Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-xxrs7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T07:36:40.766Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2017

Zoe Stamatopoulou
Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Hesiod and Classical Greek Poetry
Reception and Transformation in the Fifth Century BCE
, pp. 230 - 263
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aélion, R. (1983). Euripide héritier d’Eschyle, 2 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
Aguirre Castro, M. (2005). “Expressions of love and sexual union in Hesiod’s Catalogue of Women.” Cuadernos de filología clásica: Estudios griegos e indoeuropeos 15: 1925.Google Scholar
Ahlert, P. (1942). Mädchen und Frauen in Pindars Dichtung. Philologus Suppl. 34. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Allan, W. (2008). “Performing the will of Zeus: the Διὸς βουλή and the scope of early Greek epic.” In Performance, Iconography, Reception. Studies in Honour of Oliver Taplin, ed. Revermann, M. and Wilson, P.. Oxford: 204–16.Google Scholar
Allen, D. S. (2000). The World of Prometheus. The Politics of Punishing in Democratic Athens. Princeton.Google Scholar
Allen, T. W. (1924). Homer. The Origins and the Transmission. Oxford.Google Scholar
Aloni, A. (2008). “La performance di Esiodo.” In Atti del convegno nazionale di studi ‘Arma virumque cano ...’: l’epica dei Greci e dei Romani, ed. Uglione, R.. Alexandria: 5776.Google Scholar
Aloni, A. (2010). “Esiodo a simposio. La performance delle Opere e Giorni.” In Tra panellenismo e tradizioni locali: generi poetici e storiografia, ed. Cingano, E.. Alexandria: 115–50.Google Scholar
Anderson, C. and Dix, T. K. (2007). “Prometheus and the Basileia in Aristophanes’ Birds.” CJ 102: 321–27.Google Scholar
Anemoyiannis-Sinanidis, S. (1991). “Le symbolisme de l’œuf dans les cosmogonies orphiques.” Kernos 4: 8390.Google Scholar
Ardizzoni, A. (1978). “Tifone e l’eruzione dell’Etna in Eschilo e in Pindaro (Riflessioni sulla priorità).” GIF 9: 233–44.Google Scholar
Arrighetti, G. (1987). Poeti, eruditi e biografi. Momenti della riflessione dei Greci sulla litteratura. Pisa.Google Scholar
Arrighetti, G. (1996). “Hésiode et les Muses: le don de la vérité et la conquête de la parole.” In Le métier du mythe: Lectures d’Hésiode, ed. Blaise, F., Judet de la Combe, P., and Rousseau, P.. Lille: 5370.Google Scholar
Arrighetti, G. (1998). Esiodo. Opere. Turin.Google Scholar
Arrowsmith, W. (1973). “Aristophanes’ Birds: the fantasy politics of Eros.” Arion 1: 119–67.Google Scholar
Arthur, M. B. (1982). “Cultural strategies in Hesiod’s Theogony: law, family, society.” Arethusa 15: 6382.Google Scholar
Arthur, M. B. (1983). “The dream of a world without women: poetics and the circles of order in the Theogony prooemium.” Arethusa 16: 97115.Google Scholar
Athanassaki, L. (2003). “Transformations of colonial disruption into narrative continuity in Pindar’s epinician odes.” HSCP 101: 93128.Google Scholar
Athanassaki, L. (2011). “Giving wings to the Aeginetan sculptures: the Panhellenic aspirations of Pindar’s Eighth Olympian.” In Aegina: Contexts for Choral Lyric Poetry. Myth, History, and Identity in the Fifth Century BC, ed. Fearn, D.. Oxford: 257–93.Google Scholar
Athanassaki, L. (2012). “Performance and re-performance. The Siphnian treasury evoked (Pindar’s Pythian 6, Olympian 2 and Isthmian 2).” In Reading the Victory Ode, ed. Agócs, P., Carey, C., and Rawles, R.. Cambridge: 134–57.Google Scholar
Auger, D. (1979). “Le théâtre d’Aristophane: le mythe, l’utopie et les femmes.” Aristophane: Les femmes et la cité. Les Cahiers de Fontenay 17: 71101.Google Scholar
Austin, N. (1973). Comicorum Graecorum Fragmenta in Papyris Reperta. Berlin.Google Scholar
Austin, N. (1994). Helen of Troy and her Shameless Phantom. Ithaca, N.Y. and London.Google Scholar
Avezzù, G. (1982). Alcidamante. Orazioni e Frammenti. Rome.Google Scholar
Bagordo, A. (2013). Telekleides. Einleitung, Übersetzung, Kommentar. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Baker, G. W. (1904). “De comicis Graecis litterarum iudicibus.” HSCP 15: 121240.Google Scholar
Bakker, E. J. (2002). “Remembering the god’s arrival.” Arethusa 35: 6381.Google Scholar
Bakola, E. (2008). “The drunk, the reformer and the teacher: agonistic poetics and the construction of the persona in the comic poets of the fifth century.” CCJ 54: 129.Google Scholar
Bakola, E. (2010). Cratinus and the Art of Comedy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bakola, E. (2013). “Crime and punishment. Cratinus, Aeschylus’ Oresteia, and the metaphysics and politics of wealth.” In Greek Comedy and the Discourse of Genres, ed. Bakola, E., Prauscello, L., and Telò, M.. Cambridge: 226–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balaudé, J.-F. (2006). “Hippias le passeur.” In La costruzione del discorso filosofico nell’età dei Presocratici (= The Construction of Philosophical Discourse in the Age of the Presocratics), ed. Sassi, M.. Pisa: 287304.Google Scholar
Ballabriga, A. (1990). “Le dernier adversaire de Zeus. Le mythe de Typhon dans l’épopée grecque archaïque.” RHR 207: 330.Google Scholar
Barlow, S. A. (1986). “The language of Euripides’ monodies.” In Studies in Honour of T. B. L. Webster. Vol. I, ed. Betts, J. H., Hooker, J. H., and Green, J. R.. Bristol: 1022.Google Scholar
Barron, J. P. (1969). “Ibycus: to Polycrates.” BICS 16: 119–49.Google Scholar
Bassino, P. (2012). “Certamen Homeri et Hesiodi: nuovi spunti per una riconsiderazione delle testimonianze papiracee.” ZPE 180: 3842.Google Scholar
Bassino, P. (2013). “Certamen Homeri et Hesiodi: introduction, critical edition, and commentary.” Ph.D. dissertation, Durham University.Google Scholar
Battisti, D. (2011). “Συνετός as aristocratic self-description.” GRBS 31: 525.Google Scholar
Beasley, J. D. (1948). “Hymn to Hermes.” AJA 52: 336–40.Google Scholar
Bees, R. (1993). Zur Datierung des Prometheus Desmotes. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Benedetto, V. Di (1978). L’ideologia del potere e la tragedia greca. Turin.Google Scholar
Benedetto, V. Di (1991). “Pindaro, Pae. 7b, 11–14.” RFIC 119: 164–76.Google Scholar
Benedetto, V. Di (1995). “Tifone in Pindaro e in Eschilo.” RFIC 123: 129–39.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. (1987). Poetarum Epicorum Graecorum. Testimonia et Fragmenta. Pars I. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. (1995). “Una cosmogonía cómica: Aristófanes, Aves 685 ss..” In De Homero a Libanio, ed. López Férez, J. A.. Madrid: 195211.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. (2001). “La Teogonia di Epimenide. Saggio di ricostruzione.” In Epimenide cretese, ed. Federico, E. and Visconti, A.. Naples: 195216.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. (2002). “La théogonie orphique du papyrus de Derveni.” Kernos 15: 91129.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. (2004). Poetae Epici Graeci. Pars II. Fasc. 1. Munich and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. (2007). “The Derveni theogony: many questions and some answers.” HSCP 103: 99133.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. (2008). “Orfeo y l’orfismo en la comedia griega.” In Orfeo y la tradición órfica: un reencuentro, ed. Bernabé, A. and Casadesús, F.. Madrid: 1217–38.Google Scholar
Bernadete, R. (1964). “The crimes and arts of Prometheus.” RhM 107: 126–39.Google Scholar
Bernardini, P. A. (1983). Mito e attualità nelle ode di Pindaro. La Nemea 4, l’Olimpica 9, l’Olimpica 7. Rome.Google Scholar
Bertelli, L. (1983). “L’utopia sulla scena: Aristofane e la parodia della città.” Civiltà classica e cristiana 4: 215–61.Google Scholar
Bertelli, L. (2001). “Hecataeus: from genealogy to historiography.” In The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus, ed. Luraghi, N.. Oxford: 6794.Google Scholar
Betegh, G. (2004). The Derveni Papyrus. Cosmology, Theology and Interpretation. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Biles, Z. P. (2002). “Intertextual biography in the rivalry of Cratinus and Aristophanes.” AJP 123: 169204.Google Scholar
Biles, Z. P. (2011). Aristophanes and the Poetics of Competition. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bing, P. (2012). “A proto-epyllion? The pseudo-Hesiodic Shield and the poetics of deferral.” In Brill’s Companion to Greek and Roman Epyllion, ed. Baumbach, M. and Bär, S.. Leiden: 177–97.Google Scholar
Birt, T. (1907). Die Buchrolle in der Kunst. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Blaise, F. (1992). “L’épisode de Typhée dans la Théogonie d’Hésiode (v. 820–885): la stabilisation du monde.” REG 105: 349–70.Google Scholar
Blasina, A. (2006). “Geografie africane in Eschilo.” In L’Africa romana: le ricchezze dell’Africa: risorse, produzioni, scambi. Vol. III, ed. González, J. and Ruggeri, P.. Rome: 1949–59.Google Scholar
Blößner, N. (2005). “Hesiod und die ‘Könige’. Zu Theogonie 79–103.” Mnemosyne 58: 2345.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, A. (1914). “Hesiod fr. 219.” Hermes 49: 319–20.Google Scholar
Boeke, H. (2007). The Value of Victory in Pindar’s Odes. Gnomai, Cosmology and the Role of the Poet. Leiden.Google Scholar
Bonifazi, A. (2004). “Communication in Pindar’s deictic acts.” Arethusa 37: 391414.Google Scholar
Bonnafé, A. M. (1985). Eros et Eris. Mariages divins et mythe de succession chez Hésiode. Lyon.Google Scholar
Bonnafé, A. M. (1991). “Texte, carte et territoire: autour de l’itinéraire d’Io dans le Prométhée (1ère partie).” Journal des Savants 3: 133–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnafé, A. M. (1992). “Texte, carte et territoire: autour de l’itinéraire d’Io dans le Prométhée (2e partie).” Journal des Savants 4: 334.Google Scholar
Bosher, K. (2012). “Hieron’s Aeschylus.” In Theater Outside Athens. Drama in Greek Sicily and South Italy, ed. Bosher, K.. Cambridge: 97111.Google Scholar
Bowie, A. (2000). “Myth and ritual in the rivals of Aristophanes.” In The Rivals of Aristophanes, ed. Harvey, D. and Wilkins, J.. London: 317–39.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. (1993). “Lies, fiction and slander in early Greek poetry.” In Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World, ed. Gill, C. and Wiseman, T. P.. Austin: 137.Google Scholar
Bowra, C. M. (1952). Heroic Poetry. London.Google Scholar
Bowra, C. M. (1964). Pindar. Oxford.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. R. and Haubold, J., eds. (2010). Plato and Hesiod. Oxford.Google Scholar
Brelich, A. (1958). Gli eroi greci. Un problema storico-religioso. Rome.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. N. (1999). “Near Eastern and native traditions in Apollodorus’ account of the Flood.” In Interpretations of the Flood, ed. Martínez, F. G. and Luttikhuizen, G. P.. Leiden: 3955.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. (1997). “Chronos in column XII of the Derveni Papyrus.” In Studies on the Derveni Papyrus, ed. Laks, A. and Most, G. W.. Oxford: 149–65.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. (2003). “Sky, sex and sun. The meanings of αἰδοῖος/αἰδοῖον in the Derveni Papyrus.” ZPE 144: 119–29.Google Scholar
Brown, A. L. (1990). “Prometheus Pyrphoros.” BICS 37: 5056.Google Scholar
Brown, C. G. (2006). “Pindar on Archilochus and the gluttony of blame (Pyth. 2.52–6).” JHS 126: 3646.Google Scholar
Buchholz, E. (1898)4. Anthologie aus den Lyrikern der Griechen, 4th edn. Vol. II. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Bundy, E. L. (1962). Studia Pindarica, repr. 1986. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Burgess, J. S. (2001). “Coronis aflame: the gender of mortality.” CPh 96: 214–27.Google Scholar
Burnett, A. P. (1962). “Human resistance and divine persuasion in Euripides’ Ion.” CPh 57: 89103.Google Scholar
Burnett, A. P. (1971). Catastrophe Survived. Euripides’ Plays of Mixed Reversal. Oxford.Google Scholar
Burnett, A. P. (1985). The Art of Bacchylides. Cambridge, Mass. and London.Google Scholar
Burnett, A. P. (2005). Pindar’s Songs for Young Athletes of Aigina. Oxford.Google Scholar
Burton, R. W. B. (1962). Pindar’s Pythian Odes. Essays in Interpretation. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bury, J. B. (1892). The Isthmian Odes of Pindar. London and New York.Google Scholar
Buxton, R. (2007). “Tragedy and Greek myth.” In The Cambridge Companion to Greek Mythology, ed. Woodard, R. D.. Cambridge: 166–89.Google Scholar
Buxton, R. (2013). Myths and Tragedies in Their Ancient Greek Contexts. Oxford.Google Scholar
Buzio, C. (1938). Esiodo nel mondo greco sino alla fine dell’età classica. Milan.Google Scholar
Cairns, D. L. (1997). “Form and meaning in Bacchylides’ fifth ode.” Scholia n.s. 6: 3448.Google Scholar
Cairns, D. L. (2007). “Dating ‘Nemean’ 5 and Bacchylides 13: criteria and conclusions.” Nikephoros 20: 3347.Google Scholar
Cairns, D. L. (2010). Five Epinician Odes (3, 5, 9, 11, 13): Text, Introductory Essays, and Interpretative Commentary. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Calame, C. (1990). “Narrating the foundation of a city. The symbolic birth of Cyrene.” In Approaches to Greek Myth, ed. Edmunds, L.. Baltimore and London: 277341.Google Scholar
Calame, C. (1991). “Eros initiatique et la cosmogonie orphique.” In Orphisme et Orphée en l’honneur de Jean Rudhardt, ed. Borgeaud, P.. Geneva: 227–47.Google Scholar
Calame, C. (1995). The Craft of Poetic Speech in Ancient Greece, transl. Orion, J.. Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
Calame, C. (1996). “Le proème des Travaux d’Hésiode, prelude à une poésie d’action.” In Le métier du mythe: Lectures d’Hésiode, ed. Blaise, F., Judet de la Combe, P., and Rousseau, P.. Lille: 169–89.Google Scholar
Calame, C. (1997). “Figures of sexuality and initiatory transition in the Derveni theogony and its commentary.” In Studies on the Derveni Papyrus, ed. Laks, A. and Most, G. W.. Oxford: 6580.Google Scholar
