Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Hegel's Practical PhilosophyRational Agency as Ethical Life, pp. 282 - 300Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2008
References
(1997), “We Can Only Act Under the Idea of Freedom,” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1967), “Wants, Actions, and Causal Explanation,” in Intentionality, Minds, and Perception, ed. Castañeda (Detroit: Wayne State University Press), pp. 301–41Google Scholar
(2008), Hegel's Defense of Moral Responsibility (PhD Dissertation, University of Chicago)Google Scholar
(2002), “Pure Reason of Itself Alone Suffices to Determine the Will,” in Immanuel Kant: Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, ed. (Berlin: Akademie-Verlag), pp. 99–114Google Scholar
(1964), Commentary on the Nicomachean Ethics, trans. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press)Google Scholar
(1991), “A Reconstruction of Hegel's Theory of Civil Society,” in Hegel and Legal Theory, ed. , , and (London: Routledge, 1991), pp. 301–20Google Scholar
(1971), “Intentionalistic Explanations of Action,” Metaphilosophy, vol. 2, pp. 241–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1974), “Moral Responsibility, Freedom, and Compulsion,” American Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 11, pp. 1–14Google Scholar
(1972), Hegel's Theory of the Modern State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1975), “The Dialectics of Civil Society in Hegel's Thought,” Hegel-Jahrbuch, pp. 78–82Google Scholar
(1987), “Zum Status des abstrakten Rechts in Hegels Rechtsphilosophie,” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, vol. 41, pp. 19–42Google Scholar
(1965), “Agent, Actor, Spectator, and Critic,” The Monist, vol. 49, pp. 167–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1972), “Hegels Dialektik von Herr und Knecht,” in , Selbstbewußtsein und Spekulation: Zur Kritik der Transzendentalphilosophie (Freiburg: Rombach), pp. 110–23Google Scholar
(2007), “Dark Days: Anglophone Scholarship since the 1960s,” in Hammer (2007), pp. 70–90
(1981), “The ‘Logic’ of Civil Society: A Reconstruction of Hegel and Marx,” Philosophy and Social Criticism, vol. 8, pp. 153ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1984), “Obligation, Contract and Exchange: On the Significance of Hegel's Abstract Right,” in Pelczynski (1984), pp. 159–77
(1997), “Two Concepts of Liberty,” in The Proper Study of Mankind, ed. (New York: Farrar, Strauss & Giroux), pp. 191–242Google Scholar
(1984), “From Self-Consciousness to Community: Act and Recognition in the Master–Slave Relationship,” in Pelczynski (1984), pp. 14–39
(1996) “Confession and Forgiveness: Hegel's Poetics of Action,” in Beyond Representation: Philosophy and Poetic Imagination, ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 34–65Google Scholar
(1989) “The Logic of Political Life: Hegel's Conception of Political Philosophy,” in Knowledge and Politics, ed. and (Boulder, CO: Westview Press), pp. 145–70Google Scholar
(1984–5), “Liebe und Vernunft, Familie und bürgerliche Gesellschaft: Bemerkungen zu zwei Vermittlungskonzepten in Hegels Rechtsphilosophie,” Hegel-Jahrbuch, pp. 107–14
(1998), “The Inadvertent Conception and Late Birth of the Free Will Problem,” Phronesis, vol. XLIII no. 2, pp. 133–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2007) “German Idealism's Contested Heritage,” in Hammer (2007), pp. 309–30
(1979), “The Fundamental Question in Action Theory,” Nous, vol. 13, pp. 131–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1977), “Freedom as Constraint by Norms,” American Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 187–96Google Scholar
(1994), Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
(1996), “Perception and Rational Constraint: McDowell's Mind and World,” in Perception, ed. (Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing Company), pp. 241–59Google Scholar
(1997), “Study Guide,” in , Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind, ed. and (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), pp. 119–81Google Scholar
(1998), “Actions, Norms, and Practical Reason,” Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 12, pp. 1–13Google Scholar
(2000), Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
(2002), Tales of the Mighty Dead: Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
(2004), “Selbstbewusstsein und Selbst-Konstitution,” in Halbig, Quante, and Siep (2004), pp. 46–77
(2005), “Sketch of a Program for a Critical Reading of Hegel: Comparing Empirical and Logical Concepts,” Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus, vol. 3, pp. 131–61Google Scholar
(2007), “Self-Consciousness and Self-Constitution: The Structure of Desire and Recognition,” Philosophy and Social Criticism, vol. 33, pp. 127–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1987), Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reasons (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)
