1.Layne, LL, Vostral, SL, & Boyer, K. Feminist Technology (Champaign: University of Illinois Press, 2010).
2.For an excellent introduction to the major traditions of feminist theory, see Tong, RP. Feminist Thought: A More Comprehensive Introduction (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2013).
5.Hadfield, GK. The dilemma of choice: a feminist perspective on the limits of freedom of contract. Osgoode Hall Law J 1995; 33(2):337–51.
6.Crozier, GK. Protecting cross-border providers of ova and surrogacy services? Glob Soc Policy 2010; 10(3):292–305.
7.Gamble, N. Crossing the line: the legal and ethical problems of foreign surrogacy. Reprod Biomed Online 2009; 199(2):151–2.
8.Callahan, J, & Roberts, D. A feminist social justice approach to reproduction-assisting technologies: a case study on the limits of liberal theory. KY Law J 1996; 84:1197–234.
9.Tronto, J. Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care (New York: Routledge, 1993).
10.Nelson, HL. Damaged Identities, Narrative Repair (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2001).
11.Walker, MU. Moral Understandings: A Feminist Study in Ethics (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007).
12.Kittay, EF. Love’s Labor: Essays on Women, Equality, and Dependency (New York: Routledge, 1999).
13.Bailey, A. Reconceiving surrogacy: toward a reproductive justice account of Indian surrogacy. Hypatia 2011; 26(4):715–41.
14.Panitch, V. Surrogate tourism and reproductive rights. Hypatia 2013; 28(2):274–89.
15.Pande, A. Wombs in Labor: Transnational Commercial Surrogacy (New York: Columbia University Press, 2014).
16.Parks, JA. Care ethics and the global practice of commercial surrogacy. Bioethics 2010; 24(7):333–40.
17.Bailey, , note 12, p. 718.
18.Petrapanagos, A. Fertility preservation technologies for women: a feminist ethical analysis. Ph.D. thesis, University of Western Ontario (Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository, Paper 1299), 2013, p. 36.
19.Ibid., note 17, p. 43.
21.Pande, A. Not an “angel,” not a “whore”: commercial surrogates as “dirty” workers in India. Indian J Gend Stud 2009; 16(14):141–73.
22.Shanley, ML. “Surrogate mothering” and women’s freedom: a critique of contracts for human reproduction. In Boling, P., ed., Expecting Trouble: Surrogacy, Fetal Abuse and New Reproductive Technologies (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1995), pp. 156–77.
23.Mackenzie, C. Abortion and embodiment. Australasian J Phil 1992; 70(2):136–55.
24.Young, IM. Throwing Like a Girl and Other Essays in Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory (Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1990).
26.For an argument in favor of licensing parents who wish to reproduce through reproductive surrogacy, see Overall, C. Reproductive “surrogacy” and parental licensing. Bioethics 2015; 29(5):353–61.