Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
The Homotopy Theory of (∞,1)-Categories
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Buy the print book

Book description

The notion of an (∞,1)-category has become widely used in homotopy theory, category theory, and in a number of applications. There are many different approaches to this structure, all of them equivalent, and each with its corresponding homotopy theory. This book provides a relatively self-contained source of the definitions of the different models, the model structure (homotopy theory) of each, and the equivalences between the models. While most of the current literature focusses on how to extend category theory in this context, and centers in particular on the quasi-category model, this book offers a balanced treatment of the appropriate model structures for simplicial categories, Segal categories, complete Segal spaces, quasi-categories, and relative categories, all from a homotopy-theoretic perspective. Introductory chapters provide background in both homotopy and category theory and contain many references to the literature, thus making the book accessible to graduates and to researchers in related areas.

Reviews

'The writing is accessible, even for students, and the ideas are clear. The author gives references for every claim and definition, with the added advantage that some technical [lengthy] points can be left out to avoid burying the ideas.'

Najib Idrissi Source: zbMATH

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

References
[1] Ara, D., Higher quasi-categories vs higher Rezk spaces, J. K-Theory 14 (2014), no. 3, 701–749.
[2] Ara, D., On the homotopy theory of Grothendieck ∞-groupoids, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 217 (2013), 1237–1278.
[3] Ara, D., and Métayer, F., The Brown–Golasinski model structure on strict ∞-groupoids revisited, Homology, Homotopy Appl. 13 (2011), no. 1, 121–142.
[4] Awodey, S., Category Theory, Oxford Logic Guides 49, Clarendon Press, 2006.
[5] Ayala, D., Francis, J., and Rozenblyum, N., Factorization homology I: higher categories (2015), available at arXiv:1504.04007.
[6] Ayala, D., Francis, J., and Rozenblyum, N., A stratified homotopy hypothesis (2015), available at arXiv:1502.01713.
[7] Badzioch, B., Algebraic theories in homotopy theory, Ann. of Math. (2) 155 (2002), no. 3, 895–913.
[8] Baez, J.C., and Dolan, J., Higher-dimensional algebra. III, n-categories and the algebra of opetopes, Adv. Math. 135 (1998), no. 2, 145–206.
[9] Barwick, C., From operator categories to topological operads (2013), available at arXiv:1302.5756.
[10] Barwick, C., On left and right model categories and left and right Bousfield localizations, Homology, Homotopy Appl. 12 (2010), no. 2, 245–320.
[11] Barwick, C., and Kan, D.M., Relative categories: another model for the homotopy theory of homotopy theories, Indag. Math. (N.S.) 23 (2012), no. 1–2, 42–68.
[12] Barwick, C. and Kan, D.M., n-relative categories: a model for the homotopy theory of n-fold homotopy theories, Homology, Homotopy Appl. 15 (2013), no. 2, 281–300.
[13] Barwick, C., and Schommer-Pries, C., On the unicity of the homotopy theory of higher categories (2011), available at arXiv:1112.0040.
[14] Basic, M., and Nikolaus, T., Dendroidal sets as models for connective spectra, J. K-Theory 14 (2014), no. 3, 387–421.
[15] Batanin, M.A., Monoidal globular categories as a natural environment for the theory of weak n-categories, Adv. Math. 136 (1998), 39–103.
[16] Baues, H.-J., and Blanc, D., Comparing cohomology obstructions, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 215 (2011), 1420–1439.
[17] Baues, H.-J., and Blanc, D., Higher order derived functors and the Adams spectral sequence, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 219 (2015), no. 2, 199–239.
[18] Baues, H.-J., and Blanc, D., Stems and spectral sequences, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 10 (2010), 2061–2078.
[19] Baues, H.-J., and Jibladze, M., Secondary derived functors and the Adams spectral sequence, Topology 45 (2006), 295–324.
[20] Baues, H.-J., and Wirsching, G., Cohomology of small categories, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 38 (1985), 187–211.
[21] Beke, T., Sheafifiable homotopy model categories, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 129 (2000), 447–475.