(2007) Natur und Sittlichkeit: Die Familie in Hegels Rechtsphilosophie (Freiburg and Munich: Verlag Karl Alber)Google Scholar
(1989), “Rousseau, Hegel und die Dialektik der Aufklärung,” in Aufklärung und Gegenaufklärung in der europäischen Literatur, Philosophie und Politik von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart, ed. (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft), pp. 404–20Google Scholar
and (2002), Contours of Agency: Essays on Themes from Harry Frankfurt (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)Google Scholar
(1987), Subjects of Desire: Hegelian Reflections in 20th-Century France (New York: Columbia University Press)Google Scholar
(1976), “A Matter of Meaning It,” in , Must We Mean What We Say? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 213–37Google Scholar
(1970), “The Structure of Intention,” The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 67, no. 19, pp. 633–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1937–8), “On the So-Called Idea of Causation,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol. 38, pp. 85–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1980a), “Actions, Reasons, and Causes,” in , Essays on Actions and Events (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 3–19Google Scholar
(1980b), “How is Weakness of the Will Possible?,” in , Essays on Actions and Events (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 21–42Google Scholar
(1980c), “Agency,” in , Essays on Actions and Events (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 43–61Google Scholar
(1980d), “Intending,” in , Essays on Actions and Events (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 83–102Google Scholar
(1986), “A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge,” in Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, ed. (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 307–19Google Scholar
(1974) “Hegels Theorie der Handlung,” in (1974a), pp. 201–16
(1991), “The Dialectic of Teleology,” Philosophical Topics, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 51–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995), “Modernity, Self-Consciousness, and the Scope of Philosophy: Jürgen Habermas and Dieter Henrich in Debate,” in , The Limits of Disenchantment: Essays on Contemporary European Philosophy (London: Verso), pp. 169–93Google Scholar
(1990) Die Jugendgeschichte Hegels und andere Abhandlungen zur Geschichte des Deutschen Idealismus, in Gesammelte Schriften, Bd. 4 (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht)Google Scholar
(1975), “Determinism and Freedom: Sellars and the Reconciliationist Thesis,” in Action, Knowledge, and Reality: Critical Studies in Honor of Wilfrid Sellars, ed. (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill), pp. 55–82Google Scholar
(1989–90), “The Woman in White: On the Reception of Hegel's Antigone,” The Owl of Minerva, vol. 1, pp. 65–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), “Overcoming the Myth of the Mental: How Philosophers Can Profit from the Phenomenology of Everyday Expertise,” APA Pacific Division Presidential Address (manuscript)
(2007a), “The Return of the Myth of the Mental,” Inquiry, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 338–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1950), The Rules of Sociological Method (8th edn.), ed. , trans. and (Glencoe, IL: Free Press)Google Scholar
(1969), “On the Actuality of the Rational and the Rationality of the Actual,” The Review of Metaphysics, vol. 89, pp. 690–8Google Scholar
(1970), Doing and Deserving: Essays in the Theory of Responsibility (Princeton: Princeton University Press)Google Scholar
(1947), “Deux interprètes de la Phénoménologie de Hegel: Jean Hyppolite et Alexandre Kojève,” Études, vol. 255, pp. 368–73
(1967), “Les relations familiales dans la philosophie du droit de Hegel,” Hegel-Jahrbuch, pp. 34–63Google Scholar
(2002), L' être et l'acte: enquête sur les fondements de l'ontologie moderne de l'agir (Paris: Vrin)Google Scholar
(1998) Hegel's Idea of a Phenomenology of Spirit (Chicago: University of Chicago Press)Google Scholar
(1991), “Wider den apriorischen Intersubjektivismus: Gegenvorschläge aus Sartrescher Inspiration,” in Gemeinschaft und Gerechtigkeit, ed. and (Frankfurt a.M.: Fischer), pp. 273–89Google Scholar
(1971), “Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person,” The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 68, pp. 5–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1975), “Three Concepts of Free Action: Part 2,” The Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, vol. 49, pp. 113–25Google Scholar
(1978), “The Problem of Action,” American Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 14, pp. 157–62Google Scholar
(1988), The Importance of What We Care About (New York: Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1968), Das Recht der Philosophie in Hegels Philosophie de Rechts (Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann)Google Scholar