Calame, C. (1999). The Poetics of Eros in Ancient Greece. Princeton.Google Scholar
Calame, C. (2007). “Greek myth and Greek religion.” In The Cambridge Companion to Greek Mythology, ed. Woodard, R. D.. Cambridge: 259–85.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. (2004). Greek Mythography in the Roman World. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canevaro, L. F. (2015). Hesiod’s Works and Days: How to Teach Self-Sufficiency. Oxford.Google Scholar
Capra, A. and Gilardi, V. (1999). “Immortalità, letizia o gloria poetica? L’epinicio III di Bacchilide.” SCO 47: 159–74.Google Scholar
Capra, A. and Gilardi, V. (2002). “Quattro note alla ‘Pitica Nona’ di Pindaro (vv. 5–25; 87–92).” Acme 55: 125–32.Google Scholar
Carduff, G. A. (1986). Antike Sintflutsagen. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Carey, C. (1975). “Pindar, Pythian 6, 19–20.” Maia 27: 289–90.Google Scholar
Carey, C. (1977/78). “Bacchylides 3.85–90.” Maia 29/30: 6972.Google Scholar
Carey, C. (1978). “Pindarica.” In Dionysiaca. Nine Studies in Greek Poetry by Former Pupils Presented to Sir Denys Page on His Seventieth Birthday, ed. Dawe, R. D., Diggle, J., and Easterling, P. E.. Cambridge: 2144.Google Scholar
Carey, C. (1981). A Commentary on Five Odes of Pindar: Pythian 2, Pythian 9, Nemean 1, Nemean 7, Isthmian 8. New York.Google Scholar
Carey, C. (1990). Pindar’s Homer. The Lyric Possession of an Epic Past. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Carpenter, T. H. (1991). Art and Myth in Ancient Greece. A Handbook. London and New York.Google Scholar
Carrière, J. C. (1983)2. Le carnaval et la politique. Une introduction à la comédie grecque suivie d’un choix de fragments, 2nd edn. Paris.Google Scholar
Carson, A. (1982). “Wedding at noon in Pindar’s ninth Pythian.” GRBS 23: 121–28.Google Scholar
Carson, A. (1984). “The burners: a reading of Bacchylides’ third epinician ode.” Phoenix 38: 111–19.Google Scholar
Carter Philips, F. Jr. (1973). “Narrative compression and the myths of Prometheus in Hesiod.” CJ 68: 289305.Google Scholar
Casanova, A. (1969). “Il mito di Atteone nel catalogo esiodeo.” RFIC 97: 3146.Google Scholar
Casanova, A. (1979a). La famiglia di Pandora: analisi filologica dei miti di Pandora e Prometeo nella tradizione esiodea. Florence.Google Scholar
Casanova, A. (1979b). “Catalogo, Eèe, e i Grandi Eèe nella tradizione ellenistica.” Prometheus 5: 217–40.Google Scholar
Casevitz, M. (1978). Commentaire des “Oiseaux” d’Aristophane. Lyon.Google Scholar
Càssola, F. (1953). “Le genealogie mitiche e la coscienza nazionale greca.” Rendiconti della reale Accademia di archeologia, lettere e belle arti 28: 279304.Google Scholar
Cavalli, M. (1999). “Le Rane di Aristofane: modelli tradizionali dell’agone fra Eschilo ed Euripide.” Quaderni di acme 36: 83105.Google Scholar
Ceccarelli, P. (1996). “L’Athènes de Périclès: Un ‘Pays de cocagne’? L’idéologie démocratique et l’αὐτόματοϛ βίοϛ dans la comédie ancienne.” QUCC 54: 109–59.Google Scholar
Cerri, G. (2006). “Il dio incatenato come spettacolo, il coro come pubblico: tragedia e rapsodia nella dimensione metateatrale del Prometeo.” Lexis 24: 265–82.Google Scholar
Cerutti, M. V. (1998). “Mito di distruzione, mito di fondazione: Hes. fr. 204, 95–103 MW.” Aevum antiquum 11: 127–78.Google Scholar
Chamoux, F. (1953). Cyrene sous la monarchie des Battiades. Paris.Google Scholar
Chong-Gossard, J. H. K. O. (2008). Gender and Communication in Euripides’ Plays: Between Song and Silence. Leiden.Google Scholar
Christopoulos, M. (2010). “Dark-winged Nyx and the bright-winged Eros in Aristophanes’ ‘Orphic’ cosmogony.” In Light and Darkness in Ancient Greek Myth and Religion, ed. Christopoulos, M., Karakantza, E. D., and Levaniouk, O.. Lanham: 207–20.Google Scholar
Cingano, E. (1991). “L’epinicio 4 di Bacchilide e la data della ‘Pitica’ 3 di Pindaro.” QUCC 3: 97104.Google Scholar
Cingano, E. (2005). “A catalogue within a catalogue: Helen’s suitors in the Hesiodic Catalogue of Women.” In The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women: Constructions and Reconstructions, ed. Hunter, R.. Cambridge: 118–52.Google Scholar
Cingano, E. (2009). “The Hesiodic corpus.” In Brill’s Companion to Hesiod, ed. Montanari, F., Rengakos, A., and Tsagalis, C.. Leiden: 91130.Google Scholar
Classen, C. J. (1959). “The study of language amongst Socrates’ contemporaries.” The Proceedings of the African Classical Associations 2: 3349, reprinted in Classen, C. J., ed., (1976). Sophistik. Darmstadt: 215–47.Google Scholar
Classen, C. J. (1965). “Bemerkungen zu zwei griechischen ‘Philosophiehistorikern’.” Philologus 109: 175–81.Google Scholar
Classen, C. J. (1976). “The study of language amongst Socrates’ contemporaries.” In Classen, C. J., ed., Sophistik. Darmstadt: 215–47.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S. (1989). “What the Muses sang: Theogony 1–115.” GRBS 29: 323–33.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S. (1993). “The education of Perses: from ‘Mega Nepios’ to ‘Dion Genos’ and back.” MD 31: 2333.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S. (1999a). “Pindar’s sympotic epinicia.” QUCC 62: 2534.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S. (1999b). “The will and whip of Zeus.” Literary Imagination 1: 4060.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S. (2003). Hesiod’s Cosmos. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S. (2005). “The beginning and end of the Catalogue of Women and its relation to Hesiod.” In The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women: Constructions and Reconstructions, ed. Hunter, R.. Cambridge: 2534.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S. (2006)2. The Politics of Olympus. Form and Meaning in the Major Homeric Hymns, 2nd edn. London.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S. (2009). “Works and Days: tracing the path to Arete.” In Brill’s Companion to Hesiod, ed. Montanari, F., Rengakos, A., and Tsagalis, C.. Leiden: 7190.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S. (2011). “The Homeric Hymns as genre.” In The Homeric Hymns. Interpretative Essays, ed. Faulkner, A.. Oxford: 232–53.Google Scholar
Cockle, W. E. H. (1987). Euripides. Hypsipyle. Text and Annotation Based on a Re-examination of the Papyri. Rome.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. M. (1983). “The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women: studies on the fragments of an early Greek epic.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. M. (1986). “The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women and the Megalai Ehoiai.” Phoenix 40: 127–42.Google Scholar
Cole, T. (1983). “Archaic truth.” QUCC 13: 728.Google Scholar
Collins, D. (2004). Master of the Game: Competition and Performance in Greek Poetry. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Colonna, A. (1953). “I Prolegomeni ad Esiodo e la vita esiodea di Giovanni Tzetzes.” Accademia nazionale di Lincei: Bollettino del Comitato per la preparazione della edizione nazionale dei classici greci e latini 2: 2739.Google Scholar
Colonna, A. (1977). Opere di Esiodo. Turin.Google Scholar
Conacher, D. J. (1967). Euripidean Drama. Myth, Theme, and Structure. Toronto.Google Scholar
Conacher, D. J. (1980). Aeschylus’ Prometheus Bound: A Literary Commentary. Toronto.Google Scholar
Connor, W. R. (1993). “The Ionian era of Athenian civic identity.” TAPA 137: 194206.Google Scholar
Conti Bizzarro, F. (1999). Poetica e critica letteraria nei frammenti dei poeti comici greci. Naples.Google Scholar
Cook, B. F. (1984). “Aristaeus I.” LIMC 2: 603–07.Google Scholar
Corbato, C. (1996). “Le Etnee di Eschilo.” In Catania antica. Atti del Convegno della SISAC, ed. Gentili, B.. Pisa: 6172.Google Scholar
Crane, G. (1996). “The prosperity of tyrants: Bacchylides, Herodotus, and the contest for legitimacy.” Arethusa 29: 5785.Google Scholar
Cromey, R. D. (2006). “Apollo Patroos and the phratries.” AntCl 75: 4169.Google Scholar
Crusius, O. (1889). “Coniectanea ad comoediae antiquae fragmenta.” Philologus 47: 3344.Google Scholar
Csapo, E. and Slater, W. J. (1994). The Context of Ancient Drama. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Currie, B. (2004). “Reperformance scenarios for Pindar’s odes.” In Oral Performance and Its Context, ed. Mackie, C. J.. Leiden: 4969.Google Scholar
Currie, B. (2005). Pindar and the Cult of Heroes. Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Currie, B. (2011). “Epinician Choregia: funding a Pindaric chorus.” In Archaic and Classical Choral Song. Performance, Politics, and Dissemination, ed. Athanassaki, L. and Bowie, E.. Berlin: 269310.Google Scholar
Cusset, C. (2003). “ΛΑΚΕΡΥΖΑ ΚΟΡΩΝΗ: quand la corneille baye sur l’intertexte.” Métis 1: 4768.Google Scholar
Cyrino, M. (1998). “Sex, status and song: locating the lyric singer in the actors’ duets of Euripides.” QUCC 60: 81101.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G. B. (1992). “Pindaro Paeana VIIb (fr.52 h Sn.-M.).” In Proceedings of the XIXth International Congress of Papyrology, Cairo, 2–9 September 1989. Vol. I, ed. El-Mosalamy, A. H. S.. Cairo: 353–73.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G. B. (1994). “First-person problems in Pindar.” BICS 39: 117–39.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G. B. (1995). “Una via lontana dal cammino degli uomini (Parm. frr. 1+6 DK; Pind. Ol. VI 22–27; Pae. VIIB 10–20).” SIFC 13: 143–81.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G. B. (2004). “Past future and present past: temporal deixis in Greek archaic lyric.” Arethusa 37: 267–94.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G. B. (2005a). “The Megalai Ehoiai: a survey of the fragments.” In The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women: Constructions and Reconstructions, ed. Hunter, R.. Cambridge: 176216.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G. B. (2005b). “Ordered from the Catalogue: Pindar, Bacchylides, and Hesiodic genealogical poetry.” In The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women: Constructions and Reconstructions, ed. Hunter, R.. Cambridge: 217–38.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G. B. (2005c). Review of Hirschberger (2004). BMCR 2005.02.31.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G. B. (2015). “Theogony and Titanomachy.” In The Greek Epic Cycle and Its Ancient Reception: A Companion, ed. Fantuzzi, M. and Tsagalis, C.. Cambridge: 199212.Google Scholar
Dalfen, J. (1994). “Die ὕβρις der Nachtigall: Zu der Fabel bei Hesiod (Erga 202–218) und zur griechischen Fabel im allgemeinen.” WS 107/108: 157–77.Google Scholar
Danielewicz, J. (1990). “Deixis in Greek lyric poetry.” QUCC 34: 717.Google Scholar
Davies, D. R. (1992). “Genealogy and catalogue: thematic relevance and narrative elaboration in Homer and Hesiod.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Davies, M. (1986). Prolegomena and Paralegomena to a New Edition (with Commentary) of the Fragments of Early Greek Epic. Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen (Philologisch-Historische Klasse) 2. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Davies, M. (1988). Epicorum Graecorum Fragmenta. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Davies, M. (1989). The Greek Epic Cycle. Bristol.Google Scholar
Davies, M. (2001)2. The Greek Epic Cycle, 2nd edn. Bristol.Google Scholar
Davison, A. J. (1967). “Aeschylus and Athenian politics, 472–456 B.C..” In Ancient Society and Institutions: Studies Presented to Victor Ehrenberg on His 75th Birthday, ed. Badian, E.. Oxford: 93107.Google Scholar
Dawson, C. M. (1951) “Notes on the final scene of Prometheus Vinctus.” CPh 46: 237–39.Google Scholar
De Carli, E. (1971). Aristofane e la sofistica. Florence.Google Scholar
Deas, H. T. (1931). “The Scholia vetera to Pindar.” HSCP 42: 178.Google Scholar
Debiasi, A. (2004). L’epica perduta. Rome.Google Scholar
Debiasi, A. (2008). Esiodo e l'occidente. Rome.Google Scholar
Debiasi, A. (2013). “Dioniso e i cani di Atteone in Eumelo di Corinto (Una nuova ipotesi su P. Oxy. xxx 2509 e Apollod. 3.4.4.).” In Redefining Dionysos, ed. Bernabé, A., de Jáuregui, M. Herrero, Jiménez San Cristóbal, A. I., and Hernández, R. M.. Berlin: 200–14.Google Scholar
Demarque, M. C. (1966). “Traditional and individual ideas in Bacchylides.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. (1973)2. Les maîtres de vérité dans la grèce archaïque, 2nd edn. Paris.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. and Vernant, J.-P. (1978). Cunning Intelligence in Greek Culture and Society, transl. Lloyd, J.. Hassocks, Sussex.Google Scholar
Deubner, L. (1905). “Zur Io-Sage.” Philologus 64: 481–93.Google Scholar
Dickey, E. (2007). Ancient Greek Scholarship: A Guide to Finding, Reading, and Understanding Scholia, Commentaries, Lexica, and Grammatical Treatises, from Their Beginnings to the Byzantine Period. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dobrov, G. W. and Urios-Aparisi, A. (1995). “The maculate music: gender, genre, and the Chiron of Pherecrates.” In Beyond Aristophanes: Transition and Diversity in Greek Comedy, ed. Dobrov, G. W.. Atlanta: 139–74.Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R. (1973). The Ancient Concept of Progress and Other Essays on Greek Literature and Belief. Oxford.Google Scholar
Doherty, L. (2006). “Putting the women back into the Hesiodic Catalogue of Women.” In Laughing with Medusa: Classical Myth and Feminist Thought, ed. Leonard, M. and Zajko, V.. Oxford: 297326.Google Scholar
Dolin, E. F. Jr. (1962). “Parmenides and Hesiod.” HSCP 66: 9398.Google Scholar
Dörig, J. and Gigon, O. (1963). Der Kampf der Götter und Titanen. Olten.Google Scholar
