europe Research Institute
W. Neil Adger
Affiliation:
University of East Anglia
Andrew Jordan
Affiliation:
University of East Anglia
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Knowledge, and hence science more generally, should play a key role in shaping human future development and thus the prospects for sustainable development. It should also play a key role in the framing of agendas for economic, social and political innovation. The governance of knowledge and, by implication, of science more generally, is thus an important part of governance for sustainable development. The governance of knowledge for sustainable development chiefly addresses the ways in which science is organised in society so as to achieve a transition to sustainable development. Exploring a new social contract for the practice and focus of science is the key focus of this chapter.

The questions of when, why and how knowledge influences action have been addressed in a wide range of studies with increasing attention in recent years to the environmental arena (Clark et al., 2006). The so-called ‘rational actor’ model assumes that policy makers undertake a careful analysis of the costs and benefits of available alternatives and always turn to scientists for an objective basis for their decisions (e.g. Lindblom, 1980). Other models see that decision makers are constrained with respect to their time, resources, knowledge and cognitive abilities and thus do not necessarily always turn to scientists for input (e.g. Kahneman et al., 1982). Kingdon (1984) argued that rather than knowledge informing decision making, policy choices are made when ‘windows of opportunity’ open and streams of problems and solutions that are usually independent come together.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cash, D. W., Clark, W. C., Alcock, F., Dickson, N. M., Eckley, N., Guston, D. H., Jäger, J. and Mitchell, R. B. 2003. ‘Knowledge systems for sustainable development’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 100: 8086–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, W. C. 2005. ‘A new social contract for science?Environment 47(3): 1.Google Scholar
Clark, W. C. 2007. ‘Sustainability science: a room of its own’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104: 1737.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, W. C., Mitchell, R. B. and Cash, D. W. 2006. ‘Evaluating the influence of global environmental assessments’, in Mitchell, R. B., Clark, W. C., Cash, D. W. and Dickson, N. M. (eds.) Global Environmental Assessments: Information and Influence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Farrell, A. E. and Jäger, J. (eds.) 2005. Assessments of Regional and Global Environmental Risks: Designing Processes for the Effective Use of Science in Decision-Making. Washington DC: Resources for the Future.
Farrell, K. N., Kemp, R., Hinterberger, F., Rammel, C. and Ziegler, R. 2005. ‘From ‘for’ to governance for sustainable development in Europe: what is at stake for further research?International Journal of Sustainable Development 8: 127–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, P. M. 2002. ‘Science policy for multilateral environmental governance’, paper presented at the International Workshop on ‘The Multilateral Environmental Governance Regime: Structural Integration and the Possibility of a World Environment Organization’. United Nations Headquarters, New York, March 26–27, 2002.
,ICSU (International Council for Science) 2002. Science and Technology for Sustainable Development. International Council for Science, Initiative on Science and Technology for Sustainability, and Third World Academy of Sciences. ICSU Series on Science for Sustainable Development, No. 9. International Council for Science: Paris. URL: www.icsu.org/Gestion/img/ICSU_DOC_DOWNLOAD/70_DD_FILE_Vol9.pdf.Google Scholar
Jäger, J., Eijndhoven, J. and Clark, W. C. 2001. ‘Knowledge and action: an analysis of linkages among management functions for global environmental risks’, in Social Learning Group (eds.) Learning to Manage Global Environmental Risks, Volume 2: A Functional Analysis of Social Responses to Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, and Acid Rain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. and Tversky, A. 1982. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kates, R. W., Clark, W. C., Corell, R., Hall, J. M., Jaeger, C. C., Lowe, I., McCarthy, J. J., Schellnhuber, H. J., Bolin, B., Dickson, N. M., Faucheux, S., Gallopin, G. C., Grubler, A., Huntley, B., Jäger, J., Jodha, N. S., Kasperson, R. E., Mabogunje, A., Matson, P., Mooney, H., Moore, B., O'Riordan, T. and Svedin, U. 2001. ‘Sustainability science’, Science 292: 641–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kingdon, J. W. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Kooiman, J. (ed.) 2003. Governing as Governance. London, UK: Sage.
Lindblom, C. E. 1980. The Policy-Making Process. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Lubchenco, J. 1998. ‘Entering the century of the environment: a new social contract for science’, Science 279: 491–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, C. A. 2005. ‘The design and management of international scientific assessments: lessons from the climate regime’, in Farrell, A. E. and Jäger, J. (eds.) Assessments of Regional and Global Environmental Risks: Designing Processes for the Effective Use of Science in Decision-Making. Washington DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
Rhodes, R. A. W. 1997. Understanding Governance. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Steffen, W., Sanderson, A., Tyson, P. D., Jäger, J., Matson, P. A., Moore III, B., Oldfield, F., Richardson, K., Schellnhuber, H. J., Turner II, B. L. and Wasson, R. J. (eds.) 2004. Global Change and the Earth System: A Planet under Pressure. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Stokes, D. E. 1997. Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Susskind, L. 1994. Environmental Diplomacy: Negotiating More Effective Global Agreements. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
,United Nations Development Programme 2005. Human Development Report 2005 – International Cooperation at a Crossroads: Aid, Trade and Security in an Unequal World. New York: UNDP.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×