(1982), “Zum Theorietypus der Hegelschen Rechtsphilosophie,” in Henrich and Horstmann (1982), pp. 393–427
(1996), “Freiheit als Vermögen der Kausalität und als Weise, bei sich selbst zu sein,” in Inmitten der Zeit, ed. and (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann)Google Scholar
and (eds.) (1973), Materialen zu Hegels Phänomenologie des Geistes (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp)Google Scholar
(1995a), “Auffassungen der Freiheit,” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, vol. 49, pp. 1–14Google Scholar
(1995b), “Freedom as an Ideal,” The Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, vol. 40, (1995), pp. 87–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1978), “Moral and Literary Ideals in Hegel's Critique of ‘The Moral View of the World,’” Clio, vol. 7, pp. 375–402Google Scholar
(1973), “Labor and Interaction. Remarks on Hegel's Jena Philosophy of Mind,” in , Theory and Practice, trans. (Boston: Beacon Press), pp. 142–69Google Scholar
(ed.) (2007), German Idealism: Contemporary Perspectives (New York: Routledge)
(1994), Hegel's Social Philosophy: The Project of Reconciliation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1981), Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method and Point (Oxford: Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989), “Principles,” in , Essays in Ethical Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 48–65Google Scholar
(1972) Hegel's Development: Toward the Sunlight 1770–1801 (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
(1980), “The Concept of Recognition in Hegel's Jena Manuscripts,” Hegel-Studien: Beiheft 20, Hegel in Jena, ed. and (Bonn: Bouvier), pp. 229–48Google Scholar
(1985), “Les influences platoniciennes sur la théorie de la vie et du désir dans la Phénoménologie de l'esprit de Hegel,” Revue de Philosophie Ancienne vol. 3, pp. 59–84Google Scholar
(1976), “Ideen zu einem neuen systematischen Verständnis der Hegelschen Rechtsphilosophie,” Perspektiven der Philosophie, vol. 2, pp. 167–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1982), “Logische Form und reale Totalität,” in Henrich and Horstmann (1982), pp. 428–519
(1994), The Unity of Reason: Essays on Kant's Philosophy, ed. , trans. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
and (1982), Hegels Philosophie des Rechts: Die Theorie der Rechtsformen und ihre Logik (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta)Google Scholar
(1984), Hegel's Critique of the Enlightenment (Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Press)Google Scholar
(ed.) (1973), Essays on Freedom and Action (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul)
(1996), The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts, trans. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)Google Scholar
(2000), Suffering from Indeterminacy: An Attempt at a Reactivation of Hegel's Philosophy of Right, trans. (Assen: Van Gorcum)Google Scholar
(2002), “Grounding Recognition: A Rejoinder to Critical Questions,” Inquiry, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 499–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007), “Rejoinder,” in van den Brink and Owen (2007), pp. 348–70.CrossRef
(1974), “The Role of Civil Society in Hegel's Political Philosophy,” in Pippin and Höffe (2004), pp. 208–40
(1984), Die Vollendung der Tragödie im Spätwerk des Sophokles (Stuttgart–Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog)Google Scholar
(1987a), Hegels System: Der Idealismus der Subjektivität und das Problem der Intersubjektivität (Hamburg: Felix Meiner)Google Scholar
(1987b), “Das abstrakte Recht,” in Anspruch und Leistung von Hegels Rechtsphilosophie, ed. (Stuttgart–Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog), pp. 55–99Google Scholar
(1940), “Préface aux principe de la philosophie du droit,” in , Figures de la pensée philosophique: écrits (1931–1968), Tome 1 (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France), pp. 73–91Google Scholar
(1955), “La signification de la Révolution française dans la Phénoménologie de Hegel,” in J. Hyppolite, Études sur Marx et Hegel (Paris: Librairie Marcel Rivière et Cie), pp. 45–81Google Scholar
and (2007), “Analyzing Recognition: Identification, Acknowledgement, and Recognitive Attitudes Towards Persons,” in and (2007), pp. 33–56.CrossRef
(1963–4), “Hegels Auseinandersetzung mit der aristotelischen Politik,” Philosophisches Jahrbuch, vol. 71. pp. 38ffGoogle Scholar
(1982). “Hegel on Action,” in Vesey (1982), pp. 141–54CrossRef
(1992), “Who Invented the Will?,” Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 6 (1992), pp. 453–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005). Entfremdung: Zur Aktualität eines sozialphilosophischen Problems (Frankfurt a.M.: Campus)Google Scholar
(1972), “Herrschaft und Knechtschaft und der absolute Herr,” Philosophische Perspektiven, vol. 4, pp. 211–31Google Scholar
(1984), “Le Neveu de Rameau: Dialogue et Dialectique,” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, vol. 89, pp. 145–81Google Scholar