Dougherty, C. (1993). The Poetics of Colonization. From City to Text in Archaic Greece. Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Dover, K. (1968). Aristophanes: Clouds. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dover, K. (1980). Plato: Symposium. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dover, K. (1993). Aristophanes: Frogs. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dräger, P. (1993). Argo Pasimelousa. Der Argonautenmythos in der griechischen und römischen Literatur. Teil I: Theos Aitios. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Dover, K. (1997). Untersuchungen zu den Frauenkatalogen Hesiods. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Drexler, H. (1931). “Nachträge zur Kyrenesage.” Hermes 66: 455–64.Google Scholar
Duban, J. M. (1980). “Poets and kings in the Theogony invocation.” QUCC 4: 721.Google Scholar
Duchemin, J. (1955). Pindare poète et prophète. Paris.Google Scholar
Duchemin, J. (1967). Pindare. Pythiques (III, IX, IV, V). Paris.Google Scholar
Duchemin, J. (1972). “Le captif de l’Etna: Typhée «frère» de Prométhée.” Studi Classici in onore di Quintino Cataudella. Vol. I: 149–72.Google Scholar
Duchemin, J. (1974). Prométhée. Histoire du mythe, de ses origines orientales à ses incarnations modernes. Paris.Google Scholar
Dunbar, N. (1995). Aristophanes. Birds. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dunn, F. M. (1990). “The battle of the sexes in Euripides’ Ion.” Ramus 19: 130–42.Google Scholar
Edelstein, L. (1967). The Idea of Progress in Classical Antiquity. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Edelstein, E. J. and Edelstein, L. (1945). Asclepius: Collection and Interpretation of the Testimonies. Vol. I. Baltimore (repr. 1998, New York).Google Scholar
Effe, B. (1977). Dichtung und Lehre. Untersuchung zur Typologie des antiken Lehrgedichts. Munich.Google Scholar
Else, G. F. (1957). “The origin of ΤΡΑΓΩΙΔΙΑ.” Hermes 85: 1746.Google Scholar
Epstein, P. D. (1981). “The marriage of Peisthetairos to Basileia in the Birds of Aristophanes.” Dionysius 5: 528.Google Scholar
Erbse, H. (1975a). “Der Gott von Delphi im Ion des Euripides.” In Teilnahme und Spiegelung: Festschrift für Horst Rüdiger, ed. Gutzen, D., Allemann, B., and Koppen, E.. Berlin: 4054.Google Scholar
Erbse, H. (1975b). “Dionysos’ Schiedsspruch in den ‘Fröschen’ des Aristophanes.” In Dōrēma Hans Diller zum 70. Geburtstag: Dauer und Überleben des antiken Geistes, ed. Vourveris, K. I. and Skiadas, A. D.. Athens: 4560.Google Scholar
Erbse, H. (1984). Studien zum Prolog der euripideischen Tragödie. Berlin.Google Scholar
Erbse, H. (1999). “Über Pindars Umgang mit dem Mythos.” Hermes 127: 1332.Google Scholar
Ercolani, A. (2001). “Per una storia del testo esiodeo. Hes. fr. 343 MW.” Seminari romani di cultura greca. 4: 181215.Google Scholar
Ercolani, A. (2010). Esiodo. Opere e giorni. Rome.Google Scholar
Evelyn White, H. G. (1924). “A Peisistratean edition of the Hesiodic poems.” CQ 18: 142–50.Google Scholar
Farioli, M. (2001). Mundus alter. Utopie e distopie nella commedia greca antica. Milan.Google Scholar
Farnell, L. R. (1932). Critical Commentary to the Works of Pindar. London (repr. 1961, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
Fearn, D. (2007). Bacchylides. Poetics, Performance, Poetic Tradition. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fearn, D. (2011). “Aeginetan epinician culture: naming, ritual, and politics.” In Aegina: Contexts for Choral Lyric Poetry. Myth, History, and Identity in the Fifth Century BC, ed. Fearn, D.. Oxford: 175226.Google Scholar
Fearn, D. (2012). “Bacchylidean myths.” In Reading the Victory Ode, ed. Agócs, P., Carey, C., and Rawles, R.. Cambridge: 321–43.Google Scholar
Felson, N. (2004). “The poetic effects of deixis in Pindar’s Ninth Pythian Ode.” Arethusa 37: 365–89.Google Scholar
Felson, N. (2011). “Children of Zeus in the Homeric Hymns. Generational successions.” In The Homeric Hymns. Interpretative Essays, ed. Faulkner, A.. Oxford: 254–79.Google Scholar
Fenno, J. (2005). “Setting aright the house of Themistius in Pindar’s Nemean 5 and Isthmian 6.” Hermes 133: 294311.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. R. F. (1988). “Hesiod’s mimetic Muses and the strategies of deconstruction.” In Post-Structuralist Classics, ed. Benjamin, A. E.. London and New York: 4578.Google Scholar
Figueira, T. J. (1981). Aegina, Society and Politics. New York.Google Scholar
Fink, G. (1958). “Pandora und Epimetheus. Mythologische Studien.” Ph.D. dissertation, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität zu Erlangen.Google Scholar
Finkelberg, M. (1998). “The geography of the Prometheus Vinctus.” RhM 141: 119–41.Google Scholar
Finkelberg, M. (2005). Greeks and Pre-Greeks. Aegean Prehistory and Greek Heroic Tradition. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fitton-Brown, A. D. (1959). “Prometheia.” AJP 79: 5260.Google Scholar
Flintoff, E. (1984). “Athetos at Prometheus Vinctus 150.” Hermes 112: 367–72.Google Scholar
Flintoff, E. (1986). “The date of the Prometheus Bound.” Mnemosyne 39: 8291.Google Scholar
Flintoff, E. (1995). “Prometheus Pyrphoros.” In Studia classica Johanni Tarditi oblata, ed. Porro, A., Milanese, G. F., and Belloni, L.. Milan: 857–68.Google Scholar
Floyd, E. D. (1968). “The première of Pindar’s Third and Ninth Pythian Odes.” TAPA 99: 181202.Google Scholar
Focke, F. (1930). “Aischylos’ Prometheus.” Hermes 65: 259304.Google Scholar
Foley, H. P. (2001). Female Acts in Greek Tragedy. Princeton.Google Scholar
Fontenrose, J. (1959). Python. A Study of Delphic Myth and Its Origins. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Ford, A. (1996). “Epic as genre.” In A New Companion to Homer, ed. Morris, I. and Powell, B. B.. Leiden: 396414.Google Scholar
Ford, A. (1997). “The inland ship: problems in the performance and reception of Homeric epic.” In Written Voices, Spoken Signs. Tradition, Performance, and the Epic Text, ed. Bakker, E. and Kahane, A.. Cambridge, Mass.: 83109.Google Scholar
Ford, A. (2002). The Origins of Criticism. Literary Culture and Poetic Theory in Classical Greece. Princeton.Google Scholar
Ford, A. (2010). “Plato’s two Hesiods.” In Plato and Hesiod, ed. Boys-Stones, G. R. and Haubold, J. H.. Oxford: 133–54.Google Scholar
Forsdyke, S. L. (2012). “‘Born from the earth’: the political uses of an Athenian myth.” Journal of Ancient Near Eastern Religions 12: 119–41.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. (2000). “The didactic plot.” In Matrices of Genre. Authors, Canons, and Society, ed. Depew, M. and Obbink, D.. Cambridge, Mass.: 205–19.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. L. (1998). “Genealogical thinking, Hesiod’s Catalogue, and the creation of the Hellenes.” PCPhS 44: 119.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. L. (2000). Early Greek Mythography. I: Texts. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. L. (2013). Early Greek Mythography. II: Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fränkel, H. (1951). Dichtung und Philosophie des frühen Griechentums: Eine Geschichte der griechischen Literatur von Homer bis Pindar. New York.Google Scholar
Friedländer, P. (1905). “Argolica. Quaestiones ad Graecorum historiam fabularem pertinentes.” Ph.D. dissertation, Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Berlin.Google Scholar
Friedländer, P. (1913). “ΥΠΟΘΗΚΑΙ.” Hermes 48: 558616.Google Scholar
Fritz, K. (1947). “Pandora, Prometheus und der Mythos von den Weltaltern.” Review of Religion 11: 227–60.Google Scholar
Furley, W. D. (1999–2000). “Hymns in Euripidean tragedy.” ICS 24/25: 183–97.Google Scholar
Furley, W. D. (2007). “Prayers and hymns.” In A Companion to Greek Religion, ed. Ogden, D.. Malden and Oxford: 115–31.Google Scholar
Gantz, T. N. (1974). “Pindar’s first Pythian. The fire within.” Ramus 3: 143–51.Google Scholar
Gantz, T. N. (1980). “The Aischylean tetralogy: attested and conjectured groups.” AJP 101: 133–64.Google Scholar
Gantz, T. N. (1978). “Pindar's second Pythian: the myth of Ixion.” Hermes 106: 1426.Google Scholar
Garabo, M. L. (1986). “Eschilo, fr. 281 A, 5–13 Radt.” Giornale Filologico Ferrarese 9: 5157.Google Scholar
Garson, R. W. (1984). “Recurrent metaphors in Aeschylus’ Prometheus Bound.” Acta Classica 27: 124–26.Google Scholar
Gärtner, H. A. (1978). “Die Siegeslieder Pindars für die Söhne des Lampon.” WJA 4: 2746.Google Scholar
Garzya, A. (1958). Teognide. Elegie I–II. Florence.Google Scholar
Gaspar, C. (1900). Essai de chronologie pindarique. Brussels.Google Scholar
Gauger, B. (1977). Gott und Mensch im Ion des Euripides. Untersuchungen zum Dritten Epeisodion des Dramas. Bonn.Google Scholar
Geissler, P. (1925). Chronologie der altattischen Komödie. Berlin.Google Scholar
Gellie, G. (1984). “Apollo in the Ion.” Ramus 13: 93101.Google Scholar
Gentili, B. (1958). Bacchilide. Studi. Urbino.Google Scholar
Gentili, B., Angeli Bernardini, P., Cingano, E., and Giannini, P. (1995). Pindaro. Le Pitiche. Milan and Rome.Google Scholar
Gentili, B., Catenacci, C., Giannini, P., and Lomiento, L. (2013). Pindaro. Le Olimpiche. Milan and Rome.Google Scholar
Germar, R., Pechstein, N., and Krumeich, R. (1999). “Prometheus Pyrkaeus.” In Das griechische Satyrspiel, ed. Krumeich, R., Pechstein, N., Seidensticker, B., and Bielfeldt, R.. Darmstadt: 169–78.Google Scholar
Gianotti, G. F. (1975). Per una poetica pindarica. Turin.Google Scholar
Gigante, M. (1948). “La città dei giusti in Esiodo e gli «Uccelli» di Aristofane.” Dioniso 11: 1725.Google Scholar
Gildersleeve, B. L. (1885). Pindar. The Olympian and the Pythian Odes. New York.Google Scholar
Gisler, J.-R. (1994). “Prometheus.” LIMC 7.1: 531–53.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1983). “Narrative structure in Bacchylides 5.” Eranos 81: 6381.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1991). The Poet’s Voice: Essays on Poetics and Greek Literature. Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar
González, J. M. (2010). “The Catalogue of Women and the end of the Heroic Age (Hesiod fr. 204.94–103 MW).” TAPA 140: 375422.Google Scholar
Goossens, R. (1935). “Les ‘Ploutoi’ de Kratinos.” REA 37: 405–34.Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. (2001). “Competition in wisdom.” In Homer, Tragedy and Beyond: Essays in Honour of P. E. Easterling, ed. Budelmann, F. and Michelakis, P.London: 5774.Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. (2002). Inventing Homer. The Early Reception of Epic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. and Haubold, J. (2005). Homer: The Resonance of Epic. London.Google Scholar
Grégoire, H. and Parmentier, L. (1923). Euripide. Héraclès, Les Suppliantes, Ion, repr. 2002. Paris.Google Scholar
Griffith, M. (1977). The Authenticity of Prometheus Bound. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Griffith, M. (1978). “Aeschylus, Sicily and Prometheus.” In Dionysiaca: Nine Studies in Greek Poetry Presented to Sir Denys Page on His 70th Birthday, ed. Dawe, R. D., Diggle, J., and Easterling, P. E.. Cambridge: 105–39.Google Scholar
Griffith, M. (1983a). “Personality in Hesiod.” CA 2: 3765.Google Scholar
Griffith, M. (1983b). Aeschylus: Prometheus Bound. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Grimm, R. E. (1962). “Pindar and the beast.” CPh 57: 19.Google Scholar
Groningen, B. A. van (1966). Theognis. Le premier livre. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Grossmann, G. (1970). Promethie und Orestie: attischer Geist in der attischen Tragödie. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Guglielmino, F. (1928). La parodia nella commedia greca antica. Catania.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. (1969). A History of Greek Philosophy. Volume Three. The Fifth-Century Enlightenment. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hall, E. (2000). “Female figures and metapoetry in Old Comedy.” In The Rivals of Aristophanes, ed. Harvey, D. and Wilkins, J.. London: 407–18.Google Scholar
Hall, J. M. (1997). Ethnic Identity in Greek Antiquity. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (2011). Between Ecstasy and Truth: Interpretations of Greek Poetics from Homer to Longinus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hamilton, R. (1978). “Prologue, prophecy and plot in four plays of Euripides.” AJP 99: 277302.Google Scholar
Hamilton, R. (1989). The Architecture of Hesiodic Poetry. Baltimore and London.Google Scholar
Hardie, A. (2013) “Ibycus and the Muses of Helicon.” MD 70: 936.Google Scholar
Harriott, R. M. (1969). Poetry and Criticism before Plato. London.Google Scholar
Harrison, E. (1902). Studies in Theognis. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Harrison, J. (1900). “Pandora’s box.” JHS 20: 99114.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. (2000). “Phrynichos and his Muses.” In The Rivals of Aristophanes, ed. Harvey, D. and Wilkins, J.. London: 91134.Google Scholar
Haubold, J. (2005). “Heracles in the Hesiodic Catalogue of Women.” In The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women: Constructions and Reconstructions, ed. Hunter, R.. Cambridge: 8598.Google Scholar
Heath, M. (1985). “Hesiod’s didactic poetry.” CQ 35: 245–63.Google Scholar
Heberlein, F. (1980). Pluthygieia: Zur Gegenwelt bei Aristophanes. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Hedreen, G. (2011). “The Trojan War, Theoxenia, and Aegina in Pindar’s Paean 6 and the Aphaia Sculptures.” In Aegina: Contexts for Choral Lyric Poetry. Myth, History, and Identity in the Fifth Century BC, ed. Fearn, D.. Oxford: 323–69.Google Scholar
Heilinger, K. (1983). “Der Freierkatalog der Helena im hesiodeischen Frauenkatalog I.” MH 40: 1934.Google Scholar
Heitsch, E. (1962). “Die Nicht-Philosophische ΑΛΗΘΕΙΑ.” Hermes 90: 2433.Google Scholar
Heitsch, E. (1963). “Das Prometheus-Gedicht bei Hesiod.” RhM 106: 115.Google Scholar
