Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T09:59:50.949Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Ethnographic evaluations on coverage of hard-to-count minorities in US decennial censuses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2014

Laurie Schwede
Affiliation:
US Census Bureau
Rodney Terry
Affiliation:
US Census Bureau
Jennifer Hunter Childs
Affiliation:
US Census Bureau
Roger Tourangeau
Affiliation:
Westat Research Organisation, Maryland
Brad Edwards
Affiliation:
Westat Research Organisation, Maryland
Timothy P. Johnson
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Chicago
Kirk M. Wolter
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Nancy Bates
Affiliation:
US Census Bureau
Get access

Summary

Introduction and background

The mission of decennial censuses in the United States is to count everyone living in the country once, only once, and in the right place. The counts are important for the following decade because census results are used for redistricting, allocating seats in the House of Representatives as well as providing information to distribute as much as $400 billion in federal funds annually. Fulfilling this mission is daunting in a country that is growing increasingly more diverse and complex.

The problem

Despite best efforts to count everyone, the US Census Bureau’s own research shows persistent differential undercounts of some hard-to-count minority populations, such as African-Americans and Hispanics, across decennial censuses. Post-enumeration surveys and statistical studies have given estimates of the number of persons both missed and erroneously counted by the census and their characteristics. Ethnographic studies conducted during census data collections, but separate from those operations, have identified a range of factors affecting coverage and illuminated how and why they may affect enumeration in some racial and ethnic subpopulations. Though there is no reason to believe that race or ethnicity in and of itself leads to coverage error, it seems that some underlying variables associated in past studies with undercounting may also be correlated with race (e.g., mobility, complex living situations, and language isolation). Other variables with hypothesized links to both undercoverage and race for possible future research include poverty, immigration, and legal status.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aschenbrenner, J. (1975). Lifelines: Black Families in Chicago. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Bates, N. A., & Gerber, E. (1998). Temporary mobility and reporting of usual residence. Survey Methodology, 24(1), 89–98.Google Scholar
Bruce, A., Robinson, G. J., & Devine, J. (2013). A planning database to identify areas that are hard-to-enumerate and hard-to-survey in the United States. In H2R/2012 Proceedings. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.Google Scholar
Chan, A. (2012). Investigation of Methods to Evaluate the Coverage of Group Quarters Populations Report. 2010 Census Program for Evaluations and Experiments. 2010 Census Planning Memoranda Series #240. US Census Bureau.Google Scholar
Clark, J., & Moul, D. (2004). Coverage improvement in the Census 2000 enumeration. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program Topic Report No. 10, Tr-10. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.Google Scholar
Daniggelis, E. (2011). A Comparative Ethnographic Study of Enumeration Methods and Coverage in a Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Site in the 2010 Census Coverage Measurement Survey Operation. Report prepared under US Census Bureau contract.
de la Puente, M. (1993). Why are people missed or erroneously included in the census: a summary of findings from ethnographic coverage reports. In Proceedings of the 1993 Research Conference on Undercounting Ethnic Populations of the U. S. Census Bureau (pp. 29–66). Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.Google Scholar
de la Puente, M. (2004). Coverage improvement in the Census 2000 enumeration. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program Report No. 15, Tr-15. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.Google Scholar
Donkersloot, R. (2011). Comparative Ethnographic Studies of Enumeration Methods and Coverage in Race/ethnic Groups in the Census Coverage Measurement Person Interview Operation: Kodiak Island Borough, Alaska. Report prepared under US Census Bureau contract.
Fortier, T. (2012). Comparative Ethnographic Studies of Enumeration Methods and Coverage in Race/Ethnic Groups in the Census Coverage Measurement Person Interview Operation: American Indian Sites. Report prepared under US Census Bureau contract.
Hamid, A. (1992). Ethnographic Follow-up of a Predominately African American Population in a Sample Area in Central Harlem, New York City: Behavioral Causes of the Undercount of the 1990 Census. Ethnographic Evaluation of the 1990 Decennial Census Report #11. Report prepared under US Census Bureau contract.
Hunter Childs, J., de la Puente, M., & Salo, M. (2003). Comparative ethnographic research on mobile populations. Census 2000 Evaluation J.3: Ethnographic Studies. July 17, 2003.Google Scholar
Kang, T. (2006). Household structure and its social and economic functions among Korean American immigrants in Queens, New York: an ethnographic study. In Schwede, L., Blumberg, R. L., & Chan, A. Y. (eds.), Complex Ethnic Households in America. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Lacy, K. (2012). An Ethnographic Study of Enumeration Methods and Coverage in a 2010 Census Coverage Measurement Survey Operation Primarily among Blacks in a Chicago Field Site. Report prepared under US Census Bureau contract.
Leeman, J., & Marsh, H. (2013). Behavior coding report of the 2010 Census coverage measurement person interviews. 2010 Census Program for Evaluations and Experiments. 2010 Census Planning Memoranda Series #251. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.Google Scholar
McMillen-Wolfe, H. L. (2011). Ethnographic Evaluation of Enumeration Methods and Coverage in the 2010 Non-Response Follow Up Operation on the Island of Hawaii, with Special Focus on Native Hawaiians and Other Pacific Islanders. Report prepared under US Census Bureau contract.
Martin, E., Brownrigg, L., & Fay, R. (1990). Results of 1988 Ethnographic Studies of Census Coverage and Plans for 1990. Paper presented to the Census Advisory Committees of the American Statistical Association and on Population Statistics at the Joint Advisory Committee Meeting, Alexandria, VA.
Mule, T. (2012). Census coverage measurement estimation report: summary of estimates of coverage for persons in the United States. DSSD 2010 Census Coverage Measurement Memorandum Series #2010-G_01. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.Google Scholar
Pan, Y., & Lubkemann, S. (2012). Observing census enumeration of non-English speaking households in the 2010 Census. 2010 Census Program for Evaluations and Experiments. 2010 Census Planning Memoranda Series #249. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.Google Scholar
Robinson, G., & Adlakha, A. (2002). Comparison of A.C.E. revision II results with demographic analysis, A.C.E. Revision II Estimates Memorandum Series #PP-41. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
Sando, R. (2012). Exploring the Effects of Respondent Behavior on the Interview Process and Data Quality in a 2010 Census Case Study Evaluation. Presented at the International Conference on Methods for Surveying and Enumerating Hard-to-Reach Populations in New Orleans.
Schwede, L. (2008). Changes in the distribution of complex and noncomplex households in the United States: 1990 and 2000 Censuses. Unpublished research typology for classifying household types. Suitland, MD: US Census Bureau.
Schwede, L., Blumberg, R. L., & Chan, A. Y. (2006). Complex Ethnic Households in America. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Schwede, L., & Terry, R. (2013). Comparative ethnographic studies of enumeration methods and coverage across race/ethnic groups. 2010 Census Program for Evaluations and Experiments. 2010 CensusPlanning Memoranda Series #255. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau. .Google Scholar
US Census Bureau. (1993). Programs to Improve Coverage in the 1990 Census. 1990 Census of the Population and Housing Evaluation and Research Reports, 1990 CPH-E-3, US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
US Census Bureau. (2010). The Development and Sensitivity Analysis of the 2010 Demographic Analysis Estimates by the Demographic Analysis Research Team (December 16, 2010).
US Census Bureau. (2012). 2010 Census coverage measurement results news conference. May 22, 2012. .
Valentine, C. B., & Valentine, B. L. (1971). Missing Men: A Comparative Methodological Study of Underenumeration and Related Problems. Report prepared under Joint Statistical Agreement with the Brookdale Hospital Center, Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×