(1985), G.H. Mead: A Contemporary Re-examination of his Thought (Cambridge: Polity Press)Google Scholar
(1971), “L'honnêté et l'imposture dans la société civile (à propos du chapitre V. C. de la Phénoménologie: le règne animal de l'esprit),” Hegel-Jahrbuch, pp. 45–9Google Scholar
(1978), Hegel's Retreat From Eleusis: Studies in Political Thought (Princeton: Princeton University Press)Google Scholar
(1966), “Intention and Purpose,” The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 63, no. 20, pp. 642–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1971), “Die Aristotelesdeutung Hegels: Die Aufhebung des Aristotelischen ‘Nous’ in Hegels ‘Geist,’” Philosophisches Jahrbuch, vol. 78, pp. 237–59Google Scholar
(1992), Hegel, Carl Schmitt: la politique entre speculation et positivité (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France)Google Scholar
(1997), “The Normativity of Instrumental Reason,” in Ethics and Practical Reason, ed. and (Oxford: Clarendon Press), pp. 215–54Google Scholar
(forthcoming), Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity (The “Locke Lectures”), www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~korsgaar/#publications
(2004), “Hegel's Critique of Pure Mechanism and the Philosophical Appeal of the Logic Project,” European Journal of Philosophy, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 38–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007), “Between the Bounds of Experience and Divine Intuition: Kant's Epistemic Limits and Hegel's Ambitions,” Inquiry, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 306–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1968), Structures et mouvement dialectique dans la Phénoménologie de l'esprit de Hegel (Paris: Aubier)Google Scholar
(1982b), “Le savior absolu de l'esprit,” in The Meaning of Absolute Spirit, ed. (Ottawa: Éditions de l'université d'Ottawa), pp. 499–507Google Scholar
, and (1987), Les premiers combats de la reconnaissance, maîtrise et servitude dans la Phénoménologie de Hegel (Paris: Aubier)Google Scholar
(2005), “Evaluating Social Reasons: Hobbes vs. Hegel,” Journal of Philosophy, vol. 102, no. 7, pp. 327–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), “Interpersonal Recognition: A Response to Value or a Precondition of Personhood,” Inquiry, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 463–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004), “Hegel on Intersubjective and Retrospective Determination of Intention,” Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain, 49–50, pp. 54–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1929), Mind and the World-Order: Outline of a Theory of Knowledge (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons)Google Scholar
(1976), “Hegel on Faces and Skulls,” in Hegel: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press), pp. 219–36Google Scholar
(1990) Imagination and Interpretation in Kant: The Hermeneutical Import of the “Critique of Judgment” (Chicago: University of Chicago Press)Google Scholar
(1968), “The Conceivability of Mechanism,” The Philosophical Review, vol. 77, pp. 45–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007), “The Potential and the Actual: Mead, Honneth, and the ‘I’,” in van den Brink and Owen (2007), pp. 100–32CrossRef
(1978), Marxism and “Anthropology”: The Concept of Human Essence in the Philosophy of Marx (Assen: Van Gorcum)Google Scholar
(1973), “Hegel und das Sollen,” in , Schwierigkeiten mit der Geschichtsphilosophie (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp)Google Scholar
(1996), “Reply to Brandom,” in Perception, ed. (Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing Company), pp. 290–300Google Scholar
(1998a), “Having the World in View: Sellars, Kant, and Intentionality,” The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 95, no. 9, pp. 431–91Google Scholar
(1998b), “Virtue and Reason,” in , Mind, Value, and Reality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), pp. 50–76Google Scholar
(2002), “Reply to Robert B. Pippin,” in Reading McDowell: On “Mind and World,” ed. (London: Routledge), pp. 274–9Google Scholar
(2005), “Self-Determining Subjectivity and External Constraint,” in Deutscher Idealismus und die gegenwärtige analytische Philosophie/German Idealism and Contemporary Analytic Philosophy, vol. 3, ed. and (Berlin: de Gruyter), pp. 21–37Google Scholar
(2006), “Conceptual Capacities in Perception,” in Kreativität, ed. (Hamburg: Felix Meiner), pp. 1065–79Google Scholar
(2007c), “On Pippin's Postscript,” European Journal of Philosophy, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 395–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(forthcoming a), “Brandom on Observation”
(forthcoming b), “Hegel's Idealism as Radicalization of Kant”
(forthcoming c), “Towards a Reading of Hegel on Action in the ‘Reason’ Chapter of the Phenomenology”
(forthcoming d), “Why is Sellars's Essay Called ‘Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind’?”