Heldmann, K. (1982). Die Niederlage Homers im Dichterwettstreit mit Hesiod. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (1997). “Mass versus elite and the comic heroism of Peisetairos.” In The City As Comedy. Society and Representation in Athenian Drama, ed. Dobrov, G. W.. Chapel Hill, N.C.: 135–48.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (2000). “Pherecrates and the women of Old Comedy.” In The Rivals of Aristophanes, ed. Harvey, D. and Wilkins, J.. London: 135–50.Google Scholar
Hendrick, C. W. Jr. (1988). “The temple and cult of Apollo Patroos in Athens.” AJA 92: 185210.Google Scholar
Herington, C. J. (1963a). “A study in the Prometheia, Part I. The elements in the trilogy.” Phoenix 17: 180–97.Google Scholar
Herington, C. J. (1963b). “A study in the Prometheia, Part II: Birds and Prometheia.” Phoenix 17: 236–43.Google Scholar
Herington, C. J. (1970). The Author of the Prometheus Bound. Austin.Google Scholar
Herington, C. J. (1972). The Older Scholia on the Prometheus Bound. Leiden.Google Scholar
Heynen, C. and Krumeich, R. (1999a). “Inachos.” In Das griechische Satyrspiel, ed. Krumeich, R., Pechstein, N., Seidensticker, B., and Bielfeldt, R.. Darmstadt: 313–43.Google Scholar
Heynen, C. and Krumeich, R. (1999b). “Pandora oder Sphyrokopoi.” In Das griechische Satyrspiel, ed. Krumeich, R., Pechstein, N., Seidensticker, B., and Bielfeldt, R.. Darmstadt: 375–80.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (1998). Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hirschberger, M. (2004). Gynaikōn Katalogos und Megalai Ēhoiai. Ein Kommentar zu den Fragmenten zweier Hesiodeischer Epen. Munich and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Hirschberger, M. (2008). “Il tema della metamorfosi nel Catalogo esiodeo delle donne.” In Esiodo: cent’anni di papiri. Atti del convegno internazionale di studi, Firenze, 7–8 giugno 2007, ed. Bastianini, G. and Casanova, A.. Florence: 113–27.Google Scholar
Hofmann, H. (1976). Mythos und Komödie. Untersuchung zu den Vögeln des Aristophanes. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Holzhausen, J. (2002). “Pandora und Basileia. Hesiod-Rezeption in Aristophanes’ ‘Vögeln’.” Philologus 146: 3445.Google Scholar
Hopfner, T. (1913). Thomas Magister, Demetrios Triklinios, Manuel Moschopulos: eine Studie über ihren Sprachgebrauch in den Scholien zu Aischylos, Sophokles, Euripides, Aristophanes, Hesiod, Pindar und Theokrit. Vienna.Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. (2007). “‘Dolphins in the sea’ (Isthmian 9. 7): Pindar and the Aeginetans.” In Pindar’s Poetry, Patrons, and Festivals: From Archaic Greece to the Roman Empire, ed. Hornblower, S. and Morgan, C.. Oxford: 287308.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. (1991). “Virgil, Parthenius and the art of mythological reference.” Vergilius 37: 3136.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. (1985). The Pindaric Mind: A Study of Logical Structure in Early Greek Poetry. Brill.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. (1991a). “Theban nationalism and poetic apology in Pindar, Pythian 9.76–96.” RhM 134: 2238.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. (1991b). “Recitative anapests and the authenticity of Prometheus Bound.” AJP 112: 439–60.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. (1991c). The Mask of Comedy. Aristophanes and the Intertextual Parabasis. Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. (1995). “Hesiod’s fable of the hawk and the nightingale reconsidered.” GRBS 36: 161–71.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. (1997). “Utopianism and the sophistic city in Aristophanes.” In The City As Comedy. Society and Representation in Athenian Drama, ed. Dobrov, G. W.. Chapel Hill, N.C.: 2350.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. (2001). “Pindar and Athens after the Persian Wars.” In Gab es das Griechische Wunder? Griechenland zwischen dem Ende des 6. und der Mitte des 5. Jahrhunderts v. Chr., ed. Papenfuss, D. and Strocka, V. M.. Mainz: 387–97.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. (2004). “The dissemination of epinician lyric: Pan-Hellenism, reperformance, written texts.” In Oral Performance and Its Context, ed. Mackie, C. J.. Leiden: 7193.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. (2011). “The dissemination of Pindar’s non-epinician choral lyric.” In Archaic and Classical Choral Song: Performance, Politics and Dissemination, ed. Athanassaki, L. and Bowie, E. L.. Berlin: 347–64.Google Scholar
Hughes Fowler, B. (1957). “The imagery of the Prometheus Bound.” AJP 78: 173–84.Google Scholar
Hummel, P. (1997). Philologica Lyrica. La poésie lyrique grecque au miroir de l’érudition philologique de l’antiquité à la Renaissance. Leuven.Google Scholar
Humphreys, S. C. (1974). “The Nothoi of Kynosarges.” JHS 94: 8895.Google Scholar
Hunt, R. (1981). “Satiric elements in Hesiod’s Works and Days.” Helios 8: 2940.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2009). Critical Moments in Classical Literature. Studies in the Ancient View of Literature and Its Uses. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2011). “Apollo and the Ion of Euripides: nothing to do with Nietzsche?Trends in Classics 3: 1837.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2014). Hesiodic Voices: Studies in the Ancient Reception of Hesiod’s Works and Days. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (2001). Greek Lyric Poetry: A Commentary on Selected Larger Pieces: Alcman, Stesichorus, Sappho, Alcaeus, Ibycus, Anacreon, Simonides, Bacchylides, Pindar, Sophocles, Euripides. Oxford.Google Scholar
Huxley, G. (1986). “Prometheus Desmotes, 354.” JHS 106: 190–91.Google Scholar
Huys, M. (1995). The Tale of the Hero Who Was Exposed at Birth in Euripidean Tragedy: A Study of Motifs. Leuven.Google Scholar
Illig, L. (1932). Zur Form der pindarischen Erzählung; Interpretationen und Untersuchungen. Berlin.Google Scholar
Imhof, M. (1966). Euripides’ Ion. Eine literarische Studie. Bern and Munich.Google Scholar
Indergaard, H. (2011). “Thebes, Aegina, and the temple of Aphaia: a reading of Pindar’s Isthmian 6.” In Aegina: Contexts for Choral Lyric Poetry. Myth, History, and Identity in the Fifth Century BC, ed. Fearn, D.. Oxford: 294322.Google Scholar
Irigoin, J. (1952). Histoire du texte de Pindare. Paris.Google Scholar
Irwin, E. (2005). “Gods among men? The social and political dynamics of the Hesiodic Catalogue of Women.” In The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women: Constructions and Reconstructions, ed. Hunter, R.. Cambridge: 3584.Google Scholar
Irwin, E. (2011). “Herodotus on Aeginetan identity.” In Aegina: Contexts for Choral Lyric Poetry. Myth, History, and Identity in the Fifth Century BC, ed. Fearn, D.. Oxford: 373425.Google Scholar
Jaeger, W. (1947). The Theology of Early Greek Philosophers. Oxford.Google Scholar
Janko, R. (1982). Homer, Hesiod and the Hymns. Diachronic Development in Epic Diction. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Janko, R. (1984). “P. Oxy. 2509: Hesiod’s Catalogue on the death of Actaion.” Phoenix 38: 299307.Google Scholar
Janko, R. (1986). “The Shield of Heracles and the legend of Cycnus.” CQ 36: 3859.Google Scholar
Janko, R. (2012). “πρῶτόν τε καὶ ὕστατον αἰὲν ἀείδειν. Relative chronology and the literary history of the early Greek epos.” In Relative Chronology in Early Greek Poetry, ed. Andersen, Ø. and Haug, D. T. T.. Cambridge: 2043.Google Scholar
Jebb, R. C. (1905). Bacchylides. The Poems and Fragments. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Jensen, M. S. (1966). “Tradition and individuality in Hesiod’s Works and Days.” CM 27: 127.Google Scholar
Jouanna, J. (2006). “L’œuf, le vent et éros.” In Philologia: mélanges offerts à Michel Casevitz, ed. Brillet-Dubois, P. and Parmentier, E.. Lyon: 99108.Google Scholar
Judet de la Combe, P. (1993). “L’autobiographie comme mode d’universalisation. Hésiode et l’Hélicon.” In La componente autobiografica nella poesia greca e latina fra realtà e artificio letterario, ed. Arrighetti, G. and Montanari, F.. Pisa: 2539.Google Scholar
Judet de la Combe, P. (1996). “La dernière ruse: «Pandore» dans la Théogonie.” In Le métier du mythe. Lectures d’Hésiode, ed. Blaise, F., Judet de la Combe, P., and Rousseau, P.. Lille: 263313.Google Scholar
Judet de la Combe, P. and Lernould, A. (1996). “Sur la Pandora des Travaux. Esquisses.” In Le métier du mythe. Lectures d’Hésiode, ed. Blaise, F., Judet de la Combe, P., and Rousseau, P.. Lille: 301–13.Google Scholar
Kanavou, N. (2011). “Political myth in Aristophanes: another form of political satire?GBRS 51: 382400.Google Scholar
Käppel, L. (1992). Paian: Studien zur Geschichte einer Gattung. Berlin.Google Scholar
Kenyon, F. G. (1897). The Poems of Bacchylides from a Papyrus in the British Museum. London.Google Scholar
Kerényi, C. (1963). Prometheus. Archetypal Image of Human Existence, transl. Manheim, R.. New York.Google Scholar
Kerferd, G. B. (1981). The Sophistic Movement. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kerkhof, R. (2001). Dorische Posse, Epicharm und Attische Komödie. Munich and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Kidd, S. (2012). “The meaning of bōmolokhos in classical Attic.” TAPA 142: 239–55.Google Scholar
Kirkwood, G. M. (1982). Selections from Pindar: Edited with an Introduction and Commentary. Chico, Calif.Google Scholar
Kirkwood, G. M. (1984). “Blame and envy in the Pindaric epinician.” In Greek Poetry and Philosophy: Studies in Honour of Leonard Woodbury, ed. Gerber, D. E.. Chico, Calif.: 169–83.Google Scholar
Kirsten, E. (1941). “Ein politisches Programm in Pindars erstem pythischen Gedicht.” RhM 90: 5871.Google Scholar
Kivilo, M. (2010). Early Greek Poets’ Lives: The Shaping of the Tradition. Leiden.Google Scholar
Kleingünther, A. (1933). “ΠΡΩΤΟΣ ΕΥΡΕΤΗΣ. Untersuchungen zur Geschichte einer Fragestellung.” Ph.D. dissertation, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (publ. Leipzig).Google Scholar
Koenen, L. (1994). “Greece, the Near East, and Egypt: cyclic destruction in Hesiod and the Catalogue of Women.” TAPA 124: 134.Google Scholar
Köhnken, A. (1971). Die Funktion des Mythos bei Pindar. Interpretationen zu sechs Pindargedichten. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Köhnken, A. (1985). “‘Melichos Orga.’ Liebesthematik und aktueller Sieg in der neunten Pythischen Ode Pindars.” In Pindare, ed. Hurst, A.. Geneva and Vandoeuvres: 71111.Google Scholar
Kolde, A. (2003). Politique et religion chez Isyllos d’Épidaure. Basel.Google Scholar
Kolf, M. C. (1923). “Quaeritur quomodo Pindarus fabulas tractaverit quidque in eis mutarit.” Ph.D. dissertation Universiteit Leiden (publ. Rotterdam).Google Scholar
Kollmann, O. (1989). Das Prooimion der ersten Pythischen Ode Pindars. Ein sprachlich-poetischer Kommentar. Vienna and Berlin.Google Scholar
Komornicka, A. M. (1972). “Quelques remarques sur la notion d’ΑΛΑΘΕΙΑ et de ΨΕΥΔΟΣ chez Pindare.” Eos 70: 235–53.Google Scholar
Komornicka, A. M. (1981). “Termes déterminants le vrai et le faux chez Pindare.” In Aischylos und Pindar. Studien zu Werk und Nachwirkung, ed. Schmidt, E. G.. Berlin: 8189.Google Scholar
Koning, H. H. (2010a). Hesiod: The Other Poet. Ancient Reception of a Cultural Icon. Leiden.Google Scholar
Koning, H. H. (2010b). “Plato’s Hesiod: not Plato’s alone.” In Plato and Hesiod, ed. Boys-Stones, G. R. and Haubold, J. H.. Oxford: 89110.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (1995). Greek Comedy and Ideology. New York and Oxford.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (1997). “The Greek polis and its negotiations: versions of utopia in Aristophanes’ Birds.” In The City As Comedy. Society and Representation in Athenian Drama, ed. Dobrov, G. W.. Chapel Hill, N.C.: 322.Google Scholar
Kowalzig, B. (2011). “Musical merchandise ‘on every vessel’: religion and trade on Aegina.” In Aegina: Contexts for Choral Lyric Poetry. Myth, History, and Identity in the Fifth Century BC, ed. Fearn, D.. Oxford: 129–71.Google Scholar
Kranz, W. (1967). “Titanomachia.” In Studien zur Antiken Literatur und ihrem Fortwirken. Kleine Schriften, ed. Vogt, E.. Heidelberg: 8996 (orig. 1960 in Studi in onore di Luigi Castiglioni. Vol. I. Florence: 475–86).Google Scholar
Kraus, W. (1957). “Prometheus.” RE 23: 653730.Google Scholar
Krischer, T. (1965). “ΕΤΥΜΟΣ and ΑΛΗΘΗΣ.” Philologus 109: 161–74.Google Scholar
Kroll, W. (1894). “Adversaria Graeca.” Philologus 53: 416–28.Google Scholar
Krummen, E. (1990). Pyrsos Hymnon: Festliche Gegenwart und mythisch-rituelle Tradition bei Pindar. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Kugelmeier, C. (1996). Reflexe früher und zeitgenössischer Lyrik in der Alten attischen Komödie. Stuttgart and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Kuntz, M. (1993). Narrative Setting and Dramatic Poetry. Leiden.Google Scholar
Kurke, L. (1990). “Pindar’s sixth Pythian and the tradition of advice poetry.” TAPA 120: 85107.Google Scholar
Kurke, L. (1991a). The Traffic in Praise: Pindar and the Poetics of Social Economy. Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
Kurke, L. (1991b). “Fathers and sons: a note on Pindaric ambiguity.” AJP 112: 287300.Google Scholar
Kyriakou, P. (1994). “Images of women in Pindar.” MD 32: 3154.Google Scholar
Lada-Richards, I. (1999). Initiating Dionysus: Ritual and Theatre in Aristophanes’ Frogs. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lada-Richards, I. (2002). “Reinscribing the Muse: Greek drama and the discourse of inspired creativity.” In Cultivating the Muse: Struggles for Power and Inspiration in Classical Literature, ed. Spentzou, E. and Fowler, D.. Oxford: 6991.Google Scholar
Lamberton, R. (1988). Hesiod. New Haven and London.Google Scholar
Lardinois, A. P. (1995). “Wisdom in context: the use of gnomic statements in archaic Greek poetry.” Ph.D. dissertation, Princeton University.Google Scholar
