Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T09:59:49.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Challenges in the first ever national survey of people with intellectual disabilities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2014

Sally Malam
Affiliation:
TNS BMRB, UK
Eric Emerson
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Ian Davies
Affiliation:
Central England People First, UK
Roger Tourangeau
Affiliation:
Westat Research Organisation, Maryland
Brad Edwards
Affiliation:
Westat Research Organisation, Maryland
Timothy P. Johnson
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Chicago
Kirk M. Wolter
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Nancy Bates
Affiliation:
US Census Bureau
Get access

Summary

Introduction and background

The population of adults with intellectual disabilities has been largely neglected in survey research, as the significant impairments in communication and understanding that are common among this population were considered too great a barrier to their participation in large-scale surveys. While there had been qualitative research, prior to 2002 there had never been a nationally representative survey conducted with this population. In surveys concerning this population, data was largely collected from proxy respondents, such as parents or caregivers. In the absence of a sampling frame for the whole population, surveys generally used convenience samples of those in touch with services.

In March 2001, the UK government White Paper Valuing People: A New Strategy for Learning Disability for the 21st Century (Department of Health, 2001) was published, setting out the Government’s commitment to improving the life chances of people with intellectual disabilities in England. This was the first White Paper in thirty years concerning this population, and there had been a significant amount of change in service provision in that time. One important issue highlighted in the White Paper was the lack of national information available for England about people with intellectual disabilities, with much information based on estimates from administrative data, in the absence of survey research.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Department of Health. (1999). Facing the Facts: Services for People with Learning Disabilities – A Policy Impact Study of Social Care and Health Services. London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
Department of Health. (2001). Valuing People: A New Strategy for Learning Disability for the 21st Century: A White Paper. London: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Emerson, E. (2010). Self-reported exposure to disablism is associated with poorer self-reported health and well-being among adults with intellectual disabilities in England: cross sectional survey. Public Health, 124, 682–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emerson, E. (2011). Health status and health risks of the “hidden majority” of adults with intellectual disability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 49, 155–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emerson, E., & Hatton, C. (2008a). Socioeconomic disadvantage, social participation and networks and the self-rated health of English men and women with mild and moderate intellectual disabilities: cross sectional survey. European Journal of Public Health, 18, 31–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emerson, E., & Hatton, C. (2008b). The self-reported well-being of women and men with intellectual disabilities in England. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 113(2), 143–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emerson, E., Hatton, C., Robertson, J., Roberts, H., Baines, S., Evison, F., et al. (2012). People with Learning Disabilities in England 2011. Durham: Improving Health & Lives: Learning Disability Observatory.Google Scholar
Emerson, E., Malam, S., Davies, I., & Spencer, K. (2005). Adults with Learning Difficulties in England 2003/04. London: NHS Health and Social Care Information Centre.Google Scholar
EQual and Donovan Research. (2000). National Satisfaction Survey of Disability Services. A Report Prepared for the Steering Committee for the Review of Commonwealth/State Service Provision and the National Disability Administrators. Canberra: AusInfo.Google Scholar
Hatton, C., Emerson, E., & Lobb, C. (2006). Evaluating the Impact of Valuing People: Report of Phase 3: Moving towards Evaluating Valuing People in Practice. Lancaster: Lancaster University.Google Scholar
Livermore, G., Wright, D., Roche, A., & Grau, E. (2009). 2006 Work Activity and Use of Employment Supports under the Original Ticket to Work Regulations. National Beneficiary Survey: Methodology and Descriptive Statistics. Washington, DC: Mathematica.Google Scholar
Malam, S. (2002). Learning Difficulties Feasibility Study Report. London: NHS Health and Social Care Information Centre.Google Scholar
Malam, S. (2003). Learning Difficulties Survey Dress Rehearsal Report and Proposals for Main Stage. London: NHS Health and Social Care Information Centre.Google Scholar
Robertson, J., & Emerson, E. (2010). Participation in sports by people with intellectual disabilities in England. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 23, 616–22.Google Scholar
Robertson, J., Emerson, E., Hatton, C., Elliott, J., McIntosh, B., Swift, P., et al. (2006). A longitudinal analysis of the impact and cost of person centred planning for people with intellectual disabilities in England. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 111(6), 400–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×