(1984), “Kant on the Nondeterminate Character of Human Actions,” in Kant on Causality, Freedom, and Objectivity, ed. and (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), pp. 138–63Google Scholar
(1991), “Kant's Functionalism,” in Historical Foundations of Cognitive Science, ed. (Dordrecht: Kluwer), pp. 161–87Google Scholar
(1998), The Lesson of Carl Schmitt: Four Chapters on the Distinction between Political Theology and Political Philosophy, trans. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press)Google Scholar
(1978), “The Attainment of the Absolute of Hegel's Phenomenology,” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, vol. 7, pp. 195–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001) Authority and Estrangement. An Essay on Self-Knowledge (Princeton: Princeton University Press)Google Scholar
(1986), “Deducing Desire and Recognition in the Phenomenology of Spirit,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, vol. 24, pp. 243–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000), Foundations of Hegel's Social Theory: Actualizing Freedom (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
(1988) Zur Genealogie der Moral, in Kritische Studienausgabe, ed. and , vol. 5 (Berlin: de Gruyter)Google Scholar
(1976), “Action and Responsibility,” in Action Theory: Proceedings of the Winnipeg Conference on Human Action, ed. and (Dordrecht: Reidel), pp. 311–22Google Scholar
(1980), “Consciousness and Objective Spirit in Hegel's Phenomenology,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, vol. 18, pp. 39–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991), “Searle's Theory of Action,” in John Searle and His Critics, ed. and (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 271–87Google Scholar
(2003), “The Epistemology of Physical Action,” in Agency and Self-Awareness: Issues in Philosophy and Psychology, ed. and (Oxford: Clarendon Press), pp. 345–57Google Scholar
(1982), “Hegelsche Logik und Rechtsphilosophie. Unzulängliche Bemerkungen zu einem ungelösten Problem,” in and (1982), pp. 382–93
(1973), Das Scheitern einer Einleitung in Hegels Philosophie: Eine Analyse der Phänomenologie des Geistes (Munich: Verlag Anton Pustet)
(1986), “Bürgerliche Gesellschaft und Staat: Überlegungen zur Logik ihrer Vermittlung,” Hegel-Jahrbuch, pp. 339–48Google Scholar
(1985), “Hegel's Concept of Freedom,” in Hegel, ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 153–73Google Scholar
(1967), “Are Reasons for Actions Causes?,” in Epistemology: New Essays in the Theory of Knowledge, ed. (New York: Harper & Row), pp. 204–28Google Scholar
(ed.) (1971) Hegel's Political Philosophy: Problems and Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
(ed.) (1984) The State and Civil Society: Studies in Hegel's Political Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
(1987a), Selbsterkenntnis des Absoluten: Grundlinien der Hegeleschen Philosophie des Geistes (Stuttgart–Bad Canstatt: Frommann-Holzboog)Google Scholar
(1987b), Philosophy and Politics: A Commentary on the Preface to Hegel's Philosophy of Right (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar
(1994), Hegel's Phenomenology: The Sociality of Reason (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), German Philosophy 1760–1860: The Legacy of Idealism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1979), “The Rose and the Owl: Some Remarks on the Theory–Practice Problem in Hegel,” Independent Journal of Philosophy, vol. 3, pp. 7–16Google Scholar
(1981b), “Hegel's Political Argument and the Problem of Verwirklichung,” Political Theory, vol. 9, pp. 509–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1987), “Kant on the Spontaneity of Mind,” in Pippin (1997a), pp. 29–55CrossRef
(1988), “Apperception and the Difference Between Kantian and Hegelian Idealism,” in Proceedings of the Sixth International Kant Congress, ed. and (Washington, DC: University Press of America), pp. 535–50Google Scholar
(1989), Hegel's Idealism: The Satisfactions of Self-Consciousness (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991a), “Idealism and Agency in Kant and Hegel,” Journal of Philosophy, vol. 88, no. 10, pp. 532–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991b). Modernism as a Philosophical Problem: On the Dissatisfactions of European High Culture, 2nd edn. (Oxford: Blackwell)Google Scholar
(1993a), “You Can't Get There from Here: Transition Problems in Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit,” in The Cambridge Companion to Hegel, ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 58–63Google Scholar
(1993b), “Review of A. Wood, Hegel's Ethical Thought,” Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 489–95Google Scholar
(1997a), Idealism as Modernism: Hegelian Variations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997b), “Hegel on Historical Meaning: For Example, the Enlightenment,” Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain, vol. 35, pp. 1–17Google Scholar