Larson, J. (1995). Greek Heroine Cults. Madison.Google Scholar
Larson, S. (2007). Tales of Epic Ancestry. Boiotian Collective Identity in the Late Archaic and Early Classical Periods. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Larue, J. (1963). “Creusa’s monody: Ion 859–922.” TAPA 94: 126–36.Google Scholar
Latte, K. (1946). “Hesiods Dichterweihe.” A&A 2: 152–63.Google Scholar
Lauriola, R. (2000). “Ἐλπίς e la giara di Pandora (Hes. Op.90–104): il bene e il male sulla vita dell’uomo.” Maia 52: 918.Google Scholar
Lavecchia, S. (2000). “Pindaro ἑρμανεὺς σοφός. Considerazioni su Ol. 2, 85–86.” Hermes 128: 369–72.Google Scholar
Lebedev, A. V. (1989). “Heraclitus in P. Derveni.” ZPE 79: 3947.Google Scholar
Leclerc, C. (1992). “Epiménide sans paradoxe.” Kernos 5: 221–33.Google Scholar
Ledbetter, G. M. (2003). Poetics before Plato: Interpretation and Authority in Early Greek Theories of Poetry. Princeton.Google Scholar
Lee, K. H. (1997). Euripides. Ion. Warminster.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. (2003). Studien zu den Quellen und zum Verständnis des Prometheus Desmotes. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, M. R. (1969). “Bacchylides’ Ode 5: Imitation and Originality.” HSCP 73: 4596.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, M. R. (1975). “The influential fictions in the scholia to Pindar’s Pythian 8.” CPh 70: 173–85.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, M. R. (1976). The Victory Ode: An Introduction. Park Ridge, N.J.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, M. R. (1985). “The Pindar scholia.” AJP 3: 269–82.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, M. R. (1991). First-Person Fictions: Pindar’s Poetic “I”. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, M. R. (2012)2. The Lives of the Greek Poets, 2nd edn. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Leinieks, V. (1984). “ΕΛΠΙΣ in Hesiod, Works and Days 96.” Philologus 128: 18.Google Scholar
Lendle, O. (1957). Die ‘Pandorasage’ bei Hesiod. Textkritische und motivgeschichtliche Untersuchungen. Würzburg.Google Scholar
Lenz, L. (1980). “Feuer in der Promethie.” GB 9: 2356.Google Scholar
Leo, F. (1894). Hesiodea. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Levet, J. P. (1976). Le vrai et le faux dans la pensée grecque archaïque. Paris.Google Scholar
Livrea, E. (2008). “I versi ‘vaganti’ nel logos esiodeo delle razze (Erga 173 a–e West).” In Esiodo: cent’anni di papiri. Atti del convegno internazionale di studi, Firenze, 7–8 giugno 2007, ed. Bastianini, G. and Casanova, A.. Florence: 4353.Google Scholar
Lloyd, M. (1986). “Divine and human action in Euripides’ Ion.” A&A 32: 3345.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, H. (1973). “Modern interpretations of Pindar: the second Pythian and the seventh Nemean Odes.” JHS 93: 109–37.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, H. (1983)2. The Justice of Zeus, 2nd edn. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, H. (1990). “Pindar and the aftermath.” In Greek Epic, Lyric, and Tragedy. The Academic Papers of Sir Hugh Lloyd-Jones, ed. Lloyd-Jones, H.. Oxford: 80109.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, H. (2003). “Zeus, Prometheus, and Greek ethics.” HSCP 101: 4972.Google Scholar
Lobel, E. (1962). The Oxyrhynchus Papyri XXVIII. London.Google Scholar
Lochin, C. (1990). “Ixion.” LIMC 5.1: 857–62.Google Scholar
Löffler, I. (1963). Die Melampodie: Versuch einer Rekonstruktion des Inhalts. Meisenheim am Glan.Google Scholar
Loraux, N. (1993a). “Aristophane, les femmes d’Athènes et le théâtre.” In Aristophane, ed. Degani, E., Bremer, J. M., and Handley, E. W.. Geneva and Vandoeuvres: 203–53.Google Scholar
Loraux, N. (1993b). The Children of Athena. Athenian Ideas about Citizenship and the Division between the Sexes, transl. Levine, C.. Princeton.Google Scholar
Ludwig, P. W. (2002). Eros and Polis. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Luján, E. R. (2011). “The cosmic egg (OF 64, 79, 114).” In Tracing Orpheus. Studies of Orphic Fragments, ed. Herrero de Jáuregui, M., Jiménez San Cristóbal, A. I., Luján Martínez, E. R., Hernández, R. M., Santamaría Álvarez, M. A., and Torallas Tovar, S.. Berlin and New York: 8592.Google Scholar
Luppe, W. (1973). “Das Aufführungsdatum der ‘Archilochoi’ des Kratinos.” Philologus 117: 124–27.Google Scholar
Luppino, A. (1959). “Divagazioni e precisazioni sulla Pitica III di Pindaro.” RFIC 37: 225–36.Google Scholar
Luraghi, N. (1994). Tirannidi arcaiche in Sicilia e Magna Grecia da Panezio di Leontini alla caduta dei Deinomenidi. Florence.Google Scholar
Luther, W. (1935). Wahrheit und Lüge im ältesten Griechentum. Leipzig.Google Scholar
MacDowell, D. M. (1990). “The meaning of ἀλαζών.” In ‘Owls to Athens’. Essays on Classical Subjects Presented to Sir Kenneth Dover, ed. Craik, E. M.. Oxford: 287–92.Google Scholar
MacDowell, D. M. (1995). Aristophanes and Athens. An Introduction to the Plays. Oxford.Google Scholar
Mace, S. T. (1992). “Pindarus Hesiodicus.” Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University.Google Scholar
Mackie, H. S. (2003). Graceful Errors: Pindar and the Performance of Praise. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Maehler, H. (1963). Die Auffassung des Dichterberufs im frühen Griechentum bis zur Zeit Pindars. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Maehler, H. (1967). “Griechische literarische Papyri.” MH 24: 6178.Google Scholar
Maehler, H. (1982). Die Lieder des Bakchylides. Erster Teil. Die Siegeslieder. II. Kommentar. Leiden.Google Scholar
Maehler, H. (1989). Pindari Carmina cum Fragmentis. Pars II. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Maehler, H. (1997). Die Lieder des Bakchylides. Zweiter Teil. Die Dithyramben und Fragmente. Text, Übersetzung, und Kommentar. Leiden.Google Scholar
Maehler, H. (2000). “Io auf der Bühne: Bemerkungen zum Aufführungsdatum des ‘Gefesselten Prometheus’.” Acta Ant. Hung. 40: 321–29.Google Scholar
Maehler, H. (2004). Bacchylides: A Selection. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Major, W. E. (2006). “Aristophanes and Alazoneia: laughing at the parabasis of the Clouds.” CW 99: 131–44.Google Scholar
Malkin, I. (1994). Myth and Territory in the Spartan Mediterranean. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Malten, L. (1911). Kyrene: sagengeschichtliche und historische Untersuchungen. Berlin.Google Scholar
Mancini, M. (1986). “Semantica di ῥητός e ἄρρητος nel prologo agli Ἔργα di Esiodo.” Aion 8: 175–92.Google Scholar
Mann, C. (2001). Athlet und Polis im archaischen und frühklassischen Griechenland. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1986). “Aristotle, Plato, and the Preplatonic doxography and chronology.” In Storiografia e dossografia nella filosofia antica, ed. Cambiano, G.. Turin: 159.Google Scholar
Marckscheffel, G. (1840). Hesiodi, Eumeli, Cinaethonis, Asii et Carminis Naupactii fragmenta. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Marg, W. (1970). “Mensch und Technik: Der Prometheusmythos bei Hesiod und Aeschylos.” In Proceedings of the 1st International Humanistic Symposium at Delphi, Sept. 25–Oct. 4, 1969. Athens: 361–76.Google Scholar
Marg, W. (1970). Hesiod. Sämtliche Gedichte. Zurich and Munich.Google Scholar
Marg, W. (1984)2. Hesiod. Sämtliche Gedichte, 2nd edn. Zurich and Munich.Google Scholar
Márquez Guerrero, M. A. (1992). Las Gnomai de Baquílides. Sevilla.Google Scholar
Marshall, E. (1998). “Sex and paternity: gendering the foundation of Kyrene.” In When Men Were Men: Masculinity, Power, and Identity in Classical Antiquity, ed. Foxhall, L. and Salmon, J.. London and New York: 98110.Google Scholar
Marston, J. M. (2007). “Language of ritual cursing in the binding of Prometheus.” GRBS 47: 121–33.Google Scholar
Martin, R. P. (1992). “Hesiod’s metanastic poetics.” Ramus 21: 1133.Google Scholar
Martin, R. P. (2000). “Synchronic aspects of Homeric performance: the evidence of the Hymn to Apollo.” In Una nueva visión de la cultura griega antigua hacia el fin del milenio, ed. González de Tobia, A. M.. La Plata: 403–32.Google Scholar
Martin, R. P. (2005). “Pulp epic: the Catalogue and the Shield.” In The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women. Constructions and Reconstructions, ed. Hunter, R.. Cambridge: 153–75.Google Scholar
Massimilla, G. (1996). Aitia. Libri Primo e Secondo. Pisa.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, K. (2004). Euripides und sein Jahrhundert. Munich.Google Scholar
Mayer, H. (1913). Prodikos von Keos und die Anfänge der Synonymik bei den Griechen. Paderborn.Google Scholar
Mayer, K. (1996). “Helen and the ΒΟΥΛΗ ΔΙΟΣ.” AJP 117: 115.Google Scholar
Mayer, M. (1933). “Mousai.” RE 16: 680757.Google Scholar
Mayhew, R. (2011). Prodicus the Sophist. Texts, Translations, and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Mazon, P. (1934). “De nouveaux fragments de Cratinos.” Mélanges Bidez 2: 603–12.Google Scholar
Mazur, P. S. (2004). “Paronomasia in Hesiod Works and Days 80–85.” CP 99: 243–46.Google Scholar
Méautis, G. (1960). L’authenticité et la date du Prométhée enchaîné d’Eschyle. Neuchâtel and Geneva.Google Scholar
Mele, A. (2001). “Il corpus epimenideo.” In Epimenide cretese, ed. Federico, E. and Visconti, A.. Naples: 227–78.Google Scholar
Merkelbach, R. (1952). “Die pisistratische Redaktion der homerischen Gedichte.” RhM 95: 2347.Google Scholar
Merkelbach, R. and West, M. L. (1967). Fragmenta Hesiodea. Oxford.Google Scholar
Mess, A. von (1901). “Der Typhonmythos bei Aischylos.” RhM 56: 167–74.Google Scholar
Mette, H. J. (1963). Der Verlorene Aischylos. Berlin.Google Scholar
Miller, T. (1997). Die griechische Kolonisation im Spiegel literarischer Zeugnisse. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Miralles, C. (1993). “Le spose di Zeus e l’ordine del mondo nella ‘Teogonia’ di Esiodo.” In Maschile/Femminile: Genere e ruoli nelle culture antiche, ed. Bettini, M.. Rome: 1744.Google Scholar
Montanari, F. (2009). “Ancient scholarship on Hesiod.” In Brill’s Companion to Hesiod, ed. Montanari, F., Rengakos, A., and Tsagalis, C.. Leiden: 313–42.Google Scholar
Mordine, M. J. (2006). “Speaking to kings: Hesiod’s ΑΙΝΟΣ and the rhetoric of allusion in the Works and Days.” CQ 56: 363–73.Google Scholar
Moret, J.-M. (1990). “Ἰώ ἀποταυρουμένη.” RA 1: 326.Google Scholar
Morgan, K. A. (2015). Pindar and the Construction of Syracusan Monarchy in the Fifth Century B.C. Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Morrison, A. D. (2007). Performances and Audiences in Pindar’s Sicilian Victory Odes. London.Google Scholar
Morrison, A. D. (2011). “Pindar and the Aeginetan patrai: Pindar’s intersecting audiences.” In Archaic and Classical Choral Song. Performance, Politics, and Dissemination, ed. Athanassaki, L. and Bowie, E.. Berlin: 311–35.Google Scholar
Mossman, J. M. (1996). “Chains of imagery in Prometheus Bound.” CQ 46: 5867.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. (1985). The Measures of Praise: Structure and Function in Pindar’s Second Pythian and Seventh Nemean Odes. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. (1986). “Pindar, O. 2.83–90.” CQ 36: 304–16.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. (1993). “Hesiod and the textualization of personal temporality.” In La componente autobiografica nella poesia greca e latina fra realta e artificio letterario, ed. Arrighetti, G. and Montanari, F.. Pisa: 7392.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. (1998). “Hesiod's myth of the five (or three or four) races.” PCPS 43: 104–27.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. (2003). “Epinician envies.” In Envy, Spite and Jealousy: The Rivalrous Emotions in Ancient Greece, ed. Konstan, D. and Rutter, N. K.. Edinburgh: 123–42.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. (2006). Hesiod: Theogony, Works and Days, Testimonia. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. (2007). Hesiod. The Shield, Catalogue of Women, Other Fragments. Cambridge, Mass. and London.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. (2012). “Poet and public. Communicative strategies in Pindar and Bacchylides.” In Reading the Victory Ode, ed. Agócs, P., Carey, C., and Rawles, R.. Cambridge: 249–76.Google Scholar
Mousbahova, V. (2007). “The meaning of the terms σοφιστής and σόφισμα in the Prometheus Bound.” Hyperion 13: 3150.Google Scholar
Mühll, P. von der (1968). “Weitere pindarische Notizen.” MH 25: 226–30.Google Scholar
Murray, P. (1981). “Poetic inspiration in early Greece.” JHS 101: 87100.Google Scholar
Murray, R. D. (1958). The Motif of Io in Aeschylus’ Suppliants. Princeton.Google Scholar
Musäus, I. (2004). Der Pandoramythos bei Hesiod und seine Rezeption bis Erasmus von Rotterdam. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (1979). The Best of the Achaeans. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (1982). “Hesiod.” In Ancient Writers. Greece and Rome. Volume I: Homer to Caesar, ed. Luce, T. J.. New York: 4373.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (1990a). Greek Mythology and Poetics. Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (1990b). Pindar’s Homer: The Lyric Possession of an Epic Past. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (1999)2. The Best of the Achaeans. Concepts of the Hero in Archaic Greek Poetry, 2nd edn. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (2009). “Hesiod and the ancient biographical traditions.” In Brill’s Companion to Hesiod, ed. Montanari, F., Rengakos, A., and Tsagalis, C.. Leiden: 271311.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (2010). Homer the Preclassic. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (2011). “Asopos and his multiple daughters: traces of preclassical epic in the Aeginetan odes of Pindar.” In Aegina: Contexts for Choral Lyric Poetry. Myth, History, and Identity in the Fifth Century BC, ed. Fearn, D.. Oxford: 4178.Google Scholar