[22] Bénabou, J., Introduction to bicategories, Reports of the Midwest Category Seminar, Springer, 1967, pp. 1–77.
[23] Berger, C., Iterated wreath product of the simplex category and iterated loop spaces, Adv. Math. 213 (2007), 230–270.
[24] Bergner, J.E., A characterization of fibrant Segal categories, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 135 (2007), 4031–4037.
[25] Bergner, J.E., Complete Segal spaces arising from simplicial categories, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 361 (2009), 525–546.
[26] Bergner, J.E., Equivalence of models for equivariant (∞, 1)-categories, Glasg. Math. J. 59 (2017), no. 1, 237–253.
[27] Bergner, J.E., A model category structure on the category of simplicial categories, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 359 (2007), 2043–2058.
[28] Bergner, J.E., Rigidification of algebras over multi-sorted theories, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 6 (2006), 1925–1955.
[29] Bergner, J.E., Simplicial monoids and Segal categories, Contemp. Math. 431 (2007), 59–83.
[30] Bergner, J.E., Three models for the homotopy theory of homotopy theories, Topology 46 (2007), 397–436.
[31] Bergner, J.E., Workshop on the homotopy theory of homotopy theories (2011), available at arXiv:1108.2001.
[32] Bergner, J.E., and Rezk, C., Comparison of models for (∞, n)-categories, I, Geom. Topol. 17 (2013), 2163–2202.
[33] Bergner, J.E., and Rezk, C., Comparison of models for (∞, n)-categories, II (2014), available at arXiv:1406.4182.
[34] Blanc, D., and Paoli, S., Segal-type algebraic models of n-types, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 14 (2014), no. 6, 3419–3491.
[35] Blanc, D., and Paoli, S., Two-track categories, J. K-Theory 8 (2011), no. 1, 59–106.
[36] Boardman, J.M., and Vogt, R.M., Homotopy Invariant Algebraic Structures on Topological Spaces, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 347, Springer, 1973.
[37] Bousfield, A.K., and Kan, D.M., Homotopy Limits, Completions, and Localizations, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 304, Springer, 1972.
[38] Brown, R., Higgins, P.J., and Sivera, R., Nonabelian Algebraic Topology, with contributions by C.D., Wensley and S.V., Soloviev, EMS Tracts in Mathematics 15, European Mathematical Society, Zürich, 2011.
[39] Bullejos, M., Cegarra, A.M., and Duskin, J., On catn-groups and homotopy types, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 86 (1993), no. 2, 135–154.
[40] Cabello, J.G., and Garzón, A.R., Closed model structures for algebraic models of n-types, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 103 (1995), no. 3, 287–302.
[41] Cheng, E., Weak n-categories: comparing opetopic foundations, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 186 (2004), no. 3, 219–231.
[42] Cheng, E., Weak n-categories: opetopic and multitopic foundations, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 186 (2004), no. 2, 109–137.
[43] Chu, H., Haugseng, R., and Heuts, G., Two models for the homotopy theory of ∞-operads (2016), available at arXiv:1606.03826.
[44] Cisinski, D.-C., Batanin higher groupoids and homotopy types, Categories in Algebra, Geometry and Mathematical Physics, Contemporary Mathematics, 431, American Mathematical Society, 2007, pp. 171–186.
[45] Cisinski, D.-C., and Moerdijk, I., Dendroidal Segal spaces and ∞-operads, J. Topol. 6 (2013), no. 3, 675–704.
[46] Cisinski, D.-C., and Moerdijk, I., Dendroidal sets and simplicial operads, J. Topol. 6 (2013), no. 3, 705–756.
[47] Cisinski, D.-C., and Moerdijk, I., Dendroidal sets as models for homotopy operads, J. Topol. 4 (2011), no. 2, 257–299.
[48] Cordier, J.M., and Porter, T., Vogt's theorem on categories of homotopy coherent diagrams, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 100 (1986), 65–90.
[49] Dugger, D., Combinatorial model categories have presentations, Adv. Math. 164 (2001), no. 1, 177–201.
[50] Dugger, D., A Primer on Homotopy Colimits, available at pages.uoregon.edu/ ddugger/hocolim.pdf.
[51] Dugger, D., and Spivak, D.I., Mapping spaces in quasicategories, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 11 (2011), 263–325.
[52] Dugger, D., and Spivak, D.I., Rigidification of quasicategories, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 11 (2011), 225–261.