(1997c), “Hegel's Ethical Rationalism,” in Pippin (1997a), pp. 417–50
(2000b), “Kant's Theory of Value: On Allen Wood's Kant's Ethical Thought,” Inquiry, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 239–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000c), “Fichte's Alleged One-Sided, Subjective, Psychological Idealism,” in Sedgwick (2000), pp. 147–70
(2001a), “‘Rigorism’ and the new Kant,” in Kant und die Berliner Aufklärung: Akten des IXth Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, ed. , , and (New York: de Gruyter), pp. 313–26Google Scholar
(2001b), “Review of Alan Patten, Hegel's Idea of Freedom,” History of Political Thought, vol. 22, no. 3.Google Scholar
(2002a), “Leaving Nature Behind: Two Cheers for Subjectivism,” in Reading McDowell: On Mind and World, ed. (London: Routledge), pp. 58–75Google Scholar
(2002b), “What was Abstract Art? (From the Point of View of Hegel),” Critical Inquiry, vol. 29, no.1, pp. 1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005a), The Persistence of Subjectivity: On the Kantian Aftermath (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005b) “Postscript: On McDowell's Response to Leaving Nature Behind,” in Pippin (2005a), pp. 206–20
(2005c), “Agent and Deed in Nietzsche's Genealogy of Morals,” in A Companion to Nietzsche, ed. (Oxford: Blackwell, 2005)Google Scholar
(2005d), “Brandom's Hegel,” European Journal of Philosophy, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 381–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006), “Mine and Thine: The Kantian State,” in The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy, ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
(2007), “McDowell's Germans: Response to ‘On Pippin's Postscript’,” European Journal of Philosophy, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 411–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2004), Hegel on Ethics and Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1980), Die Unzulänglichkeit der Freiheitsbeweise: Zu einigen Lehrstücken aus der neueren Geschichte von Philosophie und Recht (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp)Google Scholar
(1972), “The Social and the Causal Concepts of Responsibility,” The Southern Journal of Philosophy, vol. 10, pp. 97–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997), “Personal Autonomy and the Structure of the Will,” in Right, Morality, Ethical Life: Studies in G.W.F. Hegel's Philosophy of Right, ed. (Jväskylä: Publications of Social and Political Science and Philosophy), pp. 45–74Google Scholar
(1999) “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited,” in , Collected Papers, ed. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), pp. 573–615Google Scholar
(1969–82), Zwischen Tradition und Revolution. Studien zu Hegels Rechtphilosophie (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta)Google Scholar
, (ed.) (1974a), Materialen zu Hegels Rechtsphilosophie, 2 vols. (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp)
, (1974b), “Der Begriff der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft und das Problem seines geschichtlichen Ursprungs,” in (1974a), pp. 135–66
(1984), “Hegel's Criticism of Natural Law Theory,” in , Between Tradition and Revolution: The Hegelian Transformation of Political Philosophy, trans. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 76–104Google Scholar
(1994), “Universal and General Wills: Hegel and Rousseau,” Political Theory vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 444–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1962), “Person und Eigentum: Zu Hegels Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts §§34–81,” Marxismusstudien, vol. 4, pp. 169–218Google Scholar
(1974), “Self-Consciousness and Self-Knowledge in Plato and Hegel,” Hegel-Studien, vol. 9, pp. 109–29Google Scholar
(1971), “He Could Have Acted Otherwise,” in Festschrift für Hans Kelsen zum 90. Geburtstag, ed. et al. (Vienna: Deuticke), pp. 242–61Google Scholar
(1988), Knowing and History: Appropriations of Hegel in Twentieth Century France (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press)Google Scholar
(1997), The Social Contract and Later Political Writings, ed. and trans. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
(1998), The Bounds of Agency: An Essay in Revisionary Metaphysics (Princeton: Princeton University Press)Google Scholar
(1984) “Hegel on Work, Ownership, and Citizenship,” in (1984), pp. 178–96
(1998), Liberalism and the Limits of Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1976), “Hegel on Freedom,” in Hegel: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press)Google Scholar
(1926), Die geistesgeschichtliche Lage des heutigen Parlamentarismus, 2nd edn. (Munich and Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot)Google Scholar
