Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2010
  • Online publication date: June 2012

3 - ‘Legal Diplomacy’ – Law, Politics and the Genesis of Postwar European Human Rights

Summary

It is somewhat of a paradox that Europe was to become the avant-garde of the international protection of human rights following World War II. No continent had been more severely impacted by the hostilities and atrocities of World War II – and no continent was more to blame for the break out of the conflict. Yet, with the radical reconfiguration of Europe following the war – prompted particularly by the breakdown of empire and the rise of European integration in the context of Cold War politics – Europe was to become the bridgehead of the international protection of human rights. The postwar legal and institutional setup dedicated to the protection of human rights in Europe, today, stands out as one of the most far-reaching and successful attempts at an international human rights protection regime. It has even become the de facto model for developing human rights elsewhere. The original objective was, however, more specific and concerned with saving Europe from its own political and legal ills. It is clear from the debates and negotiations leading to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR) that many regarded the Convention as part of a broader European integration project in which human rights was to be a source of legitimacy and politico-moral commitment. Despite these high ambitions in respect to European integration, the actual reality of the initial development of the ECHR is perhaps better described as the laying down of the cornerstones of what became eventually the much celebrated European human rights system. Certainly, as we now know, the two ‘Europes’ constructed during the postwar period – ‘Europe of the Market’ and ‘Europe of Human Rights’ – have only recently integrated.

It is the general argument of this article that the historical genesis of the European human rights regime was much less straightforward and politically self-evident than most commentators assume today. With the objective of contributing to the historiography of international human rights, the article examines how a continuous and subtle interplay of law and politics structured early European human rights law, and how this was to have decisive effects on both its institutional and legal development. During the period in focus, from the mid-1940s to late 1960s, European human rights law was, to a large extent, marked by the fact that law and politics were not yet differentiated social spheres as in national legal and political systems. This is not to say that early European human rights law was simply a ‘politicised law’ or a ‘legalised politics’, but that the boundaries between these two social fields were blurred. Drawing on the work of Pierre Bourdieu, the subject area can be described as an emerging ‘field’ – that is, a legal field in the course of being constructed and, therefore, mainly relying on preexisting international and national practices. The European Court was, in other words, constructed at the ‘crossroads’ of other preexisting fields, ranging from national law on related matters to national politics and diplomacy. It is against this background that the article argues that European human rights law originally emerged as a form of ‘legal diplomacy’. In contrast to what has been labelled ‘judicial diplomacy’ by ‘legal diplomacy’, the article seeks, more generally, to understand how the development of European human rights, at its early stage, was as much a political process as a legal one. To more concretely analyse this legal diplomacy, the article emphasises the key agents of these developments, the ‘legal entrepreneurs’ who managed to perfection the subtle game of law and diplomacy, defining the playing field of postwar European human rights.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Human Rights in the Twentieth Century
  • Online ISBN: 9780511921667
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921667
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
Moravcsik, AndrewThe Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar EuropeInternational Organization 54 2000 217
Helfer, LawrenceSlaughter, Anne-MarieToward a Theory of Effective Supranational AdjudicationYale Law Journal 107 1997 271
Delmas-Marty, MireilleLe relatif et l’universel. Les forces imaginantes du droitParis 2004
Madsen, Mikael RaskTransnational Fields: Elements of a Reflexive Sociology of the Internationalisation of LawRetfærd 3 2006 23
Alter, KarenEstablishing the Supremacy of European Law: The Making of an International Rule of Law in EuropeOxford 2001
Weiler, J. H. H.A Quiet Revolution: The European Court of Justice and Its InterlocutorsComparative Political Studies 26 1994 510
Cohen, AntoninMadsen, Mikael RaskGessner, VolkmarNelken, DavidEuropean Ways of Law: Towards a European Sociology of LawOxford 2007
Dezalay, YvesLes courtiers de l’international : Héritiers cosmopolites, mercenaires de l’impérialisme et missionnaires de l’universelActes de la recherche en sciences sociales151 2004
Burgers, Jan HermanThe Road to San Francisco: The Revival of the Human Rights Idea in the Twentieth CenturyHuman Rights Quarterly 14 1992 447
Lauren, Paul GordonThe Evolution of International Human Rights: Visions SeenPhiladelphia 2003
Morsink, JohannesThe Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Origins, Drafting, and IntentPhiladelphia 1999
Borgwardt, ElizabethA New Deal for the World: America’s Vision for Human RightsCambridge 2005
Hunt, LynnInventing Human Rights: A HistoryNew York 2007
Mazower, MarkThe Strange Triumph of Human Rights, 1933–1950Historical Journal 47 2004 379
Simpson, A. W. BrianHuman Rights and the End of Empire: Britain and the Genesis of the European ConventionOxford 2004
Bobbio, NorbertoThe Age of RightsCambridge 1995
Henkin, LouisThe Age of RightsNew York 1990
Douzinas, CostasThe End of Human Rights: Critical Legal Thought at the Turn of the CenturyOxford 2000
Rask Madsen, MikaelLa Cour qui venait du froid. Les droits de l’homme dans la genèse de l’Europe d’après guerreCritique Internationale 26 2005 133
Merrils, J. G.Robertson, A. H.Human Rights in Europe: A Study of the European Convention on Human RightsManchester 2001
Lauterpacht, HerschAn International Bill of Rights of ManNew York 1945
Madsen, Mikael RaskHalliday, S.Schmidt, P.Human Rights Brought Home: Socio-Legal Studies of Human Rights in the National ContextOxford 2004
Marston, GeoffreyThe United Kingdom’s Part in the Preparation of the European Convention on Human Rights, 1950International and Comparative Law Quarterly 42 1993 796
Simpson, A. W. BrianHersch Lauterpacht and the Genesis of the Age of Human RightsLaw Quarterly Review 2004 49
Evans, Sir VincentHuman Right for the 21st CenturyBlackburn, RobertBusuttil, James J.London 1997
Sørensen, Cf. MaxLes experiences personelles de la Convention. L’experience d’un membre de la CommissionRevue des droits de l’homme 1975 329
Robertson, A. H.The European Court of Human RightsAmerican Journal of Comparative Law 9 1960 1
Dickson (ed.), BriceHuman Rights and the European ConventionLondon 1997
Petrén, StureMélanges offerts à Polys Modinos. Problèmes des droits de l’homme et de l’unification europénneParis 1968
Scharpf, Fritz W.Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic?Oxford 1999
Bourdieu, PierreLe champ économiqueActes de la recherche en sciences sociales 119 1997 48
Dezalay, YvesGarth, BryantFrom the Cold War to Kosovo: The Rise and Renewal of the Field of International Human RightsAnnual Review of Law and Social Science 2006 231
Lester, LordUK Acceptance of the Strasbourg Jurisdiction: What Really Went on in Whitehall in 1965Public Law 1998 237
Kronman, Anthony T.Max WeberStanford 1983
Hutchinson, Michael R.The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the European Court of Human RightsInternational and Comparative Law Quarterly 48 1999 638