[53] Dwyer, W.G., and Kan, D.M., Calculating simplicial localizations, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 18 (1980), 17–35.
[54] Dwyer, W.G., and Kan, D.M., A classification theorem for diagrams of simplicial sets, Topology 23 (1984), 139–155.
[55] Dwyer, W.G., and Kan, D.M., Equivalences between homotopy theories of diagrams, Algebraic Topology and Algebraic K-Theory, Annals of Mathematics Studies 113, Princeton University Press, 1987, pp. 180–205.
[56] Dwyer, W.G., and Kan, D.M., Function complexes in homotopical algebra, Topology 19 (1980), 427–440.
[57] Dwyer, W.G., and Kan, D.M., Simplicial localizations of categories, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 17 (1980), no. 3, 267–284.
[58] Dwyer, W.G., Kan, D.M., and Smith, J.H., Homotopy commutative diagrams and their realizations, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 57 (1989), 5–24.
[59] Dwyer, W.G., and Spalinski, J., Homotopy theories and model categories, Handbook of Algebraic Topology, Elsevier, 1995.
[60] Friedman, G., An elementary illustrated introduction to simplicial sets, Rocky Mountain J. Math. 42 (2012), no. 2, 353–423.
[61] Gabriel, P., and Zisman, M., Calculus of Fractions and Homotopy Theory, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, 35, Springer, 1967.
[62] Goerss, P.G., and Jardine, J.F., Simplicial Homotopy Theory, Progress in Mathematics, 174, Birkhäuser, 1999.
[63] Gordon, R., Power, A.J., and Street, R., Coherence for tricategories, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 117 (1995), no. 558.
[64] Gurski, M.N., An algebraic theory of tricategories, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Chicago, 2006.
[65] Gurski, N., Nerves of bicategories as stratified simplicial sets, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 213 (2009), no. 6, 927–946.
[66] Hatcher, A., Algebraic Topology, Cambridge University Press, 2002.
[67] Hermida, C., Makkai, M., and Power, J., On weak higher dimensional categories. I, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 154 (2000), no. 1–3, 221–246.
[68] Heuts, G., Hinich, V., and Moerdijk, I., On the equivalence between Lurie's model and the dendroidal model for infinity-operads, Adv. Math. 302 (2016), 869–1043.
[69] Hirschhorn, P. S., Model Categories and Their Localizations, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs 99, American Mathematical Society, 2003.
[70] Hirschowitz, A., and Simpson, C., Descente pour les n-champs (1998), available at arXiv:9807049.
[71] Hovey, M., Model Categories, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs 63, American Mathematical Society, 1999.
[72] Ilias, A., Model structure on the category of small topological categories, J. Homotopy Relat. Struct. 10 (2015), no. 1, 63–70.
[73] Joyal, A., Quasi-categories and Kan complexes, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 175 (2002), 207–222.
[74] Joyal, A., and Tierney, M., Quasi-categories vs Segal spaces, Contemp. Math. 431 (2007), 277–326.
[75] Kachour, C., Operadic definition of non-strict cells, Cah. Topol. Géom. Différ. Catég. 52 (2011), no. 4, 269–316.
[76] Kazhdan, D., and Varshavskiĭ, Ya., The Yoneda lemma for complete Segal spaces, Funktsional. Anal. i Prilozhen. 48 (2014), no. 2, 3–38; translation in Funct. Anal. Appl. 48 (2014), no. 2, 81–106.
[77] Kock, J., Joyal, A., Batanin, M., and Mascari, J.-F., Polynomial functors and opetopes, Adv. Math. 224 (2010), 2690–2737.
[78] Lack, S., A Quillen model structure for 2-categories, K-Theory 26 (2002), 171–205.
[79] Lack, S., A Quillen model structure for bicategories, K-Theory 33 (2004), no. 3, 185–197.
[80] Lack, S., A Quillen model structure for Gray-categories, J. K-Theory 8 (2011), 183–221.
[81] Lafont, Y., Métayer, F., and Worytkiewicz, K., A folk model structure on omegacat, Adv. Math. 224 (2010), 1183–1231.
[82] Lawvere, F.W., Functorial semantics of algebraic theories, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 50 (1963), 869–872.
[83] Leinster, T., Higher Operads, Higher Categories, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series 298, Cambridge University Press, 2004.
[84] Leinster, T., Operads in higher-dimensional category theory, Theory Appl. Categ. 12 (2004), no. 3, 73–194.