(1998), The Invention of Autonomy: A History of Modern Moral Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
(1983), Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991), “Response: The Background of Intentionality and Action,” in John Searle and His Critics, ed. and (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 289–99Google Scholar
(1988), “Hegel's Critique of the Subjective Idealism of Kant's Ethics,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, vol. 26, pp. 89–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, (ed.) (2000), The Reception of Kant's Critical Philosophy. Fichte, Schelling and Hegel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)CrossRef
(2001), “The State as Organism: The Metaphysical Basis of Hegel's Philosophy of Right,” in The Southern Journal of Philosophy (Spindel Conference Supplement), pp. 171–88.CrossRef
(1991), Agency and Alienation: A Theory of Human Presence (Savage, MD: Rowan & Littlefield)Google Scholar
(1963a), “Philosophy and the Scientific Image of Man,” in , Science, Perception and Reality (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul), pp. 1–40Google Scholar
(1963b), “Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind,” in , Science, Perception and Reality (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul), pp. 127–96Google Scholar
(1963c), “Some Reflections on Language Games,” in , Science, Perception and Reality (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul), pp. 321–58Google Scholar
(1966), “Thought and Action,” in Freedom and Determinism, ed. (New York: Random House), pp. 105–39Google Scholar
(1968), Science and Metaphysics, Variations on Kantian Themes (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul)Google Scholar
(1974), “The Phenomenology: Beyond Morality,” The Western Political Quarterly, vol. 27, pp. 527–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1976), Freedom and Independence: A Study of the Political Ideas of Hegel's Phenomenology of Mind (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
(1974a), “Der Kampf um Anerkennung: Zu Hegels Auseinandersetzung mit Hobbes in den Jenaer Schriften,” Hegel-Studien, vol. 9, pp. 155–207Google Scholar
(1979), Anerkennung als Prinzip der praktischen Philosophie: Untersuchungen zu Hegels Jenaer Philosophie des Geistes (Freiburg and Munich: Karl Alber)Google Scholar
(1982a), “Was heißt: ‘Aufhebung der Moralität in Sittlichkeit’ in Hegels Rechtsphilosophie?,” Hegel-Studien, vol. 17, pp. 75–96; also in Siep (1992a), pp. 217–39Google Scholar
(1982b), “Intersubjektivität, Recht und Staat in Hegels ‘Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts’,” in and (1982), pp. 255–76
(1983), “Das Problem einer philosophischen Begründung des Rechts bei Fichte und Hegel,” Giornale de Metafisica, vol. 5, pp. 264–79; also in Siep (1992a), pp. 65–81Google Scholar
(1988a), “‘Gesinnung’ und ‘Verfassung’: Bemerkungen zu einem nicht nur Hegelschen Problem,” in Philosophie und Poesie, vol. 1, ed. (Stuttgart–Bad Canstatt: Frommann-Holzboog); also in Siep (1992a), pp. 270–84Google Scholar
(1988b), “Hegels Metaphysik der Sitten,” in Metaphysik nach Kant?, ed. and (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta), pp. 263–74Google Scholar
(1992b), “Personbegriff und praktische Philosophie bei Locke, Kant, und Hegel,” in Siep (1992a), pp. 81–115
(1992c), “Hegels Theorie der Gewaltenteilung,” in Siep (1992a), pp. 240–69
, (ed.) (1997), Hegel: Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts (Berlin: Akademie-Verlag)
(1998), “Die Bewegung des Anerkennens in der Phänomenologie des Geistes,” in Köhler and Pöggeler (1998), pp. 107–27
(2000), Der Weg der Phänomenologie des Geistes. Ein einführender Kommentar zu Hegels “Differenzschrift” und “Phänomenologie des Geistes” (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp)Google Scholar
(2006), “The Contemporary Relevance of Hegel's Practical Philosophy,” in (2006), pp. 143–58
(1989), Hegel's Critique of Liberalism: Rights in Context (Chicago: University of Chicago Press)Google Scholar
(2001), Hegel, Literature and the Problem of Agency (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1988), Logic and Politics: Hegel's Philosophy of Right (New Haven: Yale University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006), “Notes on Carl Schmitt, The Concept of the Political,” in , Carl Schmitt and Leo Strauss: The Hidden Dialogue, trans. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 91–119Google Scholar
(1974), “Freedom and Resentment,” in , Freedom and Resentment and Other Essays (London: Methuen), pp. 1–25Google Scholar
(1985a), Human Agency and Language: Philosophical Papers, vol. I (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1985b), “Hegel's Philosophy of Mind,” in Taylor (1985a), pp. 77–96
(1985c), “What is Human Agency?,” in Taylor (1985a), pp. 15–44.
(1970), Hegels Lehre vom absoluten Geist als theologisch-politischer Traktat (Berlin: de Gruyter)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1984), The Other: Studies in the Social Ontology of Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre, and Buber, trans. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)Google Scholar
(1978), “Begriff und Realität: Aufhebung des metaphysischen Wahrheitsbegriff,” in Seminar: Dialektik in der Philosophie Hegels, ed. (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp), pp. 324–59Google Scholar
(1982), “Die verdrängte Intersubjektivität in Hegels Philosophie des Rechts,” in and (1982), pp. 317–81
(1995), “The Representation of Life,” in Virtues and Reasons: Philippa Foot and Moral Theory, ed. , , and (Oxford: Clarendon Press), pp. 247–97Google Scholar
(2004a), “Apprehending Human Form,” in Modern Moral Philosophy, ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 47–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004b), “What is it to Wrong Someone? A Puzzle about Justice,” in Reason and Value, eds. , , , and (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 333–84Google Scholar
(forthcoming), “Naïve Action Theory”
and (2007), Recognition and Power: Axel Honneth and the Tradition of Critical Social Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001a), “Anscombe on Practical Inference,” in Varieties of Practical Reasoning, ed. (Cambridge, MA: MIT), pp. 437–64Google Scholar
(2001b), “We Were Never in Paradise,” in Practical Rationality and Preference: Essays for David Gauthier, ed. and (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 209–31Google Scholar
(2006), “Modern Moral Philosophy Again: Isolating the Promulgation Problem,” in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 345–62
(1951), La Malheur de la Conscience dans la philosophie de Hegel (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France)Google Scholar
(1994), Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
(2005) Hegel's Philosophy of Reality, Freedom, and God (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1972), “Aspekte des Zwecksbegriff in Hegels Biologieverständnis,” in Zum Hegelverständnis unserer Zeit, ed. (Berlin, Deutsche Verlag der Wissenschaften), pp. 224–52Google Scholar
, (ed.) (1979) Hegel et la philosophie du droit (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France)
(1973), “Towards a Reasonable Libertarianism,” in (1973), pp. 33–61
(1974), “Hegels Kritik des Jakobinismus,” in Hegel-Studien: Beiheft 11, Stuttgarter Hegel-Tage 1970 ed. (Bonn: Bouvier), pp. 417–27Google Scholar
(1982), Autonomie und Anerkennung: Hegels Moralitätskritik im Lichte seiner Fichte Rezeption (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta)Google Scholar
(1981), “Internal and External Reasons,” in , Moral Luck (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 101–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument, sel., ed., and with an Introduction by G. Hawthorn (Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press)Google Scholar
(1980) Hegels Theorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft: Eine materialistische Kritik (Hamburg: VSA-Verlag)Google Scholar
(1992), Das Körper-Seele Problem: Kommentar zu Hegel, Enzyklopädie (1830), #389 (Frankfurt a.M.: Klostermann)Google Scholar
(2004), “Hegel's Organicist Theory of the State: On the Concept and Method of Hegel's ‘Science of the State’,” in Pippin and Höffe (2004), pp. 291–322
(1971), “Reasons as Causes,” The Australasian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 49, pp. 90–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar