Book contents
- High-Risk Pregnancy: Management Options
- High-Risk Pregnancy: Management Options
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Section 1 Prepregnancy Problems
- Section 2 Early Prenatal Problems
- Chapter 5 Bleeding and Pain in Early Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 15th March 2019)
- Chapter 6 Recurrent Miscarriage (Content last reviewed: 15th March 2020)
- Chapter 7 Screening for Fetal Abnormality in the First and Second Trimesters (Content last reviewed: 15th March 2020)
- Chapter 8 Invasive Procedures for Prenatal Diagnosis (Content last reviewed: 15th March 2020)
- Section 3 Late Prenatal – Fetal Problems
- Section 4 Problems Associated with Infection
- Chapter 24 Hepatitis Virus Infections in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 23rd July 2019)
- Chapter 25 Human Immunodeficiency Virus in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 23rd July 2019)
- Chapter 26 Rubella, Measles, Mumps, Varicella, and Parvovirus in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 11th November 2020)
- Chapter 27 Cytomegalovirus, Herpes Simplex Virus, Adenovirus, Coxsackievirus, and Human Papillomavirus in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 11th November 2020)
- Chapter 28 Parasitic Infections in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 15th June 2018)
- Chapter 29 Other Infectious Conditions in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 11th November 2020)
- Section 5 Late Pregnancy – Maternal Problems
- Section 6 Late Prenatal – Obstetric Problems
- Section 7 Postnatal Problems
- Section 8 Normal Values
- Index
- References
Chapter 8 - Invasive Procedures for Prenatal Diagnosis (Content last reviewed: 15th March 2020)
from Section 2 - Early Prenatal Problems
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 November 2017
Book contents
- High-Risk Pregnancy: Management Options
- High-Risk Pregnancy: Management Options
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Section 1 Prepregnancy Problems
- Section 2 Early Prenatal Problems
- Chapter 5 Bleeding and Pain in Early Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 15th March 2019)
- Chapter 6 Recurrent Miscarriage (Content last reviewed: 15th March 2020)
- Chapter 7 Screening for Fetal Abnormality in the First and Second Trimesters (Content last reviewed: 15th March 2020)
- Chapter 8 Invasive Procedures for Prenatal Diagnosis (Content last reviewed: 15th March 2020)
- Section 3 Late Prenatal – Fetal Problems
- Section 4 Problems Associated with Infection
- Chapter 24 Hepatitis Virus Infections in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 23rd July 2019)
- Chapter 25 Human Immunodeficiency Virus in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 23rd July 2019)
- Chapter 26 Rubella, Measles, Mumps, Varicella, and Parvovirus in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 11th November 2020)
- Chapter 27 Cytomegalovirus, Herpes Simplex Virus, Adenovirus, Coxsackievirus, and Human Papillomavirus in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 11th November 2020)
- Chapter 28 Parasitic Infections in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 15th June 2018)
- Chapter 29 Other Infectious Conditions in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 11th November 2020)
- Section 5 Late Pregnancy – Maternal Problems
- Section 6 Late Prenatal – Obstetric Problems
- Section 7 Postnatal Problems
- Section 8 Normal Values
- Index
- References
Summary
Invasive prenatal tests, including chorionic villus sampling, amniocentesis, fetal blood sampling, and fetal tissue biopsy, allow examination of fetal genetic material and tissue and provide information for the management of fetal infections and anemia. The specific test employed is usually dependent on the indication, parental wishes, and the timing of preceding screening tests.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- High-Risk PregnancyManagement Options, pp. 189 - 206Publisher: Cambridge University PressFirst published in: 2017
References
Fetal Anomaly Screening Programme. Cut off changes to Down’s syndrome screening. 2008. http://fetalanomaly.screening.nhs.uk/programmestatements#fileid11755 (accessed 01 January 2015).Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Advanced Training Skills Module: Fetal Medicine. London: RCOG, 2010. https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/careers-training/specialty-training-curriculum/atsms/atsm-fetal-medicine/ (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Amniocentesis and Chorionic Villus Sampling. Green-top Guideline No. 8. London: RCOG, 2010. https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg_8.pdf (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
Blessed, WB, Lacoste, H, Welch, RA. Obstetrician-gynecologists performing genetic amniocentesis may be misleading themselves and their patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 1784: 1340–2.Google Scholar
Lane, S, Weeks, A, Scholefield, H, Alfirevic, Z. Monitoring obstetricians’ performance with statistical process control charts. BJOG 2007; 114: 614–18.Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Amniocentesis. Consent Advice 6. London: RCOG, 2006.Google Scholar
Weiner, CP, Okamura, K. Diagnostic fetal blood sampling-technique related losses. Fetal Diagn Ther 1996; 11: 169–75.Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Use of Anti D Immunoglobulin for Rh prophylaxis. Green-top Guideline No. 22. London: RCOG, 2002.Google Scholar
Fung Kee Fung, K, Eason, E. Prevention of Rh alloimmunization. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2003; 25: 765–73.Google Scholar
Gordon, MC, Narula, K, O’Shaughnessy, R, Barth, WH. Complications of third-trimester amniocentesis using continuous ultrasound guidance. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99: 255–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Cahill, AG, Macones, GA, Stamilio, DM, et al. Pregnancy loss rate after mid-trimester amniocentesis in twin pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200: 257.e1–e6.Google Scholar
Yi, W, Pan, CQ, Hao, J, et al. Risk of vertical transmission of hepatitis B after amniocentesis in HBs antigen-positive mothers. J Hepatol 2014; 60: 523–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maiques, V, Garcia-Tejedor, A, Perales, A, Cordoba, J, Esteban, RJ. HIV detection in amniotic fluid samples. Amniocentesis can be performed in HIV pregnant women? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003; 108: 137–41.Google Scholar
Alfirevic, Z, Navaratnam, K, Mujezinovic, F. Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; (9): CD003252.Google Scholar
Mujezinovic, F, Alfirevic, Z. Procedure-related complications of amniocentesis and chorionic villous sampling: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 687–94.Google Scholar
Akolekar, R, Beta, J, Picciarelli, G, Ogilvie, C, D’Antonio, F. Procedure-related risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 45: 16–26.Google Scholar
Giorlandino, C, Cignini, P, Cini, M, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis before second-trimester genetic amniocentesis (APGA): a single-centre open randomised controlled trial. Prenat Diagn 2009; 29: 606–12.Google Scholar
Thirkelson, A. Cell culture and cytogenetic technique. In Murken, JD, Stengel-Rutdowski, S, Schwinger, E (eds), Third European Conference on Prenatal Diagnosis of Genetic Disorders. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke, 1979, pp. 258–70.Google Scholar
Wolstenholme, J. Confined placental mosaicism for trisomies 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 16 and 22: their incidence, likely origins, and mechanisms for cell lineage compartmentalization. Prenat Diagn 1996; 16: 511–24.Google Scholar
Firth, HV, Boyd, PA, Chamberlain, P, et al. Severe limb abnormalities after chorionic villus sampling at 56–66 days’ gestation. Lancet 1991; 337: 762–3.Google Scholar
Carlin, AJ, Alfirevic, Z. Techniques for chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: a survey of practice in specialist UK centres. Prenat Diagn 2008; 28: 914–19.Google Scholar
Young, C, Von Dadelszen, P, Alfirevic, Z. Instruments for chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (1): CD000114.Google Scholar
Gordon, MC, Narula, K, O’Shaughnessy, R, Barth, WH. Complications of third-trimester amniocentesis using continuous ultrasound guidance. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99: 255–9.Google Scholar
Van Schoubroeck, D, Verhaeghel, J. Does local anesthesia at mid-trimester amniocentesis decrease pain experience? A randomized trial in 220 patients. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 536–8.Google Scholar
Mujezinovic, F, Alfirevic, Z. Procedure-related complications of amniocentesis and chorionic villous sampling: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 687–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabor, A, Philip, J, Madsen, M, et al. Randomised controlled trial of genetic amniocentesis in 4606 low-risk women. Lancet 1986; 1: 1287–93.Google ScholarPubMed
Daffos, F, Cappella-Pavlovsky, M, Forestier, F: A new procedure for fetal blood sampling in utero: preliminary results of fifty-three cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 146: 985–7.Google Scholar
Orlandi, F, Damiani, G, Jaklil, C, Lauricella, S, Bertolino, O, Maggio, A. The risks of early cordocentesis (12–21 weeks): analysis of 500 procedures. Prenat Diagn 1990; 10: 425–8.Google Scholar
Bovicelli, L, Orsini, LF, Grannum, PA. A new funipuncture technique: two-needle ultrasound and needle-biopsy guided procedure. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 73: 428–31.Google Scholar
Fassihi, H, Eady, RA, Mellerio, JE, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of severe inherited skin disorders: 25 years experience. Br J Dermatol 2006; 154: 106–13.Google Scholar
Hoffman, EP. Genotype/phenotype correlations in Duchenne/Becker dystrophy. Mol Cell Biol Hum Dis Ser 1993; 3: 12–36.Google Scholar