[85] Leinster, T., A survey of definitions of n-category, Theory Appl. Categ. 10 (2002), 1–70.
[86]Loday, J.-L., Spaces with finitely many nontrivial homotopy groups, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 24 (1982), no. 2, 179–202.
[87] Lurie, J., Higher Algebra, available at www.math.harvard.edu/∼1lurie/papers/ HA.pdf.
[88] Lurie, J., Higher Topos Theory, Annals of Mathematics Studies 170, Princeton University Press, 2009.
[89] Lurie, J., On the classification of topological field theories, Current Developments in Mathematics, 2008, International Press, 2009, pp. 129–280.
[90] Mac Lane, S., Categories for theWorking Mathematician, Second Edition, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 5, Springer, 1997.
[91] May, J.P., Simplicial Objects in Algebraic Topology, University of Chicago Press, 1967.
[92] Moerdijk, I., Lectures on dendroidal sets, Simplicial Methods for Operads and Algebraic Geometry, Advanced Courses in Mathematics – CRM, Barcelona, Birkhäuser, 2010, pp. 1–118.
[93] Moerdijk, I., and Weiss, I., Dendroidal sets, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 7 (2007), 1441–1470.
[94] Moerdijk, I., andWeiss, I., On inner Kan complexes in the category of dendroidal sets, Adv. Math. 221 (2009), no. 2, 343–389.
[95] Morrison, S., andWalker, K., Higher categories, colimits, and the blob complex, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108 (2011), no. 20, 8139–8145.
[96] Paoli, S., Weakly globular cat n-groups and Tamsamani's model, Adv. Math. 222 (2009), no. 2, 621–727.
[97] Pellissier, R., Catégories enrichies faibles (2003), available at arXiv:0308246.
[98] Porter, T., n-types of simplicial groups and crossed n-cubes, Topology 32 (1993), no. 1, 5–24.
[99] Quillen, D., Higher algebraic K-theory. I, Algebraic K-Theory, I: Higher KTheories (Proc. Conf., Battelle Memorial Inst., Seattle, Wash., 1972), Lecture Notes in Mathematics 341, Springer, 1973.
[100] Quillen, D., Homotopical Algebra, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 43, Springer, 1967.
[101] Reedy, C.L., Homotopy Theory of Model Categories, available at www-math .mit.edu/˜psh.
[102] Rezk, C., A cartesian presentation of weak n-categories, Geom. Topol. 14 (2010), 521–571.
[103] Rezk, C., A model for the homotopy theory of homotopy theory, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 353 (2001), no. 3, 973–1007.
[104] Riehl, E., Categorical Homotopy Theory, New Mathematical Monographs 24, Cambridge University Press, 2014.
[105] Riehl, E., and Verity, D., The 2-category theory of quasi-categories, Adv. Math. 280 (2015), 549–642.
[106] Riehl, E., and Verity, D., Fibrations and Yoneda's lemma in an ∞-cosmos, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 221 (2017), no. 3, 499–564.
[107] Riehl, E., and Verity, D., Kan extensions and the calculus of modules for ∞-categories, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 17 (2017), no. 1, 189–271.
[108] Robertson, M., The homotopy theory of simplicially enriched multicategories (2011), available at arXiv:1111.4146.
[109] Segal, G., Categories and cohomology theories, Topology 13 (1974), 293–312.
[110] Simpson, C., Homotopy Theory of Higher Categories, NewMathematical Monographs 19, Cambridge University Press, 2012.
[111] Street, R., The algebra of oriented simplexes, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 49 (1987), no. 3, 283–335.
[112] Strøm, A., The homotopy category is a homotopy category, Arch. Math. (Basel) 23 (1972), 435–441.
[113] Tamsamani, Z., Sur les notions de n-categorie et n-groupóıde non-stricte via des ensembles multi-simpliciaux, K-Theory 16 (1999), no. 1, 51–99.
[114] Thomason, R.W., Cat as a closed model category, Cah. Topol. Géom. Différ. Catég. 21 (1980), no. 3, 305–324.
[115] Töen, B., Homotopical and higher categorical structures in algebraic geometry (a view towards homotopical algebraic geometry) (2003), available at arXiv:0312262.
[116] Töen, B., Vers une axiomatisation de la théorie des catégories supérieures, K-Theory 34 (2005), no. 3, 233–263.
[117] Verity, D.R.B., Weak complicial sets I: basic homotopy theory, Adv. Math. 219 (2008), no. 4, 1081–1149.
[118] Weibel, C.A., An Introduction to Homological Algebra, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics 38, Cambridge University Press, 1994.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed