Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • This chapter is unavailable for purchase
  • Cited by 410
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Khedekar-Swaminathan, Ashlesha 2019. Maintaining Financial Stability in Times of Risk and Uncertainty. p. 177.

    Spiegel, Thais 2019. Advanced Methodologies and Technologies in Business Operations and Management. p. 602.

    Imbir, Kamil K. 2018. Arousal and Subjective Significance Shapes Stimuli Interpretation across Warmth Vs. Competence Dimensions. Current Psychology, Vol. 37, Issue. 4, p. 716.

    Brodien Hapairai, Poerava M. Walters, Gabrielle and Li, Shanshi 2018. The effectiveness of ad-induced emotion in reducing tourist risk perceptions towards politically unstable destinations. Tourism Recreation Research, Vol. 43, Issue. 4, p. 483.

    Fraenkel, Liana Stolar, Marilyn Bates, Jonathan R. Street, Richard L. Chowdhary, Harjinder Swift, Sarah and Peters, Ellen 2018. Variability in Affect and Willingness to Take Medication. Medical Decision Making, Vol. 38, Issue. 1, p. 34.

    Bouder, Frederic 2018. Towards a concept of genetic risk tolerance: a risk analysis perspective. Journal of Risk Research, Vol. 21, Issue. 2, p. 190.

    Prevost, M. Hot, P. Muller, L. Ruffieux, B. Cousin, E. Pichat, C. and Baciu, M. 2018. Neural correlates of the healthiness evaluation processes of food labels. Nutritional Neuroscience, Vol. 21, Issue. 7, p. 467.

    Renn, Ortwin 2018. Psychological Perspectives on Risk and Risk Analysis. p. 345.

    van Giesen, Roxanne I. Fischer, Arnout R.H. and van Trijp, Hans C.M. 2018. Changes in the influence of affect and cognition over time on consumer attitude formation toward nanotechnology: A longitudinal survey study. Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 27, Issue. 2, p. 168.

    Hine, Donald W. Clarke, Kirsten Marks, Anthony D. G. and Morgan, Methuen I. 2018. Feelings About Fracking: Using the Affect Heuristic to Understand Opposition to Coal Seam Gas Production. Risk Analysis,

    Tong, Luqiong Zhu, Rui Zheng, Yuhuang and Zhao, Ping 2018. Warmer or cooler: the influence of ambient temperature on complex choices. Marketing Letters, Vol. 29, Issue. 3, p. 337.

    Golecki, Mariusz Jerzy 2018. How to Measure the Quality of Judicial Reasoning. Vol. 69, Issue. , p. 57.

    Khedekar-Swaminathan, Ashlesha and Kulkarni, Savita 2018. Behavioral Challenges for Retirement Planning. International Journal of Applied Behavioral Economics, Vol. 7, Issue. 2, p. 15.

    McNair, Simon Okan, Yasmina Hadjichristidis, Constantinos and de Bruin, Wändi Bruine 2018. Age differences in moral judgment: Older adults are more deontological than younger adults. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,

    Skubisz, Christine 2018. College, mental health, and a violent student: employing numerical formats to communicate risk on campus. Journal of Risk Research, p. 1.

    Spiegel, Thais 2018. Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Fourth Edition. p. 2076.

    Bello-Bravo, Julia Zakari, Ousseina Abdoulaye Baoua, Ibrahim and Pittendrigh, Barry Robert 2018. Facilitated discussions increase learning gains from dialectically localized animated educational videos in Niger. Information Technology for Development, p. 1.

    Redler, Jörn 2018. Die Store Brand. p. 195.

    Dickert, Stephan Ashby, Nathaniel J. S. and Dickert, Andreas 2018. Psychological Ownership and Consumer Behavior. p. 145.

    von Mossner, Alexa Weik 2018. Green states of mind? Cognition, emotion and environmental framing. Green Letters, p. 1.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2002
  • Online publication date: June 2012

23 - The Affect Heuristic

from PART TWO - NEW THEORETICAL DIRECTIONS
Summary

This chapter introduces a theoretical framework that describes the importance of affect in guiding judgments and decisions. As used here, affect means the specific quality of “goodness” or “badness” (1) experienced as a feeling state (with or without consciousness) and (2) demarcating a positive or negative quality of a stimulus. Affective responses occur rapidly and automatically – note how quickly you sense the feelings associated with the stimulus words treasure or hate. We argue that reliance on such feelings can be characterized as the affect heuristic. In this chapter, we trace the development of the affect heuristic across a variety of research paths followed by ourselves and many others. We also discuss some of the important practical implications resulting from ways that this heuristic impacts our daily lives.

BACKGROUND

Although affect has long played a key role in many behavioral theories, it has rarely been recognized as an important component of human judgment and decision making. Perhaps befitting its rationalistic origins, the main focus of descriptive decision research has been cognitive, rather than affective. When principles of utility maximization appeared to be descriptively inadequate, Simon (1956) oriented the field toward problem-solving and information-processing models based on bounded rationality. The work of Tversky and Kahneman (1974) and Kahneman, Slovic, and Tversky (1982) demonstrated how boundedly rational individuals use such heuristics as availability, representativeness, and anchoring and adjustment to make judgments, and how they use simplified strategies such as “elimination by aspects” to make choices (Tversky, 1972).

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Heuristics and Biases
  • Online ISBN: 9780511808098
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808098
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×