Nasta, M. (2006). “La typologie des catalogues d’Éhées: un réseaux généalogique thématisé.” Kernos 19: 5978.Google Scholar
Neitzel, H. (1976). “Pandora und das Fass: Zur Interpretation von Hesiod, Erga 42–105.” Hermes 104: 387419.Google Scholar
Neitzel, H. (1980). “Hesiod und die Lügenden Musen: Zur Interpretation von Theogonie 27f.” Hermes 108: 387401.Google Scholar
Nelson, S. (1997). “The justice of Zeus in Hesiod’s fable of the hawk and the nightingale.” CJ 92: 235–47.Google Scholar
Neschke-Hentschke, A. (1983). “Geschichten und Geschichte: Zum Beispiel Prometheus bei Hesiod und Aischylos.” Hermes 111: 385402.Google Scholar
Nestle, W. (1936). “Die Horen des Prodikos.” Hermes 71: 151–70.Google Scholar
Newiger, H. J. (1957). Metapher und Allegorie. Studien zu Aristophanes. Munich.Google Scholar
Newiger, H. J. (1983). “Gedanken zu Aristophanes’ Vögeln.” In Aretēs mnēmē: aphierōma eis mnēmēn tou Kōnstantinou I. Vourverē, ed. Soile, C.. Athens: 4757.Google Scholar
Nicolai, W. (1964). Hesiods Erga, Beobachtungen zum Aufbau. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1870). “Der florentinische Traktat über Homer und Hesiod, ihr Geschlecht und ihren Wettkampf.” RhM 25: 529–40.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1873). “Der florentinische Traktat über Homer und Hesiod, ihr Geschlecht und ihren Wettkampf (Schluss von Bd. XXV S. 528–540).” RhM 28: 211–49.Google Scholar
Nisetich, F. J. (1989). Pindar and Homer. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Noorden, H. van (2015). Playing Hesiod. The ‘Myth of the Races’ in Classical Antiquity. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Northrup, M. D. (1980). “Hesiodic personifications in Parmenides A 37.” TAPA 110: 223–32.Google Scholar
Norwood, G. (1931). Greek Comedy. London.Google Scholar
Noussia, M. (2003). “The language of tyranny in Cratinus, PCG 258.” PCPS 49: 7488.Google Scholar
Noussia-Fantuzzi, M. (2010). Solon the Athenian: The Poetic Fragments. Leiden.Google Scholar
Nünlist, R. (1998). Poetologische Bildersprache in der frühgriechischen Dichtung. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Nünlist, R. (2009). The Ancient Critic at Work. Terms and Concepts of Literary Criticism in Greek Scholia. Cambridge.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, N. (1992). Alcidamas, Aristophanes, and the Beginnings of Greek Stylistic Theory. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, P. and Collard, C. (2013). Euripides, Cyclops, and Major Fragments of Greek Satyric Drama. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ogden, D. (2013). Drakōn. Dragon Myth and Serpent Cult in the Greek and Roman Worlds. Oxford.Google Scholar
Olson, S. D. (1998). Aristophanes. Peace. Oxford.Google Scholar
Olson, S. D. (2007). Broken Laughter: Select Fragments of Greek Comedy. Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Oost, S. I. (1976). “The tyrant kings of Syracuse.” CPh 71: 224–36.Google Scholar
Ormand, K. (2004). “Marriage, identity, and the tale of Mestra in the Hesiodic Catalogue of Women.” AJP 125: 303–38.Google Scholar
Ormand, K. (2014). The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women and Archaic Greece. Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar
Ornaghi, M. (2004). “Omero sulla scena. Spunti per una riconstruzione degli Odissei e degli Archilochi di Cratino.” In Momenti della ricezione Omerica. Poesia arcaica e teatro, ed. Zanetto, G., Canavero, D., Capra, A., and Sgobbi, A.. Milan: 197228.Google Scholar
Ornaghi, M. (2007). “Note di onomastica comica (II): Aristofane e i poeti comici del V secolo.” Quaderni del Dipartimento di filologia linguistica e tradizione classica «Augusto Rostagni» 6: 2360.Google Scholar
Ornaghi, M. (2012). “Gli Esiodi di Teleclide e le variazione comiche del modello agonale.” In Poesia, musica e agoni nella Grecia antica. Vol. I, ed. Castaldo, D., Giannachi, F. G., and Manieri, A.. Lecce: 385414.Google Scholar
Osborne, R. (2005). “Ordering women in Hesiod’s Catalogue.” In The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women: Constructions and Reconstructions, ed. Hunter, R.. Cambridge: 524.Google Scholar
Owen, A. S. (1939). Euripides. Ion. Oxford.Google Scholar
Paley, F. A. (1889). The Epics of Hesiod. London.Google Scholar
Papastavrou, H. (1992). “Nyx.” LIMC 6.1: 939–41.Google Scholar
Pardini, A. (1993). “L’Ornitogonia (Ar. Av. 693 sgg.) tra serio e faceto: premessa letteraria al suo studio storico-religioso.” In Orfeo e l’Orfismo, ed. Masaracchia, A.. Rome: 5365.Google Scholar
Park, A. (2013). “Truth and gender in Pindar.” CQ 63: 1736.Google Scholar
Parker, R. (1987) “Myths of early Athens.” In Interpretations of Greek Mythology, ed. Bremmer, J. N.. New York.Google Scholar
Parsons, P. (1974). The Oxyrhynchus Papyri. Vol. XLII. London.Google Scholar
Pattoni, M. P. (1987). L’autenticità del Prometeo incatenato di Eschilo. Pisa.Google Scholar
Patzer, A. (1986). Der Sophist Hippias als Philosophiehistoriker. Freiburg and Munich.Google Scholar
Pavese, C. O. (1998). “The rhapsodic epic poems as oral and independent poems.” HSCP 98: 6390.Google Scholar
Pavlou, M. (2008). “Metapoetics, poetic tradition, and praise in Pindar Olympian 9.” Mnemosyne 61: 533–67.Google Scholar
Pearson, A. C. (1917). The Fragments of Sophocles. Vol. II. Cambridge (repr. 1963, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
Pellegrino, M. (2000). Utopie e immagini gastronomiche nei frammenti dell’Archaia. Bologna.Google Scholar
Pelliccia, H. (1987). “Pindarus Homericus: Pythian 3.1–80.” HSCP 91: 3963.Google Scholar
Pellikaan-Engel, M. E. (1978). Hesiod and Parmenides. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Pellizer, E. (1996). “Réflexions sur les combats de la Théogonie.” In Le métier du mythe. Lectures d’Hésiode, ed. Blaise, F., Judet de la Combe, P., and Rousseau, P.. Lille: 236–49.Google Scholar
Péron, J. (1974). “Pindare et Hiéron dans la IIe Pythique (vv. 56 et 72).” REG 87: 132.Google Scholar
Péron, J. (1976). “Pindare et la victoire de Télésicrate dans la IXe Pythique (v. 76–96).” RPh 50: 5878.Google Scholar
Péron, J. (1982). “Le poème à Polycrate: une ‘palinodie’ d’Ibycus?RPh 56: 3356.Google Scholar
Pertusi, A. (1955). Scholia vetera in Hesiodi Opera et Dies. Milan.Google Scholar
Pfeijffer, I. L. (1995). “The date of Pindar’s Fifth Nemean and Bacchylides’ Thirteenth Ode.” CQ 45: 318–32.Google Scholar
Pfeijffer, I. L. (1999). Three Aeginetan Odes of Pindar: A Commentary on Nemean V, Nemean III & Pythian VIII. Leiden.Google Scholar
Philippson, P. von (1936). Untersuchungen über den griechischen Mythos. Zurich.Google Scholar
Picard, C. (1951), “Le culte et la légende du Centaure Chiron dans l’Occident méditerraneen.” RÉA 53: 525.Google Scholar
Piccirilli, L. (1975). Μεγαρικά: Testimonianze e Frammenti. Pisa.Google Scholar
Pieters, Th. M. F. (1946). Cratinus: bijdrage tot de geschiedenis der vroeg-attische comedie. Leiden.Google Scholar
Podlecki, A. J. (1975). “Reconstructing an Aeschylean trilogy.” BICS 22: 119.Google Scholar
Podlecki, A. J. (2005). Aeschylus. Prometheus Bound. Oxford.Google Scholar
Pohlenz, M. (1916). “Kronos und die Titanen.” Neue Jahrbücher für das klassische Altertum 37: 549–94.Google Scholar
Pohlenz, M. (1954). Die griechische Tragödie. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Poli-Palladini, L. (2001). “Some reflections on Aeschylus’ Aetnae(ae).” RhM 144: 287325.Google Scholar
Poli-Palladini, L. (2013). Aeschylus at Gela: An Integrated Approach. Alexandria.Google Scholar
Pratt, L. H. (1993). Lying and Poetry from Homer to Pindar: Falsehood and Deception in Archaic Greek Poetics. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Pretagostini, R. (1982). “Archiloco ‘Salsa di Taso’ negli Archilochi di Cratino (fr. 6 K.).” QUCC 11: 4352.Google Scholar
Privitera, G. A. (1980). “Politica religiosa dei Dinomenidi e ideologia dell’optimus rex.” In Perennitas: Studi in onore di Angelo Brelich. Rome: 393411.Google Scholar
Privitera, G. A. (1982). Pindaro. Le Istmiche. Milan.Google Scholar
Pucci, P. (1977). Hesiod and the Language of Poetry. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Pucci, P. (1996). “Auteur et destinataires dans les Travaux d’Hésiode.” In Le métier du mythe: Lectures d’Hésiode, ed. Blaise, F., Judet de la Combe, P., and Rousseau, P.. Lille: 191210.Google Scholar
Pucci, P. (2007). Inno alle Muse (Esiodo, Teogonia, 1–115), Testo, Introduzione, Traduzione e Commento. Pisa and Rome.Google Scholar
Pucci, P. (2009). “The poetry of the Theogony.” In Brill’s Companion to Hesiod, ed. Montanari, F., Rengakos, A., and Tsagalis, C.. Leiden: 3770.Google Scholar
Puelma, M. (1972). “Sänger und König: zum Verständnis von Hesiods Tierfabel.” MH 29: 86109.Google Scholar
Puelma, M. (1989). “Der Dichter und die Wahrheit in der griechischen Poetik von Homer bis Aristoteles.” MH 46: 65100.Google Scholar
Quaglia, R. (1998). “Elementi strutturali nelle comedie di Cratino.” Acme 51: 2371.Google Scholar
Rabinowitz, N. S. (1993). Anxiety Veiled. Euripides and the Traffic in Women. Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
Race, W. H. (1981). “The end of Olympia 2: Pindar and the Vulgus.” CA 12: 251–67.Google Scholar
Race, W. H. (1982). The Classical Priamel from Homer to Boethius. Leiden.Google Scholar
Race, W. H. (1997a). Pindar. Olympic Odes. Pythian Odes. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Race, W. H. (1997b). Pindar. Nemean Odes. Isthmian Odes. Fragments. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Radermacher, L. (1938). “Zu griechischen Texten.” WS 56: 110.Google Scholar
Radt, S. (1977). Tragicorum Graecorum Fragmenta. Vol. 4. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Radt, S. (1985). Tragicorum Graecorum Fragmenta. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Ramnoux, C. (1986). La nuit et les enfants de la nuit dans la tradition grecque. Paris.Google Scholar
Ramnoux, C. (1987). “Les femmes de Zeus: Hésiode, Théogonie, vers 885 à 955.” In Poikilia: Etudes offertes à Jean-Pierre Vernant. Paris: 155–64.Google Scholar
Rau, P. (1967). Paratragodia. Untersuchung einer komischen Form des Aristophanes. Munich.Google Scholar
Reckford, K. J. (1987). Aristophanes’ Old-and-New Comedy. Chapel Hill, N.C.Google Scholar
Rehm, R. (1992). Greek Tragic Theatre. London and New York.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, K. (1949). Aischylos als Regisseur und Theologe. Bern.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, K. (1957). “Vorschläge zum neuen Aischylos.” Hermes 85: 117.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, K. (1960). Tradition und Geist. Gesammelte Essays zur Dichtung. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Reinsch-Werner, H. (1976). Callimachus Hesiodicus. Die Rezeption der hesiodischen Dichtung durch Kallimachos von Kyrene. Berlin.Google Scholar
Rengakos, A. (2009). “Hesiod’s narrative.” In Brill’s Companion to Hesiod, ed. Montanari, F., Rengakos, A., and Tsagalis, C.. Leiden: 203–21.Google Scholar
Revemann, M. (2013). “Paraepic comedy: point(s) and practices.” In Greek Comedy and the Discourse of Genres, ed. Bakola, E., Prauscello, L., and Telò, M.. Cambridge: 101–28.Google Scholar
Ricciardelli Apicella, G. (1993). “Le teogonie orfiche nell’ambito delle teogonie greche.” In Orfeo e l’Orfismo, ed. Masaracchia, A.. Rome: 2751.Google Scholar
Richardson, N. J. (1981). “The contest of Homer and Hesiod and Alcidamas’ Mouseion.” CQ 31: 110.Google Scholar
Richardson, N. J. (2010). Three Homeric Hymns. To Apollo, Hermes, and Aphrodite. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rigoglioso, M. (2009). The Cult of Divine Birth in Ancient Greece. New York.Google Scholar
Rijksbaron, A. (2009). “Discourse cohesion in the proem of Hesiod’s Theogony.” In Discourse Cohesion in Ancient Greek, ed. Bakker, S. J. and Wakker, G. C.. Leiden: 241–65.Google Scholar
Risch, E. (1947). “Namensbedeutungen und Worterklärungen bei den ältesten griechischen Dichtern.” In Eumusia: Festgabe für Ernst Howald zum sechzigsten Geburtstag. Zurich: 7291.Google Scholar
Robbins, E. (1978). “Cyrene and Cheiron: the myth of Pindar’s ninth Pythian.” Phoenix 32: 91104.Google Scholar
Robbins, E. (1990). “The gifts of the gods: Pindar’s third Pythian.” CQ 40: 307–18.Google Scholar
Robert, C. (1914). “Pandora.” Hermes 49: 1738.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. S. (1938). “On the chronology of Aeschylus.” PCPhS 169–71: 910.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. S. (1951). “Prometheus and Chiron.” JHS 71: 150–55.Google Scholar
Robertson, N. (1980). “Heracles’ ‘catabasis’.” Hermes 108: 274300.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Noriega Guillén, L. (1996). Epicarmo de Siracusa. Testimonios y Fragmentos. Edición crítica bilingüe. Oviedo.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Noriega Guillén, L. (2012). “On Epicharmus’ literary and philosophical background.” In Theater outside Athens. Drama in Greek Sicily and South Italy, ed. Bosher, K.. Cambridge: 7696.Google Scholar
Romer, F. E. (1997). “Good intentions and the ὁδὸς ἡ ἐς κόρακας.” In The City As Comedy. Society and Representation in Athenian Drama, ed. Dobrov, G. W.. Chapel Hill, N.C.: 5174.Google Scholar
Roscher, W. H. (1890–94). Ausführliches Lexikon der Griechischen und Römischen Mythologie. Zweiter Band, erste Abteilung. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Roselli, D. K. (2012). Theater of the People: Spectators and Society in Ancient Athens. Austin.Google Scholar
Rosen, R. M. (1988). Old Comedy and the Iambographic Tradition. Atlanta.Google Scholar
Rosen, R. M. (1990). “Poetry and sailing in Hesiod’s Works and Days.” CA 9: 99113.Google Scholar
Rosen, R. M. (1997). “Homer and Hesiod.” In A New Companion to Homer, ed. Morris, I. and Powell, B.. Leiden: 463–88.Google Scholar
Rosen, R. M. (2004). “Aristophanes’ Frogs and the Contest of Homer and Hesiod.” TAPA 134: 295322.Google Scholar
Rosen, R. M. (2013). “Iambos, comedy and the question of generic affiliation.” In Greek Comedy and the Discourse of Genres, ed. Bakola, E., Prauscello, L., and Telò, M.. Cambridge: 8197.Google Scholar
Rosivach, V. J. (1987). “Autochthony and the Athenians.” CQ 37: 294306.Google Scholar
Ross, D. O. (1975). Backgrounds to Augustan Poetry: Gallus, Elegy and Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rossi, L. E. (1997). “Esiodo, le Opere e i Giorgni: un nuovo tentativo di analisi.” In Posthomerica: tradizione omeriche dell’Antiquità al Rinascimento, ed. Montanari, F. and Pittaluga, S.. Genoa: 722.Google Scholar
Rousseau, P. (1996). “Instruire Persès. Notes sur l’ouverture des Travaux d’Hésiode.” In Le métier du mythe: Lectures d’Hésiode, ed. Blaise, F., Judet de la Combe, P., and Rousseau, P.. Lille: 93167.Google Scholar
Rudhardt, J. (1986). Le rôle d’Éros et d’Aphrodite dans les cosmogonies grecques. Paris.Google Scholar
Rudhardt, J. (1999). Thémis et les Hôrai. Recherche sur les divinités grecques de la justice et de la paix. Geneva.Google Scholar
Ruffell, I. (2000). “The world turned upside down: utopia and utopianism in the fragments of Old Comedy.” In The Rivals of Aristophanes, ed. Harvey, D. and Wilkins, J.. London: 473506.Google Scholar
Ruffell, I. (2012). Aeschylus: Prometheus Bound. London.Google Scholar
Russo, C. F. (1965)2. Hesiodi Scutum. Florence.Google Scholar
Rusten, J. S. (1984). “Phanes-Eros in the theogony of ‘Orpheus’ (PDerveni col. IX 4).” In Atti del XVII Congresso Internazionale di Papirologia. Naples: 333–35.Google Scholar
Rusten, J. S. (1985). “Interim notes on the papyrus from Derveni.” HSCP 89: 121–40.Google Scholar
Rusten, J. S. (2011). The Birth of Comedy. Texts, Documents, and Art from Athenian Comic Competitions, 486–280. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. (1988). “Pindar on the birth of Apollo.” CQ 38: 6575.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. (2000). “Formulas, voice, and death in Ehoie-Poetry, the Hesiodic Gunaikon Katalogos, and the Odysseian Nekuia.” In Matrices of Genre. Authors, Canons, and Society, ed. Depew, M. and Obbink, D.. Cambridge, Mass.: 8196.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. (2001). Pindar’s Paeans: A Reading of the Fragments with a Survey of the Genre. Oxford.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. (2005). “Mestra at Athens: Hesiod fr. 43 and the poetics of Panhellenism.” In The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women: Constructions and Reconstructions, ed. Hunter, R.. Cambridge: 99117.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. (2015). “Pindar’s Cycle.” In The Greek Epic Cycle and Its Ancient Reception: A Companion, ed. Fantuzzi, M. and Tsagalis, C.. Cambridge: 450–60.Google Scholar
Rzach, A. (1913). Hesiodi Carmina, repr. 1958. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Saïd, S. (1977). “Les Combats de Zeus et le problème des interpolations dans la Théogonie d’Hésiode.” REG 90: 183210.Google Scholar
Saïd, S. (1982). “Eschyle, Hésiode et les combats de Zeus ou comment se réécrit le mythe.” Etudes de littérature ancienne. Questions de sens 2: 8191.Google Scholar
Saïd, S. (1985). Sophiste et tyran, ou le problème du Prométhée Enchaîné. Paris.Google Scholar
Saïd, S. (2006). “Les dons de Prométhée et leur valeur dans le Prométhée enchaîné à la lumière d’une comparaison avec Hèsiode, Platon et Aelius Aristide.” Lexis: Poética, retórica e comunicaciones nella tradizione classica 24: 247–64.Google Scholar
Saxonhouse, A. W. (1986). “Myths and the origins of cities: reflections on the autochthony theme in Euripides’ Ion.” In Greek Tragedy and Political Theory, ed. Euben, J. P.. Berkeley and Los Angeles: 252–73.Google Scholar
Scafuro, A. (1990). “Discourses of sexual violation in mythic accounts and dramatic versions of ‘The Girl’s Tragedy’.” Differences 2: 126–59.Google Scholar
Schade, G. (2006). “Die Oden von Pindar und Bakchylides auf Hieron.” Hermes 134: 373–78.Google Scholar
Schadewaldt, W. (1928). Der Aufbau des Pindarischen Epinikion. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Schadewaldt, W. (1966)2. Monolog und Selbstgespräch. Untersuchungen zur Formgeschichte der griechischen Tragödie, 2nd edn. Berlin.Google Scholar
Scharffenberger, E. W. (1995). “Peisetaerus’ ‘satyric’ treatment of Iris: Aristophanes’ Birds 1253–6.” JHS 115: 172–73.Google Scholar
Schein, S. (1987). “Unity and meaning in Pindar’s sixth Pythian Ode.” Mètis 2: 235–47.Google Scholar
Scheurer, S. and Krumeich, R. (1999). “Kophoi.” In Das griechische Satyrspiel, ed. Krumeich, R., Pechstein, N., Seidensticker, B., and Bielfeldt, R.. Darmstadt: 349–55.Google Scholar
Schibli, H. S. (1990). Pherekydes of Syros. Oxford.Google Scholar
Schmid, W. (1929). Untersuchungen zum gefesselten Prometheus. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Schmidt, D. A. (1987). “The performance of Bacchylides Ode 5.” CQ 37: 2023.Google Scholar
Schmidt, J.-U. (1988). “Die Einheit des Prometheus-Mythos in der ‘Theogonie’ des Hesiod.” Hermes 116: 129–56.Google Scholar
Schmitt, A. (1975). “Zum Prooimion des hesiodischen Frauenkatalogs.” WJA 1: 1931.Google Scholar
Schömann, G. F. (1857). Opuscula Academica. II: Mythologica et Hesiodea. Berlin.Google Scholar
Schroeder, O. (1922). Pindars Pythien. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Schwabl, H. (1963). “Hesiod und Parmenides: Zur Formung des parmenideischen Prooimions (28 B 1).” RhM 106: 134–42.Google Scholar
Schwartz, J. (1960). Pseudo-Hesiodeia; recherches sur la composition, la diffusion et la disparition ancienne d’œuvres attribuées à Hésiode. Leiden.Google Scholar
Schwarze, J. (1971). Die Beurteilung des Perikles durch die attische Komödie und ihre historische und historiographische Bedeutung. Munich.Google Scholar
Schwenn, F. (1934). Die Theogonie des Hesiodos. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Schwinge, E.-R. (1977). “Aristophanes und die Utopie.” WJA 3: 4367.Google Scholar
Scodel, R. (1982). “The Achaean Wall and the myth of destruction.” HSCP 86: 3350.Google Scholar
Scodel, R. (2014). “Prophetic Hesiod.” In Between Orality and Literacy: Communication and Adaptation in Antiquity, ed. Scodel, R.. Leiden: 5676.Google Scholar
Scott, W. C. (1987). “The development of the chorus in Prometheus Bound.” TAPA 117: 8596.Google Scholar
Scully, S (2015). Hesiod’s Theogony from Near Eastern Creation Myth to Paradise Lost. Oxford.Google Scholar
Seaford, R. (1990). “The structural problems of marriage in Euripides.” In Euripides, Women, and Sexuality, ed. Powell, A.. London and New York: 151–76.Google Scholar
Segal, C. (1967). “Pindar’s seventh Nemean.” TAPA 98: 431–80.Google Scholar
Segal, C. (1976). “Bacchylides reconsidered: epithets and the dynamics of lyric narrative.” QUCC 22: 99130.Google Scholar
Sellschopp, J. (1934). Stilistische Untersuchungen zu Hesiod. Gerlingen.Google Scholar
Severyns, A. (1926). “Le cycle épique et l’épisode d’Io (Eschyle, Prométhée, 771 et s.).” Musée Belge 30: 119–30.Google Scholar
Severyns, A. (1928). Le cycle épique dans l’école d’Aristarque. Liège and Paris.Google Scholar
Shaw, C. A. (2014). Satyric Play. The Evolution of Greek Comedy and Satyr Drama. Oxford.Google Scholar
Siegmann, E. (1956). Literarische Griechische Texte der Heidelberger Papyrussammlung. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Silk, M. S. (1998). “Pindar’s poetry and the obligatory crux: Isthmian 5.56–63, text and interpretation.” TAPA 128: 2588.Google Scholar
Silk, M. S. (2000). Aristophanes and the Definition of Comedy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Simon, E. (1981). “Anesidora.” LIMC 1.1: 790–91.Google Scholar
Simon, E. (1992). “Coronis.” LIMC 6.1: 103–06.Google Scholar
Sinclair, T. A. (1927). “The so-called Peisistratean edition of Hesiod.” CQ 21: 195–98.Google Scholar
Sissa, G. (1990). “Maidenhood without maidenhead: the female body in ancient Greece.” In Before Sexuality: The Construction of Erotic Experience in the Ancient Greek World, ed. Zeitlin, F. I., Winkler, J. J. and Halperin, D. M.. Princeton: 339–64.Google Scholar
Skempis, M. (2011). “Ironic genre demarcation: Bacchylides 17 and the epic tradition.” Trends in Classics 3: 254300.Google Scholar
Slater, W. J. (1988). “Pindar’s Pythian 3: structure and purpose.” QUCC 29: 5161.Google Scholar
Smith, D. G. (2012). “Sicily and the identities of Xuthus. Stesichorus, Aeschylus’ Aenaeae, and Euripides’ Ion.” In Theater outside Athens. Drama in Greek Sicily and South Italy, ed. Bosher, K.. Cambridge: 112–36.Google Scholar
Snell, B. and Maehler, H. (1970). Bacchylidis carmina cum fragmentis. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Snell, B. and Maehler, H. (1987). Pindari carmina cum fragmentis. I: Epinicia. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1934). “Euripides’ Ion im Vergleich mit anderen Tragödien.” Hermes 69: 390419.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1949). Hesiod and Aeschylus. Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1982). “The earliest stages in the history of Hesiod’s text.” HSCP 86: 131.Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A. H. (1991)2. Aristophanes: Birds. Oxford.Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A. H. (1996). “Aristophanes and the demon Poverty.” In Oxford Readings in Aristophanes, ed. Segal, E.. Oxford: 252–81.Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A. H. (2006). “Rape and consent in Athenian tragedy.” In Dionysalexandros. Essays on Aeschylus and His Fellow Tragedians in Honour of Alexander F. Garvie, ed. Cairns, D. and Liapis, V.. Swansea: 233–51.Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A. H. (2008). Aeschlylus. Fragments. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A. H. (2010a)2. Aeschylean Trilogy, 2nd edn. London.Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A. H. (2010b). The Tangled Ways of Zeus and Other Studies in and around Greek Tragedy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A. H. (2010c). “La tetralogia di Eschilo sulla guerra persiana.” Dionysus ex machina 1: 420Google Scholar
Sourvinou-Inwood, C. (2011). Athenian Myths and Festivals. Aglauros, Erechtheus, Plynteria, Panathenaia, Dionysia, ed. Parker, R.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Sperduti, A. (1950). “The divine nature of poetry in antiquity.” TAPA 81: 209–40.Google Scholar
Spira, A. (1960). Untersuchungen zum Deus ex machina bei Sophokles und Euripides. Kallmünz.Google Scholar
Stafford, E. (2000). Worshipping Virtues. Personification and the Divine in Ancient Greece. London.Google Scholar
Stamatopoulou, Z. (2012). “Weaving Titans for Athena: Euripides and the Panathenaic peplos (Hec. 466–74 and IT 218–24).” CQ 62: 7280.Google Scholar
Stamatopoulou, Z. (2013). “Reading the Aspis as a Hesiodic poem.” CPh 108: 273–85.Google Scholar
Stamatopoulou, Z. (2014). “The reception of Hesiod in Plutarch’s Symposium of the Seven Sages.” AJP 135: 533–58.Google Scholar
Stamatopoulou, Z. (2016). “The quarrel with Perses and Hesiod’s biographical tradition.” GRBS 51: 117.Google Scholar
Stamatopoulou, Z. (in press). “Wounding the gods: the mortal theomachos in the Iliad and the Hesiodic Aspis.” Mnemosyne.Google Scholar
Steffen, W. (1961). “Bacchylides’ fifth ode.” Eos 51: 1120.Google Scholar
Stéfos, A. (1975). Apollon dans Pindare. Athens.Google Scholar
Steiner, D. (2005). “Nautical matters: Hesiod’s nautilia and Ibycus fragment 282 PMG.” CPh 100: 347–55.Google Scholar
Steiner, D. (2007). “Feathers flying: avian poetics in Hesiod, Pindar, and Callimachus.” AJP 128: 177208.Google Scholar
Steiner, D. (2011). “Pindar’s bestiary: the ‘coda’ of Pythian 2.” Phoenix 65: 238–67.Google Scholar
Steiner, D. (2012). “Fables and frames: the poetics and politics of animal fables in Hesiod, Archilochus, and the Aesopica.” Arethusa 45: 141.Google Scholar
Stenger, J. (2004). Poetische Argumentation: die Funktion der Gnomik in den Epinikien des Bakchylides. Berlin.Google Scholar
Stiewe, K. (1962). “Die Entstehungszeit der hesiodischen Frauenkataloge.” Philologus 106: 291–99.Google Scholar
Stiewe, K. (1963). “Die Entstehungszeit der hesiodischen Frauenkataloge (Fortsetzung von Band 106, 1962, 291–299).” Philologus 107: 129.Google Scholar
Stinton, T. C. W. (1976). “Si credere dignum est: some expressions of disbelief in Euripides and others.” PCPS 22: 6089.Google Scholar
Stoddard, K. B. (2003). “The programmatic message of the ‘kings and singers’ passage: Hesiod, Theogony 80–103.” TAPA 133: 116.Google Scholar
Stoddard, K. B. (2004). The Narrative Voice in the Theogony of Hesiod. Leiden.Google Scholar
Stoessl, F. (1988). Der Prometheus des Aischylos als geistesgeschichtliches und theatergeschichtliches Phänomen. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Storey, I. C. (2011). Fragments of Old Comedy. Volume I. Alcaeus to Diocles. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Storey, I. C. (2014). “The first poets of Old Comedy.” In The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Comedy, ed. Fontaine, M. and Scafuro, A. C.. Oxford: 95112.Google Scholar
Stroh, W. (1976). “Hesiods lügende Musen.” In Studien zum antiken Epos, ed. Görgemanns, H. and Schmidt, E.. Meisenheim am Glan: 85112.Google Scholar
Strohm, H. (1957). Euripides. Interpretationen zur dramatischen Form. Munich.Google Scholar
Studniczka, F. (1890). Kyrene, eine altgriechische Göttin. Archäologische und mythologische Untersuchungen. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Sutton, D. F. (1979). Sophocles’ Inachus. Meisenheim am Glan.Google Scholar
Svenbro, J. (1976). La parole et le marbre: Aux origines de la poétique grecque. Lund.Google Scholar
Taplin, O. (1975). “The title of Prometheus Desmotes.” JHS 95: 184–86.Google Scholar
Taplin, O. (1977). The Stagecraft of Aeschylus. The Dramatic Use of Exits and Entrances in Greek Tragedy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Taplin, O. (1993). Comic Angels and Other Approaches to Greek Drama through Vase-Paintings. Oxford.Google Scholar
Taplin, O. (2006). “Aeschylus’ Persai – the entry of tragedy into the celebration culture of the 470s?” in Dionysalexandros. Essays on Aeschylus and His Fellow Tragedians in Honour of Alexander F. Garvie, ed. Cairns, D. and Liapis, V.. Swansea: 110.Google Scholar
Telò, M. (2007). Eupolidis Demi. Florence.Google Scholar
Telò, M. (2013). “Epic, nostos, and generic genealogy in Aristophanes’ Peace.” In Greek Comedy and the Discourse of Genres, ed. Bakola, E., Prauscello, L., and Telò, M.. Cambridge: 129–52.Google Scholar
Thalmann, W. G. (1984). Conventions of Form and Thought in Early Greek Epic Poetry. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Thompson, D. W. (1895). A Glossary of Greek Birds. Oxford.Google Scholar
Thompson, G. (1932). Aeschylus. The Prometheus Bound. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thummer, E. (1968). Pindar. Die Isthmischen Gedichte. Vol. I. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Thummer, E. (1969). Pindar. Die Isthmischen Gedichte. Vol. II. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Toohey, P. (1996). Epic Lessons. An Introduction to Ancient Didactic Poetry. London and New York.Google Scholar
Torjussen, S. (2005). “Phanes and Dionysus in the Derveni Papyrus.” SO 80: 722.Google Scholar
Tortorelli Ghidini, M. (1991). “Due teonimi orfici nel papiro di Derveni.” In Orphisme et Orphée en l’honneur de Jean Rudhardt, ed. Borgeaud, P.. Geneva: 249–61.Google Scholar
Touchefeu-Meynier, O. (1997). “Typhon.” LIMC 8.1: 147–51.Google Scholar
Trendall, A. D. and Webster, T. B. L. (1971). Illustrations of Greek Drama. London.Google Scholar
Treu, M. (1967). Review of Bowra (1964), Gymnasium 74: 149–53.Google Scholar
Troxler, H. (1964). Sprache und Wortschatz Hesiods. Zurich.Google Scholar
Trumpf, J. (1958). “Stadtgründung und Drachenkampf.” Hermes 86: 129–57.Google Scholar
Tsagalis, C. (2009). “Poetry and poetics in the Hesiodic corpus.” In Brill’s Companion to Hesiod, ed. Montanari, F., Rengakos, A., and Tsagalis, C.. Leiden: 131–77.Google Scholar
Tsagalis, C. (2013). “Typhon and Eumelus’ Titanomachy.” TC 5: 1948.Google Scholar
Tsitsibakou-Vasalos, E. (2010). “Brightness and darkness in Pindar’s Pythian 3. Aigla-Koronis-Arsinoë and her coming of age.” In Light and Darkness in Ancient Greek Myth and Religion, ed. Christopoulos, M., Karakantza, E., and Levaniouk, O.. Plymouth: 3076.Google Scholar
Unterberger, R. (1968). Der gefesselte Prometheus des Aischylos: eine Interpretation. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Untersteiner, M. (1954). Sofisti. Testimonianze e Frammenti. Fasc. III. Florence.Google Scholar
Vallet, G. (1985). “Pindare et la Sicile.” In Pindare, ed. Hurst, A.. Geneva and Vandoeuvres: 285327.Google Scholar
Valloza, M. (1989). “Il motivo dell’invidia in Pindaro.” QUCC 31: 1330.Google Scholar
Vandvik, E. (1943). The Prometheus of Hesiod and Aeschylus. Oslo.Google Scholar
Verdenius, W. J. (1971). “A ‘hopeless’ line in Hesiod: ‘Works and Days’ 96.” Mnemosyne 24: 225–31.Google Scholar
Verdenius, W. J. (1972). “Notes on the proem of Hesiod’s Theogony.” Mnemosyne 25: 225–60.Google Scholar
Verdenius, W. J. (1976). “Notes on the Prometheus Bound.” In Miscellanea Tragica in honorem J. C. Kamerbeek, ed. Bremer, J. M., Radt, S. L., and Ruijgh, C. J.. Amsterdam: 451–70.Google Scholar
Verdenius, W. J. (1985). A Commentary on Hesiod. Works and Days, vv. 1–382. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Vergados, A. (2011). A Commentary on the Homeric Hymn to Hermes. Berlin.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. (1974). Mythe et société en Grèce ancienne. Paris.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. (1979). “A la table des hommes: mythe de fondation du sacrifice chez Hésiode.” In La cuisine du sacrifice en pays grec, ed. Detienne, M. and Vernant, J.-P.. Paris: 37132.Google Scholar
Vian, F. (1952). Guerre des géants. Le mythe avant l’époque hellénistique. Paris.Google Scholar
Vogt, E. (1959). “Die Schrift vom Wettkampf Homers und Hesiods.” RhM 102: 193221.Google Scholar
Volk, K. (2002). The Poetics of Latin Didactic. Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid, Manilius. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wade-Gery, H. T. (1949). “Hesiod.” Phoenix 3: 8193.Google Scholar
Walcot, P. (1960). “Allusion in Hesiod.” REG 73: 3639.Google Scholar
Walsh, G. B. (1978). “The rhetoric of birthright and race in Euripides’ Ion.” Hermes 106: 301–15.Google Scholar
Wassermann, F. M. (1940). “Divine violence and providence in Euripides’ Ion.” TAPA 71: 587604.Google Scholar
Watkins, C. (1995). How to Kill a Dragon. Aspects of Indo-European Poetics. Oxford.Google Scholar
Welcker, F. G. (1824). Die aeschylische Trilogie Prometheus und die Kabirenweihe zu Lemnos: nebst Winken über die Trilogie des Aeschylus überhaupt. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Welcker, F. G. (1849). Der epische Cyclus: oder die homerischen Dichter. Vol. II. Bonn.Google Scholar
Wessels, A. (1999). “Dike-Drama.” In Das griechische Satyrspiel, ed. Krumeich, R., Pechstein, N., Seidensticker, B., and Bielfeldt, R.. Darmstadt: 98106.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (1966). Hesiod. Theogony. Oxford.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (1967). “The contest of Homer and Hesiod.” CQ 17: 433–50.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (1978). Hesiod: Works and Days. Oxford.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (1979). “The Prometheus trilogy.” JHS 99: 130148, reprinted with postscript in M. Lloyd, ed. (2007). Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Aeschylus. Oxford: 359–96.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (1983a). “The Hesiodic Catalogue: Xouthids and Aiolids.” ZPE 53: 2730.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (1983b). The Orphic Poems. Oxford.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (1985a). The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women. Its Nature, Structure, and Origins. Oxford.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (1985b). “The Hesiodic Catalogue: new light on Apollo’s love-life.” ZPE 61: 17.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (1987). “᾽Ιάων.” ZPE 67: 20.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (1990). Studies in Aeschylus. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (1994). “Ab ovo: Orpheus, Sanchuniathon, and the origins of the Ionian world model.” CQ 44: 289307.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (2000). “Iliad and Aethiopis on the stage: Aeschylus and son.” CQ 50: 338–52.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (2001). “Some Homeric words.” Glotta 77: 118–35.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (2002). “‘Eumelos’: a Corinthian epic cycle?JHS 122: 109–33.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (2003). Greek Epic Fragments. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (2013). The Epic Cycle. A Commentary on the Lost Troy Epics. Oxford.Google Scholar
West, S. (1984). “Io and the dark stranger (Sophocles, Inachus F 269a).” CQ 34: 292302.Google Scholar
West, S. (1994). “Prometheus orientalized.” MH 51: 129–49.Google Scholar
Westphal, R. (1869). Prolegomena zu Aeschylus Tragödien. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Whittaker, M. (1935). “The comic fragments in their relation to the structure of Old Attic Comedy.” CQ 29: 181–91.Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. (1886). Isyllos von Epidauros. Berlin.Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. (1905). “Lesefrüchte.” Hermes 40: 116–53.Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. (1914). Aeschylus-Interpretationen. Berlin.Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. (1922). Pindaros. Berlin.Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. (1926). Euripides. Ion. Berlin.Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. (1928). Hesiodos Erga. Berlin.Google Scholar
Wilkins, J. (2000). “Edible Choruses.” In The Rivals of Aristophanes, ed. Harvey, D. and Wilkins, J.. London: 341–54.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, C. L. (2013). The Lyric of Ibycus. Berlin and Boston.Google Scholar
Willcock, M. M. (1995). Victory Odes: Olympians 2, 7, 11; Nemean 4; Isthmians 3, 4 and 7. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Willi, A. (2008). Sikelismos: Sprache, Literatur und Gesellschaft im griechischen Sizilien (8.–5. Jh. v. Chr.). Basel.Google Scholar
Wilson, A. M. (1977). “The individualized chorus in Old Comedy.” CQ 27: 278–83.Google Scholar
Wilson, N. G. (2007). Aristophanis Fabulae. Vol. 1. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. (1980). “Pindar and his reputation in antiquity.” PCPS 26: 97114.Google Scholar
Wind, R. (1971). “Bacchylides and Pindar: a question of imitation.” CJ 67: 913.Google Scholar
Winnington-Ingram, R. P. (1983). Studies in Aeschylus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Winter, J. G. (1925). “A new fragment on the life of Homer.” TAPA 56: 120–29.Google Scholar
Wolff, C. (1965). “The design and myth of Euripides’ Ion.” HSCP 69: 169–94.Google Scholar
Woodbury, L. (1972). “Apollo’s first love: Pindar, Pyth. 9.26 ff.” TAPA 103: 561–73.Google Scholar
Woodbury, L. (1982). “Cyrene and the ΤΕΛΕϒΤΑ of marriage in Pindar’s ninth Pythian Ode.” TAPA 112: 245–58.Google Scholar
Woodbury, L. (1986). “The judgment of Dionysus: books, taste, and teaching in the Frogs.” In Greek Tragedy and Its Legacy: Essays Presented to D. J. Conacher, ed. Cropp, M., Fantham, E., and Scully, S. E.. Calgary: 241–57.Google Scholar
Wright, M. (2012). The Comedian As Critic: Greek Old Comedy and Poetics. London.Google Scholar
Wüst, E. (1967). “Pindar als geschichtsschreibender Dichter.” Ph.D. dissertation Tübingen.Google Scholar
Wyckoff, E. (1946). “Pindar Pythian 2. 52–56.” CPh 41: 160–62.Google Scholar
Xanthou, M. G. (2013). “Pind. P. 3.25 M. post S. καλλιπέπλου λῆμα Κορωνίδος: among literary representation, ethological description and circumlocutio cum colore epico.” QUCC 105: 5376.Google Scholar
Yalouris, N. (1986). “Le mythe d’Io: les transformations d’Io dans l’iconographie et la littérature grecque.” In Iconographie classique et identités régionales: Paris, 26 et 27 mai 1983, ed. Kahil, L., Augé, C., and de Bellefonds, P. Linant. Paris: 323.Google Scholar
Yalouris, N. (1990). “Io I.” LIMC 5.1: 661–76.Google Scholar
Young, D. C. (1968). Three Odes of Pindar. A Literary Study of Pythian 11, Pythian 3, and Olympian 7. Leiden.Google Scholar
Young, D. C. (1983). “Pindar Pythians 2 and 3: inscriptional ποτέ and the ‘poetic epistle’.” HSCP 87: 3148.Google Scholar
Yunis, H. (1988). A New Creed: Fundamental Religious Beliefs in the Athenian Polis and Euripidean Drama. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Yziquel, P. (2001). “Le drama satyrique eschyléen.” CGITA 14: 122.Google Scholar
Zacharia, K. (1995). “The marriage of tragedy and comedy in Euripides’ Ion.” In Laughter Down the Centuries. Vol. II, ed. Jäkel, S. and Timonen, A.. Turku: 4563.Google Scholar
Zacharia, K. (2003). Converging Truths: Euripides’ Ion and the Athenian Quest for Self-Definition. Leiden.Google Scholar
Zagdoun, M. A. (1992). “Kyrene.” LIMC 6.1: 167–70.Google Scholar
Zanetto, G. (1987). Aristophane. Gli Uccelli. Milan.Google Scholar
Zannini Quirini, B. (1987). Nephelokokkygia. La prospettiva mitica degli Uccelli di Aristofane. Rome.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. I. (1986). “Configurations of rape in Greek myth.” In Rape, ed. Tomaselli, S. and Porter, R.. Oxford: 122–51.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. I. (1996). Playing the Other. Gender and Society in Classical Greek Literature. Chicago.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (1995). Cicero. De Re Publica. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, B. (1983). “Utopisches und Utopie in den Komödien des Aristophanes.” WJA 9: 5777.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, B. (1991). “Nephelokokkygia. Riflessioni sull’utopia comica.” In Carnevale e utopia nella Grecia antica, ed. Rösler, W. and Zimmermann, B.. Bari: 55101.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, B. (1993). “Aristophanes und die Intellektuellen.” In Aristophane, ed. Bremer, J. M. and Handley, E. W.. Geneva and Vandoeuvres: 255–86.Google Scholar
Ziogas, I. (2011). “Ovid as a Hesiodic poet: Atalanta in the Catalogue of Women (fr. 72–6 M–W) and the Metamorphoses (10.560–707).” Mnemosyne 64: 249–70.Google Scholar
Ziogas, I. (2013). Ovid and Hesiod. The Metamorphosis of the Catalogue of Women. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Zuntz, G. (1993). “Aeschyli Prometheus.” HSCP 95: 107–11.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Zoe Stamatopoulou, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book: Hesiod and Classical Greek Poetry
  • Online publication: 05 July 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316678541.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Zoe Stamatopoulou, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book: Hesiod and Classical Greek Poetry
  • Online publication: 05 July 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316678541.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Zoe Stamatopoulou, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book: Hesiod and Classical Greek Poetry
  • Online publication: 05 July 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316678541.008
Available formats
×